Article Id: ARCC1379 | Page : 50 - 53
Citation :- GENERATION MEAN ANALYSIS IN PEARL MILLET [PENISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.].Agricultural Science Digest.2010.(30):50 - 53
S.B. Godasara, C. J. Dangaria, J.J.Savaliya, A.G.Pansuriya and B.K.Davada
Address : Department of Agricultural Botany, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh- 362 001, India


The experimental material comprised of six basic generations, viz., P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 of
four pearl millet crosses (ICMB 95222 X J 2372, ICMB 95444 X J 2340, ICMB 94555 X J 2290 and
JSMB- 101 X J 2405). The individual and joint scaling tests indicated the presence of epistasis for all
the characters studied, except for number of productive tillers per plant and fodder yield per plant.
The nature and magnitude of gene effects indicated, that the nature and magnitude of gene action
varied from cross to cross. Hence, each cross has to be handled separately for specific character. The
results also indicated the role of either higher order gene interaction or tight linkage for the expression
of grain yield per plant, 1000 grain weight and days to maturity.


Generation mean analysis Additive Dominance Epistasis


  1. Ansodaria, V. V. (2004). (Agri) Thesis, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, India
  2. Cavalli, L.L. (1952). An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: Quantitative Inheritance, (Rieve, ECR
  3. and. Waddington C. H ed) HMSO London, pp135.
  4. Dangaria, C. J. et al.(2004). In: 3rd National Seminar held at ARS Mandor, Jodhpur on 11-12 March, 2004: p1.
  5. Davada, B. K. (2004). (Agri) Thesis, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, India
  6. Hayman, I. B. (1958). Heredity, 12: 371-390
  7. Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics, 1st Edn. Dover Publications. Inc., New York.
  8. Rasal, P.N. and Patil, H. S. (2003). Res. crops, 4: 85-90.
  9. Singh, B. et al. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res., 20: 328-330.
  10. Singh, B. et al (2004). Ann. Agric. Res., 21: 23-26

Global Footprints