Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 45 issue 2 (june 2024) : 340-344

Morpho-physiological and Biochemical Changes under Drought Stress in Strawberry: A Review

Amrita Thokchom1,*, B.N. Hazarika1
1Department of Fruit Sciences, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat-791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Thokchom Amrita, Hazarika B.N. (2024). Morpho-physiological and Biochemical Changes under Drought Stress in Strawberry: A Review . Agricultural Reviews. 45(2): 340-344. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2295.
Drought stress is one of the most important environmental stress that affects plant growth and development. Strawberry plants are very sensitive to drought stress due to its herbaceous nature and shallow root system. Depending upon the nature, intensity, duration and cultivars, the effect of this stress augments losses in yield and quality of the fruits. This optimization of yield loss and quality is due to the response of the plant to the stress with the changes in morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular attributes. Drought stress results in the change of leaf anatomy, leaf area, transpiration rate, photosynthesis, stomata closure, relative water content (RWC), shoot length, root length etc. ROS such as H2O2 production occurs as a result of drought causing oxidative damage to the plant cells. Strawberry plant on the other hand have a mechanism to detoxify these ROS with the production of both the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), gluthathione, ascorbic acid, tocopherols, carotenoids etc.
Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) is one of the important temperate fruit crop in the world which belongs to the family Rosaceae. They are man-made hybrid crop evolved by crossing Fragaria chiloensis and Fragaria virginiana. Even though strawberry is considered a temperate crop, some varieties are grown successfully in tropical and subtropical regions (Sachin et al., 2015). Strawberries are one of the most cultivated fruit crop over the world. In India, it is mostly grown in Satara district, Mahabaleshwar, Wai and Panchagani areas of Maharashtra and some parts of Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir. The area under its cultivation is increasing due to its diverse ecological state and cultivars having tolerance to different environmental conditions.

Strawberry fruits are known for the rich source of vitamin C, fibre and antioxidants. It also contains potassium, vitamin K and magnesium which are important for healthy and strong bone (Sachin et al., 2015). The consumption of strawberry fruit also has benefit on cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and other human diseases such as aging, obesity and cancer (Maas et al., 1991, Zhang et al., 2008, da Silva Pinto et al., 2010). Strawberries are generally grown for fresh consumptions and are also used for making jam, jelly, cake, juice, ice-cream, soft drinks, confectionaries, chewing gums etc.

Strawberry plants are herbaceous perennials and a  have shallow root system i.e., about 50-90% of the roots are in 0-15 cm zone and are highly sensitive to water stress (Klamkowski and Treder, 2006). Therefore, ample water should be provided during the early growth and development in order to cope up with the loss of water through leaching, evapo-transpiration, inefficient application and inappropriate assessment of water on daily requirement by the crop. Limited water supply during early growth, flowering and fruiting reduce berry size and yield (Hoppula and Salo, 2007; Liu et al., 2007). Apart from being an important horticultural crop, strawberry (Fragaria spp.) is a good candidate for studying the principles of drought tolerance in the Rosaceae which contains economically important fruit, nut, ornamental and wood-bearing species from different subfamilies such as peach, cherry and almond (Amygyloideae), apple and pear (Maloideae), blackberry, raspberry and rose (Rosoideae), etc (Farzaneh Razavi, 2012).
 
Drought stress in strawberry
 
Strawberry plants are highly sensitive to certain environmental stresses. Drought stress is one of the major stresses limiting the plant growth (Moussa, 2011; Rohbakhsh, 2013). Limited water requirement induce morphological, physiological and biochemical response on plants (Chandler and Ferree, 1990; Johnson et al., 2009; Farzaneh Razavi, 2012; Nezhadahmadi et al., 2015; Gulen et al., 2018). Plants have their own adaptive mechanisms to survive under water deficit or avoidance mechanisms to get the specific growth habit even under water stress conditions (Levitt 1980) (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of drought stress in higher plants (Reddy et al., 2014).



Depending upon the severity of the stress, drought stress results in changes of various morpho-physiological responses of the plants such as shoot and root length, leaf area, leaf number (Farzaneh Razavi, 2012), water use efficiency (WUE), chlorophyll inflorescence, total dry matter (Sairam et al., 1990; Gholamin and Khayatnezhad, 2010) and pigment content stability (Ehdaie et al., 1991; Datta et al., 2001; Keyvan, 2010) and finally death of the plant (Jaleel et al., 2008). Drought stress also changes the biochemical attributes of the plant by altering the activity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant responses (Sun et al., 2015). Proline level increases depending upon the severity of the stress and is considered to be an important indicator of drought stress and is correlated with the osmotic regulation (Ghaderi et al., 2015; Gulen et al., 2018).Under water deficit, Fragaria species responded well by adjusting osmotic potential and ROS scavenging mechanisms (Farzaneh Razavi, 2012). Drought stress also cause fruit yield reduction by decreasing flower numbers, fruit set, numbers of fruit per plant and fruit size. However, tolerance level to water stress in strawberry varies according to plant growth stage, stress duration, growing system, growing medium and cultivars (Adak et al., 2017). Furthermore, strawberries grown in greenhouse and soilless cultivation are more sensitive to water stress than those grown in open air (Adak, 2009; Nezhadahmadi et al., 2015). In strawberry, plants under deficit irrigation regulate fruit size and yield to cope up with stress effect (Liu et al., 2007), but despite this, the quality of fruit increases (Terry et al., 2007; Heiadari and Golpayegani, 2012).

Drought tolerance has been studied for various crop species (Bota et al., 2001,Herraldeet_al2001), but there is still a lack of information about morpho-physiological behaviour of different strawberry cultivars under limited water availability (Klamkowski and Treder, 2008).
 
Morpho-physiological changes under drought stress
 
Drought stress are linked to different plant morphological and physiological traits like reduced plant size, early maturity and also reduced leaf area (Rizza et al., 2014). Due to adverse effect of drought, there is decreased in plant height in strawberry (Nezhadahmadi et al., 2015). Decreased in plant height can be considered as an important mechanism for preservation of the carbohydrates by plants for constant metabolism and accumulation of solute for osmotic adjustment (Sunkar and Bartels, 2005). Drought stress in strawberry results in reduced leaf area and shoot length but stimulates root length, leaf abscission, leaf wax deposition, the number of leaves per plant, leaf size and leaf longevity (Shao et al., 2008; Jamali et al., 2011; Hussein et al., 2017). Reduced leaf area decreases the transpirational surface thereby diminishing the water loss and on the other hand the higher root to shoot ratio results in greater water uptake due to higher root depth. This is important factor for the plants survival under drought stress (Klamskowki and Treder, 2006; Nezhadahmadi et al., 2015).The small leaf area of strawberry cultivars can also be of advantage for variety selection as a drought tolerant characteristic (Grant et al., 2010). Relative water content (RWC) of leaf is also an important criterion for water status of the plant. It decreases as a result of drought stress which in turn limited plant growth and development (Parvin et al., 2015; Bolat et al., 2014; Li et al., 2011; Jungklang and Saengil, 2012).

Drought stress dominantly alters stomatal activities in strawberry and restricts gas exchange between the leaves and atmosphere under severe condition (Klamkowski and Treder, 2008).The closing of stomata by leaf under drought stress is due to the modulation by drought-induced root-to-leaf signalling of abscisic acid (ABA) promoted by soil drying through the transpiration stream (Reddy et al., 2014). The stimulation of stomata closure under drought decreases the photosynthesis by limiting CO2 uptakes in the leaves (Chaves et al., 2003).This results in the influence of electron-transport chain activity in chloroplasts, oxygen accumulation and ATP-synthesis which results in relative effects on growth and yield (Ogren and Oquist, 1985; Nogues et al., 2002). There is also an imbalance light capture and its utilization in the chloroplast due to drought stress which also cause the reduction photosynthetic activities (Foyer and Noctor, 2000). Decrease in photosynthesis under severe drought stress is also due to the decrease in Rubisco activity (Bota, 2004). Due to the inhibition of CO2 assimilation and imbalance generation and utilization of electrons by down regulation of photosystem I and II activity in the chloroplast, quantum yield changes and dissipation of excess light energy takes place, thereby finally leads to generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Asada, 1999; Reddy et al., 2014; Farzaneh Razavi, 2012).

Ratio of chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘carotenoids’ also changes due to drought stress with the resistant cultivars having higher chlorophyll content (Farooq, et al., 2009). Strawberry varieties grown in natural condition have more chlorophyll content as compared to the varieties cultivated under protected environment at different soil moisture levels (Nezhadahmadi et al., 2015). Depending upon the cultivars tolerance, yield and fruit size also decreases as a result of drought stress in strawberry (Johnson et al., 2009; Grant et al., 2010; Erdogan et al., 2016; Adak et al., 2017).
 
Biochemical changes under drought stress
 
Proline content of the plant is considered to be an indicator of drought tolerance, osmoregulation and protection of a plant (Molassiotis et al., 2006). In strawberry, plants subjected to drought stress accumulate more amount of proline than the normal ones (Ghaderi et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2015). The higher proline content conceivably be due to increase activity of the enzymes involved in proline biosynthesis viz, ornithineaminotransferase and pyrroline 5-carboxylate reductase, as well as due to the prevention of proline oxidase, proline catabolising enzymes (Debnath, 2008).

With the increase in severity of drought stress, strawberry plants tend to acclimate and develop adaptive mechanisms to contrive limited water availability. Soluble carbohydrates especially sucrose tends to increase under drought stress with decrease in starch content to ameliorate the osmotic adjustment (Farzaneh Razavi, 2012; Yordanov et al., 2000) and resulted in increased fruit quality and taste (i.e greater sweetness and sugar/acid ratio) of strawberry (Bordonaba and Terry, 2010). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) signalling is significantly affected during drought stress resulting into oxidative damage to the cells. ROS such as H2O2 increases in the leaves and roots of drought stressed strawberry plants (Nucleolus et al., 2012). The increased in H2O2 resulted in the production of antioxidants such as catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and alters plant acclimation responses to water deficit (Miller et al., 2010; Suzuki et al., 2012). The detoxification of ROS is mainly based on the mechanisms of both the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant i.e. non-enzymatic antioxidants include ascorbic acids (AsA), glutathione (GSH), tocopherol (vitamin E), flavonoids, alkaloids and carotenoids whereas enzymatic antioxidants include superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidases (POX), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), etc. (Mittler, 2002). Total antioxidant capacity (TAC content considerably increased in stressed plants of ‘Elsanta’ strawberry under prolonged drought stress, while the CAT activity decreased and APX and SOD activity tended to decline under drought stress (Farzaneh Razavi, 2012).

However, with the severity and duration of the drought plant cannot cope up with the oxidative damage and as a result the antioxidant enzymes tends to decrease as the drought stressed becomes severe (Sun et al., 2015). Changes in protein content occur under drought stress either qualitatively or quantitatively depending upon the cultivars, severity and duration of the stress (Neocleous et al., 2012).
The level of drought stress in strawberry depends upon the nature, severity, duration and cultivars leading to the changes in their physiological and biochemical response. This responses cause the plant to alter their growth and developmental process resulting in the loss of yield and quality of the fruit. Under drought stress conditions, strawberry plants have specific tolerance mechanism at certain alleviated stress level by inhibiting the production of ROS by the antioxidant such as SOD, CAT, POX, AsA, etc. and prevent the oxidative damage of the plant cell. However, there is less research on strawberry stress and further studies would be required to identify cultivars tolerant to drought stress.
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Adak, N. (2009). Effects of different growing media on the yield and quality of soilless grown strawberries. Ph.D, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Turkey.

  2. Adak, N., Gubbukb, H. and Tetikc, N. (2017). Yield, quality and biochemical properties of various strawberry cultivars under water stress. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 98: 304-311.

  3. Asada, K. (1999). The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: Scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 50: 601-639.

  4. Bolat, I., Dikilitas, M., Ercisli, S., Ikinci, A. and Tonkaz, T. (2014). The effect of water stress on some morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics and bud success on apple and quince rootstocks. The Scientific World Journal. 1-8.

  5. Bordonaba, J. and Terry, L.A. (2010). Manipulating the taste-related composition of strawberry fruits (Fragaria × ananassa) from different cultivars using deficit irrigation. Food Chemistry. 122: 1020-1026.

  6. Bota, J. (2004). Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and Rubp content under progressive water stress? New Phytologist. 162: 671-681

  7. Bota, J., Flexas, J. and Medrano, H. (2001). Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivars. Annals of Applied Biology. 138: 353-361.

  8. Chandler, C.K. and Ferree, D.C. (1990). Response of ‘Raritan’ and ‘Surecrop’ strawberry plants to drought stress. Fruit Varieties Journal. 44: 183-185.

  9. Chaves, M.M., Maroco, J.P. and Pereira, J.S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology. 30: 239-264.

  10. Da Silva Pinto, M., De Carvalho, J.E., Lajolo, F.M., Genovese, M.I. and Shetty, K. (2010). Evaluation of antiproliferative, anti- type 2 diabetes and antihypertension potentials of ellagitannins from strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) using in vitro models. Journal of Medicinal Food. 13(5): 1027-1035.

  11. Datta, J.K., Mondal, T., Banerjee, A. and Mondal, N.K. (2001). Assessment of drought tolerance of selected wheat cultivars under laboratory condition. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 7: 1383-393. 

  12. Debnath, M. (2008). Responses of Bacopa monnieri to salinity and drought stress in vitro. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 11: 347-351.

  13. Ehdaie, B., Hall, A.E., Farquhar, G.D., Nguyen, H.T. and Waines, J.G. (1991). Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Science. 31: 1282-1288. 

  14. Erdogan, U., Cakmakci, R., Varmazyari, A., Turan, M., Erdogan, Y. and Kitir, N. (2016). Role of inoculation with multi-trait rhizobacteria on strawberries under water deficit stress. Zemdirbyste-agric, 1: 67-76. doi:10.13080/z-a.2016.103.009.

  15. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D. and Basra, S.M.A. (2009). Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 29: 185-212.

  16. Farzaneh, R.H. (2012). Molecular and physiological responses to drought stress in Fragaria sp. Ph.D, Thesis. Ghent University, Belgium.

  17. Foyer, C.H. and Noctor, G. (2000). Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytologist. 146: 359-388.

  18. Ghaderi, N., Normohammadi, S. and Javadi, T.(2015). Morpho-physiological responses of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) to exogenous salicylic acid application under drought stress. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology. 17: 167-178.

  19. Gholamin, R. and Khayatnezhad, M. (2010). Effects of polyethylene glycol and NaCl stress on two cultivars of wheat (Triticum durum) at germination and early seedling stages. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 9(1): 86-90.

  20. Grant, O.M., Johnson, A.W., Davies, M.J., James, C.M. and Simpson, D.W. (2010).  Physiological and morphological diversity of cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) in response to water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 68: 264-272.

  21. Gulen, H., Kesici, M., Cetinkaya, C. and Ergin, S. (2018). Proline and antioxidant enzyme activities in some strawberry cultivars under drought and recovery. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 46(2): 570-578. doi:10.15835/nbha46211077. 

  22. Heiadari, M. and Golpayegani, A. (2012). Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 11: 57-61.

  23. Herralde, F., Save, R., Biel, C., Batlle, I. and Vargas, F.J. (2001). Differences in drought tolerance in two almond cultivars: ‘Lauranne’ and ‘Masbovera’. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes. 56: 149-154.

  24. Hoppula, K.I. and Salo, T.J. (2007). Tensiometer-based irrigation scheduling in perennial strawberry cultivation. Irrigation Science. 25: 401-409.

  25. Hussein, E.A., El-Kerdany, A.Y. and Afifi, M.K. (2017). Effect of drought and salinity stresses on two strawberry cultivars during their regeneration in vitro. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology. 4(8): 83-93.

  26. Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Lakshmanan, G.M.A., Gomathinayagam, M. and Panneerselvam, R. (2008). Alterations in morphological parameters and photosynthetic pigment responses of Catharanthus roseus under soil water deficits. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 61: 298-303.

  27. Jamali, B., Eshghi, S. and Tafazoli, E. (2011). Vegetative and reproductive growth of strawberry plants cv. Pajaro affected salicylic acid and nickel. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology. 13: 895-904.

  28. Johnson, A.W., Grant, O.M., Davies, M.J., James, C.M., Passey, A.J. and Simpson, D.W. (2009). Determining the response of ten strawberry cultivars to water-limited conditions. Acta Horticulturae. 842: 769-772.

  29. Jungklang, J. and Saengnil, K. (2012). Effect of paclobutrazol on patumma cv. Chiang Mai Pink under water stress. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 34(4): 361-366.

  30. Keyvan, S. (2010). The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 8(3): 1051-1060. 

  31. Klamkowski, K. and Treder, W. (2006). Morphological and physiological responses of strawberry plants to water stress. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 71: 159-165.

  32. Klamkowski, K. and Treder, W. (2008). Response to drought stress of three strawberry cultivars grown under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research. 16: 179-188.

  33. Levitt, J. (ed). (1980). Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. New York: Academic press.

  34. Li, Y., Zhao, H., Duan, B., Korpelainen, H. and Li, C. (2011). Effect of drought and ABA on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant system of Cotinus coggygria seedlings under two different light condition. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 71: 107-111.

  35. Liu, F., Savic, S., Jensen, C.R., Shahnazari, A., Jacobsen, S.E., Stikic, R. and Andersen M.N. (2007). Water relations and yield of lysimeter-grown strawberries under limited irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae. 111: 128-132.

  36. Maas, J.L., Galletta, G.J. and Stoner, G.D. (1991). Ellagic acid, an anticarcinogen in fruits, especially strawberry: A review. Horticultural Science. 26: 10-14.

  37. Miller, G., Suzuki, N., Ciftci-Yilmaz, S. and Mittler, R. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell and Environment. 33: 453-467.

  38. Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 7: 405-410.

  39. Molassiotis, A., Sotiropoulos, T., Tanou, G., Diamantidis, G. and Therios, I. (2006). Boroninduced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM 9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 56: 54-62.

  40. Moussa, H. R. (2011). Low dose of gamma irradiation enhanced drought tolerance in soybean. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 59: 1-12.

  41. Neocleous, D., Ziogas, V. and Vasilakakis, M. (2012). Antioxidant responses of strawberry plants under stress conditions. Acta Horticulturae. 926: 339-345.

  42. Nezhadahmadi, A., Faruq, G. and Rashid, K. (2015). The impact of drought stress on morphological and physiological parameters of three strawberry varieties in different growing conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 52: 79-92.

  43. Nogues, S., Cotxarrera, L., Alegre, L. and Trillas, M.I. (2002). Limitation to photosynthesis in tomato leaves induced by Fusarium wilt. New Phytologist. 154: 461-470.

  44. Ogren, E. and Oquist, G. (1985). Effects of drought on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition susceptibility in intact willow leaves. Planta. 166: 380-388.

  45. Parvin, S., Javadi, T. and Ghaderi, N. (2015). Effects of different water stress levels and paclobutrazol on strawberry. Cercetari Agronomice. DOI: 10.1515/cerce-2015-0022.

  46. Reddy, R.A., Chaitanya, K.V. and Vivekanandan, M. (2014). Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 161: 1189-1202.

  47. Rizza, F., Badeck, F. W., Cattivelli, L., Lidestri, O., di Fonzo, N. and Stanca, A.M. (2014). Use of a water stress index to identify barley genotypes adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop Science. 44(6): 2127-2137.

  48. Rohbakhsh, H. (2013). Alleviating adverse effects of water stress on growth and yield of forage sorghum by potassium application. Advances in Environmental Biology. 7(1): 40- 46.

  49. Sachin, T., Ahmad, M., Sahay, S., Nanher, A.H. and Nandan, B. (2015). Strawberry: A potential cash crop in India. Rashtriya Krishi. 10(2): 57-59.

  50. Sairam, R. K., Deshmukh, P. S., Shukla, D. S. and Ram, S. (1990). Metabolic activity and grain yield under moisture stress in wheat genotypes. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 33: 226-231. 

  51. Shao, H.B., Chu, L.Y., Jaleel, C.A. and Zhao, C.X. (2008). Water- deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 331: 215-225.

  52. Sun, C., Li, X., Hu. Y., Zhao, P., Xu, T., Sun, J. and Gao, X. (2015). Proline, sugars and antioxidant enzymes respond to drought stress in the leaves of strawberry plants. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 33(5): 625-632.

  53. Sunkar, R. and Bartels, D. (2005). Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 24: 23-58.

  54. Suzuki, N., Koussevitzky, S., Mittler, R. and Miller, G. (2012). ROS and redox signaling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell and Environment. 35: 259-270.

  55. Terry, L.A., Chope, G.A. and Gine Bordonaba, J. (2007).  Effect of water deficit irrigation and inoculation with Botrytis cinerea on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 55: 10812-10819.

  56. Yordanov, I., Velikova, V. and Tsonev T. (2000). Plant responses to drought, acclimation and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica. 38: 171-186.

  57. Zhang, H., Yin, W. and Xia, X. (2008). Calcineurin B-Like family in Populus: comparative genome analysis and expression pattern under cold, drought and salt stress treatment. Plant Growth Regulation. 56: 129-140.

Editorial Board

View all (0)