Chief Editor:

Arvind kumar

Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA

Frequency:Bi-monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...

GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN EARLY DURATION FINGER MILLET AND EVALUATION OF YIELD STABILITY AND ADAPTABILITY

R.C. Misra, S. Das, N. Senapati

Affiliations

¹Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar-751 003, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Misra R.C., Das S., Senapati N. (2025). GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN EARLY DURATION FINGER MILLET AND EVALUATION OF YIELD STABILITY AND ADAPTABILITY. Agricultural Science Digest. 29(3): 194-197. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Multilocation yield trials on fifteen early duration (90-105 days) finger millet (Eleusine coracana
G.) genotypes were conducted under early and late transplanting condition at Bhubaneswar and
early direct sown condition at Berhampur for three years 2004-2006, during kharif season. G´E
interaction analysis in Eberhart and Russell model revealed highly significant differences among
genotypes and environments. The G´E interaction component was also significant indicating
differential performance of genotypes over environments. Considering mean, regression and
deviation from regression together VL 149 showed stability and adaptability to all environments,
while OEB 65, RAU 8, BM 107-2 and DM 7 showed specific adaptation to favourable environments
and Neelachal showed specific adaptation to unfavourable environments.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Eberhart S.A. and Russell W.A.(1966). Crop Sci., 6:36-40.
Mallana K.N. et al. (1982). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 52:151-153.
Marimuthu R. et al. (1995). Madras Agric. J., 82:246-248.
Navale, P.A. et al. (2005). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 30:106-107.
Patil H.E. (2007). Int. J. Agric. Sci., 3:84-86.
Seetharam A. (1995). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, 51-56.
Sharathbabu et al. (2008). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 21:190-193.
Solanki J.S. et al. (2000). Indian J. Agric. Res., 34:268-270.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.