Pollination is necessary not only for sustaining the present yield levels but also to increase quantity and improve the quality of the produce in many crops (Fig 1). Insect pollinators play an indispensable role in the success of agroecosystems (
Abrol, 2012). To compare the visitation and efficiency of crop-pollinating bees and non-bees at a global scale, we review the literature published from 1950 to 2018 concerning the visitors and pollinators of 105 global food crops that are known to benefit from animal pollinators (
Roubik, 1995). Of the 105 animal-pollinated crops, significant proportions are visited by both bee and non-bee taxa, with a total gross domestic product (GDP) value of US$780.8 billion. The estimated proportion of flowering plants pollinated by animals, including wild bees exceeds 85% worldwide and a total of 87 world-leading food crops are dependent on animal pollination which represents 35% of global food production
(Klein et al., 2007; Ollerton et al., 2011).
Climate change is a global threat to the food and nutritional security of the world. As greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere are increasing, the temperature is also rising due to the greenhouse effect
(Shukla et al., 2023). The average global temperature is increasing continuously and is forecasted to rise by 2°C until 2100 (Fig 2). This would cause considerable economic losses at the international level
(Inouye et al., 2000) and (
Khan and Jadaun, 2023). Animal pollination can potentially impact food security since many crops rely on pollinators to produce fruits and seeds
(Hung et al., 2018). However, the effects of projected climate change on crop pollinators and, therefore, on crop production are still unclear, especially for wild pollinators and aggregate community responses (
Abrol and Abrol, 2012). More than one-third of food crops depend on commercial bees for pollination at an international level, but over 30% of domesticated honey bee colonies die out each year due to poor nutrition, pathogens, exposure to pesticides and transportation stress
(Miranda et al., 2019).
Impact of pollinators on fruits and vegetables
Insects and other animal pollinators play a vital role in the production of crops for food, fiber, edible oils, pharmaceuticals and other goods. More than 1,300 different plant species are grown around the world for food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, condiments, spices and even textiles. Animals pollinate over three-fourths of these
(Delaplane et al., 2000). Pollinators are directly responsible for more than one out of every three bites of food or liquids we consume. Pollinators such as bees, birds and bats affect more than one-third (35%) of global crop productivity
(Minachilis et al., 2021). These enhance the outputs of 87 of the world’s chief food crops as well as numerous plant-derived medicines
. Hay crops grown from bee-pollinated seeds occupy around 40 million acres (alfalfa, clovers, lespedezas). Approximately 6 million acres are allocated to the production of fruits, vegetables and nuts, the majority of which are insect-pollinated (
Ollerton, (2017). These plants account for around 15% of the human diet. In 2005, Insect-pollinated crops provided $20 billion directly and the value of agricultural crop production ascribable to honey bee pollination was $14.6 billion in the United States in 2000. In 2008, the entire economic value of insect pollination of Chinese fruits and vegetables was 52.2 billion US dollars, accounting for 25.5% of the total production value of China’s forty-four crops. This is almost 13% of the province’s overall annual crop value. Commercially raised bumblebees are the major pollinators in greenhouses and the crops they pollinate contribute around $502 million to the economy of Ontario each year. pollinators in greenhouses and the crops they pollinate contribute around $502 million to the economy of Ontario each year.
Significance of beekeeping in agricultural and rural development
The value of enhanced production from honeybee pollination services alone is approximately 15-20 times more than the value of all hive goods combined (Sain and Nain, 2017). Pollination by honey bees enhances the quality of products as well. The potential benefits of bee pollination in terms of increased crop production range from 5% to 33150%. The following crops have seen an improvement in yield due to bee pollination (
Anonymous, 2017) (Graph 1).
Pollinators play a pivotal role in the pollination of many wild plants and agricultural species (
Southwick and Southwick, 1992). Many fruit crops, such as apple, blueberries, blackberries, cherries, cranberries, raspberries and strawberries and vegetables like coriander, cucumber, radish, turnip/rutabaga, globe artichoke and asparagus, brinjal, tomato, bitter gourd, ridge gourd, watermelon, pumpkin
etc. (Table 1). Require an insect pollinator to ensure pollination. Having an ample number of pollinators enhances the quantitative and qualitative features of a wide range of fruit crops. The current research discusses the importance of native and managed pollinators in the production of fruit crops. Honeybee pollination may improve the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of various fruit harvests depending on the variety and conditions at the site.
Decline of pollinators
In 1967, pesticides injured or caused the death of 500,000 colonies in the United States, with 70,000 in Arizona and 76,000 in California (
Abrol, 2012). Deaths in California were significantly higher in 1968, with 83,000 colonies lost. The commercial bee colonies’ count in the United States has plummeted from 5.9 million in the late 1940s to 2.7 million in 1995. According to FAO estimates, the decrease of pollinators would have an impact on the main three crop categories: fruits and vegetables and edible oilseed crops
(Parry et al., 2022). Losses for fruits and vegetables amount to $50 billion each
(Giannin et al., 2017), followed by edible oilseed crops with a loss of $39 billion. A decrease in the number of pollinators could have a wide-ranging impact on different parts of the earth. Intriguingly, those regions that depend on pollination for nutrition were also those with a high prevalence of malnutrition and poverty
(Potts et al., 2010).
Causes of or reasons for the decline
Threats to pollinators and the benefits they provide are thought to be increasing all over the world and they are mostly man-made
(Kearns et al., 1998; Cane 2001). Pollinator declines have been documented in numerous parts of the world (
Williams 1986;
Rasmont 1988;
Westrich 1989;
Corbet et al., 1991; Osborne et al., 1991; Day 1991;
Williams 1996;
Pekkarinen et al., 1987; Luig and Maavara 1998) and the primary causes of pollinator loss can be classified as follows:
1. Land malpractices (for example, habitat loss due to mechanical destruction, fragmentation, fire, overgrazing and recreation)
(Sathish et al., 2024).
2. Pests and diseases.
3. Competition between Man and the different plant species.
4. Global warming.
Effect of pesticides on pollinators
Bees are affected in one or more ways, including stomach poisons, contact materials and fumigants. Arsenicals are common stomach poisons (
Champaneri, Patel, 2022). While pyrethrum is a common contact insecticide Neonicotinoids (
e.g., imidacloprid) and fipronil are more toxic and persistent than the bulk of organophosphorus (e.g., malathion), carbamates (
e.g., carbofuran) and pyrethroids (
e.g., cypermethrin) insecticides. Botanicals like the potential acute toxicity and sub lethal effects of Citronella oil, eucalyptus oil, garlic extract, neem oil and rotenone effects bees
(Ostiguy et al., 2019).
Bee pollinators vs. climate change
Climate change may be a major reason for decline in the bee population. It has heavily affected crop pollination in many agricultural areas. Historical records reveal that beehives fluctuate every 7 or 8 years, influenced by weather and crop output. Climate change is thought to be the worst calamity that we would face in the future. It would be very detrimental in terms of habitat loss, ecosystem destruction and biodiversity loss
(Settele et al., 2016) and (
Abrol and Abrol, 2012).
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 Assessment Report, global average temperatures in 2100 will be between 1.8°C and 4.0°C higher than the 1980-2000 average. Based on observed rates of ice flow from Greenland and Antarctica, sea levels are expected to raise 0.18/0.59 meters by 2100. Extreme weather phenomena, such as drought and flooding, are also anticipated to become more common and intense (Fig 3).
Pollinator population decline and its effects
Pollinator loss may enhance the susceptibility of some plant species to extinction, while results in non-agricultural settings are difficult to determine. Because of the impact on honey pastures, bee colonies are heavily influenced by frequent extreme temperature and rainfall circumstances (drought period, exceptionally intense precipitation, especially during August). As honey pastures decline, so will overwintering and, eventually, the death of the bee colony. Reduced bee populations in the environment resulted in less effective pollination of native plant species as well as a 30% decrease in crop production, particularly for oleaginous plants. Climate change has an influence on native pollinators in agroecosystems, particularly bumble bees and solitary bees and their decline is linked to plant species extinction (
Luig and Maavara, 1998).
Climate change and the diversity of butterfly species
Climate change could be one of the most serious threats to pollinator biodiversity. According to
Kerr (2001), the human effect on climate is unexpectedly ubiquitous. Continental precipitation losses in industrialised countries, for example, can be ascribed to an increase in atmospheric particle matter, which impairs raindrop nucleation (
Rosenfeld 2000). On North America’s Atlantic coast, industrial aerosols influence storm timing and frequency (
Balling and Cerveny 1998). Regional variations in species distributions recorded in Europe and North America provide compelling evidence that climate change is already having an impact on pollinator taxa
(Rodder et al., 2021) (Table 2).
The direct effects of rising CO
2 levels in the atmosphere on pollinators and their mutualistic plant hosts are equally difficult to anticipate (
Hill, 2021). Indirectly, increased atmospheric CO
2 is projected to alter carbon and nitrogen ratios in plant tissues (
Bazzaz, 1998;
Bazzaz and Sombroek 1996), perhaps resulting to changes in herbivory patterns by creatures such as butterfly larvae (
Rusterholz and Erhardt, 1998). It’s unclear how this will influence pollinator communities. Furthermore, rising CO
2 levels in the atmosphere are likely to alter plant community structure, notably the proportions of C3 and C4 plants in a given environment.
Climate change hinders flower pollination timing
Pollination timing could be thrown off by global warming, causing major problems for both plants and pollinators. Changes in the timing of flowering in high altitudes will be one of the most pernicious effects of global warming, potentially leading to diminished reproductive success and extinction (
Inouye and Wielgolaski 2003;
Wielgolaski and Inouye 2003). According to
Inouye et al., (2003), global warming could affect pollination time in alpine habitats, with major consequences for both plants and pollinators.
Climate change on phenology
The time of phenological processes like blossoming is frequently linked to environmental variables like temperature. Changing conditions are thus predicted to cause changes in life cycle events, which have been documented for many plant species. Climate change is influencing the timing and intensity of seasons, hence influencing phenology. Spring is arriving early by about 1.2 days each decade across the whole northern hemisphere. Across Europe, for example, the growing season increased by 10.8 days between 1960 and 1999 (6 days earlier spring, 4.8 days longer summer). The IPCC estimated in 2007 that more than 89% (25,810) of the changes observed in physical and biological systems are in the direction expected as a result of climate change, based on a review of more than 29,000 observational data series.
Bees and flowers are both disappearing
According to research led by the University of Leeds and published in science, the diversity of bees and the flowers they pollinate has fallen dramatically in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands over the last 25 years. The study is the first to show a broad reduction in bee diversity. Concerns concerning the loss of pollination services have been raised for years, but most data has been limited to a few critical species or a few focal areas.
Biesmeijer et al., (2006) gathered biodiversity records for 100 sites and discovered that bee diversity has decreased in about 80% of them. In the United Kingdom, many bee species are dwindling or have become extinct.
Mitigation strategies
Make an environment with availability of forage through habitat management
Many species’ distributions are changing as a result of climate change. Agricultural genetic resources that aid crop adaptation to climate change are being sought. Pollinators, on the other hand, will mostly adapt by limiting or increasing their ranges in response to new climatic trends. Thus, the possibility of crops losing critical pollinating species, or mismatches in crop and pollinator ranges, is a genuine threat. Such repercussions have already been felt in India’s seed sector
(Daniels et al., 2020).
Use biodiversity-friendly agroecosystem strategies, beekeeping, colony management skills and ecotourism in key areas
This diagram depicts (Fig 4). The Tier 1 components of the social-ecological system framework, include bee habitat (resource system), managed hives (resource unit), organizations (governance system) and commercialization. Beekeepers (actors), hive migration (interactions) and apiary productivity are all featured in this film
(Patel et al., 2020).
Modern genomics methods
The Earth BioGenome Project (EBP) is an ambitious international endeavour to sequence the genomes of over 2 million identified eukaryotic species. Beenome is one of many efforts linked with the EBP. Eukaryotes are distinguished from other life forms by the presence of nuclei and other organelles in their cells. All plants, fungi and animals, including bees, are included in this domain.
The national bee board (NBB) and its function
The primary goal of NBB is to promote scientific beekeeping in the country in order to boost crop productivity through pollination support and the production of honey and other beehive products in order to increase farmers’/beekeepers’ income. NBB is one of MIDH’s National Level Agencies (NLAs).
Currently, the main focus of NBB is to establish at least one Integrated Beekeeping Development Centre (IBDC)/Centre of Excellence (CoE) in beekeeping in each state.
Beekeeping industry in india
Currently, over 30 lakh bee colonies in India produce 94500 metric tonnes of honey (2016-17 estimated), including honey from wild honey bees and employ approximately 3.00 lakh people. India is one of the countries that export honey. Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, France, Italy and Spain are among the key markets for Indian honey.
World beekeeping scenario
Honey is a valuable natural health commodity that is produced all over the world. A total of 14-15 lakh metric tonnes are generated globally. 15 countries in the world contribute 90% of global output. China, the United States, Mexico, Argentina, Ukraine, Turkey, Russia and India are major honey producers.
Possibilities and opportunities
India has enormous beekeeping potential. The diversity of flora and fauna opens up new avenues for the development of the beekeeping sector. The National Commission on Agriculture estimated that approximately 150 million bee colonies would be required to pollinate the country’s 12 key agricultural crops. Currently, 200 million bee colonies are needed to boost yield, which will employ 215 lakh people, create 10 million tonnes of honey and increase crop production.
