Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 44 issue 1 (march 2023) : 12-21

Biological Control Methods for Agricultural Mites: A Review

Alicia Daniels1,*, Gyanpriya Maharaj2, Mark Ram1, Rovindra Lakenarine1
1Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Guyana, Turkeyen Campus, Guyana.
2Center for the Study of Biological Diversity, University of Guyana, Turkeyen Campus, Guyana.
Cite article:- Daniels Alicia, Maharaj Gyanpriya, Ram Mark, Lakenarine Rovindra (2023). Biological Control Methods for Agricultural Mites: A Review . Agricultural Reviews. 44(1): 12-21. doi: 10.18805/ag.RF-247.
Agriculture is the most important economic activity around the world with its contributions reflected by its share in the gross domestic product of countries. It ensures food security, provides raw materials for many industries and employment opportunities. Today, pest and diseases are among the main challenges plaguing the agricultural sector. More specifically, phytophagous mites are devastating many economically important crops worldwide. Tetranychus urticae Koch (Two-spotted spider mites), Raoiella indica Hirst, (red palm mites), Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks (broad mites) and Panonychus ulmi Koch (European red mites) are widely known for their extensive damage to crops. To control these mites, farmers have incorporated the use of pesticides into their farming systems. However, chemical control comes with many problems such as insect resistance, detrimental environmental effects and various human health implications. As such biological control is an environmentally friendly alternative that uses bio-control agents such as predators, pathogens and parasitoids to control pests. In this review, it was found that predators and pathogens were the most widely used biocontrol agents, specifically, the Amblyseius spp. Berlese were most effective and widely documented. The available literature also suggests that for successful control of agricultural mites via biological control, there needs to be a clear understanding of the behaviors of these mites and the bio-control agents used.
Agriculture is the backbone of many economies given its major contributions to many sectors that cater to the basic needs of humans (Praburaj, 2018). The global value of agriculture is estimated to be 2.4 trillion US dollars, with employment provision for approximately 1.3 billion people worldwide (Alston and Pardey, 2014). Developing and underdeveloped nations dominate this sector which in turn provides their economies with much-needed GDP (Freire, 2014). Despite the widespread modernization of agricultural development, the industry is still faced with issues such as urban development, irrigation, natural disaster, pest, diseases, etc. (Makal et al., 2017). Pests and diseases pose a serious threat to food security as they damage crops and increase the demand for produce. Changes in climate compound this threat because pests are constantly migrating to new environments with favorable conditions (FAO, 2017).

Mites are a diverse group of insects that have been destroying and devastating the agricultural industry for many decades. They are categorized in the class Arachnida, subclass Acari and families Tenuipalpidae, Tarsonemidae, Tetranychidae and Eriophyidae (Baker and Wharton, 1958). They also occupy a wide range of habitats and a wide range of hosts including vegetable and ornamental crops (Al-Atawi, 2011; Boczek and Kropczynska, 1964). Mites cause damage by piercing plant cells with their mouthparts and sucking the plant juices (Bensoussan et al., 2016). Common symptoms of mite infection include yellow/ whitish spots on the leaf tissues and the formation of small webs (Jeppson et al., 1975).

Effects of these pests can be seen in industries such as soybean, which was devastated between 2005-2006 in the state Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, by spider mites that attacked areas with and without chemical control and resulted in losses of 270 kg ha on average in soybean production (Arnemann et al., 2006). Symptoms of this infestation included white and yellow spots on the leaf surface while severe effects included premature leaflets, accelerated maturation and reduced grain yield (Dehghan et al., 2009). In 2009, the coconut industry in Brazil also suffered more than 70% losses in production due to the effects of the red palm mite (RPM) which were already dispersed in Martinique, Antilles islands and Trinidad (Rodrigues et al., 2020). Further studies on eggplant and tomato crops by Maina et al. (2014) on spider mites around the Lake Chad Shore Area of Nigeria showed that farmers experienced more than 50% yield losses href="#maina_2014">(Maina et al., 2014). Renkema et al., (2017) reported the grievances of strawberry growers due to the attack of Broad mites during the 2015-2016 growing season and its increase in 2016-2017. Symptoms of the mite infestation include stunted plants, curling of young leaves, darkening of leaf petioles, yellowing, etc. Plants showing such symptoms were recorded in five strawberry fields with <1% of each field area affected. Yong-Heon (2002) investigated the control of two-spotted spider mites (TSSM) destroying strawberry crops in Korea. The excessive use of pesticides to control these mites resulted in the death of untargeted species (e.g., pollinating bees) and the development of strains of TSSM that were highly resistant to all forms of pesticides. Furthermore, these studies found that the control of the pests was almost impossible because of their high fecundity rate, rapid development and rate of development of resistance to miticide (Yong-Heon, 2002).

Pest management is dominated by the use of pesticides which in the long term can cause severe environmental effects, public health concerns and insecticide resistance; hence the need for biological control (Tudi et al., 2021; Gangwar, 2017). These chemicals are detrimental to the environment as they pollute the air, water and soils, diminish biodiversity, reduce nitrogen fixation, etc. (Mahmood, 2016). Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach non-target species (Miller, 2004; Follet and Duan, 2000; Robinson et al., 1999). Toxic residues from these pesticides may remain in the environment for long periods; continued exposure is associated with immune system dysfunction, neurological dysfunction, reproductive system defects and blood disorders (Miraglia et al., 2009; Baker and Wilkinson, 1990). Bio-accumulation and bio-magnification may cause severe effects on human health as organisms at the top of the food chain are most affected (Ali et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2000).

Biological control is an environmentally friendly, sustainable and effective method of managing pests (Routray et al., 2016; Bale et al., 2008). This method is inexpensive, does not affect non-target species, environmentally friendly and involves a safe application and bio-control agents that can enhance root and plant growth by encouraging beneficial soil microflora (Sharma, 2013; Waage and Greathead, 1988). Bio-control agents include predators, parasitoids, pathogens and competitors (Kamal et al., 2015). It typically involves active human management. The history of biological control is divided into 3 periods; (1) preliminary efforts when living agents were released haphazardly with no scientific approach (2) the intermediate period (3) the modern period where there is now careful planning and evaluation of natural enemies (Polanczyk and Pratissoli, 2009; Van Driesche et al., 2008). In this paper, we analyze and synthesize results from previous studies on the biological control of mites in the agricultural field. We specifically examine different methods of biological control and their effectiveness in regulating agricultural mite populations.

The broad survey of the literature indicates that biological control can be successful in eradicating agricultural mite populations. Over the years, there have been major developments in biological control as scientists work to find a balance between food production and conserving biodiversity within the environment for present and future generations (Ghosh, 2011). The excessive use of agrochemicals/ pesticides can have serious implications on human health and the environment (Mahmood, 2016; Baker and Wilkinson, 1990); hence most published articles emphasized the need for biological control as it is a step toward a ‘greener’ world (Sheppard et al., 2019; Bale et al., 2008). Successful bio-control programs require adequate knowledge of population dynamics of pest/predators, endemic species, seasonality of species, generation time and the ability to be mass-reared, among other areas of knowledge surrounding pest biology and ecology. Analysis of the publications identified the following key concepts: (i) predators, (ii) pathogens and (iii) parasitoids as biological control agents. Further, Hoy (1986) outlined the criteria for successful predator release as the potential of the agent to manifest after release, survive spray routines and manipulate target pest populations. Al-Atawi (2011) identified the four families of phytophagous mites that cause economic damage to crops: Tetranychidae Tenuipalpidae, Tarsonemidae and Eriophyidae as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Phytophagous mites and crops affected.


In Mexico, the citrus rust mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead was a major pest of citrus fruits and caused decreased production in the industry (href="#canoye-eligio_2017">Vanoye-Eligio et al., 2017). href="#acosta-robles_2019">Acosta-Robles et al., (2019) evaluated the effect of concentrations of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Isaria fumosorosea on mortality and growth rate of P. oleivora populations under greenhouse conditions. The results indicated that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae were efficient in controlling the citrus rust mite populations under greenhouse conditions as the growth rate of the mites under these pathogen treatments was lower than that of the control. In both treatments, the higher concentrations were inversely proportional to the mortality of the mites. However, it was evident that I. fumosorosea controlled the population at moderate levels as the growth rate of the citrus mites were still below that of the control but higher than that of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae. In other words, I. fumosorosea was not as effective as B. bassiana and M.anisopliae (href="#acosta-robles_2019">Acosta-Robles et al., 2019). Parveen et al., (2021) in an investigation to screen fungal isolates of B. bassiana, M. anisopliae and Lecanicillium lecanii against TSSM and broad mites found that both agricultural mites were susceptible to all fungal isolates tested. However, isolates of B. bassiana showed the highest mortality in TSSM and M. anisopliae showed the same in broad mites. Despite the varying degree of virulence, it was evident that with increased concentrations of fungal isolates there was an increase in the mortality rates of both mites href="#acosta-robles_2019">(Acosta-Robles et al., 2019). Table 2 further highlights various fungi reported to control agricultural mites.

Table 2: Bio-control for agricultural mites using fungi.

Locusts and grasshoppers are the most dominant insect pest in dry grasslands and desert areas; often forming large swarms while feeding on crops resulting in massive economic losses and are therefore treated as a national priority (Lecoq and Cease, 2022; Lomer et al., 2001; Bullen, 1966). They attack plants such as cotton, corn, wheat and barley (Wright, 1986). Locust outbreaks were recorded in Ethiopia in 1958 amounting to £4 million in losses; later in 1962, Khuzistan also recorded £150,000 in losses and India and Pakistan suffered up to £600,000 in economic damage (Bullen, 1966). To rapidly eradicate these devastating pests chemical control techniques were implemented in areas prone to locusts and grasshopper infestation, as their control is critical to ensuring food security (Zhang et al., 2019; Lomer et al., 2001). However, with increasing awareness of public health and the negative environmental impacts caused by the excessive use of pesticides, there has been an active effort to implement bio-control techniques. Bio-pesticides from plants and micro-organisms proved to be an excellent alternative as it has high specificity, non-toxic to humans and animals and have little to no negative impact on the environment (Kooyman, 2003). Metarhizium flavoviride in water-based formulations was among the first pathogen to be tested against desert locusts in both laboratory and field conditions (Githae and Khuria, 2021). To improve its efficiency, treatments were made in oil formulations. Under laboratory conditions, daily food consumption and flight activity were reduced (Seyoum 1994; Moore 1992).

On the other hand, in field experiments, Langewald et al., (1997) saw reduced numbers in swarms and mortality within 10-11 days in open fields and 6-10 days in cages. However, M. flavoviride in oil formulations displayed negative impacts on non-target organisms such as bees leading to the use of another entomopathogenic fungus, M. anisopliae (Ball et al., 1994; Zimmerman, 1993). This fungus kills approximately 70-90% of locusts in about 14-20 days with little to no effect on non-target organisms (Lomer et al., 2001). Mohamed et al., (2011) conducted a study to investigate the combined effects of Phenylacetonitrile (PAN) and Teflubenzuron with M. anisopliae on desert locusts. The results indicated that applying each component at half doses aided in speeding up the rate of fungal infection. This supports reports by Hassan and Charnley (1989) and Joshi et al., (1992) who demonstrated that a combination of Metarhizium and insect growth regulator e.g., Teflubenzuron can weaken the insect body wall increasing its susceptibility to fungal infection. Furthermore, PAN induces stress upon the insects also increasing their susceptibility to fungal infection (Lecoq, 2001). Therefore, implementing integrated management programs with the use of M. anisopliae can be ideal for effectively eradicating locust infection while protecting the environment and ensuring human safety.

Thuringiensin which is a bacterial pathogen was also proven to be successful in controlling agricultural mites (Vargas et al., 2001; Royalty et al., 1990). During vegetative growth, thuringiensin is secreted externally from Bacillus thuringiensis berliner cells into the culture medium (Farkas et al., 1969). It acts by hindering the ribosomal DNA-dependent RNA polymerase and competing with ATP for enzymatic binding sites href="#mohd-salleh_1980">(Mohd-Salleh et al., 1980). Toxicity is an expressed process that requires high rates of RNA synthesis i.e., high growth rates and physiological processes that occur in immature insects (Sebesta et al., 1981). Perring and Farrar (1986) investigated the use of thuringiens in the bio-control of TSSM on melons which resulted in no control of the pest population. Later, Royaltyet_al(1991, 1990) discovered low mortality after three days in the immature stages of TSSM and European red mite (ERM) which were more susceptible than adults. Vargas et al., (2001) conducted an experiment that involved the comparison of the direct and residual toxicity of thuringiensin on immature and adult stages of TSSM and ERM, also to determine the effects of the bacteria on the reproduction and population development of TSSM. The results indicated that direct toxicity was higher than residual toxicity to TSSM (Vargas et al., 2001). Also, the immature stages for both mites were more susceptible than adults. After adult females of TSSM were exposed to thuringiensin residues for varying periods, fecundity was significantly reduced. Tehri et al., (2014) stated that due to the high reproduction rates of TSSM, it is crucial to apply control measures as soon as mite infestation is detected.

Natural enemies

There are several natural predators of agricultural mites including the green lacewings and mites such as the Amblyseius spp., Stethorus punctillum Weise and Phytoseilus persimilis Athias-Henriot.

Raoiella indica (Red Palm Mite)

Raoiella indica (RPM) was first discovered in Martinique in 2004 (Flechtmann and Etienne, 2004), after which it was rapidly dispersed in the Caribbean Regions: Saint Lucia (2005), Dominica (2005), Trinidad (2006) and Guyana (2013) (Van Lenteren, 2019; Kane et al., 2005). In almost all the affected countries, RPMs were prominent on palm trees of the family, Arecaceae, with the coconut palms being more severely affected (Pena et al., 2012). The leaves at the base of the coconut tree were the most targeted as they turned pale and yellow and some died completely after the attack of RPMs (Pena et al., 2012; Kane and Ochoa, 2006).  The immature stages of lacewings of the genus Ceraeochrysa have actively shown to prey on RPMs on coconut palms, hence its potential as a biocontrol agent (Carrillo et al., 2012). Afzal and Khan (1978) discovered that one Chrysoperla carnea Stephens larvae can consume up to 487 aphids and 511 whitefly pupae before pupation and has excellent searching capacity. Viteri Jumbo et al., (2019) assessed the potential of Ceraeochrysa caligata Banks, as a biological control agent of RPMs by conducting functional response bioassays. Three stages of RPMs (eggs, immature stages and adult females) were provided to less than 24 hrs old C. caligata in coconut leaf arenas. The amount of prey consumed was recorded six hours after releasing the lacewings. They found that the ability of the lacewings to feed on the RPMs increased with larval development (Viteri Jumbo et al., 2019).

Higher feeding levels were recorded for the first and second instars of C. caligata when preying upon the eggs and immature stages of R. indicaViteri Jumbo et al., (2019) stated that C. caligata of different stages exhibited differential functional responses, for example, C. caligata second instar individuals exhibited an increase in consumption rate with increasing prey availability (type III functional response) when preying upon immature stages of R. indica. However, when preying on the adult females, C. caligata second instar individuals exhibited a type II functional response (i.e., an increase in consumption rate with increasing prey availability, before reaching a plateau). Predator individuals of the first and third instar stages exhibited a type II functional response for all prey types. As the prey density increased, predatory consumption also increased eventually leading to a decline in the prey population. Therefore, green lacewings can be considered excellent predators/natural enemies of RPM. Hassanpour et al. (2009) also evaluated green lacewings as a potential predator against the two-spotted spider mites and found similar results. As the prey density increased, predatory consumption also increased leading to a decline in the prey population. The first and second instar showed a type II functional response i.e., as prey density increases, predator consumption increases. However, the third larval instar showed type III functional response i.e., responding to high levels of prey density in a density-dependent manner (Hassanpour et al., 2009). According to these studies, we can conclude that green lacewings are excellent predators/ natural enemies of RPMs and TSSM.

Amblyseius spp

The phytophagous mites of the Amblyseius species were the most effective predators against Red Palm mites, Broad mites, European red mites and Two Spotted Spider Mites. They occupy a wide range of habitats and are generalists feeding on several prey, pollen and plant exudates (McMurtry et al., 2015; Carillo et al., 2014). Numerous overlapping observations of Amblyseius spp. attribute these characteristics to its successes.

Carillo et al., (2014) assessed the effects of Amblyseius largoensis Muma on R. indica using exclusion and release strategies to obtain coconut palms with varying levels of the natural enemy. Four treatments consisting of four rates of release of A. largoensis females (0= control, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:30 A. largoensisR. indica) were tested. The results showed that the highest reduction of R. indica (92%) was observed at the highest predator release rate (1:10 A. largoensis: R. indica). Meanwhile, the other release rates (1:20 and 1:30 A. largoensisR. indica) caused 55% and 43% reductions, respectively in the pest populations. In another study, Carillo and Pena (2011) assessed the potential of A. largoensis to control R. indica populations by evaluating the predator preferences among R. indica developmental stages and estimating predator functional and numerical responses to varying densities of its most preferred prey stage. The results indicated that A. largoensis consumed significantly more eggs than in other stages, therefore it was the most preferred stage. Moreover, A. largoensis displayed a type II functional response which demonstrated that with increased prey population density there was increased mortality. Hence, the results of these assessments support the hypothesis that A. largoensis is an important biological control agent of R. indica and should be implemented in Integrated Pest Management programs (Carillo et al., 2014).

Furthermore, Van Maanen et al. (2010) analyzed the ability of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot to control broad mites on pepper plants in a greenhouse by measuring oviposition and predation. Plants infested with adult female broad mites were used in the experiment. Pollen was used as food by A. swirskii, hence, young plants without flowers (without food) and pollen-producing plants were used as a control. The oviposition rate of A. swirskii, on a diet of broad mites, was lower than the oviposition rate on a diet of pollen, but higher than oviposition in the absence of food. On average, the predators consumed 8.6 and 10.2 adult female broad mites during the first and second day respectively (Van Maanen et al., 2010).

To control ERM and TSSM at peach orchards in Ontario in 1995, Lester et al., (1999) released a pyrethroid-resistant strain phytoseiid mite known as Amblyseius fallacis Garman. The predator was mass-produced on kidney bean plants and approximately three bean leaves were wrapped in a ‘twist tie’ around one peach leaf which was infected with two-spotted spider mites. Overall, approximately 1000-2000 predatory mites were released per tree. Throughout 1995, the peach orchard received deltamethrin on seven occasions and additional fungicides as part of a spray program. The initial release of 2,000 A. fallacis per tree in June and July 1995 showed an increased density of the predator species than those observed in control trees where no predatory mite was released. However, the release of 1,000 A. fallacis per tree in August, did not result in increased abundance. The following year displayed low densities of A. fallacis throughout the growing season with increased densities of TSSM (Lester et al., 1999). In 1995, A. fallacis was established and its abundance increased, however, in 1996 the organisms overwintered and arrived too late to be used as a biological control agent in peach orchards (Lester et al., 1999). This study involved spray programs that may have affected the re-emergence of the predatory mite. Hence, the importance of gathering substantial information before conducting such research. Penman et al. (1979) recognized a similar trend where A. fallacis was introduced in Australia and significantly controlled TSSM and ERM populations affecting apple orchards. Unfortunately, in the following season, Penman et al., (1979) observed a decline in predator populations. A. fallacis typically overwinters at the base of plants or beneath the ground; after winter they recolonize their way up to the canopy, feeding on prey species present (Johnson and Croft, 1976). This shows that the nourishment of ground cover is important for the survival and renewal of predators (Croft and McGroarty, 1978). Climatic elements, spray routines, low humidity, the presence of other species acting together in a complex food web, etc. are all factors that may influence the ability of A. fallacis to establish, survive and accomplish biological control (Janssen et al., 1998; Berry et al., 1991; Boyn and Hain, 1983). The success of Amblyseius spp. as a biological control agent is due to varying characteristics as shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Characteristics that attribute to the success of the Amblyseius spp. (Janssen et al., 1998; Berry et al., 1991; Boyn and Hain, 1983).


Stethorus spp., Weise, commonly known as the lady beetles and belonging to the family Coccinellidae; are well known for being natural predators (Biddinger et al., 2009). Chazeau (1985) reported Stethorus beetles present in various regions and ecosystems (tropical rainforests to dry savannahs) with differing climates. The adults and larvae of S. punctillum were identified as a potential biological control agent of spider mites in various crops (Roy et al., 1999; Hull 1977; Hull et al., 1976). Parvin and Haque (2008) investigated the ability of three predators (Scolothrips sexmaculatus Pergande, P. persimilis, S. punctillum) to control TSSM affecting bean plants in Bangladesh (Takafuzi et al., 2000; Herron et al., 1993; Helle and Sabelis 1985). The experiment was carried out during three different periods. The bean plants were cultivated in pots and infected with TSSM eight weeks after cultivation. The predators were later released on the plants of group B after one week of mite infestation and on the plants of group C after three weeks of mite infestation; hence plants of group A were considered the control and went untreated (Parvin and Haque, 2008). The results indicated that TSSM populations increased exponentially up to the sixth week on plants of group A. However, in plants of Group B and C, where the predators were released, the mite population was reduced significantly due to predation. Parvin and Haque (2008) concluded that the early release of the predators reduced the TSSM population earlier in all the cases. Table 3 shows predators of agricultural mites and crops that are mostly affected by the infestation of these mites.

Table 3: Bio-control for agricultural mites using predators.


Despite several studies on parasitoids’ ecology and evolution, (Calatayud, 2020; Colmenarez, 2018) no study documented parasitoids’ potential to minimize agricultural mite populations. Key gaps lie in the availability of adequate data to understand and resolve challenges for current and future potential biological control programs. Further field investigations will enable more precise attempts at developing control plans since several environmental elements cannot manifest under laboratory conditions. Information on population dynamics throughout a season, dispersion levels and patterns can aid in unpredicted setbacks such as predator species affecting untargeted organisms. In addition, for parasitoids to successfully develop and infect insect hosts, they must be adapted to the physiology, life cycle and defenses of the host (Stoner, 1998). Consequently, increased accuracy of informed control plans leads to less application of chemicals which overall achieves environmental sustenance and improved health and wellness.
Overall, the phytophagous mites causing economic damage to crops were among four families: Tetranychidae, Tenuipalpidae, Tarsonemidae and Eriophyidae. Predators/ Natural enemies were the most successful biological control agent. Predacious mites (Amblyseius sp.), green lacewings (Chrysopidae and Ceraeochyrsa sp.) and lady beetles (Stethorus sp.) can effectively reduce mite populations due to their specificity to the target pest, ability to manifest after release and survive spray regimes. Despite a few challenges experienced with affecting non-target and beneficial organisms, pathogens still proved to be good bio-control agents. Due to a lack of sufficient data, parasitoids’ potential to minimize agricultural mites is still unknown. Adequate data on pest/predator population dynamics, generation time, ability to be mass-reared and interaction/relationship with other organisms are essential to fill the gaps and promote biological control as it is an alternative method to promote ecological sustainability.
We are grateful to the National Agricultural Research and Extension Institute (NAREI) for conceptualizing the initial project idea.

  1. Acosta-Robles, N.I., Acosta-Torres, R.I., Chacon, C.J., Flores, L.J. (2019). Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents of Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Prostigmata: Eriophyidae) under Greenhouse Conditions. Florida Entomologist. 102: 303-308

  2. Afzal, M. and Khan, M.R. (1978). Life history and feeding behavior of green lacewings Chrysopa carnea Steph. (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 10(1): 83-90. 

  3. Al-Atawi, J.F. (2011). Phytophagous and predaceous mites associated with vegetable crops from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 4627(3): 301-330.

  4. Alston, J.M. and Pardey, P.G. (2014). Agriculture in the global economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 28(1): 121-146.

  5. Ali, S., Muhammad, U., Asif, S., Qaiser, S., Azhar, H. (2021). Environmental and health effects of pesticide residues. Approaches to the Biological Control of Insects. 48: 311-336.

  6. Arnemann, J.A., Rubens, A.F., Jerson, V.C.G., Henrique, P., Rafael, P.M., Clerison, R.P. and Lindolfo, S. (2006). Assessment of damage caused by the spider mite Mononychellus planki (McGregor) on soybean cultivars in South America. Departamento de Defesa Fitossanitária, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Campus de Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brasil. 12(12): 1989-1996.

  7. Baker, E.W. and Wharton, G.W. (1958). An Introduction to Acarology. Mac Millan Company, New York. 

  8. Baker, S.R. and Wilkenson, C.F. (1990). The Effects of Pesticides on Human Health: Advances in Modern Environmental Toxicology, Vol 18. Princeton Scientific, Princeton, New Jersey. 

  9. Bale, J.S., van Lenteren, J.C., Bigler, F. (2008). Biological control and sustainable food production. Philosophical Transactions of Society B. 363: 761-776.

  10. Ball, B.V., Pye, B.J., Carreck, N.L., Moore, D., Bateman, R.P. (1994). Laboratory testing of a mycopesticide on non-target organisms: The effects of an oil formulation of Metarhizium flavoviride applied to Apis mellifera. Biocontrol Science and Technology.  4(3): 289-296.

  11. Bensoussan, N., Santamaria, M.E., Vladimir, Z., Diaz, I., Miodrag, G. and Vojislava, G. (2016). Herbivore Interaction: Dissection of the Cellular Pattern of Tetranychus urticae Feeding on the Host Plant. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 1105.

  12. Berry, J.S., Holtzer, T.O. and Norman, J.M. (1991). Experiments using a simulation model of the Banks grass mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the predatory mite Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in a corn microenvironment. Environmental Entomology. 20(4): 1074-1078.

  13. Biddinger, D.J., Weber, D.C., Hull, L.A. (2009). Coccinellidae as predators of mites: Stethorini in biological control. Biological Control. 51: 268-283.

  14. Boczek, J. and Kropczynska, D. (1964). Studies on mites (Acarina) living on plants in Poland. I. Fragmenta Faunistica. 11: 161-188.

  15. Boyne, J.V. and Hain, F.P. (1983). Responses of Neoseiulus fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to different prey densities of Oligonychus ununguis (Acarina: Tetranychidae) and relative humidity regimes. Canadian Entomologist. 115: 1607-1614.

  16. Bullen, F.T., (1966). Locusts and Grasshoppers as pests of crops and pasture- A preliminary economic approach. Journal of Applied Ecology. British Ecological Society. 3(1): 146-168.

  17. Calatayud, P.A., Clarke, C.W., Sforza, R.F.H., Ndemah, R.N., Nyamukondiwa, C. (2020). Parasitoids’ Ecology and Evolution. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA.

  18. Carillo, D., Hoy, M.A. and Pena, J.E. (2014). Effect of Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Raoiella Indica  (Acari:  Tenuipalpidae) by Predator Exclusion and Predator Release Techniques. Florida Entomologist. 97(1): 256-261.

  19. Carrillo, D. and Pena, J.E. (2011). Prey-stage preferences and functional numerical responses of Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae).  Experimental and Applied Acarology. 57(3-4): 361-372.

  20. Carrillo, D., Amalin, D., Hosein, F., Roda, A., Duncan, R.E., Peña, J.E. (2012). Host plant range of Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) in areas of invasion of the New World. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 57(3-4): 271-289.

  21. Carrillo, D., Frank, J.H., Rodrigues, J.C., Pena, J.E. (2012). A review of the natural enemies of the red palm mite, Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology. 57(3-4): 347-360.

  22. Chandler, D., Davdison, G., Jacobson, R.J. (2005). Laboratory and glasshouse evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi against two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: tetranychidae) on tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 15(1): 37-54.

  23. Chazeau, J. (1985). Predaceous Insects. In Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. Vol 1B: 211-246.

  24. Colmenarez, C.Y., Corniani, N., Jahnke, M.S., Sampaio, V.M. and Vasquez, C. (2018). Use of parasitoids as a biocontrol agent in the Neotropical Region: Challenges and Potential In Horticultural Crops. In Tech Open, London. 171-185.

  25. Croft, B.A. and McGroarty, D.L. (1978). The role of Amblyseius fallacis in Michigan apple orchards. Wiley Interscience, New York. 

  26. de Moura, A.P.,  Guimarães, J.A.,  da Costa, R.I.F.,  Brioso, P.S.T. (2015). Species of Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) associated to trellised tomato crops in two cities of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Brazil. Agricultural Entomology. 82(0). DOI: 10.1590/1808-1657000412013.

  27. Dehghan, M.S., Allahyari, H., Saboori, A., Nowzari, J., Naveh, V.H. (2009). Fitness of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) on different soybean cultivars: Biology and fertility life-tables. International Journal of Acarology. 35: 341-347.

  28. Dresner, E. (1949). Culture and use of entomogenous fungi for the control of insects. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 15(6): 319-335. 

  29. Farkas, J., Sebesta, K., Horska, K., Samek, Z., Dolejs, L. and Sorm, F. (1969). The structure of exotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis var. gelechiae. Collection of Czechoslovak Communications.  34: 1118-1120. 

  30. Fasulo, T.R. and Denmark, H.A. (2003). Two-spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Arachnida: Acari: Tetranychidae). University of Florida. IFSA Extension. EENY150/IN307, 1-4.

  31. Flechtmann, C.H.W. and Etienne, J. (2004). The red palm mite, Raoiella indica Hirst, a threat to palms in the Americas (Acari: Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology. 9(31): 109-110.

  32. Follet, P.A. and Duan, J.J. (2000). Parasitoid Drift in Hawaiian Pentatomids. In: Non-target Effects of Biological Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherland.

  33. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations (FAO). (2017). Plant Health and Security. International Plant Protection Convention.

  34. Freire, C. (2014). The role of agriculture in closing development gaps LCD’s. Policy papers on countries with special needs. CSN/14/01. 1-36. 

  35. Gangwar, K.R. (2017). Role of Biological Control Agents in Integrated Pest Management Approaches. Acta Scientific Agriculture. 1: 9-11.

  36. Ghosh, S.K. (2011). Role of Biological Control in Conserving Biodiversity. Loss of Biodiversity and its Ethical Implications. 101.

  37. Githae, W.E. and Kuria, K.E. (2021). Biological control of desert locust (Schistocera gregaria Forskal). CAB Reviews. 16(13).

  38. Hassan, A.E.M. and Charnley, A.K. (1989). Ultrastrucural study of the penetration by Metarhizium anisopliae through Dimilin affected cuticle of Manduca sexta. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 54(1): 117-124. 

  39. Hassanpour, M., Nouri- Ganbalani, G., Mohaghegh, J. and Enkegaard,  A. (2009). Functional response of different larval instars of the green lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), to the two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 7(2): 424-428.

  40. Helle, W. and Sabelies, M.W. (1985). Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol1. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

  41. Herron, G., Edge, V. and Rophalia, J. (1993). Clofentezine and hexythiazox resistance in Tetranychus urticae Koch in Australia. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 17(6): 433-440.

  42. Hoy, M. (1986). Use of genetic improvement in biological control. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 15(2-3): 109-119.

  43. Hull, L. (1977). The mite searching ability of Stethorus punctum within an apple orchard. Environmental Entomology. 6(5): 684-688.

  44. Hull, L.A., Asquith, D. and Mowery, P.D. (1976). Distribution of Stethorus punctum in relation to densities of European red mite. Environmental Entomology. 5(2): 337-342.

  45. Janssen, A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M. and Sabelis, M.W. (1998). Behavior and indirect interactions in food webs of plants inhabiting arthropods. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 22(9): 497-521.

  46. Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. (1975). Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 

  47. Johnson, D.T. and Croft, B.A. (1976). Laboratory study of the dispersal behavior of Amblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Annual Review of Entomology. 69(6): 1019-1023.

  48. Joshi, L., Charnley, A.K., Arnold, G., Brain, P., Bateman, R.P. (1992). Synergism between entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium species and the benzoylurea insecticide, teflubenzuron, against the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Proceedings -Brighton Crop Protection Conference. Pests and Diseases. 1: 369-374.

  49. Kamal, R., Gusain, S.Y., Kumar, V., Sharma, K.A. (2015). Disease management through biological control agents: An eco- friendly and cost-effective approach for sustainable agriculture- A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(1): 37-45.

  50. Kane, E.C. and Ochoa, R. (2006). Detection and Identification of the Red Palm Mite Raoiella indica Hirst (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland.

  51. Kane, E.C., Ochoa, R., Mathurin, G. and Erbe, E.F. (2005). Raoiella indica Hirst (Acari: Tenuipalpidae. An island-hopping mite pest in the Caribbean In Abstracts, ESA meeting. Fort Lauderdale, USA.  

  52. Kooyman, C. (2003). Report of the Workshop on the Use of Green Muscle (Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum) and Desert Locust adult pheromone (Phenylacetonitrile: PAN) to Control Desert Locust Hopper Bands. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Port Sudan. 1-31.

  53. Langewald, J., Kooyman, C., Douro-Kpindou, O., Lomer, C.J., Dahmoud, A.O., Mohamed, H.O. (1997). Field treatment of desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskal) hoppers in Mauritania  using an oil formulation of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium flavoviride. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 7(4): 603-612.

  54. Lecoq, M., Cease, A. (2022). What Have We Learned after Millennia of Locust Invasions? Agronomy. 12(2): 472.

  55. Lecoq, M. (2001). Recent progress in Desert and Migratory Locust management in Africa. Are preventative actions possible, Journal of Orthoptera Research. 10(2): 277-291.

  56. Lee, B.G., Grimscom, S.B., Lee, J.S., Choi, H.J., Koh, C.H., Luoma, S.N. and Fisher, N.S. (2000). Influences of dietary uptake and reactive sulfides metal bioavailability from aquatic sediments. Science. 287: 282-284.

  57. Lester, P.J., Thistlewood, H.M.A., Marshall, D.B. and Harmsen, R. (1999). Assessment of Amblyseius fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for biological control of tetranychid mites in an Ontario peach orchard. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 23(12): 995-1009.

  58. Lomer, C.J., Bateman, R.P., Johnson, D.L., Langewald. J., Thomas, M. (2001). Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annual Review of Entomology. 46(1): 667-702.

  59. Mahmood, I., Imadi, S.R., Shazadi, K., Gul, A., Hakeem, K.R. (2016). Effects of Pesticides on Environment In Plant, soil and microbes. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.

  60. Maina, U.M., Sastawa, B.M., and Lawan, M. (2014). A survey on the incidence of red spider mite (Tetranychus spp) around the Lake Chad Shore Area of Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 7: 1-4.

  61. Makal, A., Banerjee, A., Roy, A., Hazra, S., Polley, K. (2017). Issues and Problems in Agricultural Development: A Study on the Farmers of West Bengal In Bhui, S., Das, MS and Coomar, PC Development among the Tribal and Minority Societies. Gyan Publishing House, New Delhi.

  62. McMurtry, J.A., Sourassou, N.F. and Demite, P. (2015). The Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) as biological control agents In Prospects for Biological Control of Plant Feeding Mites and Other Harmful Organisms. Progress in Biological Control, Vol 19 Springer, Cham.

  63. Miller, G.T. (2004). Sustaining the Earth. 6th edn., Thompson Learning Inc. Pacific Grove, California.

  64. Miraglia, M., Marvin, H., Kleter, G., Battilani, P., Brera, C., Coni, E., Cubadda, F., Croci, L., De Santis, B., Dekkers, S. (2009). Climate change and food safety: An emerging issue with special focus on Europe. Food Chemical Toxicology. 47(5): 1009-1021.

  65. Mohamed, M.M., Elshafie, H.A., Bashir, M.O. (2011). Use of teflubenzuron alone and combined with Metarhizium anisopliae and Phenylacetonitrile as control agent against the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Orthoptera: acrididae). Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 2(9): 1293-1303.

  66. Mohd-Salleh, M.B., Beegle, C.C. and Lewis, L.C. (1980). Fermentation media and production of exotoxin by three varieties of Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 35: 75-83.

  67. Montasser, A.A., Taha, M.A., Hanafy, A.R.I., Hassan, M.G. (2010). Biology and control of the broad mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks, 1904) (Acari: Tarsonemidae). International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (IJESE)  1: 26-34.

  68. Moore, D., Reed, M., Le Patourel, G., Abraham, Y.J., Prior, C. (1992). Reduction of feeding by the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, after infection with Metarhizium flavoviride. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 60(3): 304-307.

  69. Parveen, S., Ramaraju, K. and Jeyarani, S. (2021). Entomopathogenic  fungal screening against two spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch in tomato and broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) in Chilli. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 488-492.

  70. Parvin, M. and Haque, M.M. (2008). Control of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) by predators on potted plants. Department of Zoology, University of Rjshahi, Bangladesh. 27: 51-54.

  71. Peña, J.E., Bruin, J. and Sabelis, M.W. (2012). Biology and control of the red palm mite, Raoiella indica: An introduction. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 57(3): 211-213.

  72. Penman, D.R., Wearing, C.H., Collyer, E., Thomas, W.P. (1979). The Role of Insecticide Resistant Phytoseiids in Integrated Mite Control in New Zealand. In Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic Press. 59-69. 

  73. Perring, T.M. and Farrar, C.A. (1986). Evaluation of acaricides for control of spider mites on cantaloupes. Insecticide and Acaricide Tests. Entomological Society of America, College Park, Maryland, USA. 11(1): 119-120.

  74. Polanczyk, R.A., Pratissoli, D. (2009). Biological control of agricultural pests: Principles and field applications. Revista Ceres. 56(4): 410-419.

  75. Praburaj, L. (2018). Role of agriculture in the economic development of a country. Shanlax International Journal of Commerce. 6(3): 1-5.

  76. Renkema, M.J., LeFors, A.J. and Johnson, D.T. (2017). First Report of broad mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on commercial strawberry in Florida. Florida Entomologist. 100(4): 804-806. 

  77. Rhodes, M.E. and Liburd, E.O. (2006). Evaluation of Predatory Mites and Acramite for Control of Twospotted Spider Mites in Strawberries in North Central Florida. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville. 99(4): 1291-1298.

  78. Robinson, D.E., Mansingh, A. and Dasgupta, T.P. (1999). Fate and transport of ethoprophos in the Jamaican environment. Sci. Total Environ. 237: 373-378.

  79. Robles-Acosta, I.N., Chacón-Hernández, Julio C., Torres-Acosta, Reyna I., Landeros-Flores, J., Vanoye-Eligio, V. (2019). Entomopathogenic Fungi as Biological Control Agents of Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Prostigmata: Eriophyidae) under Greenhouse Conditions. Florida Entomologist. 102(2): 303-308. 

  80. Rodrigues, V.C.J, Cosh, H.M.E. Raymond Hunt, E.R., de Moraes, J.G., Barroso, G., White, A.W. and Ochoa. R. (2020). Tracking Red Palm Mite Damage in the Western Hemisphere Invasion with Landsat Remote Sensing Data. Insects. 11(9): 627.

  81. Routray, S., Dey, D., Baral, S., Das, P.A., Mahantheshwara, B. (2016). Genetic improvement of natural enemies: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 37(4): 325-332.

  82. Roy, M., Brodeur, J. and Clourtier, C. (1999). Seasonal abundance of spider mites and their predators on red raspberry in Quebec. Environmental Entomology. 28(4): 735-747.

  83. Royalty, R.N., Hall, F.R. and Taylor, R.A.J. (1990). Effects of thuringiensin on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)  mortality, fecundity and feeding. Journal of Economic Entomology. 83(3): 792-798.

  84. Royalty, R.N., Hall, F.R. and Taylor, R.A.J. (1991). Effects of thuringiensin on European red mite (Acarina: Tetranychidae) mortality, oviposition rate and feeding. Journal of Economic Entomology. 33(3): 383-391.

  85. Sebesta, K., Farkas, J., Horská, K. and Vankova, J. (1981). Thuringiensin, the Beta-exotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensin In: Microbial Control of Plant Pests and Diseases. Academic Press, London. 249-277. 

  86. Seyoum, E., Moore, D. and Charnley, A.K. (1994). Reduction in flight activity and food consumption by the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria Forskål (Orth., Cyrtacanthacrinae), after infection with Metarhizium flavoviride. Journal of Applied Entomology. 118(1-5): 310-315.

  87. Sharma, A., Diwevidi, V.D., Singh, S., Pawar, K.K., Jerman, M., Singh, L.B., Singh, S., Srivastawa, D. (2013). Biological Control and its Important in Agriculture. International Journal of Biotechnology and Biotechnology and Bioengineering Research. 4: 175-180. 

  88. Sheppard, A.W., Paynter, Q., Mason, P., Murphy, S., Stoett, P., Cowan, P., Brodeur, J., Warner, K., Villegas, C., Shaw, R., Hinz, H., Hill, M., Genovesi, P. (2019). IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group In the Application of Biological Control for the Management of Established Invasive Alien Species Causing Environmental Impacts. 91.

  89. Stoner, K. (1998). Approaches to the biological control of insects. Ellsworth: University of Maine Cooperative Extension.

  90. Takafuzi, A., Ozawa, A., Nemoto, H. and Gotoh, T. (2000). Spider mites of Japan: Their biology and control. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 24(5): 319-335.

  91. Tamai, M.A., Alves, N.B., de Almeida, J.E.M., Faion, M. (2002). Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi for control of Tetranychus urticae Koch. (Acari: Tetranychidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. 69(3): 77-84.

  92. Tehri, K., Gulati, R., Geroh, M. (2014). Host plant responses, biotic stress and management strategies for the control of Tetranychus Urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Agricultural Reviews. 35(4): 250-260.

  93. Tudi, M., Ruan, D.H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Sadler, R., Connell, D., Chu, C., Phung, D.T. (2021). Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(3): 1112.

  94. Van Driesche, R.G., Lyon, S., Sanderson, J.P., Bennett, K.C., Stanek, E.J., Zhang, R.T. (2008). Greenhouse trials of Aphidius Colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) banker plants for control of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouse spring floral crops. Florida Entomologist. 91(4): 583-591.

  95. Van Lenteren, J.C., Vanda, H.P., Bueno, M.G.L. and Colmenarez, Y. (2019). Biological Control in Latin America and the Caribbean: Its Rich History and Bright Future. CABI. Vol 12.  

  96. Van Maanen, R., Vila, E., Sabelis, M.W., Janssen, A. (2010). Biological control of broad mites (Polyphagotarsonemus latus) with the generalist predator Amblyseius swirskii. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 52(1): 29-34. 

  97. Vanoye-Eligio V., Barrientos-Lozano, L., Mora-Olivo, A., Sánchez- Ramos, G., Chacón-Hernández, J.C. (2017). Spatial heterogeneity of Anastrepha ludens populations over a large citrus region including a sterile insect release area in northeastern Mexico. Precision Agriculture. 18(5): 843-858. 

  98. Vargas, R., Chapman, B. and Penman, D.R. (2001). Toxicity of thuringiensin on immature and adult stages of Tetranychus urticae Koch and Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Agricultural Technology. 61: 3-14.

  99. Viteri Jumbo, L.O., Teodoro, A.V., Rêgo, A.S., Haddi, K., Galvão, A.S., de Oliveira, E.E. (2019). The lacewing Ceraeochrysa caligata as a potential biological agent for controlling the red palm mite Raoiella indica. Peer J. 7: e7123.

  100. Waage J.K, Greathead D.J. (1988). Biological control: Challenges and opportunities. Philos Transac Royal Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 318(1189): 111-128.

  101. Wekesa, V.W., Maniania, N.K., Knapp, M., Boga, H.I. (2006). Effects of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae to the tobacco spider mite Tetranychus evansi. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 36(1): 41-50.

  102. Wright, D.E. (1986). Damage and loss in yield of wheat crops caused by the Australian plague locust, Chortoicetes terminifera (Walker). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 26(5): 613-618.

  103. Xu, C., Liu, S., Xu, R., Chen, J., Qiao, H., Jin, H., Lin, C., Guo, K., Cheng, H. (2014). Investigation of production status in major wolfberry producing areas of China and some suggestions. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 39(11): 1979-1984.

  104. Yong-Heon, K. (2002). Control of two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus Urticae) by predatory mite (Phytoseilus persimilis). National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. 

  105. Zannou, I.D., Negloh, K., Hanna, R., Houadakpode, S., Sabelis, M.W. (2010). Mite diversity in coconut habitat in West and East Africa in International Congress of Acarology. 18: 295.

  106. Zhang, L., Lecoq, M., Latchininsky, A., Hunter, D. M. (2019). Locusts and Grasshopper Management. Annual Review of Entomology. 64(1): 15-34.

  107. Zimmermann, G. (1993). The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae and its potential as a biocontrol agent. Pesticide Science. 37(4): 375-379.

Editorial Board

View all (0)