The global restriction of antibiotic use in poultry production has driven the search for effective alternatives. Bacteriophages, viruses that specifically infect bacteria, are gaining attention as promising feed additives due to their safety, specificity and antimicrobial efficacy. This review outlines the biological characteristics of bacteriophages, their applications in poultry for therapy, food safety, disinfection and performance enhancement. It also discusses current research findings, potential commercial products and challenges related to phage resistance and gut microbiota interaction. Bacteriophages show promise as alternatives to antibiotics, but further research on stability, dosage and resistance mechanisms is essential for widespread use.

Poultry plays a significant role in generating income and providing livelihood to millions of farmers in India. As per 20th Livestock Census, poultry population in India was 851.81 million (BAHS, 2019). In India, the meat production from poultry was 4.995 million tonnes and egg production were 138.38 billion during year 2022-23 (BAHS, 2023). Poultry meat and eggs are important sources of nutrients, contributing significantly to human nutrition. The uses of in-feed antibiotics in chickens are aimed at improving production performance, controlling enteric diseases and reducing the production cost (Eid et al., 2020). However, the use of antibiotics as growth promoters have been associated with antibiotic residues in animal products leading to bacterial resistance to these drugs, posing a global health challenge (Anee et al., 2021). Now days, there is increasing health awareness, consumers are demanding high-quality, safe and nutritious food products. In light of this, several alternatives have been studied recently to replace antibiotic growth promoters in chickens to improve growth performance, product quality and health (Gosai et al., 2023; Qiu et al., 2023). Bacteriophage as a newer feed additive in chickens has been investigated as an alternative to replace antibiotic growth promoters (Shaufi et al., 2024).
       
Bacteriophages have been studied as a viable alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. This review discusses the biological mechanisms, applications and advantages of bacteriophages in poultry farming.
       
This review was prepared through a systematic evaluation of published literature retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. Keywords including bacteriophage, phage therapy, poultry, broiler, layer, feed additive and antibiotic alternative were used. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 focusing on poultry performance, gut health, immunity, pathogen reduction and food safety were included.

Bacteriophages: Biology and mechanism of action
 
Bacteriophages are bacteria-infecting viruses which multiply in a specific bacterial host. They are ubiquitous and classified into two categories: virulent and temperate. Discovered independently by Frederick Twort (1915) and Felix d’Herelle (1917), with an estimated global population of 1031 particles (Kazi and Annapure, 2016). They are naturally present in water, soil, plants and even the human gut microbiome.

Phages are categorized into two main types based on their life cycles:
 
1. Lytic (Virulent) Phages: These infect bacteria, replicate inside and subsequently lyse the bacterial cell to release new phages (Loc-Carrillo and Abedon,2011).
 
2. Lysogenic (Temperate) Phages: These integrate their DNA into the host bacterial genome, remaining dormant until triggered to enter the lytic cycle (Shaufi et al., 2024).
       
Lytic phages, due to their ability to destroy bacterial cells, are considered for therapeutic use in livestock production.

Application of bacteriophages in poultry production
 
Bacteriophages are being explored as a novel feed additive in poultry to address various challenges such as bacterial infections and food contamination. Their main applications are categorized into the following:
 
Phage therapy in poultry disease management
 
Phage therapy utilizes bacteriophages to target and eliminate bacterial pathogens like Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, which are of zoonotic concern (Wernicki et al., 2017). Lytic phages, with their specific host-targeting abilities, offer an advantage over antibiotics, which indiscriminately kill both harmful and beneficial bacteria (Abedon et al., 2017).
       
In a european food safety authority (EFSA) report, campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis and shiga toxin-producing E. coli infections were the most common zoonotic diseases linked to poultry (EFSA, 2019). Bacteriophage therapy has shown efficacy in reducing these bacterial pathogens in poultry, mitigating risks to public health (Dlamini et al., 2023).
       
Phages have been used experimentally to control diseases such as necrotic enteritis, salmonellosis and colibacillosis. Targeted phage therapy can lower pathogen loads in the gastrointestinal tract, reduce mortality and minimize economic losses due to infectious outbreaks (Sarrami et al., 2022).
 
Bacteriophage as a feed additive
 
Recent studies demonstrate that bacteriophages can be administered as a feed additive to improve growth performance, modulate gut microbiota and reduce pathogen loads in poultry (Shaufi et al., 2023; Huff et al., 2002). For example, Upadhaya et al., (2021) found that bacteriophage supplementation enhanced broiler weight gain and positively impacted the gut microbiome, particularly increasing the relative abundance of Lactobacillus.
 
Food biocontrol and decontamination
 
Bacteriophages are used as bio-preservatives to reduce bacterial contamination in meat products. Commercial products like ListShield™ and Listex™ have been developed to target Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods (Bigot et al., 2018). Phage-based treatments can decontaminate poultry carcasses without affecting the organoleptic properties of the food. Phages also serve as disinfectants in hatcheries and transport systems, reducing surface contamination and biofilm formation (Atterbury et al., 2003). Commercial phage-based sprays have shown efficacy in reducing surface contamination without altering the product’s quality or appearance (Garcia et al., 2008).
 
Advantages of bacteriophages over antibiotics
 
Phages offer several advantages over traditional antibiotics:
High specificity: Phages target specific bacterial strains without disturbing the host’s beneficial microbiota (Wernicki et al., 2017).
•​  Reduced resistance development: Phage cocktails can be designed to minimize the risk of bacterial resistance (Allen et al., 2013).
•​ Safety and tolerability: Bacteriophages do not replicate in animal cells, ensuring minimal toxicity or side effects (Pirnay et al., 2011).
•​  Self-replicating: Amplifies at the site of infection,sustaining its activity naturally (Upadhaya et al., 2021).
•​  Low risk of dysbiosis: Unlike antibiotics, does not disrupt gut microbial balance (Shaufi et al., 2024; Huff et al., 2010; Waseh et al., 2010).
•​  Minimal environmental impact: No chemical residues; does not contribute to environmental pollution (Kazi and Annapure, 2016).
•​  Versatile applications: Used in feed, water, sprays and as surface sanitizers (Dlamini et al., 2023).
 
Challenges and Limitations
 
Despite their potential, several challenges limit the widespread adoption of bacteriophages in poultry production:
•​  Bacterial Resistance: Bacteria may develop resistance to specific phages, although this can be mitigated by using phage cocktails.
•​  Stability and Storage: Phage viability may be compromised under extreme storage conditions, requiring careful formulation and preservation (Burrowes et al., 2011).
•​  Regulatory Hurdles: The use of bacteriophages in food production is subject to stringent regulatory approval processes, which vary across regions (Garcia et al., 2008).
•​  Immune neutralization: Host immune system may inactivate phages before they act (Kazi and Annapure, 2016).
•​  Risk of horizontal gene transfer: Lysogenic phages can potentially spread antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) (Pirnay et al., 2011).
    Further research is needed to determine optimal dosing strategies, administration methods and long-term impacts of bacteriophage use in poultry.
 
Recent research findings
 
Several recent studies provide promising insights into the use of bacteriophages in poultry farming:
•  Upadhaya et al., (2021) reported that supplementation of a bacteriophage cocktail (0.05%) significantly improved body weight gain and feed conversion ratio in broiler chickens, with performance comparable to antibiotic growth promoters. The same study also observed increased populations of beneficial Lactobacillus species in the gut.
•  Shaufi et al., (2024) found that broilers fed diets supple- mented with phage cocktails exhibited improved growth performance and enhanced gut microbial diversity. Further research by Shaufi et al., (2024) demonstrated synergistic effects when bacteriophages were combined with probiotics, resulting in better feed efficiency and intestinal health.
•  Dlamini et al., (2023) evaluated encapsulated Salmonella- specific bacteriophages and observed a significant reduction in intestinal Salmonella counts, along with improved intestinal histomorphology and meat quality traits, although growth responses varied with dosage.
•  Sarrami et al., (2022) reported enhanced immune response markers and modulation of gut health-related gene expression in broilers receiving bacteriophage supple-mentation.
•  Phage-based interventions have also shown effectiveness in reducing Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli colonization in poultry, thereby lowering zoonotic risk and    improving food safety (Wernicki et al., 2017; Atterbury et al., 2003; Clavijo  et al., 2018).
•  These findings suggest that bacteriophage therapy can effectively substitute for antibiotics as a growth promoter in poultry, offering an eco-friendly and safe alternative.
 
Future prospects
 
Despite encouraging results, phage therapy in poultry remains an emerging field. Research is ongoing to:
•  Optimize phage dose, frequency and administration methods.
•  Develop stable, commercial-grade phage formulations.
•  Combine phages with other feed additives (e.g., probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes) for synergistic benefits (Asrore  et al., 2023).
•   Study long-term effects on antibiotic resistance genes and microbiome composition (Shaufi et al., 2024).
Bacteriophages represent a promising, targeted and eco-friendly alternative to antibiotics in poultry production. They have shown significant potential in improving growth performance, enhancing disease resistance and ensuring food safety. Despite initial skepticism, numerous studies have demonstrated their effectiveness, especially in the context of rising multidrug resistance. However, challenges such as narrow host range, potential for resistance development and regulatory complexities remain. Continued research is essential to address these limitations, particularly in understanding phage-bacterium interactions, determining optimal dosages and exploring the influence of diet composition on phage efficacy. With more studies and better understanding, bacteriophages could become an important part of poultry health management.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abedon, S.T., García, P., Mullany, P. and Aminov, R. (2017). Editorial: Phage therapy: Past, present and future. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 981.

  2. Allen, H.K., Trachsel, J., Looft, T. and Casey, T.A. (2013). Finding alternatives to antibiotics: Understanding the effects of antimicrobial resistance and persistence in bacterial populations. Frontiers in Microbiology. 4: 96. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096.

  3. Anee, I.J., Alam, S., Begum, R.A., Shahjahan, R.M. and Khandaker, A.M. (2021). The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology. 82(1): 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-021-00237-z.

  4. Asrore, M.S., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Hun, T.G., Omar, A.R., Ming, G.H. and Ho, Y.W. (2023). Effects of phage cocktail, probiotics and their combination on growth performance and gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Animals. 13(8): 1328. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani13081328.

  5. Atterbury, R.J., Connerton, P.L., Dodd, C.E.R., Rees, C.E.D. and Connerton, I.F. (2003). Application of host-specific bacteriophages to the surface of chicken skin leads to a reduction in recovery of Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69(10): 6302-6306. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.69.10.6302-6306.2003.

  6. BAHS. (2019). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India. https:// dahd.nic.in/documents/statistics/livestock-census.

  7. BAHS. (2023). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India. https:// dahd.nic.in/sites/default/filess/BAHS2023.pdf.

  8. Bigot, B., Lee, W.J., McIntyre, L., Wilson, T., Hudson, J.A., Billington, C. and Heinemann, J.A. (2018). Control of Listeria monocytogenes growth by virulent bacteriophages in ready-to-eat foods. Food Microbiology. 76: 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm. 2018.06.005.

  9. Burrowes, B., Harper, D.R. anderson, J., McConville, M. and Enright, M.C. (2011). Bacteriophage therapy: Potential uses in the control of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 9(9): 775-785. https://doi.org/ 10.1586/eri.11.90.

  10. Clavijo, V. and Flórez, M.J.V. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5: 262.

  11. Dlamini, S.B., Mnisi, C.M., Ateba, C.N., Egbu, C.F. and Mlambo, V. (2023). In-feed Salmonella-specific phages alter the physiology, intestinal histomorphology and carcass and meat quality parameters in broiler chickens. Scientific African. 21: e01756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01756.

  12. EFSA and ECDC. (2019). The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA Journal. 17(12): e05926. https:// doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926.

  13. Eid, S., El Atfehy, N.M., Amer, F., Tolba, H.N. and Hamed, R.I. (2020). Prevention of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens by prebiotics and probiotics vs control by antibiotics: In vivo study. Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences. 64(1): 143-151. https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.100845.

  14. García, P., Martínez, B., Obeso, J.M. and Rodríguez, A. (2008). Bacterio- phages and their application in food safety. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 47(6): 479-485. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02458.x.

  15. Górski, A., Miêdzybrodzki, R. and Borysowski, J., et al. (2012). Phage as a modulator of immune responses: Practical implications for phage therapy. Advances in Virus Research. 83: 41-71.

  16. Gosai, A.S., Pawar, M.M., Patil, S.S., Ankuya, K.J., Srivastava, A.K. and Ashwar, B.K. (2023). Effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel powder supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and haemato-biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 93(5): 481-486.

  17. Huff, W.E., Huff, G.R., Rath, N.C., Balog, J.M. and Donoghue, A.M. (2002). Prevention of Escherichia coli respiratory infection in broiler chickens with bacteriophage. Poultry Science. 81(4): 437-441.

  18. Huff, W.E., Huff, G.R., Rath, N.C. and Donoghue, A.M. (2010). Immune interference of bacteriophage efficacy when treating coliba- cillosis in poultry. Poultry Science. 89(5): 895-900. https:// doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00558.

  19. Joerger, R.D. (2003). Alternatives to antibiotics: Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages. Poultry Science. 82(4): 640-647.

  20. Kazi, M. and Annapure, U.S. (2016). Bacteriophage biocontrol of food borne pathogens. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 53(3): 1355-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015- 2113-3.

  21. Loc-Carrillo, C. and Abedon, S.T. (2011). Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage. 1(2): 111-114.

  22. Pirnay, J.P., De Vos, D., Verbeken, G., Merabishvili, M., Chanishvili, N., Vaneechoutte, M. and Van Parys, L. (2011). The phage therapy paradigm: Prêt-à-porter or sur-mesure. Bacteriophage. 1(1): 5-15. https://doi.org/10.4161/bact. 1.1.14936.

  23. Qiu, K., Chen, Z., Zheng, A., Chang, W., Cai, H., Zhang, X. and Liu, G. (2023). Augmentation of performance, carcass trait, biochemical profile and lipid metabolism concerning the use of organic acidifier in broiler chickens. Agriculture. 13(9): 1765. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091765.

  24. Sarrami, Z., Sedghi, M., Mohammadi, I., Kim, W.K. and Mahdavi, A.H. (2022). Effects of bacteriophage supplement on the growth performance, microbial population and PGC-1á and TLR4 gene expressions of broiler chickens. Scientific Reports. 12(1): 14391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 022-18387-3.

  25. Shaufi, M.A.M., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Geok Hun, T., Omar, A.R., Han Ming, G. and Wan Ho, Y. (2023). Effects of phage cocktail, probiotics and their combination on growth performance and gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Animals. 13(8): 1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081328.

  26. Shaufi, M.A.M., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Tan, G.H., Omar, A.R. and Ho, Y.W. (2024). Multiple factorial analysis of growth performance and gut microbiota in broilers fed phage cocktail and probiotics. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 23(1): 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024. 2301564.

  27. Sillankorva, S., Oliveira, H. and Azeredo, J. (2012). Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. International Journal of Microbiology.  863945.

  28. Upadhaya, S.D., Ahn, J.M., Cho, J.H., Kim, J.Y., Kang, D.K., Kim, S.W. and Kim, I.H. (2021). Bacteriophage cocktail supplementation improves growth performance, gut microbiome and production traits in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 12: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104- 021-00563-4.

  29. Waseh, S., Hanifi-Moghaddam, P., Coleman, R., Masotti, M., Ryan, S., Foss, M. and Henry, M. (2010). Orally administered bacteriophages reduce Escherichia coli colonization in broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76(19): 6605-6611.

  30. Wernicki, A., Nowaczek, A. and Urban-Chmiel, R. (2017). Bacteriophage therapy to combat bacterial infections in poultry. Virology Journal. 14(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985- 017-0761-7.

The global restriction of antibiotic use in poultry production has driven the search for effective alternatives. Bacteriophages, viruses that specifically infect bacteria, are gaining attention as promising feed additives due to their safety, specificity and antimicrobial efficacy. This review outlines the biological characteristics of bacteriophages, their applications in poultry for therapy, food safety, disinfection and performance enhancement. It also discusses current research findings, potential commercial products and challenges related to phage resistance and gut microbiota interaction. Bacteriophages show promise as alternatives to antibiotics, but further research on stability, dosage and resistance mechanisms is essential for widespread use.

Poultry plays a significant role in generating income and providing livelihood to millions of farmers in India. As per 20th Livestock Census, poultry population in India was 851.81 million (BAHS, 2019). In India, the meat production from poultry was 4.995 million tonnes and egg production were 138.38 billion during year 2022-23 (BAHS, 2023). Poultry meat and eggs are important sources of nutrients, contributing significantly to human nutrition. The uses of in-feed antibiotics in chickens are aimed at improving production performance, controlling enteric diseases and reducing the production cost (Eid et al., 2020). However, the use of antibiotics as growth promoters have been associated with antibiotic residues in animal products leading to bacterial resistance to these drugs, posing a global health challenge (Anee et al., 2021). Now days, there is increasing health awareness, consumers are demanding high-quality, safe and nutritious food products. In light of this, several alternatives have been studied recently to replace antibiotic growth promoters in chickens to improve growth performance, product quality and health (Gosai et al., 2023; Qiu et al., 2023). Bacteriophage as a newer feed additive in chickens has been investigated as an alternative to replace antibiotic growth promoters (Shaufi et al., 2024).
       
Bacteriophages have been studied as a viable alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. This review discusses the biological mechanisms, applications and advantages of bacteriophages in poultry farming.
       
This review was prepared through a systematic evaluation of published literature retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. Keywords including bacteriophage, phage therapy, poultry, broiler, layer, feed additive and antibiotic alternative were used. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 focusing on poultry performance, gut health, immunity, pathogen reduction and food safety were included.

Bacteriophages: Biology and mechanism of action
 
Bacteriophages are bacteria-infecting viruses which multiply in a specific bacterial host. They are ubiquitous and classified into two categories: virulent and temperate. Discovered independently by Frederick Twort (1915) and Felix d’Herelle (1917), with an estimated global population of 1031 particles (Kazi and Annapure, 2016). They are naturally present in water, soil, plants and even the human gut microbiome.

Phages are categorized into two main types based on their life cycles:
 
1. Lytic (Virulent) Phages: These infect bacteria, replicate inside and subsequently lyse the bacterial cell to release new phages (Loc-Carrillo and Abedon,2011).
 
2. Lysogenic (Temperate) Phages: These integrate their DNA into the host bacterial genome, remaining dormant until triggered to enter the lytic cycle (Shaufi et al., 2024).
       
Lytic phages, due to their ability to destroy bacterial cells, are considered for therapeutic use in livestock production.

Application of bacteriophages in poultry production
 
Bacteriophages are being explored as a novel feed additive in poultry to address various challenges such as bacterial infections and food contamination. Their main applications are categorized into the following:
 
Phage therapy in poultry disease management
 
Phage therapy utilizes bacteriophages to target and eliminate bacterial pathogens like Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, which are of zoonotic concern (Wernicki et al., 2017). Lytic phages, with their specific host-targeting abilities, offer an advantage over antibiotics, which indiscriminately kill both harmful and beneficial bacteria (Abedon et al., 2017).
       
In a european food safety authority (EFSA) report, campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis and shiga toxin-producing E. coli infections were the most common zoonotic diseases linked to poultry (EFSA, 2019). Bacteriophage therapy has shown efficacy in reducing these bacterial pathogens in poultry, mitigating risks to public health (Dlamini et al., 2023).
       
Phages have been used experimentally to control diseases such as necrotic enteritis, salmonellosis and colibacillosis. Targeted phage therapy can lower pathogen loads in the gastrointestinal tract, reduce mortality and minimize economic losses due to infectious outbreaks (Sarrami et al., 2022).
 
Bacteriophage as a feed additive
 
Recent studies demonstrate that bacteriophages can be administered as a feed additive to improve growth performance, modulate gut microbiota and reduce pathogen loads in poultry (Shaufi et al., 2023; Huff et al., 2002). For example, Upadhaya et al., (2021) found that bacteriophage supplementation enhanced broiler weight gain and positively impacted the gut microbiome, particularly increasing the relative abundance of Lactobacillus.
 
Food biocontrol and decontamination
 
Bacteriophages are used as bio-preservatives to reduce bacterial contamination in meat products. Commercial products like ListShield™ and Listex™ have been developed to target Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods (Bigot et al., 2018). Phage-based treatments can decontaminate poultry carcasses without affecting the organoleptic properties of the food. Phages also serve as disinfectants in hatcheries and transport systems, reducing surface contamination and biofilm formation (Atterbury et al., 2003). Commercial phage-based sprays have shown efficacy in reducing surface contamination without altering the product’s quality or appearance (Garcia et al., 2008).
 
Advantages of bacteriophages over antibiotics
 
Phages offer several advantages over traditional antibiotics:
High specificity: Phages target specific bacterial strains without disturbing the host’s beneficial microbiota (Wernicki et al., 2017).
•​  Reduced resistance development: Phage cocktails can be designed to minimize the risk of bacterial resistance (Allen et al., 2013).
•​ Safety and tolerability: Bacteriophages do not replicate in animal cells, ensuring minimal toxicity or side effects (Pirnay et al., 2011).
•​  Self-replicating: Amplifies at the site of infection,sustaining its activity naturally (Upadhaya et al., 2021).
•​  Low risk of dysbiosis: Unlike antibiotics, does not disrupt gut microbial balance (Shaufi et al., 2024; Huff et al., 2010; Waseh et al., 2010).
•​  Minimal environmental impact: No chemical residues; does not contribute to environmental pollution (Kazi and Annapure, 2016).
•​  Versatile applications: Used in feed, water, sprays and as surface sanitizers (Dlamini et al., 2023).
 
Challenges and Limitations
 
Despite their potential, several challenges limit the widespread adoption of bacteriophages in poultry production:
•​  Bacterial Resistance: Bacteria may develop resistance to specific phages, although this can be mitigated by using phage cocktails.
•​  Stability and Storage: Phage viability may be compromised under extreme storage conditions, requiring careful formulation and preservation (Burrowes et al., 2011).
•​  Regulatory Hurdles: The use of bacteriophages in food production is subject to stringent regulatory approval processes, which vary across regions (Garcia et al., 2008).
•​  Immune neutralization: Host immune system may inactivate phages before they act (Kazi and Annapure, 2016).
•​  Risk of horizontal gene transfer: Lysogenic phages can potentially spread antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) (Pirnay et al., 2011).
    Further research is needed to determine optimal dosing strategies, administration methods and long-term impacts of bacteriophage use in poultry.
 
Recent research findings
 
Several recent studies provide promising insights into the use of bacteriophages in poultry farming:
•  Upadhaya et al., (2021) reported that supplementation of a bacteriophage cocktail (0.05%) significantly improved body weight gain and feed conversion ratio in broiler chickens, with performance comparable to antibiotic growth promoters. The same study also observed increased populations of beneficial Lactobacillus species in the gut.
•  Shaufi et al., (2024) found that broilers fed diets supple- mented with phage cocktails exhibited improved growth performance and enhanced gut microbial diversity. Further research by Shaufi et al., (2024) demonstrated synergistic effects when bacteriophages were combined with probiotics, resulting in better feed efficiency and intestinal health.
•  Dlamini et al., (2023) evaluated encapsulated Salmonella- specific bacteriophages and observed a significant reduction in intestinal Salmonella counts, along with improved intestinal histomorphology and meat quality traits, although growth responses varied with dosage.
•  Sarrami et al., (2022) reported enhanced immune response markers and modulation of gut health-related gene expression in broilers receiving bacteriophage supple-mentation.
•  Phage-based interventions have also shown effectiveness in reducing Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli colonization in poultry, thereby lowering zoonotic risk and    improving food safety (Wernicki et al., 2017; Atterbury et al., 2003; Clavijo  et al., 2018).
•  These findings suggest that bacteriophage therapy can effectively substitute for antibiotics as a growth promoter in poultry, offering an eco-friendly and safe alternative.
 
Future prospects
 
Despite encouraging results, phage therapy in poultry remains an emerging field. Research is ongoing to:
•  Optimize phage dose, frequency and administration methods.
•  Develop stable, commercial-grade phage formulations.
•  Combine phages with other feed additives (e.g., probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes) for synergistic benefits (Asrore  et al., 2023).
•   Study long-term effects on antibiotic resistance genes and microbiome composition (Shaufi et al., 2024).
Bacteriophages represent a promising, targeted and eco-friendly alternative to antibiotics in poultry production. They have shown significant potential in improving growth performance, enhancing disease resistance and ensuring food safety. Despite initial skepticism, numerous studies have demonstrated their effectiveness, especially in the context of rising multidrug resistance. However, challenges such as narrow host range, potential for resistance development and regulatory complexities remain. Continued research is essential to address these limitations, particularly in understanding phage-bacterium interactions, determining optimal dosages and exploring the influence of diet composition on phage efficacy. With more studies and better understanding, bacteriophages could become an important part of poultry health management.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abedon, S.T., García, P., Mullany, P. and Aminov, R. (2017). Editorial: Phage therapy: Past, present and future. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 981.

  2. Allen, H.K., Trachsel, J., Looft, T. and Casey, T.A. (2013). Finding alternatives to antibiotics: Understanding the effects of antimicrobial resistance and persistence in bacterial populations. Frontiers in Microbiology. 4: 96. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096.

  3. Anee, I.J., Alam, S., Begum, R.A., Shahjahan, R.M. and Khandaker, A.M. (2021). The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology. 82(1): 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-021-00237-z.

  4. Asrore, M.S., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Hun, T.G., Omar, A.R., Ming, G.H. and Ho, Y.W. (2023). Effects of phage cocktail, probiotics and their combination on growth performance and gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Animals. 13(8): 1328. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani13081328.

  5. Atterbury, R.J., Connerton, P.L., Dodd, C.E.R., Rees, C.E.D. and Connerton, I.F. (2003). Application of host-specific bacteriophages to the surface of chicken skin leads to a reduction in recovery of Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69(10): 6302-6306. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.69.10.6302-6306.2003.

  6. BAHS. (2019). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India. https:// dahd.nic.in/documents/statistics/livestock-census.

  7. BAHS. (2023). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India. https:// dahd.nic.in/sites/default/filess/BAHS2023.pdf.

  8. Bigot, B., Lee, W.J., McIntyre, L., Wilson, T., Hudson, J.A., Billington, C. and Heinemann, J.A. (2018). Control of Listeria monocytogenes growth by virulent bacteriophages in ready-to-eat foods. Food Microbiology. 76: 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm. 2018.06.005.

  9. Burrowes, B., Harper, D.R. anderson, J., McConville, M. and Enright, M.C. (2011). Bacteriophage therapy: Potential uses in the control of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 9(9): 775-785. https://doi.org/ 10.1586/eri.11.90.

  10. Clavijo, V. and Flórez, M.J.V. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5: 262.

  11. Dlamini, S.B., Mnisi, C.M., Ateba, C.N., Egbu, C.F. and Mlambo, V. (2023). In-feed Salmonella-specific phages alter the physiology, intestinal histomorphology and carcass and meat quality parameters in broiler chickens. Scientific African. 21: e01756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01756.

  12. EFSA and ECDC. (2019). The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA Journal. 17(12): e05926. https:// doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926.

  13. Eid, S., El Atfehy, N.M., Amer, F., Tolba, H.N. and Hamed, R.I. (2020). Prevention of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens by prebiotics and probiotics vs control by antibiotics: In vivo study. Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences. 64(1): 143-151. https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.100845.

  14. García, P., Martínez, B., Obeso, J.M. and Rodríguez, A. (2008). Bacterio- phages and their application in food safety. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 47(6): 479-485. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02458.x.

  15. Górski, A., Miêdzybrodzki, R. and Borysowski, J., et al. (2012). Phage as a modulator of immune responses: Practical implications for phage therapy. Advances in Virus Research. 83: 41-71.

  16. Gosai, A.S., Pawar, M.M., Patil, S.S., Ankuya, K.J., Srivastava, A.K. and Ashwar, B.K. (2023). Effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel powder supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and haemato-biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 93(5): 481-486.

  17. Huff, W.E., Huff, G.R., Rath, N.C., Balog, J.M. and Donoghue, A.M. (2002). Prevention of Escherichia coli respiratory infection in broiler chickens with bacteriophage. Poultry Science. 81(4): 437-441.

  18. Huff, W.E., Huff, G.R., Rath, N.C. and Donoghue, A.M. (2010). Immune interference of bacteriophage efficacy when treating coliba- cillosis in poultry. Poultry Science. 89(5): 895-900. https:// doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00558.

  19. Joerger, R.D. (2003). Alternatives to antibiotics: Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages. Poultry Science. 82(4): 640-647.

  20. Kazi, M. and Annapure, U.S. (2016). Bacteriophage biocontrol of food borne pathogens. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 53(3): 1355-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015- 2113-3.

  21. Loc-Carrillo, C. and Abedon, S.T. (2011). Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage. 1(2): 111-114.

  22. Pirnay, J.P., De Vos, D., Verbeken, G., Merabishvili, M., Chanishvili, N., Vaneechoutte, M. and Van Parys, L. (2011). The phage therapy paradigm: Prêt-à-porter or sur-mesure. Bacteriophage. 1(1): 5-15. https://doi.org/10.4161/bact. 1.1.14936.

  23. Qiu, K., Chen, Z., Zheng, A., Chang, W., Cai, H., Zhang, X. and Liu, G. (2023). Augmentation of performance, carcass trait, biochemical profile and lipid metabolism concerning the use of organic acidifier in broiler chickens. Agriculture. 13(9): 1765. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091765.

  24. Sarrami, Z., Sedghi, M., Mohammadi, I., Kim, W.K. and Mahdavi, A.H. (2022). Effects of bacteriophage supplement on the growth performance, microbial population and PGC-1á and TLR4 gene expressions of broiler chickens. Scientific Reports. 12(1): 14391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 022-18387-3.

  25. Shaufi, M.A.M., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Geok Hun, T., Omar, A.R., Han Ming, G. and Wan Ho, Y. (2023). Effects of phage cocktail, probiotics and their combination on growth performance and gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Animals. 13(8): 1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081328.

  26. Shaufi, M.A.M., Sieo, C.C., Chong, C.W., Tan, G.H., Omar, A.R. and Ho, Y.W. (2024). Multiple factorial analysis of growth performance and gut microbiota in broilers fed phage cocktail and probiotics. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 23(1): 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024. 2301564.

  27. Sillankorva, S., Oliveira, H. and Azeredo, J. (2012). Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. International Journal of Microbiology.  863945.

  28. Upadhaya, S.D., Ahn, J.M., Cho, J.H., Kim, J.Y., Kang, D.K., Kim, S.W. and Kim, I.H. (2021). Bacteriophage cocktail supplementation improves growth performance, gut microbiome and production traits in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 12: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104- 021-00563-4.

  29. Waseh, S., Hanifi-Moghaddam, P., Coleman, R., Masotti, M., Ryan, S., Foss, M. and Henry, M. (2010). Orally administered bacteriophages reduce Escherichia coli colonization in broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76(19): 6605-6611.

  30. Wernicki, A., Nowaczek, A. and Urban-Chmiel, R. (2017). Bacteriophage therapy to combat bacterial infections in poultry. Virology Journal. 14(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985- 017-0761-7.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Reviews

Editorial Board

View all (0)