Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 45 issue 2 (june 2024) : 249-257

Seed Priming for Mitigating Salinity Stress Effects in Plants: A General Review

Mehtap Gürsoy1,*
1Aksaray University Güzelyurt Vocational School Güzelyurt/Aksaray/Türkiye.
Cite article:- Gürsoy Mehtap (2024). Seed Priming for Mitigating Salinity Stress Effects in Plants: A General Review . Agricultural Reviews. 45(2): 249-257. doi: 10.18805/ag.RF-282.

Salinity is a significant abiotic stressor that inflicts considerable harm on agricultural fields and plants. Factors such as global warming, improper irrigation practices, excessive fertilization, drainage issues, inappropriate tillage and cultivation methods contribute significantly to the emergence of salinity problems in agricultural lands. When faced with stressors, plants employ various mechanisms to ensure their survival. Consequently, salinity stress adversely affects seed germination, leads to stunted plant growth, reduces yield, results in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), diminishes chlorophyll content, elevates proline levels, promotes the production of malondialdehyde (MDA) and impacts osmoprotectants like glycine betaine. Salt stress not only induces osmotic stress and ion toxicity but also disrupts plant nutrient uptake. Today, numerous approaches are available to mitigate the detrimental impacts of stressful conditions and one such method is seed priming, which encompasses various techniques. This review delves into the adverse effects of salinity on plants and examines the role of seed priming processes in ameliorating these harmful consequences.

Plants face a multitude of stressors throughout their lifecycles, which can originate from both abiotic and biotic sources. Among these challenges, high salinity stands out as a prominent abiotic stressor that poses a significant environmental threat (Jisha et al., 2013). Additional abiotic stresses impacting plants include heat, salt, irradiation and light stress, all of which have detrimental effects (Reyes and Cisneros-Zevallos, 2007; Singh et al., 2022). Abiotic stresses impose severe limitations on crop production worldwide, exacerbated by global warming, climate fluctuations and unpredictable weather patterns (Deshmukh et al., 2017). Notably, soil salinity has emerged as a paramount global concern (Attia et al., 2021: Hafeez et al., 2021; Mukhopa dhyay et al., 2021; Hossen et al., 2022; El-Beltagi et al., 2023; El-Hawary et al., 2023). Disturbingly, research indicates that over 33% of agricultural regions are currently grappling with salinity issues (El-Beltagi et al., 2023). The rise in salinity within agricultural lands can be attributed to factors such as global warming and inappropriate farming practices (Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015). This salinity stress disproportionately affects many plant species that are crucial for human nutrition, as they exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity or tolerance to salt stress. Consequently, ensuring food security, safe food access and sustainable agriculture for our growing global population becomes an increasingly daunting challenge.
 
Adverse effects of salt stress on plants
 
Germination and plant growth
 
Salinity exerts its influence on all plant processes (Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Johnson and Puthur, 2021; Linic et al., 2021), resulting in disruptions across various developmental stages, including seed germination, plant growth, development, reproduction and yield (Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015). The adverse effects of salinity on germination and the hampering of plant growth are closely linked to ion toxicity, thereby subjecting plants to stress (Katambe et al., 1998). The impact of salt accumulation in soils on plant growth varies across different developmental stages (Bernstein, 1975). While plants can experience salinity stress at all growth stages, germination and the early growth phase are notably more sensitive for the majority of plant species (Ibrahim et al., 2018; Ali et al., 2020; Ali et al., 2021; Dhanyasree et al., 2022). Seed germination, a pivotal and delicate stage in plant development, plays a critical role in shaping plant growth, yield and quality (Gupta and Huang, 2014) (Fig 1).
 
Stomatal Conductivity, photosynthesis and carotenoids
 
High salt concentrations in the soil or water not only hinder the uptake of water through plant roots but also lead to the inhibition of stomatal conductivity, photosynthesis and overall plant growth (Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015; Gürsoy, 2022a; Oliviera et al., 2023). The impact of salt stress on photosynthesis involves a reduction in stomatal conductivity, a critical process that diminishes nutrient and water uptake, ultimately leading to a decrease in chlorophyll content (Ahanger et al., 2020). Furthermore, disruptions in stomatal arrangement, attributed to ion imbalances, result in decreased photosynthesis capacity, reduced leaf surface area and a host of related morphological and biochemical disturbances, ultimately diminishing yield and its components (Granaz et al., 2022; Hossen et al., 2022). Salt stress inflicts damage on plant membranes, alters the activity of plant growth regulators and further suppresses photosynthesis, impacting all physiological processes and potentially leading to plant death (Ibrahim et al., 2016). Some studies have reported that carotenoid levels may increase under stress conditions (Gürsoy, 2020; 2022b) (Fig 1).

@figure1
 
Plants responses to salt stress
 
When confronted with stress-induced changes, plants employ a variety of mechanisms for self-protection. One such method involves increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn triggers oxidative stress and leads to ion imbalance issues within the cells (Nabi et al., 2019). Plants initiate the generation of ROS as an initial response to various abiotic stresses, such as salinity and drought, among others (Fig 1). This response is recognized for its potential to inflict significant damage to cell structures and disrupt normal cellular functions (Deshmukh et al., 2017).
 
Enzyme activities
 
Plants employ a range of mechanisms to shield themselves from the detrimental effects of ROS. Among these protective strategies is the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes that serve to neutralize the impact of excessive ROS production (Shaki et al., 2017) (Fig 1). Some prominent members of these enzymes include superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX) and catalase (CAT), all belonging to the group of enzymatic antioxidants. In addition to enzymatic defenses, plants produce non-enzymatic antioxidants, like phenolic compounds, as a shield against heightened ROS production (Grassmann et al., 2002; Zamljen et al., 2022).  Consequently, the augmentation of antioxidant enzymes and the presence of non-enzymatic phenolic compounds play a vital role in the plant’s response mechanism to stress. Furthermore, high salinity stress in plants not only triggers the formation of superoxide but also induces the generation of singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide (Rajput et al., 2021).
 
Malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline
 
In addition, the excessive intake of sodium ions (Na+) leads to an ion imbalance within plant cells and results in membrane damage, primarily through the production of malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline (Kishor and Sreenivasulu, 2014; Fang et al., 2021; Gürsoy, 2022b). In response to the effects of salt stress, both MDA and proline production increase (Fig 1). MDA, or lipid peroxidation, is recognized as a byproduct of active oxygen species under various stress conditions (Fu and Huang, 2001; Yang et al., 2009; Gürsoy, 2022b) and it serves as a natural indicator of oxidative damage induced by salt stress. Meanwhile, proline assumes critical roles in scavenging free radicals during salinity stress (Zhu et al., 2019). This versatile compound, proline, ranks among the most commonly encountered osmolytes (Saxena et al., 2013).
 
Seed priming and its beneficial effects
 
Various techniques have been adapted to enhance plant tolerance to stresses (Jisha et al., 2013). Among these methods, seed priming stands out as a low-risk, cost-effective and easily applicable technique that effectively boosts plant resistance to various stressors (Jisha et al., 2013; Thakur et al., 2019; Garcia et al., 2022; Gürsoy, 2022c; Paul et al., 2022). Moreover, the priming process is highly efficient in enhancing both seed germination and seedling growth by triggering numerous vital processes (Johnson and Puthur, 2021). Seed priming contributes to stress reduction through various means, including early and uniform germination, accelerated root and shoot development and the promotion of overall plant growth (Ghosh and Atta, 2022; Patel et al., 2023). It not only ensures consistent and rapid germination but also fortifies resistance against a range of environmental stressors (Afzal et al., 2016; Johnson and Puthur, 2021). Priming induces enhanced germination by introducing significant physiological variation in the seed (Damalas et al., 2019). Essentially, seed priming involves the initiation of diverse processes in plants through the treatment with natural and synthetic compounds (Jisha et al., 2013) and these applications enhance various characteristics along with cellular and plant development (Savvides et al., 2016). Numerous studies have explored the effects of priming applications against one or more stress factors (Savvides et al., 2016; Van Oosten et al., 2017).
 
Priming methods
 
Various priming techniques are available to reduce the effects of stress factors which includes hydropriming, halopriming, osmopriming, hormonal priming and biopriming (Neto et al., 2020; Chakraborty and Dwivedi, 2021).
 
Hydropriming
 
One of the most widely employed priming techniques in recent times is hydropriming. Hydropriming is an environmentally friendly, cost-effective and easily applicable method for stress protection (Forti et al., 2020; Garcia et al., 2022) (Fig 2). Essentially, hydropriming involves soaking seeds in pure water for a specified duration, subject to specific light and temperature conditions (Zhao et al., 2018; Damalas et al., 2019; Tanwar et al., 2023). This approach has been shown to have positive effects on plant growth, both during the initial stages and later in development (Rhaman et al., 2020). Hydropriming is particularly valuable for crops where germination and growth may be hampered by stressful conditions (Castro-Colina et al., 2012). The application of hydropriming has a significant impact on the antioxidant system of plants under various stress conditions. For instance, in a study involving alfalfa seeds subjected to salt stress conditions, Amooaghaie (2011) observed an increase in the activity of various enzymes following hydropriming. Concurrently, proline content, electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels decreased. Similarly, when hydropriming was applied to Quercus rugosa seeds, rapid and synchronized germination and improved growth parameters were observed (Castro-Colina et al., 2012). In the case of corn seeds exposed to salt stress, hydropriming positively affected germination and seedling growth parameters (Jayesh and Meeta, 2015). Moreover, hydropriming has been found to enhance photosynthetic activity, stomatal conductivity and evapotranspiration in bread wheat seeds under both normal and stress conditions (Tabassum et al., 2017). Researchers have also reported that hydropriming can increase the salt tolerance of sunflower plants, with no accumulation of proline in hydroprimed seedlings, indicating protective properties (Matias et al., 2018). In rice seeds, hydropriming has had a positive impact on morphological and physiological properties Mondal et al. (2018), while in faba bean seeds, it has improved germination parameters and seedling emergence (Damalas et al., 2019). An increase in chlorophyll content has been observed after hydropriming (Bourioug et al., 2020). Furthermore, in Medicago truncatula seeds, hydropriming resulted in the best germination outcomes Forti et al. (2020). In the context of enhancing resistance to Aspergillus niger in wheat plants, various priming treatments were applied, with hydropriming proving to be particularly effective. Physiological and biochemical properties of wheat demonstrated that hydropriming was more effective in disease reduction and it led to higher expression levels of β-1,3-glucanase, Thaumatin-like protein (TLP) and chitinase, further contributing to increased disease resistance Gul et al., (2022). Additionally, a 6-hour hydropriming treatment was found to be highly effective in increasing the germination of rice cultivars (Ranmeechai et al., 2022).
 
Halopriming
 
Halopriming is another commonly employed technique, wherein seeds are primed in a solution containing organic salts. This method expedites germination and fosters uniform seedling growth even under the influence of stress factors (Afzal et al., 2008; Hidayah et al., 2022). Halopriming has been demonstrated to offer numerous advantages, including improved crop establishment, enhanced uniformity, increased plant growth and higher productivity, particularly in the face of abiotic environmental stresses, which are essential to meet future food demand sustainably and reliably (El-Sanatawy et al., 2021). When seeds undergo halopriming, it can bolster plant growth even in the presence of salt stress conditions (Hidayah et al., 2022). It achieves this by regulating the activities of existing enzymes and producing essential germination metabolites (Ahmad et al., 2017). For instance, research conducted with wheat seeds treated with different inorganic salts (CaCl2, NaCl and CaSO4) found that halopriming enhanced salt stress tolerance and improved germination, seedling growth parameters, seedling vigor, ion homeostasis and starch metabolism (Afzal et al., 2008). Halopriming also helps prevent the accumulation of sodium ions (Na+) through tissue tolerance effects. Additionally, halopriming contributes to enhanced plant and seedling growth and increases salinity tolerance, especially during the seedling stage (Hidayah et al., 2022). Halopriming plays a pivotal role in regulating enzyme activities, ensuring the production of necessary germination metabolites (Ahmad et al., 2017). In the case of rice seeds, priming under salt stress conditions stimulated metabolism and increased seedling vigor (Jisha and Puthur, 2014). Furthermore, when halopriming treatment was applied to Gerbera jamesonii and Zinnia elegans seeds with CaCl2, KNO3 and KCl, it resulted in uniform maturity and improved flower harvesting (El-Sanatawy et al., 2021). In a study that examined the effects of halopriming in conjunction with different irrigation systems on corn seeds, researchers found that it enhanced germination uniformity, speed, rate and strength. Additionally, it increased water use efficiency in field conditions compared to the control, which was significant in mitigating the adverse effects of water scarcity (El-Sanatawy et al., 2021). Halopriming has also been applied to Hibiscus sabdariffa seeds under salt stress conditions, leading to an increased germination rate and emergence percentage (Taghvaei et al., 2022).
 
Osmopriming
 
Osmopriming involves the immersion of seeds in various osmotic solutions, such as polyethylene glycol, mannitol, sorbitol and more (Ghassemi-Golezani et al., 2008; Garcia et al., 2022). This technique can enhance seed resistance to salt stress (Fig 2). When seeds are exposed to osmotic solutions, it promotes the expression of numerous stress-related genes and proteins, expediting stress and cross-tolerance mechanisms (Benadjaoud et al., 2022). Osmopriming operates by facilitating the movement of components within seeds at low water content, enabling seeds to slowly take up water while reducing cell damage (Garcia et al., 2022). This process activates stress tolerance mechanisms, including enhanced antioxidant capacity and the activation of signaling molecules, ultimately leading to higher productivity (Kerchev et al., 2020; Stasio et al., 2020). Osmopriming induces molecular changes in seeds, consequently enhancing seed germination and emergence across a wide range of plant species  (Hassanpouraghdam et al., 2009). For instance, maize seeds subjected to osmopriming exhibited improved germination and vigor characteristics (Ghiyasi et al., 2011). The effects of osmopriming on rapeseed varieties were examined, revealing higher germination percentages, increased radicle and seedling height, greater dry weight and higher sodium (Na) content in primed seeds compared to unprimed seeds. Notably, potassium (K) content in primed seeds was also relatively higher than in unprimed seeds (Hassanpouraghdam et al., 2009). In another study involving soybean seeds treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000), the application of osmopriming at -1.2 MPa for 12 hours yielded the most favorable results across the examined properties. Primed seeds generally exhibited better characteristics than the control group (Sadeghi et al., 2011). Osmopriming has been found to enhance seed germination and seedling growth in barley (Tabatabaei, 2013). Additionally, when osmopriming was applied to rapeseed seeds using polyethylene glycol, transcription factors, small interfering RNA, hormones and germination properties all showed positive effects (Kubala et al., 2015). Furthermore, the application of osmopriming to Lavandula stoechas L. plant seeds under salt and water stress conditions effectively mitigated the adverse effects of stress on germination (Benadjaoud et al., 2022).

@figure2
 
Hormonal priming
 
Hormonal priming is a priming technique that involves the use of various plant growth regulators (Bryksova et al., 2020) or phytohormones to stimulate seed metabolism, subsequently promoting plant growth and ultimately increasing yield (Bryksova et al., 2020). Plant growth regulators and phytohormones like gibberellins, cytokinins, auxins and salicylic acid are commonly employed to enhance germination and plant growth, especially under stress conditions (Gürsoy, 2019; 2022a). For example, applying kinetin to Salvia officinalis seeds under salt stress conditions was found to be effective in mitigating the stress effects (Tounekti et al., 2011). In a study examining salt tolerance in wheat seeds primed with gibberellic acid, positive effects were observed on seed yield, salt tolerance, ion uptake in roots and seedlings Iqbal and Ashraf (2013). Gibberellic acid applied to oat varieties under salt stress conditions resulted in increased germination percentages, shoot and root length, total weight and water content parameters, effectively alleviating the negative effects of stress (Chauhan et al., 2019). Hormopriming with gibberellic acid positively affected the germination properties of safflower varieties (Gürsoy, 2019). When salicylic acid (SA) was applied from the leaf under saline conditions, it positively affected plant height, stem diameter and chlorophyll content (Rehman et al., 2019). Additionally, in lentil seeds, both hydropriming and osmopriming applications were found to improve seed germination and seedling growth (Ghassemi-Golezani et al.,  2008). Wheat seeds primed with kinetin and gibberellic acid under salt stress conditions displayed interesting outcomes. Gibberellic acid increased K+ levels and decreased the accumulation of Na+ and Cl- in seedlings, whereas kinetin increased Cl- accumulation and decreased K+ accumulation (Akhtar et al., 2021). Hormopriming with salicylic acid had positive effects on the morphological and biochemical properties of sunflower and linseed seeds under salt stress conditions Gürsoy (2022a). Furthermore, the application of salicylic acid to the seeds of the Ocimum basilicum plant under salt stress was effective in mitigating the adverse effects of stress on gas exchange and total chlorophyll parameters (Silva et al., 2022).
 
Biopriming
 
Biopriming is a seed priming technique involving the inoculation of seeds with living bacteria, including plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Mahmood et al., 2016). It typically entails soaking seeds in solutions containing beneficial bacteria for specific durations (Abuamsha et al., 2011). This environmentally friendly method can be applied to all plants (Deshmukh et al., 2020; Miljakovic et al., 2022) and serves to reduce the transmission of pathogens to both the seeds and the soil by coating the seeds with beneficial microorganisms (Forti et al., 2020). Beneficial microorganisms used in biopriming include Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp. and Trichoderma spp. (Paparella et al., 2015). Biopriming offers a means to protect seeds from bacterial damage and enhance their resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses (Rajendra Prasad et al., 2016; Miljakovic et al., 2022). For instance, biopriming of chickpea seeds demonstrated significant improvements in disease control and yield compared to untreated seeds (Parmar et al., 2021). Soaking pigeonpea seeds in liquid cultures, such as pink-pigmented facultative methylotroph (PPFM) at a 1:100 dilution for 3 hours or Rhizobium or phosphobacteria at a 1:50 dilution for 4 hours, increased germination and seed vigor (Raja et al., 2019). While the populations of Rhizobium and phosphobacteria in microbial-infused seeds showed only slight reductions during three months of storage, the population of PPFM decreased significantly. Nevertheless, PPFM exhibited better seed quality enhancement among the cultures. A consortium of Rhizobium and PPFM at a 1:1 ratio for 3 hours increased seed vigor with improved microbial populations (Raja et al., 2019). Biopriming with Bacillus spp. applied to Medicago truncatula seeds resulted in increased seedling growth and biomass Forti et al., (2020). Seed germination and seedling development were also positively affected. In another study, biopriming with Pseudomonas geniculata was applied to corn seeds in salty sodic soil, leading to the mitigation of salt-induced damage, enhanced plant growth and reduced crop losses. This application of P. geniculata reduced the uptake of sodium ions (Na+) while increasing potassium (K+) and calcium ions (Ca2+) in maize roots, maintaining ionic balance and homeostasis under excessive salt conditions (Singh et al., 2020). Additionally, biopriming with a commercial biostimulant and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Abelmoschus esculentus genotypes increased plant development, yield and biochemical parameters (Makhaye et al., 2021). Furthermore, soybean seeds primed with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bacillus megaterium exhibited improvements in seedling height, seedling vigor, seedling and root weight and germination in both old and normal seeds under stress conditions (Miljakovic et al., 2022).
Seed priming is a valuable technique that ensures improved germination, seedling and root development, ultimately leading to increased yield and quality of crops. Additionally, it serves as a means to enhance resistance against abiotic stresses. A wide range of priming techniques has been thoroughly researched across various plant species and stress conditions, consistently demonstrating their beneficial effects. Seed priming methods stand out as the optimal solution for promoting germination and seedling development, especially in unfavorable environmental conditions, while also enhancing the plant’s defense mechanisms, yield and quality. Seed priming techniques offer several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, ease of application, reliability and environmental friendliness. Consequently, seed priming technology emerges as a highly useful approach to bolster crop production and improve crop quality, particularly under stress conditions.
The author have no conflict of interest.

  1. Abuamsha, R., Salman, M., Ehlers, R. (2011). Effect of seed priming with Serratia plymuthica and Pseudomonas chlororaphis to control Leptosphaeria maculans in different oilseed rape cultivars. Eur J. Plant Pathol. 130: 287-295.

  2. Afzal, I., Rauf, S., Basra, S.M.A., Murtaza, G. (2008). Halopriming improves vigor, metabolism of reserves and ionic contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress. Plant Soil Envýron. 54(9): 382-388.

  3. Afzal, I., Rehman, H.U., Naveed, M., Basra, S.M.A. (2016). Recent Advances in Seed Enhancements. New Challenges in Seed Biology-Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology. New Challenges in Seed Biology Eds: Edited by Susana Araujo and Alma Balestrazzi. doi: 10.5772/64791.

  4. Ahanger, M.A., Aziz, U., Alsahli, A.A., Alyemeni, M.N., Ahmad, P. (2020). Influence of exogenous salicylic acid and nitric oxide on growth, photosynthesis and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in salt stressed Vigna angularis. Biomolecules. 10: 42. doi:10.3390/biom10010042.

  5. Ahmad, I., Saleem, A.M. Mustafa, G., Ziaf, K., Afzal, I., Qasim, M. (2017). Seed halopriming enhances germination performance and seedling vigor of Gerbera jamesonii and Zinnia elegans.  Sarhad J. Agric. 33: 199-205.

  6. Akhtar, N., Karim, A., Afrin, S., Hossain, F. (2021). Effects of gibberellic acid and kinetin on germination and ýon accumulation in a bangladesh wheat variety under salt stress conditions. European Journal of Biophysics. 9(2): 86-91. http:// www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ejb doi: 10.11648/ j.ejb.20210902.15.

  7. Ali, A.Y.A., Ibrahim, M.E.H., Zhou, G., Nimir, N.E.A., Jiao, X., Zhu, G., Elsiddig, A.M.I., Suliman, M.S.E., Elradi, S.B.M., Yue, W. (2020). Exogenous jasmonic acid and humic acid increased salinity tolerance of sorghum. Agron. J. 112: 1-14.

  8. Ali, A.Y.A., Ibrahim, M.E.H., Zhou, G., Nimir, N.E.A., Elsiddig, A.M.I., Jiao, X., Zhu, G., Salih, E.G.I., Suliman, M.S.E.S., Elradi, S.B.M. (2021). Gibberellic acid and nitrogen efficiently protect early seedlings growth stage from salt stress damage in sorghum. Scientific Reports. 11: 1-11.

  9. Amooaghaie, R. (2011). The effect of hydro and osmopriming on alfalfa seed germination and antioxidant defenses under salt stress. Afr J. Biotechnol. 10: 6269-6275.

  10. Attia, H., Harrathi, J., Alamer, K.H., Alsalmi, F.A., Magné, C., Khalil, M. (2021). Effects of NaCl on antioxidant, antifungal and antibacterial activities in safflower essential oils. Plants. 10: 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants10122809.

  11. Benadjaoud, A., Dadach, M., El-Keblawy, A., Mehdadi, Z. (2022). Impacts of osmopriming on mitigation of the negative effects of salinity and water stress in seed germination of the aromatic plant Lavandula stoechas L. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 31: 100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2022.100407.

  12. Bernstein, L. (1975). Effect of salinity and sodality on plant growth. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 13: 295–312. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.py.13.090175.001455.

  13. Bourioug, M., Ezzaza, K., Bouabid, R., Alaoui-Mhamdi, M., Bungau, S., Bourgeade, P., Alaoui-Sossé, L., Alaoui-Sossé, B., Aleya, L. (2020). Influence of hydro-and osmo-priming on sunflower seeds to break dormancy and improve crop performance under water stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27: 13215-13226.

  14. Bryksova, M., Hybenová, A., Hernándiz, A.E., Novák, O., Pen¡cík, A., Spíchal, L., De Diego, N., Doležal, K. (2020). Hormopriming to mitigate abiotic stress effects: A case study of n9- substituted cytokinin derivatives with a fluorinated carbohydrate moiety. Front. Plant Sci. 11: 599228. doi: 10.3389/fpls. 2020.599228.

  15. Castro-Colina, L., Martínez-Ramos, M., Sánchez-Coronado, M.E., Huante, P., Mendoza, A., Orozco-Segovia, A. (2012). Effect of hydropriming and acclimation treatments on Quercus rugosa acorns and seedlings. Eur J. For Res. 131(3): 747-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011- 0548-7.

  16. Chakraborty, P., Dwivedi, P.(2021). Seed priming and its role in mitigating heat stress response in crop response. Jounal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 21: 1718-1734. https:/ /doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00474-4.

  17. Chauhan, A., AbuAmarah, B.A., Kumar, A., Verma, J.S., Ghramh, H.A., Khan, K.A., Ansari, M. J. (2019). Influence of gibberellic acid and different salt concentrations on germination percentage and physiological parameters of oat cultivars. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 26(6): 1298- 1304.

  18. Damalas, S.C.A., Koutroubas, S.D., Fotiadis, S. (2019). Hydro- priming effects on seed germination and field performance of faba bean in spring. Agriculture. 9: 201. doi:10.3390/ agriculture9090201.

  19. Deshmukh, A.J., Jaiman, R.S., Bambharolia, R.P., Patil Vijay, A. (2020). Seed biopriming-A review. International Journal of Economic Plants. 7(1): 38-43. doi: 10.23910/2/2020. 0359.

  20. Deshmukh, R.K., Ma, J.F., Bélanger, R.R. (2017). Editorial: Role of Silicon in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8: 1858. doi: 10.3389/ fpls.2017.01858.

  21. Dhanyasree, K., Rafeekher, M., Premachandran, A. (2022). Abiotic stress management in fruit crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2557.

  22. El-Beltagi, H.S., Al-Otaibi, H.H., Parmar, A., Ramadan, K.M.A., Lobato, A.K.D.S., El-Mogy, M.M. (2023). Application of potassium humate and salicylic acid to mitigate salinity stress of common bean. Life. 13: 448. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/life13020448.

  23. El-Hawary, M.M., Hashem, O.S.M., Hasanuzzaman, M. (2023). Seed priming and foliar application with ascorbic acid and salicylic acid mitigate salt stress in wheat. Agronomy. 13: 493. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020493.

  24. El-Sanatawy, A.M., Ash-Shormillesy, S.M.A.I., Qabil, N., Awad, M.F., Mansour, E. (2021). Seed halo-priming ýmproves seedling vigor, grain yield and water use efficiency of maize under varying irrigation regimes. Water. 13: 2115. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ w13152115.

  25. Fang, S., Hou, X., Liang, X. (2021). Response mechanisms of plants under saline-alkali stress. Front. Plant Sci. 12: e667458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.667458.

  26. Forti, C., Shankar, A., Singh, A., Balestrazzi, A., Prasad, V., Macovei, A. (2020). Hydropriming and biopriming ýmprove medicago truncatula seed germination and upregulate dna repair and antioxidant genes. Genes.11: 242. doi:10.3390/ genes11030242.

  27. Fu, J., Huang, B. (2001). Involvement of antioxidants andlipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-seasongrasses to localized drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 45(2): 105- 114. DOI:10.1016/s0098-8472(00)00084-8.

  28. Garcia, D., Zhao, S., Arif, S., Zhao, Y., Ming, L.C., Huang, D. (2022). Seed priming technology as a key strategy to increase crop plant production under adverse environmental conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Research. 5(1): 27-46.

  29. Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Aliloo, A.A., Valizadeh, M., Moghaddam, M. (2008). Effects of hydro and osmo-priming on seed germination and field emergence of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 36(1): 29-33.

  30. Ghiyasi, M., Tajbakhsh, M., Amirnia, R. (2011). Effect of osmopriming on harvested seed vigor of maize (Zea mays L.). Advances in Environmental Biology. 5(11): 3540-3542.

  31. Ghosh, T., Atta, K. (2022). Mitigation of environmental stress by seed priming. The Science World. 2(6): 791-795.

  32. Grassmann, J., Hippeli, S., Elstner, E.F. (2002). Plant’s defence and its benefitsfor animals and medicine: Role of phenolics and terpenoids in avoiding oxygen stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 40: 471-478.

  33. Granaz., S.K., Baksh, G., Zahra, N., Hafeez, M.B., Raza, A., Samad, A., Nizar, M., Wahid, A. (2022). Foliar application of  thiourea, salicylic acid and kinetin alleviatesalinity stress in maize grown under etiolated and de etiolated conditions. Discover Food. 2. 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187- 022-00027-3.

  34. Gul, S., Hussain, A., Ali, Q., Alam, I., Alshegaihi, R.M., Meng, Q., Zaman, W., Manghwar, H., Munis, M.F.H. (2022). Hydropriming and osmotic priming induce resistance against aspergillus niger in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by activating β-1, 3- glucanase, chitinase and thaumatin-like protein genes. Life. 12: 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122061.

  35. Gupta, B., Huang, B. (2014). Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical and molecular characterization.    Int. J. Genom. 1: 1-18.

  36. Gürsoy, M. (2019). The effect of different giberellýc acid doses on germination properties of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. International Food, Agriculture and Livestock Congress 19-22 September 2019 pp: 395-402.

  37. Gürsoy, M. (2020). Effect of chitosan pretreatment on seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme activity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under saline conditions. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 18(5): 6589-6603. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1805_ 65896603.

  38. Gürsoy, M. (2022a). Effect of salicylic acid pretreatment on seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) plants in salinity conditions. Romanian Agricultural Research. 39: 1-8.

  39. Gursoy, M. (2022b). Effect of foliar aminopolysaccharide chitosan applications under saline conditions on seedling growth characteristics antioxidant enzyme activity, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. Pak. J. Bot. 54(5): 1605-1612. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.30848/PJB2022-5(15).

  40. Gürsoy, M. (2022c). Role of biostimulant priming applications on germination, growth and chlorophyll content of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars under salinity stress. Selcuk J. Agr Food Sci. 36(1): 75-81. doi: 10.15316/ SJAFS.2022.011.

  41. Hafeez, M.B., Raza, A., Zahra, N., Shaukat, K., Akram, M.Z., Iqbal, S., Basra, S.M.A. (2021). Gene regulation in halophytes in conferring salt tolerance, Handbook of bioremediation. Elsevier. pp 341-370.

  42. Hassanpouraghdam, M.B., Pardaz, J.E., Akhtar, N.F. (2009). The effect of osmo-priming on germination and seedling growth of Brassica napus L. under salinity conditions. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 7(2): 620- 622.

  43. Hidayah, A.A., Nisak, R.R., Susanto, F.A., Nuringtyas, T.R., Yamaguchi, N., Purwestri, A. (2022). Seed halopriming improves salinity tolerance of some rice cultivars during seedling stage. Botanical Studies. 63: 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40529-022-00354-9.

  44. Hossen, M.S., Karim, M.F., Fujita, M., Bhuyan, M.H.M.B., Nahar, K., Masud, A.A.C., Mahmud, J.A., Hasanuzzaman, M. (2022). Comparative physiology of ýndica and japonica rice under salinity and drought stress: An intrinsic study on osmotic adjustment, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification. Stresses. 2: 156-178. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/stresses2020012.

  45. Ibrahim, M.E.H., Zhu, X., Zhou, G., Nimir, N.E.A. (2016). Comparison of germination and seedling characteristics of wheat varieties from China and Sudan under salt stress. Agronomy Journal. 108: 85-92.

  46. Ibrahim, M.E.H., Zhu, X., Zhou, G., Ali, A., Ahmed, I., Elsiddig, A. (2018). Nitrogen fertilizer reduces the impact of sodium chloride on wheat yield. Agron. J. 110: 1-7.

  47. Iqbal, M., Ashraf, M. (2013). Gibberellic acid mediated induction of salt tolerance in wheat plants: Growth, ionic partitioning, photosynthesis, yield and hormonal homeostasis. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 86: 76-85. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.06.002.

  48. Jayesh, V., Meeta, J. (2015). Influence of halopriming and hydropriming on seed germination and growth characteristics of Zea mays L. cv. GSF-2 under salt stress. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 19: 1-6.

  49. Jisha, K.C., Vijayakumari, K., Puthur, J.T. (2013). Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: An overview. Acta Physiol Plant. 35: 1381-1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1186-5.

  50. Jisha, V.K.C., Puthur, J.T. (2014). Seed halopriming outdo hydropriming in enhancing seedling vigor and osmotic stress tolerance potential of rice varieties. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 17(4): 209-219. DOI 10.1007/s12892-014-0077-2.

  51. Johnson, R., Puthur, J.T. (2021). Seed priming as a cost effective technique for developing plants with cross tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 162: 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.034.

  52. Katembe, W.J., Ungar, I.A., Mitchell, J.P. (1998). Effect of salinity on germination and seedling growth of two Atriplex species (Chenopodiaceae). Annals of Botany. 82(2): 167-175. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0663.

  53. Kerchev, P., van der Meer, T., Sujeeth, N., Verlee, A., Stevens, C.V., Van Breusegem, F., Gechev, T. (2020). Molecular priming as an approach to induce tolerance against abiotic and oxidative stresses in crop plants. Biotechnol. Adv. 40: 107503. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107503.

  54. Kishor, P.B.K., Sreenivasulu, N. (2014). Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue?. Plant, Cell and Environment. 37: 300-311.

  55. Kubala, S., Garnczarska, M., Wojtyla, Ł., Clippe, A., Kosmala, A., Żmieñko, A., Lutts, S., Quinet, M. (2015). Deciphering priming-induced improvement of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) germination through an integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach. Plant Science. 231: 94-113.

  56. Lini´c, I., Mlinari´c, S., Brklja¡ci´c, L., Pavlovi´c, I., Smolko, A., Salopek-Sondi, B. (2021). Ferulic acid and salicylic acid foliar treatments reduce short-term salt stress in chinese cabbage by ýncreasing phenolic compounds accumulation and photosynthetic performance. Plants. 10: 2346. https:/ /doi.org/10.3390/plants10112346.

  57. Mahmood, A., Turgay, O.C., Farooq, M., Hayat, R. (2016). Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 92(8): 1-14. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw112.

  58. Makhaye, G., Aremu, A.O., Gerrano, A.S., Tesfay, S., DuPlooy, C.P., Amoo, S.O. (2021). Biopriming with seaweed extract and microbial-based commercial biostimulants ýnfluences seed germination of five Abelmoschus esculentus genotypes. Plants. 10: 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071327.

  59. Matias, J.R., Torres, S.B., Leal, C.C.P., Leite, M.D.S., Carvalho, S. (2018). Hydropriming as inducer of salinity tolerance in sunflower seeds. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental. 22(4): 255-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ 1807-1929/agriambi.v22n4p255-260.

  60. Miljakovi´c, D., Marinkovi´c, J., Tamindži´c, G., Ðordevi´c, V., Tintor, B., Miloševi´c, D., Ignjatov, M., Nikoli´c, Z. (2022). Bio- Priming of soybean with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bacillus megaterium: strategy to improve seed germination and the initial seedling growth. Plants. 11: 1927. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ plants11151927.

  61. Mondal, S.S., Kumar, M., Bose, B. (2018). Effect of hydropriming and osmopriming with magnesium nitrate in the early vegetative growth phase of rice variety. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(5): 1343-1346.

  62. Mukhopadhyay, R., Sarkar, B., Jat, H.S., Sharma, P.C., Bolan, N.S. (2021). Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. Journal Environmental Management. 15(280): 111736. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736.

  63. Nabi, R.B.S., Tayade, R., Hussain, A., Kulkarni, K.P., Imran, Q.M., Mun, B.G., Yun, B.W. (2019). Nitric oxide regulates plant responses to drought, salinity and heavy metal stress. Environ Exper Bot. 161: 120-133.

  64. Neto, A.P.A., Oliviera, G.R.F., Mello, S.C., Silva, M.S., Junior, F.G.G., Novembre, A.D.D.L.C., Azevedo, R.A. (2020). Seed priming with seaweed extract mitigate heat stress in spinach: Effect on germination, seedling growth and antioxidant capacity. Bragantia. 79(4): 502-511. https:// doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200127.

  65. Oliveira, V.K.N., Silva, A.A.R.d., Lima, G.S.d., Soares, L.A.D.A., Gheyi, H.R., de Lacerda, C.F., Vieira de Azevedo, C.A., Nobre, R.G., Garófalo Chaves, L.H., Dantas Fernandes, P., Lima, V.L.A.D. (2023). Foliar application of salicylic acid mitigates saline stress on physiology, production and post-harvest quality of hydroponic japanese cucumber. Agriculture. 13: 395. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agriculture 13020395.

  66. Paparella, S., Araújo, S.S., Rossi, G., Wijayasinghe, M., Carbonera, D., Balestrazzi, A. (2015). Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Reports. 34(8): 1281-1293.

  67. Parmar, H., V., Gohel, N.M. (2021). Management of wilt complex of chickpea with seed biopriming and soil application of Trichoderma spp. Legume Research. doý: 10.18805/LR-4580.

  68. Patel, F.Y., Patel, A., Shah, N.J. (2023). Osmo-priming with a novel actives carrabiitol® alleviates abiotic stresses in sorghum and fenugreek: Effect on seed germination and seedling growth. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(6): 741-750. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5771.

  69. Paul, S., Dey, S., Kundu, R. (2022). Seed priming: An emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 97: 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-021-00761-1.

  70. Raja, K., Anandham, R., Sivasubramaniam, K. (2019). Infusing microbial consortia for enhancing seed germination and vigour in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Current Science. 117(12): 2052-2058.

  71. Rajendra, P.S., Kamble, U.R., Sripathy, K.V.,  Bhaskar, K.U., Singh, D.P. (2016). Seed Bio-Priming for Biotic and Abiotic Stress Management. In: Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. [Singh, D., Singh, H., Prabha, R. (Eds)]: Springer New Delhi India pp. 211-228.

  72. Rajput, V.D., Singh, R.K.H., Verma, K.K., Sharma, L., Quiroz- Figueroa, F.R., Meena, M., Gour, V.S., Minkina, T., Sushkova, S., Mandzhieva, S. (2021). Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology. 10(4): 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040267.

  73. Ranmeechai, N., Lacap, A.T., Tac-an, M.I.A., Bayogan, E.R.V. (2022). Seed germination and vigor of four philippine rice varieties as influenced by hydropriming and storage at various durations. Philippine Journal of Science. 151(2): 755-765.

  74. Rhaman, M.S., Rauf, F., Tania, S.S., Khatun, M. (2020). Seed priming methods: Application in field crops and future perspectives. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science. 5(2): 8-19.

  75. Rehman, A.U., Safeer, M., Qamar, R., Altaf, M.M., Sarwar, N., Farooq, O., Iqbal, M.M., Ahmad, S. (2019). Exogenous application of salicylic acid ameliorates growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in saline soil. Agrosciencia. 53: 207-217.

  76. Reyes, L.F., Cisneros-Zevallos, L. (2007). Electron-beam ionizing radiation stress affects on mango fruit (Mangifera indica L.) antioxidant constituents before and during post harvest storage. J. Agric Food Chem. 55(15): 6132-6139.

  77. Sadeghi, H., Khazaei, F., Yari, L., Sheidaei, S. (2011). Effect of seed osmopriming on seed germination behavior and vigor of soybean (Glycine max L.). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 6(1): 39-43.

  78. Savvides, A., Ali, S., Tester, M., Fotopoulos, V. (2016). Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: Mission possible? Trends Plant Sci. 21: 329-340.

  79. Saxena, S.C., Kaur, H., Verma, P., Prakash, B., Rao, V., Majee, M. (2013). Osmoprotectants: Potential for Crop Ýmprovement under Adverse Conditions. In: Plant Accimilation to Environmental Stress. [Tuteja, N., Gill, S.S., (editors)]. 1st ed. Springer. 197-232. doý: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5001- 6_9.

  80. Shaki, F., Maboud, H.E., Niknam, V. (2017). Central role of salicylic acid in resistance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) against salinity. Journal of Plant Interactions. 12(1): 414- 420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1373870.

  81. Shrivastava, P., Kumar, R. (2015). Soil salinity: A serious environmental ýssue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 22: 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001.

  82. Silva, T.I.D., Silva, J.D.S., Dias, M.G., Martins, J.V.D.S., Ribeiro, W.S., Dias, T.J. (2022). Salicylic acid attenuates the harmful effects of salt stress on basil. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering. 26(6): 399-406. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi. v26n6p399-406.

  83. Singh, S., Singh, U.B., Trivedi, M., Sahu, P.K., Paul, S., Paul, D., Saxena, A.K. (2020). Seed biopriming with salt-tolerant endophytic Pseudomonas geniculata-modulated biochemical responses provide ecological fitness in maize (Zea mays L.) grown in saline sodic soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(1): 253.

  84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010253.

  85. Singh, M., Nara, U., Kumar, A., Jaswal, C. (2022). Signaling for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A review. Agricultural Reviews. doý: 10.18805/ag.R-2306.

  86. Stasio, E.D., Cirillo, V., Raimondi, G., Giordano, M., Esposito, M., Maggio, A. (2020). Osmo-priming with seaweed extracts enhances yield of salt-stressed tomato plants.  Agronomy. 10: 1559; doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101559.

  87. Tabassum, T., Farooq, M., Ahmad, R., Zohaib, A. (2017). Seed priming and transgenerational drought memory improves tolerance against salt stress in bread wheat. Plant Physiol Biochem. 118: 362-369.

  88. Tabatabaei, S.A. (2013). Effect of osmo-priming on germination and enzyme activity in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds under drought stress conditions. Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry. 9(4): 25-31.

  89. Taghvaei, M., Nasrolahizadehi, A., Mastinu, A. (2022). Effect of light, temperature, salinity and halopriming on seed germination and seedling growth of Hibiscus sabdariffa under salinity stress. Agronomy. 12: 2491. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ agronomy12102491.

  90. Tanwar, H., Mor, V.S., Sharma, S., Khan, M., Bhuker, A., Singh, V., Yadav, J., Sangwan, S., Singh, J., Yashweer, S., Singh, K. (2023). Optimization of ‘onfarm’ hydropriming conditions in wheat: Soaking time and water volume have interactive effects on seed performance. PLoS One. 18(1): e0280962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280962.

  91. Thakur, M., Sharma, P., Anand, A. (2019). Seed priming-ýnduced early vigor in crops: An alternate strategy for abiotic stress tolerance. Priming and Pretreatment of Seeds and Seedlings. Springer: Singapore. 163-180.

  92. Tounekti, T., Hernández, I., Müller, M., Khemira, H., Munné-Bosch, S. (2011). Kinetin applications alleviate salt stress and improve the antioxidant composition of leaf extracts in Salvia officinalis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 49: 1165-1176.

  93. Van Oosten, M.J., Pepe, O., De Pascale, S., Silletti, S., Maggio, A. (2017). The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4: 5. do1: 10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5.

  94. Yang, F., Hu, J., Li, J., Wu, X., Qian, Y. (2009). Chitosan enhances leaf membrane stability and antioxidant enzyme activities in apple seedlings under drought stress. Plant Growth Reg. 58: 131-136.

  95. Xiong, L., Zhu, J.K. (2002). Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25: 131- 139.

  96. Zamljen, T., Medic, A., Hudina, M., Veberic, R., Slatnar, A. (2022). Salt stress differentially affects the primary and secondary metabolism of peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) according to the genotype, fruit part and salinity level. Plants. 11(7): 853. doi: 10.3390/plants11070853.

  97. Zhao, Y., Hu. M., Gao. Z., Chen. X., Huang, D. (2018). Biological mechanisms of a novel hydro-electro hybrid priming recovers potential vigor of onion seeds. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 150: 260-271.

  98. Zhu, G., Yin, J., Guo, X., Chen, X., Zhi, W., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Lu, H., Jiao, X., Zhou, G. (2019). Gibberellic acid amended antioxidant enzyme and osmotic regulation to improve salt tolerance of okra at early growth stage. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 22: 270-276.Abiotic stress

Editorial Board

View all (0)