Nanotechnology has emerged as a new discipline and nanoparticles have become the centre of attraction for researchers because of their unique physico-chemical properties compared to bulk particles
(Gatoo et al., 2014). Nanoparticle characterization is considered an important parameter for confirming whether nanoparticle formation has occurred or not. UV-visible absorption spectroscopy is widely being used to examine the optical properties of nanosized particles. The absorption spectrum of ZnO nanopowder is shown in Fig 1. It exhibits a strong absorption band at about 322 nm. This confirmed the proper synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles
(AL-Asady et al., 2020; Shamhari et al., 2018).
Germination frequency was recorded after 8, 16 and 21 days. It was observed from Table 1 that the percent seed germination decreased in the zinc-treated group as compared to the control group. Also, the per cent germination was found to decrease with an increasing concentration of ZnO nanoparticles. Seed germination is an important phenomenon in modern agriculture because it is a thread of life for plants that guarantees their survival
(Siddiqui et al., 2014). Results pertaining to seed germination and early seedling growth clearly indicate that ZnO nanoparticles at lower concentrations promoted seed germination, but at higher concentrations reduced seed germination and seedling growth. An increase in germination at low concentrations of nanoparticles may be due to the absorption and utilisation of ZnO nanoparticles by the seeds. Also, there could be the generation of superoxide and hydroxide anions by ZnO nanoparticles that might have encouraged the intake of water and oxygen needed for quick germination (
Pathak and Bedi, 2015). ZnO nanoparticles have the potential to overcome seed germination issues in plant species that have low seed germination due to zinc alone.Therefore, a decrease in seed germination at a higher nanoparticle concentration might be due to the physical or chemical toxicity exerted by ZnO nanoparticles on plants, depending on their chemicacomposition, size, surface energy and plant species
(Talam et al., 2012).
After harvesting, root length, shoot length, leaf length and lamina of control as well as different treated groups were taken. The root length was found to decrease in the zinc-treated group as compared to the control group. The 100 ppm of nanoparticle treatment also caused a significant decrease in root length as compared to the control plants. However, the root length was found to increase at 200 ppm treatment and it again decreased significantly at 500 ppm nanoparticle treatment (Table 1). On the contrary, the shoot length was found to decrease after zinc treatment, further significantly decreased at 100 and 200 ppm nanoparticle treatments but was found to be increased at 500 ppm nanoparticle treatment. Zinc treatment also caused a decrease in leaf length in barley plants. However, the leaf length was found to increase with an increase in the concentration of ZnO nanoparticles. Further, zinc treatment again caused a decrease in leaf lamina in barley plants. However, the leaf length was found to increase with an increase in the concentration of nanoparticles. Plant growth and development starts with the germination of seeds, followed by root elongation and shoot emergence. These are regarded as the earliest signs of growth and development. Therefore, it is important to understand the course of plant growth and development in relation to nanoparticles. The results obtained in the present study are in accordance with the results obtained by
Lawre and Rasker (2014), who revealed that the higher dose of ZnO nanoparticles suspension reduced root and shoot growth of gram and mung seedlings, which may be due to toxicity levels of nanoparticles. ZnO nanoparticles were also reported to be one of the most toxic nanoparticles that could terminate root growth of radish, rape, ryegrass, lettuce, corn and cucumber
(Tymoszuk et al., 2017; Lawre and Raskar, 2014). This can also be accepted because more ions are released from particles over time and accumulate in plantlets, making them more toxic. However,
Prasad et al., (2012) found that lower concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles were beneficial to seed germination in peanut,
Sedghi et al., (2013) in soybean,
Ramesh et al., (2014) in wheat and
Raskar and Laware (2014) in onion. The higher plant growth with nanoparticles might also be due to the mobilisation of nutrients in the soil as well as an increase in microbial population, especially in the rhizosphere (
Raliya and Tarafdar, 2013). In the case of root/shoot ratio, an increasing trend was seen from lower (100 ppm) to higher concentrations (200 ppm) of ZnO nanoparticles (Table 1). However, the root/shoot ratio decreased concomitantly from 200 ppm to 500 ppm of ZnO nanoparticles. This indicates that at this higher concentration, the root length promotion is comparatively less when compared to shoot length. This indicates that roots were affected more by higher concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles as compared to percent seed germination and shoot growth.
The results with respect to shoot and root length as well as root to shoot ratio are also consistent with previous studies that report nanoparticles had less of an effect on seed germination than on seedling growth
(Lin et al., 2007; Ruffini et al., 2009). This may be explained by the protective effect of the seed coat
(Adhikari et al., 2015). Since roots are the first target tissue to confront pollutants, toxic symptoms seem to appear more strongly in roots than in shoots
(Garriga et al., 2014). The result clearly indicates that ZnO nanoparticles are effective in enhancing plant growth and yield. Studies on other types of nanoparticles have also shown that the engineered nanoparticles can boost seed germination, growth and development of plants
(Siddiqui et al., 2014; Lahiani et al., 2013). As zinc is the structural component of phosphorous (P)-mobilizing phosphatase and phytase enzymes, it can be hypothesised that application of nanoZnO may help in more secretion of these enzymes, which are involved in the mobilisation of phosphorus for plant nutrition from unavailable organic sources. Excess zinc in the soil can often compete with the plant’s uptake of phosphorus, iron, or copper, resulting in deficiency in plants and, as a result, toxic ZnO nanoparticles at higher concentrations.The higher percentage of seed germination and significantly longer seedling length observed in barley seedlings obtained from ZnO nanoparticles treated plants can also be attributed to zinc movement from leaf tissues to seed during the seed development and maturation process.
Data with respect to the promptness index (PI) clearly showed that PI decreased with zinc treatment and also at all concentrations of nanoparticle treatment as compared to control, with a slight increase at 200 ppm (Table 2). A higher Germination stress tolerance index (GSI) (37.68) was observed in the 200 ppm ZnO nanoparticle treatment, while a lower GSI (34.78) was observed in the 100 and 500 ppm ZnO nanoparticle treatments. Zinc treatment alone also showed a decrease in GSI value. Plant height stress tolerance index (PHSI) values also showed a decrease at all concentrations of nanoparticle treatment compared to control.
A significant decrease in PHSI value,
i.e., 68.55 at 100 ppm. However, a significant increase was noticed at 200 ppm and again at 500 ppm, a slight decrease was noted. A significant decrease in root length stress tolerance index (RLSI) values was observed at 100 ppm of ZnO nanoparticles treatment over control and a significant increase in RLSI values (77.59) was observed at 200 ppm, while again a decrease (35.23) was observed at 500 ppm concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles. Seedling vigour index (SVI) and relative root elongation (RRE) also showed a similar trend with decrease noticed at all concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles except at 200 ppm concentration, where a significant increase in SVI was noticed (Table 2).
The result regarding PI shows that ZnO at lower concentration increased seed germination, promptness index and seedling growth. This indicates the lower concentration is not harmful to the cell division and early seedling growth. GSI indicates the speed of seed germination in the seedlings. Thus, the results of PI, GSI, PHSI, RLSI, SVI and RRE demonstrated that nano particles have both positive and negative effects on crops, depending on solution concentration, particle size and chemical and physical properties of nano particles.