Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 43 issue 2 (june 2022) : 260-263

Indigestible Foreign Bodies in the Rumen-reticulum of Cattle Slaughtered at Batna Slaughterhouse, Algeria: A Postmortem Study

Rouabah Zahra, Tlidjane Madjid, Hafid Nadia
1Department of Veterinary, Laboratory of Environmental Health and Animal Production, University Hadj Lakhder Batna1, 05000 Algeria.
Cite article:- Zahra Rouabah, Madjid Tlidjane, Nadia Hafid (2022). Indigestible Foreign Bodies in the Rumen-reticulum of Cattle Slaughtered at Batna Slaughterhouse, Algeria: A Postmortem Study. Agricultural Reviews. 43(2): 260-263. doi: 10.18805/ag.RF-222.
Background: To determine the prevalence of indigestible foreign bodies in rumen-reticulum of cattle. Identify the types and the common diseases associated with their occurrence. 289 cattle were examined at Batna (Algeria) municipal abattoir.
Methods: About 289 cattle were examined immediately after slaughtering to determine the presence or absence of the foreign bodies in their rumen-reticulum and different lesions were recorded.
Result: From total of 289 cattle examined 151 (52.24%) were found positive for various types of foreign bodies in their rumen and/or reticulum. From each 56 (19.37%) and 95 (52.24%) were positive for vulnerable bodies and non-vulnerable foreign bodies respectively. The types of foreign bodies detected were: wire segments, needles, nails, hair clips, coins, corks, ropes, cloth, pebbles, sand, glass pieces, trichobezoar, plastic bags. The plastics were the most common found in 61 (23.92%) males and 34 (79.06%) females. The most common lesions in rumen of cattle with Foreign bodies were traumatic reticuloperitonitis, perirecticular abscess, esophageal obstruction, non penetrating reticulum and/or ruminal foreign bodies were respectively 3.79%, 12.65%, 1.26% and 82.27%. The study revealed that the plastics in rumen my play an important role in the pathologenesis of cattle.

  1. Abu-Seida, A.M. (2016). Current status and prospect of ultrasonographic application in buffaloes. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 11: 144-157.

  2. Akinbobola, J.S., Omeje, J.N., Akinbobola, R.I., Ayoade, R.I., Ajagbe, O.A., Okaiyeto, S.O. (2016). Prevalence of indigestible foreign bodies in the rumen of cattle slaughtered at Gwagwalada Abattoir, Abuja, Nigeria. International Journal of Livestock Research. 6(6): 25-31.

  3. Aref, N.M. and Abdel-Hakiem, M.A.H. (2013). Clinical and diagnostic methods for evaluation of sharp foreign body syndrome in buffaloes. Veterinary World. 6(9): 586-591.

  4. Bakhiet, N.O. (2008). Studies on the rumen pathology of Sudanese desert sheep in slaughter house. Sudan Sheep. Scientific Research and Essay. 3(7): 294-298.

  5. Bhatt, R.H., Jingesh, B.P., Nisha, J. (2011). Surgical management of ruminal impaction due to non-penetrating foreign body syndrome in Kankrej cattle. International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Medical Sciences. 5: 477-480.

  6. Braun, U., Lejeune, B., Schweizer, G., Puorger, M. and Ehrensperger, F. (2007). Clinical findings in 28 cattle with traumatic pericarditis. The Veterinary Record. 161: 558-563. 

  7. Tesfaye, D., Diriba, D., Birhanu, M and Amene, F. (2012).The Problem of environmental pollution as reflected in the fore stomach of cattle: A postmortem study in eastern Ethiopia. Global Journal of Environmental Research. 6 (2): 61-65.

  8. Fraser, A.F. and Broom, D.M. (1990). Farm Animal Behavior and Welfare 3rd ed, ELBS Bailliere Tindall, London. pp. 318-322.

  9. Ghurashi, M.A.H., Seri, H.I., Bakheit, A.H. and Ashwag, E.A.M. (2009). Effect of surgical removal of foreign body from goat’s rumen with special reference to the prevalence of foreign body in goats in Southern Darfur. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 3(2): 664-668.

  10. Hailat, N., Al-Darraji, A., Lafi, S., Barakat, S.A.F., Al-Ani, F., El- Magrhaby, H., Al-Qudah, K., Gharaibeh, S., Rousan, M., Al-Smadi, M. (1998). Pathology of the rumen in goats caused by plastic foreign bodies with reference to its prevalence in Jordan. Small Ruminant Research. 30: 77-83.

  11. Hailat, N., Nouh, S., AI-Darraji, A., Lafi, S., Al-Ani, F., Al-Majali, A. (1996). Prevalence and pathology of foreign bodies (plastics) in Awassi Sheep in Jordan. Small Ruminant Research. 24: 43-48.

  12. Hussain, S.A. and Uppal, S.K. (2012). Rumen impaction in buffaloes a haemato-biochemical study. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 82(4): 369-373.

  13. Igbokwe, I.O., Koloand, M.Y., Egwu, G.O. (2003). Rumen impaction in sheep with indigestible foreign body in the semi arid region of Nigeria. Small Ruminant Research. 49: 141-147.

  14. Jan, M.K., Glulam, H., Mohammad, M.S. (1999). Prevalence of foreign indigestible materials in the reticulo-rumen of adult buffaloes. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 19(4): 176-180.

  15. Kassahu, B. and Wale, T. (2017). Study on rumen and reticulium foreign bodies in cattle slauthered at Wolaita Sodo municipal Abattoir, Ethoipia. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research. 4(1): 11-19.

  16. Khurshaid, A., Ikhwan, K., Asim, A., Muhammad, M., Anwarud, D., Yasir, A., Zubair, A. (2013). Prevalence of indigestible rumen and reticulum foreign bodies in Achai cattle at different regions of Khyber pakhtunkhwa, ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 8(8): 580-586.

  17. Majali, A., Hailat, N., Nouh, S. and AL-Ani, F. (1995). Dismacement of abomasum in cattle: diagnosis and treatment. Al-Tabib AlBairati. 11: 61-64.

  18. Maxie, G.M. (2007). Pathology of Domestic Animals 5th ed. USA: Elsevier, pp: 88-112.

  19. McCurin, D.M. and Basser, J.M. (2006). Clinical Text Book for Veterinary Technicians. 6th, Ed. Elsevier, pp: 224-244.

  20. Mekuanint, S., Alemneh, T., Asredie, T. (2017). Indigestible rumen foreign bodies- Causes of rumen impaction in cattle, sheep and goats slaughtered at Addis Ababa Abattoir Enterprise, Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine. 5(1): 5.

  21. Misk, N.A., Nigam, J.M., Rifat, J.F. (1984). Management of foreign body syndrome in Iraqi cattle. Agri Practice. 5: 19-21.

  22. Misk, N., Semieka, M., Ali, S. (2001). Varieties and sequelae of ingested foreign bodies in buffalo and cattle. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal. 46: 250-273.

  23. Mohammed, A., Bakhiet, O., Hayder, A. (2006). Retrospective study on the prevalence of foreign body in goat’s Rumen: Omdurman Province, Khartoum State, Sudan (1998-2002). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 5: 449-451.

  24. Mushonga, B., Habarugira, G., Musabyemungu, A., Udahemuka, J.C., Jaja F.I., Pepe. D., (2015). Investigations of foreign bodies in the fore-stomach of cattle at Ngoma Slaughterhouse, Rwanda. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. 86(1): Art. #1233, 6 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jsava. v86i1.1233.

  25. Negash, S., Sibhat, B., Sheferaw, D. (2015). A postmortem study on indigestible foreign bodies in the rumen and reticulum of ruminants, eastern Ethiopia, Onderstepoort. Journal of Veterinary Research. 82(1): 881.

  26. Ngoshe, A. (2012). Incidence of polythene bag ingestion by ruminant animals at Maiduguri central abattoir. Ramat Journal for Management Science and Technology. 1(4): 12-16. 

  27. Otesile, E.B. and Obasaju, M.F. (1982). Relationship between age and rostral teeth development in Nigerian goats, in Proc. 3rd Inter. Conf. on Goat Production and Disease, University of Arizona, vol. 10-15, pp. 349.

  28. Remi-Adewunmi, B.D., Gyang, E.O. and Osinowo A.O. (2004). Abattoir survey of foreign body rumen impaction in small ruminants. Nigerian Veterinary Journal. 25: 32-38.

  29. Rajput, P.K., Parikh, P.V., Parmar, J.J., Mehta, T.A. and Patil, D.B. (2018). Studies on foreign body syndrome in bovines of Anand district of Gujarat. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52: 744-749.

  30. Rouabah, Z., Tlidjane, M., Safsaf, B., Mallem, M. and Meziane, T. (2017). Hemato-biochemical profile in cattle with rumen impaction. Global Veterinaria. 18(4): 250-255.

  31. Semieka, M.A. (2010). Radiography of unusual foreign body in ruminants. Veterinary World. 13: 473-475. 

  32. Sheferaw, D., Fikreysus, G., Metenyelesh, A., Tesfaye, D. and Ethana, D. (2014). Ingestion of indigestible foreign materials by free grazing ruminants in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 46: 247-250.

  33. Tesfaye, D. and Mersha, C. (2012). Study on Rumen and Reticulum Foreign Bodies in Cattle Slaughtered at Jimma Municipal Abattoir, South West Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 7(4): 160-167.

  34. Tyagi, R.S. and Singh, J. (1993). Hernia Ruminant’s Surgery. 1st ed. New Delhi, India: CBS publishers and Distributors, pp: 225-237.

  35. Vanitha, V., Nambi, A.P., Gowri, B. and Karitha, S. (2010). Rumen impaction in cattle with indigestible foreign bodies in Chennai. Tamil Nadu Journal Veterinary and Animal Science. 6 (3): 138-140.

Editorial Board

View all (0)