Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 29 issue 3 (september 2009) :

COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND YIELD TRAITS IN MICROSPERMA × MACROSPERMA DERIVATIVES OF LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.)

N
Naresh Kumar
R
R.K. Chahota
B
B.C. Sood
1Department of Crop Improvement, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Naresh, Chahota R.K., Sood B.C. (2025). COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND YIELD TRAITS IN MICROSPERMA × MACROSPERMA DERIVATIVES OF LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.). Agricultural Science Digest. 29(3): . doi: .

ABSTRACT

Eleven agro-morphological characters were studied for variability and their inter-relationships
using 95 advanced (F6) elite derivatives of microsperma x macrosperma crosses along with 5
checks namely Vipasa, EC-1(Markandya), PL-639, L-259, and L-4145 at Palampur. The present
investigation revealed sufficient variability for all the characters except seeds per pod. For 100-
seed weight, pods per plant and biological yield per plant, high heritability coupled with high
genetic advance indicated the predominant role of additive gene action in the inheritance of
these traits. On the basis of mean performance of different genotypes, it was observed that lines
HPCL-2290, HPCL-2301 and HPCL-2208 were superior to best check Vipasa for seed yield per
plant, pods per plant and number of fertile nodes per plant. Seed yield per plant showed positive
association with biological yield per plant, seeds per pod, pods per plant, number of fertile nodes
per plant, primary branches per plant and plant height. Path analysis revealed that biological
yield had highest positive direct effect followed by harvest index on the seed yield. Biological
yield not only had highest direct effect but several other traits, like pods per plant, number of
fertile nodes per plant, primary branches per plant and plant height had also contributed
significantly indirectly through it. Based on the present study a plant ideotype with higher biomass,
harvest index, pods per plant, number of fertile nodes per plant, primary branches per plant and
plant height would enhance the seed yield of lentil

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Jibouri, H.A. et al. (1958). Agro. J. 50:633-636.
  2. Begum, S. (1996). Bangladesh J. Botany 25(1):79-82.
  3. Burton, G.W. and De Vane, E.H. (1953). Agron. J. 45:478-481.
  4. Chakraborty, M. and Haque, M.F. (2000). J. Res. Birsa Agri. Univ. 12 (2):199-204.
  5. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agro. J. 51:515-518.
  6. Jumbunathan, R. et al. (1984). In: Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. (Muehlbayer, F.J.
  7. and Kaiser W.J. (eds.)) Kulwer Academic Publisher. Dordrecht, The Netherland pp. 98-112.
  8. 168 AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE DIGEST
  9. Kishore, N. and Gupta, V.P. (2002). Indian J. Gene. 62(1):34-37.
  10. Ladizinsky, G. (1979). Euphytica 28:179-187.
  11. Muehlbauer, F.J. et al. (1985). In: Grain Legume Crops. (Summerfield R.J. and Roberts E.H. (eds.)) Collins, 8 GraftonStreet, London, UK p. 266-311.
  12. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1984). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
  13. Zohari, D. (1972). Econ. Bot. 26:236-332.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 29 issue 3 (september 2009) :

    COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND YIELD TRAITS IN MICROSPERMA × MACROSPERMA DERIVATIVES OF LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.)

    N
    Naresh Kumar
    R
    R.K. Chahota
    B
    B.C. Sood
    1Department of Crop Improvement, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Kumar Naresh, Chahota R.K., Sood B.C. (2025). COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND YIELD TRAITS IN MICROSPERMA × MACROSPERMA DERIVATIVES OF LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.). Agricultural Science Digest. 29(3): . doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Eleven agro-morphological characters were studied for variability and their inter-relationships
    using 95 advanced (F6) elite derivatives of microsperma x macrosperma crosses along with 5
    checks namely Vipasa, EC-1(Markandya), PL-639, L-259, and L-4145 at Palampur. The present
    investigation revealed sufficient variability for all the characters except seeds per pod. For 100-
    seed weight, pods per plant and biological yield per plant, high heritability coupled with high
    genetic advance indicated the predominant role of additive gene action in the inheritance of
    these traits. On the basis of mean performance of different genotypes, it was observed that lines
    HPCL-2290, HPCL-2301 and HPCL-2208 were superior to best check Vipasa for seed yield per
    plant, pods per plant and number of fertile nodes per plant. Seed yield per plant showed positive
    association with biological yield per plant, seeds per pod, pods per plant, number of fertile nodes
    per plant, primary branches per plant and plant height. Path analysis revealed that biological
    yield had highest positive direct effect followed by harvest index on the seed yield. Biological
    yield not only had highest direct effect but several other traits, like pods per plant, number of
    fertile nodes per plant, primary branches per plant and plant height had also contributed
    significantly indirectly through it. Based on the present study a plant ideotype with higher biomass,
    harvest index, pods per plant, number of fertile nodes per plant, primary branches per plant and
    plant height would enhance the seed yield of lentil

    REFERENCES

    1. Al-Jibouri, H.A. et al. (1958). Agro. J. 50:633-636.
    2. Begum, S. (1996). Bangladesh J. Botany 25(1):79-82.
    3. Burton, G.W. and De Vane, E.H. (1953). Agron. J. 45:478-481.
    4. Chakraborty, M. and Haque, M.F. (2000). J. Res. Birsa Agri. Univ. 12 (2):199-204.
    5. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agro. J. 51:515-518.
    6. Jumbunathan, R. et al. (1984). In: Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. (Muehlbayer, F.J.
    7. and Kaiser W.J. (eds.)) Kulwer Academic Publisher. Dordrecht, The Netherland pp. 98-112.
    8. 168 AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE DIGEST
    9. Kishore, N. and Gupta, V.P. (2002). Indian J. Gene. 62(1):34-37.
    10. Ladizinsky, G. (1979). Euphytica 28:179-187.
    11. Muehlbauer, F.J. et al. (1985). In: Grain Legume Crops. (Summerfield R.J. and Roberts E.H. (eds.)) Collins, 8 GraftonStreet, London, UK p. 266-311.
    12. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1984). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
    13. Zohari, D. (1972). Econ. Bot. 26:236-332.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)