Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 43 issue 1 (march 2022) : 29-37

Feeding Total Mixed Ration (TMR) on Production and Reproductive Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows: A Review

R.H.W.M. Karunanayaka1, R.T.P. Liyanage1, W.A.D. Nayananjalie1,*, M.A.A.P. Kumari1, S.C. Somasiri1, A.M.J.B. Adikari1, W.V.V.R. Weerasingha1
1Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Puliyankulama, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka.
Cite article:- Karunanayaka R.H.W.M., Liyanage R.T.P., Nayananjalie W.A.D., Kumari M.A.A.P., Somasiri S.C., Adikari A.M.J.B., Weerasingha W.V.V.R. (2022). Feeding Total Mixed Ration (TMR) on Production and Reproductive Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows: A Review . Agricultural Reviews. 43(1): 29-37. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-208.
The development of the dairy sector is economically important to many countries of the world. However, the dairy sector has faced many constraints due to the unavailability of quality and quantity of feed resources and their responses on growth, health and reproduction in dairy animals. The total mixed ration (TMR) is an alternate strategy to overcome the feed shortage of lactating cows by utilizing available feed resources effectively and efficiently. This review article elaborates the effects of TMR on the production and reproduction performance of lactating dairy cows. Interestingly, TMR feeding has a significant effect on the body weight, feed intake, feed efficiency, milk yield and composition and reproductive performances of lactating dairy cows. Feeding TMR to dairy animals was investigated to provide a balanced diet, reduce feed wastage and save labour cost and time. Hence, feeding TMR as per the animal requirement is more efficient as compared to traditional feeds.
The dairy sector plays an indispensable role in the economy of many countries. Dairy farming has been identified as a priority sub-sector for development among all the other livestock sub-sectors in Sri Lanka. Dairy farming contributes to the livelihood of farmers in different ways. It provides milk and value-added products, organic manure for crops and biogas as a source of energy. Thus, dairy farming enhances the productivity of the farm by effectively utilizing agricultural by-products and available marginal lands. Hence, the development of the dairy sector uplifts the social and financial status of the farmers via providing employment, sustaining income and enhancing the nutritional status (Perera and Jayasuriya, 2008). 
FAO (2012) has identified that poor nutrition of farm animals is a severe constraint in the developing world. Accordingly, Sri Lanka has also encountered the unavailability of quality feed sources in the required quantity throughout the year (Houwers et al., 2015). Grazing is the major form of feeding practice in many South Asian countries including Sri Lanka. Even though plenty of fresh forage is available for cattle during the rainy season, an acute shortage of feeds is experienced in the dry periods of the year. In most cases, during dry periods animals graze on over matured, fibrous, low-quality forage available in woods and uncultivated fields resulting in poor production performance. The available area for grazing has been reduced due to an increase in human population, urbanization (Beigh et al., 2017) and extensive agricultural practices. Further, the majority of the farmers do not cultivate required forage species in the farms due to the lack of knowledge, poor water availability, prolonged drought conditions and the perspective of thinking that crop cultivation is better due to direct returns. Therefore, grazing animals do not meet their optimum nutritional requirement during the dry periods of the year which lead to poor body conditions (Ibrahim and Jayatileka, 2000).
In efforts to resolve the issue of poor nutrition, a shift from extensively grazing to stall feeding using total mix ration (TMR) has been explored (Nissanka et al., 2010; Bodahewa et al., 2014). Many of these efforts are targeted to increase the production and reproduction performances of dairy cows. Thus, this review aims to discuss the effect of feeding TMR on the production and reproduction performances of lactating dairy cows.
Total mixed ration (TMR)
Preparation of a nutritionally complete single ration by blending different feed ingredients according to the nutritional requirements of dairy cattle is known as a TMR (Coppock et al., 1981). Every bite of TMR contains a balanced ration (Beigh et al., 2017). Thus, feeding TMR overcomes the poor nutritional status of dairy cattle. It is also a remedy for the scarcity of available feeds during dry periods of the year. Different forage species, crop residues and industrial byproducts can be used efficiently to prepare TMR. The nutritional status of TMR in tropical countries can be improved by mixing forages or forage-based silages with industrial byproducts such as coconut (Cocos nucifera) poonac, rice (Oryza sativa) bran, maize (Zea mays) meal and soybean (Glycine max) meal. Besides, non-protein nitrogenous compounds such as urea can be easily and safely fortified with the TMRs  (Beigh et al., 2017).
Total mixed ration feeding reduced labour cost and  could be formulated according to the individual animal requirement (Schingoethe, 2017). Feeding TMR avoided selection and sorting of feeds and supplied adequate nutrition in the required amount and improved the feed utilization efficiency (Bargo et al., 2003; Morales-Almaráz et al., 2010; Charlton et al., 2011; Mendoza et al., 2016; Beigh et al., 2017; Premarathne and Samarasinghe, 2020). Further, it increased feed intake, digestibility and improved the microbial activity of the rumen resulting in increased productivity of the cows (Belyea et al., 1975; Wongnen et al., 2009).
Before the formulation of a standard TMR, certain factors need to be considered related to the animal such as; age, weight, body condition score (BCS), level of production and environment (Mohammad et al., 2017; Li et al., 2012). Improper mixing of different feed ingredients in TMR resulted in sorting and inconsistency of nutrient intake  (Leonardi and Armentano, 2003; Stone, 2004; Sova et al., 2014). Errors in the mixing equipment and the order of mixing different ingredients also affected the consistency of TMR (Mikus et al., 2012). Hence, feeding a precise and accurately formulated TMR provided consistent production performances in dairy cows (Sova et al., 2014).  
Effect of feeding TMR on lactating dairy cows
Body weight
The proper balance of nutrition led to a healthy and ideal body weight of lactating dairy cows and body weight could be used as an important tool to identify the reproductive performance of dairy cows (Rehak et al., 2012). The livestock owners get benefits through the TMR as it improves body weight. Further, cows fed with TMR may completely maintain or gain BCS (Kolver and Muller, 1998; Tucker et al., 2001; Bargo et al., 2002a) while cows consuming only-pasture diets lose BCS (Kolver and Muller, 1998; Tucker et al., 2001). The main intention of preparing a TMR is to improve the performance of dairy cattle. Many researchers observed losses in body weight and body condition of high-producing cows when they were fed only with pasture. However, feeding TMR may not always bring the expected outcomes (Table 1).

Table 1: Effect of feeding TMR on body weight change in dairy cattle.

Dry matter intake (DMI) and efficiency of feed utilization
Dairy cattle fed with roughages and concentrates showed more preference towards concentrates than roughages (Ingvartsen et al., 2001; Bach et al., 2007; Moujahed et al., 2009). Hence by feeding TMR, it is possible to overcome selective feeding since TMR consists of both roughages and concentrate and each bite contains a similar composition. Also, a lower feed conversion ratio is reported for the TMR fed group than the control (Teshome et al., 2017). This revealed that TMR fed group efficiently utilize the DM to produce one liter of milk compared to the control group.
Mendoza et al., (2016) concluded that the cows with 4 hours of access to high-quality fresh forage had similar DMI as cows fed only with TMR, but if the duration of access to fresh forages was more than 4 hours, DMI was reduced. Further, Prayitno et al., (2017) revealed that the lower chewing time with the TMR decreases the feed intake while digestibility increased. Sova et al., (2014) reported that when the daily variability of TMR is minimum, it would lead to an increase in the DMI resulting in herd profitability. Jonker et al., (2002) explained that improving the efficiency of feed nitrogen utilization by dairy cattle is the most effective way to reduce the nutrient losses from dairy farms. They further suggested that when offering protein closer to the required levels, resulted in a higher production improving feed nitrogen utilization.
Lower DMI may result in diets containing less than 40% DM. However, wet TMR may reduce DMI per meal and also the TMR with higher moisture are less stable in elevated environmental temperatures (Eastridge, 2006). More than 60% of DM in the TMR would result in lower DMI of the animal, which also leads to a higher level of sorting too (Felton and DeVries, 2010). The moisture content and particle size of the forage are primary factors which influence the sorting feed ingredients. Large particles are more prone to be sorted by the animal. Tafaj et al., (2004) reported that particle size of the TMR influenced the feed intake, digestion and milk production of early lactation cows.
Interestingly, Vibart et al., (2008) observed higher feed efficiencies of the cows grazing on pasture compared to cows fed with TMR and pasture (55% TMR and 45% pasture). Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) is a tool to assess the protein and energy balance of dairy cows (Hristov et al., 2018). Further looking at MUN value, rations could be adjusted for crude protein (CP) which improved sufficient utilization of protein in the ration, this increased the milk yield and milk protein content (Nousiainen et al., 2004).
However, Moore and Varga (1996) observed no differences in MUN in pasture-fed and TMR-fed cows and ranged between 10-15 mg/dL (Vibart et al., 2008). Further, the ratio of rumen degradable:undegradable protein and protein:energy ratio in the ration also affect MUN (Baker et al., 1995). Wachirapakorn et al., (1997) revealed that TMR feeding increased DMI and milk production compared to the pasture-fed system (Wongnen et al., 2009). Incorporating TMR into the cattle feed partially, totally, or in fermented type have a positive effect upon feed intake and utilization (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of feeding TMR on Dry matter intake (DMI) in dairy cows.

Milk production and composition
The TMR feeding resulted in more milk yield than normal feeding (Gordon et al., 1995; Mohammad et al., 2017).  Bargo et al., (2002b) reported there were no differences in milk yields of cows fed TMR as compared to 6 or 12 hours feeding on mixed pasture (grasses and legumes). Further, the rumen acids and linolenic acids in milk fat have been increased with grazing time. Three different grazing times in TMR-fed cows were compared by Storm and Kristensen (2010) and reported that milk yield was higher in cows grazing for 4 to 9 hours. Du et al., (2020)  reported higher milk yield from the dairy cows fed with TMR compared to local grain-based diet but the milk quality did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. However, in a TMR-based study, the cows have minimum energy expenditure due to less walking or zero-grazing compared to cows in a pasture-based system. Hence, cows in the TMR based study could divert more energy to milk synthesis than when they were grazed (Elgersma et al., 2006). Sova et al., (2014) reported that higher milk yields and efficient milk production could be achieved by reducing the sorting of fine particles over long particles. Their findings also interpreted that frequent consistent nutrient consumption might have resulted in greater productivity. This might be due to the consequence of higher DMI and higher digestibility values of the TMR rations resulted in higher milk yields in lactating dairy cows (Istasse et al., 1986; Yan et al., 1997). However, it is possible to obtain a milk yield similar to that of cows fed only a TMR also by incorporating high-quality fresh forage in the diets (Mendoza et al., 2016).
Milk composition depends on genetic and non-genetic factors like breed, heredity, dietary regime, time and frequency of milking and season (Sarker et al., 2019). Ruminants fed high concentrate diet, the milk composition changed due to decreasing MUN content (NRC, 2001). However, while feeding with concentrates, the protein content of milk could be increased (Yan et al., 1997). The milk fat content, lactose, solids non-fat and total solid content were also high in cattle fed with TMR (Gaafar et al., 2010). The higher saturated fatty acid content in milk was reported by Rego et al., (2004). However, Teshome et al., (2017) reported that the fat, protein, lactose, ash and total solids in milk were not affected by feeding TMR or pasture. Nevertheless, Rego et al., (2004) and Hundal et al., (2004) revealed that the milk fat yield was not affected when animals were fed with the TMR. According to Schroeder et al., (2003), there was no significant difference between milk composition or milk production among TMR fed and pasture-fed dairy cows. White et al., (2001) and Bargo et al., (2002a) have reported that lower milk production was obtained by grazing dairy cattle as compared to TMR fed cattle. Further, Schroeder et al., (2003) revealed the milk protein concentration was higher in the TMR fed cows as compared to the grazing dairy cattle (3.70% vs. 3.45%) although the milk protein yield was the same (0.71 kg/day) (Kolver and Muller, 1998; Bargo et al., 2002a).
Schroeder et al., (2005) reported that milk production tended to be lower and fat, protein and lactose contents were also lower when the cows were fed with pasture instead of TMR. Similarly, Kolver and Muller, (1998) and Bargo et al., (2002a) stated that due to low intake of energy, milk production and BCS in grazing cattle were lower. Teshome et al., (2017) observed a higher daily milk yield in cows fed TMR than cows fed a conventional feed, however, there was no significant difference in milk composition between the two treatments. Jonker et al., (2002) stated that in commercial dairy farms, the rations were frequently balanced thus resulted in a greater milk yield. Also, they observed that TMR rations improved milk yield, or nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) compared to its product carbon footprint (PCF).
Jonker et al., (2002) investigated a TMR block that was made out of forage and grain. It increased milk yield but decreased the milk fat percentage, which might be due to inadequate intake of effective fibre. Teshome et al., (2017) revealed that the differences in CP and energy intake may be associated with the difference among milk yields. As Kolver and Muller (1998) and Schroeder et al., (2003) explained, the lower milk yields of grazing cows resulted in the difficulty of achieving the high levels of DMI.
Milk fat composition/profile was strongly affected by the feed offered. A typical fatty acid (FA) profile in cow’s milk is around 70% saturated fatty acids (SFA), 25% mono-unsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and 5% poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (Grummer, 1991). According to Loor et al., (2003), milk obtained from grazing cows contains more trans-fatty acids compared to cows fed with TMR. Eastridge (2006) stated that cows fed with TMR have a lower concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in the milk compared to the cattle fed with pasture. Similarly, Dewhurst et al., (2001) and Mackle et al., (2003) observed that the cows consuming high-quality pastures produced milk rich with C18:3 fatty acid (Linolenic acid) which was beneficial for human health. Similar results were found in previous studies (Loor et al.,  2003). Even though there is a beneficial effect of high-quality pasture on milk FA composition, supplementation strategies are needed to avoid the reduction in production and reproduction performance (Schroeder et al., 2003).
In contrast, Schroeder et al., (2005) stated that the total concentration of short, medium and long-chain FA in milk were not affected by treatment either TMR or pasture-fed. The concentration of C18:0 and C18:2 FA were higher in TMR fed, which was possibly due to the high level of corn grain in the TMR diet. The saturated fatty acid content could be increased in dairy cattle fed with TMR compared to concentrate supplemented pasture-feeding regime (Rego et al., 2004). Many research revealed that dairy cattle grazed on pasture had a lower saturated: unsaturated FA ratio in their milk and a CLA concentration than cattle on TMR. These changes in FA composition may produce more beneficial dairy products in terms of human health. Therefore, the results suggested that the incorporation of TMR may influence milk production as well as milk composition with positive effects upon the human.
Rumen processes and health
Beauchemin (2002) reported that the rumen environment must be healthy to digest the fibre at the highest rate and to maximize the feed intake. Rumen microbial population has the foremost opportunity to digest the feed which the cow ingests and that may ultimately affect the nutrient availability for productive purposes.
“Cow rumen is a host microbial ecosystem that enables cows to convert complex dietary carbohydrates that cannot be digested by mammalian enzymes into short-chain fatty acids (SCFA)” (Aschenbach et al., 2011). Absorption of SCFA and some minerals took place in the rumen (Tomas and Potter, 1976; Schröder and Breves, 2006). Proper development and health of the rumen are also important in providing the cow with energy and essential minerals. Around 80% of total fibre digestion and 50-70% of total amino acid supply in cattle take place during rumen fermentation. Thus, proper functioning of the rumen is very important for better performances and health of dairy cattle (Zerbini et al., 1988; Archimede et al., 1997; Soriano et al., 2001).
Abudabos et al., (2020) observed that the rumen environment of cattle fed with a TMR produced with dried distillers’ grains with soluble (DDGS) was healthy. Furthermore, he suggested that the DDGS can be utilized as a substitute for Soybean and Barley. A disturbed rumen often results in incomplete degradation and digestion processes at rumen (Metzler-Zebeli et al., 2013). Proper functioning of the rumen is crucial for the synthesis of microbial protein, vitamins and B-vitamins (NRC, 2001).
Sharifi (2014) emphasized that the quality of the TMR and the ability of the animals to sort were important facts to maintain rumen health. Callaghan et al., (2018) revealed that the feeding system influenced rumen functions and milk production. An increased amount of volatile fatty acids were observed in TMR-fed cows. Furthermore, significantly higher rumen choline content was recorded with feeding TMR. Acetic acid is the main energy source for ruminants and choline is vital in animal health and milk production. Further, it is recommended to incorporate 30-40% of the concentrates in the dairy rations which optimized the efficiency of the rumen microbial population (Archimede et al., 1997).
Cattle were often fed with large amounts of concentrates to reduce the inconsistency in intake and nutrients requirement (Zebeli et al., 2012). This may cause major dietary imbalances which are critical to the rumen. However, health scientists have found that feeding TMR ensures adequate intake of physically effective neutral detergent fibre (peNDF). Further sorting of TMR would result in a low intake of peNDF and a high intake of ruminally degradable starch. This may increased the risk of rumen disorders (Leonardi and Armentano, 2003; Sova et al., 2014).
In fact, rumen health is one of the vital importance in ensuring healthy and efficient dairy cattle production. The term “subacute ruminal acidosis” (SARA) is used for “poor rumen health”. Decreased chewing time due to lesser intake of the forage-rich TMR contributed to the lower ruminal pH in the susceptible cows (Humer et al., 2018) and might be resulted in poor rumen health.
Reproductive performance
The reproductive performance of dairy cattle is directly controlled by nutrition, health, genetics and management (Zebeli et al., 2015). Drackley and Cardoso (2014) stated that the main key parameter affecting reproductive performance is the ‘metabolic health’. Accordingly, Swanepoel and Robinson, (2019) discovered that most of the reproductive measures are disturbed by the Negative energy balance (NEB) developed in the body. The NEB may also induce physiological changes such as delaying the resumption of ovarian activity, decreasing LH pulse frequency, reducing growth rate and diameter of the dominant follicle, decreasing weight of corpus luteum, reducing peri-oestrus hormones like estradiol (E2), progesterone, reducing conception and pregnancy rate and ultimately increasing calving intervals (Garnsworthy et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2018; Cardoso et al., 2020).
When dairy cows are in NEB, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and b-hydroxy butyric acid (BHBA) concentrations are high in the blood circulation. These metabolites negatively affect the growth of the oocytes. Hence, impaired fertility is resulted, when NEFA and BHBA are elevated in the blood circulation of the animal (Butler, 2014). Total mixed ration would be a good solution to overcome NEB controlling proper nutritional management of dairy cattle resulting in an optimized level of fertility.
According to Roche, (2006), to have optimum reproductive efficiency, 90% of cows must be resumed ovulation and oestrus by day 42. The BCS is a determining factor that affects the first postpartum dominant follicles to ovulates. Cows at the poor BCS (<2.5) have a less diameter of the dominant follicles, reduced oestradiol, insulin and IGF-I concentrations, low LH pulse frequency (Roche, 2006). The low estradiol concentration is insufficient to induce LH surge and ovulation and thereby experience a prolonged anoestrous period. Furthermore, Overton and Waldron, (2004) suggest that at calving the BSC should be 2.75-3. Moreover, the authors stated that between calving and first service cows should not lose more than 0.5 of a unit of BCS (Overton and Waldron, 2004). The conception rate, services per conception and interval from calving to conception are greatly affected by the plane of nutrition during the dry period and after calving of dairy cows (Roche, 2006). Nutrition management affects reproduction efficiency through BCS changes, metabolic diseases and abnormal metabolic profiles. Cows that develop metabolic diseases are prone to have a lower conception rate and require more inseminations, or get delayed to become pregnant (LeBlanc et al., 2002; Gilbert et al., 2005). Furthermore, negative energy balance that occurred early in lactation is the main factor that contributes to delay in the interval from calving to conception (Staples et al., 1990).
In TMR systems, a diet should be formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of most of the cows rather than allocating amounts of concentrate based on milk production. Proper nutritional formulation of the diet is essential to ensure that the supply of all nutrients. Total mixed ration could be a better nutritional strategy to improve the follicular dynamics concerning the reproductive hormones and metabolites. Since there is a strong relationship between energy balance and fertility, this would be a very useful method to alleviate most of the problems (Alves et al., 2019). When high-yielding cows are reared in TMR-fed systems, it promotes fertility performance and reduces metabolic disorders (Cardoso et al., 2013). To obtain a successful reproduction, estrogen production by the dominant follicle, restoration of pulsatile LH secretion and responsiveness of the ovary to LH are mainly responsible (Drackley and Cardoso, 2014). However, according to Endo et al., (2013), feeding has no impact on LH secretion but progesterone does. Khan et al., (2018) and Cardoso et al., (2020) revealed that, when an animal was fed with high-energy TMR diets, progesterone concentration was increased from 0.16 to 0.73 ng/mL. Also, Geppert et al., (2017) stated that ovarian function is promoted by providing sufficient nutrient compounds. According to Drackley and Cardoso, (2014), before calving, provision of all the required nutrients in appropriate amounts in the TMR system could help to release the animal from NEB after calving. Cardoso et al., (2013) also emphasized that the high-yielding dairy cows reared in confined systems fed with high-fibre TMR diets reduced BCS gain during the dry period, promoted postpartum appetite, reduced the occurrence of metabolic disorders and improved fertility performance. Gong et al., (2002) reported that feeding a TMR diet stimulated higher circulation of glucose and insulin adding a favourable impact on the reproductive system. Moreover, Zebeli et al., (2015) revealed that to improve the health and reproduction in dairy cows, maintaining rumen health and reducing systemic inflammation could be practised as strategies. Hence, nutritional management plays a main role in achieving positive fertility goals in dairy cattle (Butler, 2014).
Kolver and Muller, (1998) and Washburn et al., (2002) indicated that the body weights and condition scores are generally higher for TMR fed cows than pastured cows and Washburn et al., (2002) suggested that it may be due to the variation of the total consumption, pasture type, quality, quantity and the energy expenditure. Furthermore, Kolver and Muller, (1998) and Bargo et al., (2002a) reported losses of BCS for pasture-fed cows while cows consuming a TMR maintained or gained BCS. Hence, according to Roche et al., (2013) and Roche (2006), a successful reproductive outcome may be gained by optimum BCS and BW of the dairy cattle and it can be well maintained by supplying a TMR ration to the animals. However, Löf et al., (2007) reported that TMR-fed cows had a longer calving interval and calving to last AI interval and the authors stated that it may be due to the improper management of the TMR fed cows. When the cows are over-conditioned, their DMI is less and they experienced a higher loss of BCS thereby a higher chance for an anovulatory anestrus.
Implementation of the TMR to dairy cattle is efficient and effective, especially it improves the production performances of dairy cattle in terms of milk production, milk composition, dry matter feed intake, feed utilization and reproductive performance.  Accordingly, the literature review provides an in-depth understanding for possible stakeholders to have constant milk production throughout the year and to maintain good health and reproduction.
This research is supported by a grant from the Accelerating Higher Education Expansion and Development (AHEAD) operation project and the World Bank group.

  1. Abudabos, A.M., Abdelrahman, M.M., Alatiyat, R.M., Aljumaah, M.R., Jassim, R.Al. and Stanley, D. (2020). Effect of dietary inclusion of graded levels of distillers dried grains with solubles on the performance, blood profile and rumen microbiota of Najdi lambs. Heliyon. 6: 1-10. DOI:10.1016/ j.heliyon.2020.e05683.

  2. Alves, J.P.M., Fernandes, C.C.L., Rossetto, R., Silva, C.P. da, Galvão, I.T.O.M., Bertolini, M. and Rondina, D. (2019). Impact of short nutrient stimuli with different energy source on follicle dynamics and quality of oocyte from hormonally stimulated goats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 54(9): 1206-1216. DOI:10.1111/rda.13500.

  3. Archimede, H., Sauvant, D. and Schmidely, P. (1997). Original article quantitative review of ruminal and total tract digestion of mixed diet organic matter and carbohydrates. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 37(590): 173-189.

  4. Aschenbach, J.R., Penner, G.B., Stumpff, F. and Gäbel, G. (2011). Ruminant nutrition symposium: Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science. 89(4): 1092-1107. DOI:10.2527/jas.2010-3301.

  5. Bach, A., Iglesias, C. and Devant, M. (2007). Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 136(1-2): 146-153. DOI:10.1016/ j.anifeedsci.2006.09.011.

  6. Baker, L.D., Ferguson, J.D. and Chalupa, W. (1995). Responses in urea and true protein of milk to different protein feeding schemes for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 78(11): 2424-2434. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76871-0.

  7. Bargo, F., Muller, L.D., Delahoy, J.E. and Cassidy, T.W. (2002a). Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(7): 1777-1792. DOI:10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(02)74252-5.

  8. Bargo, F., Muller, L.D., Delahoy, J.E. and Cassidy, T.W. (2002b). Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(11): 2948- 2963. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74381-6.

  9. Bargo, F., Muller, L.D., Kolver, E.S. and Delahoy, J.E. (2003). Invited review: Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science. 86(1): 1-42. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73581-4.

  10. Beauchemin, K. (2002). Applying nutritional management to rumen health. In: Pennsylvania State Dairy Cattle Nutrition (pp. 107-114).

  11. Beigh, Y.A., Ganai, A.M. and Ahmad, H.A. (2017). Prospects of complete feed system in ruminant feeding: A review. Veterinary World. 10(4): 424-437. DOI:10.14202/vetworld. 2017.424-437.

  12. Belyea, R.L., Coppock, C.E. and Lake, G.B. (1975). Effects of silage diets on health, reproduction and blood metabolites of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 58(9): 1336-1346. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84715-1.

  13. Bodahewa, A.P., Weerasinghe, W.M.P.B. and Palliyeguru, M.W.C.D. (2014). Effects of feeding total mixed ration (TMR) on the production performance of dairy cows. The Sri Lanka Veterinary Journal (Supplement). 11: 6.

  14. Butler, S.T. (2014). Nutritional management to optimize fertility of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Animal. 8(SUPPL. 1). 15-26. DOI:10.1017/S1751731114000834.

  15. Callaghan, T.F.O., Rosa, V., Serra-cayuela, A., Dong, E., Mandal, R., Hennessy, D., Mcauliffe, S., Dillon, P., Wishart, D.S., Stanton, C. and Ross, R.P. (2018). Pasture feeding changes the bovine rumen and milk metabolome. Metabolites. 8(27): 1-24. DOI:10.3390/metabo8020027.

  16. Cardoso, F.C., Kalscheur, K.F. and Drackley, J.K. (2020). Symposium review: Nutrition strategies for improved health, production and fertility during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science. 103(6): 5684-5693. DOI:10.3168/jds.2019-17271.

  17. Cardoso, F.C., Leblanc, S.J., Murphy, M.R. and Drackley, J.K. (2013). Prepartum nutritional strategy affects reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 96(9): 5859-5871. DOI:10.3168/jds.2013-6759.

  18. Charlton, G.L., Rutter, S.M., East, M. and Sinclair, L.A. (2011). Preference of dairy cows: Indoor cubicle housing with access to a total mixed ration vs. access to pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 130(1-2), 1-9. DOI:10.1016/ j.applanim.2010.11.018.

  19. Coppock, C.E., Woelfel, C.G. and Belyea, R.L. (1981). Forage and feed testing programs-problems and opportunities. Journal of Dairy Science. 64(7)L 1625-1633. DOI:10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(81)82736-1.

  20. Dewhurst, R.J., Scollan, N.D., Youell, S.J., Tweed, J.K.S. and Humphreys, M.O. (2001). Influence of species, cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses. Grass and Forage Science. 56(1): 68-74. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00247.x.

  21. Drackley, J.K. and Cardoso, F.C. (2014). Prepartum and postpartum nutritional management to optimize fertility in high-yielding dairy cows in confined TMR systems. Animal. 8(SUPPL. 1): 5-14. DOI:10.1017/S1751731114000731.

  22. Du, Z., Yamasaki, S., Oya, T., Nguluve, D., Tinga, B., Macome, F. and Cai, Y. (2020). Ensiling characteristics of total mixed ration prepared with local feed resources in Mozambique and their effects on nutrition value and milk production in Jersey dairy cattle. Animal Science Journal = Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho. 91(1): e13370. DOI:10.1111/asj.13370.

  23. Eastridge, M.L. (2006). Major advances in applied dairy cattle nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(4): 1311-1323. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72199-3.

  24. Elgersma, A., Tamminga, S. and Ellen, G. (2006). Modifying milk composition through forage. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 131(3-4): 207-225. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2006.06.012.

  25. Endo, N., Nagai, K., Tomomi, T. and Kamomae, H. (2013). Changes in plasma progesterone levels in the caudal vena cava and the jugular vein and luteinizing hormone secretion pattern after feeding in lactating and non-lactating dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 59(2): 107-114. DOI:10.1262/jrd.2012-129.

  26. FAO (2012). Use of lesser-known plants and plant parts as animal feed resources in tropical regions, by Emmanuel S. Quansah and Harinder P.S. Makkar. Animal Production and Health Working Paper. No. 8. Rome.

  27. Felton, C. A. and DeVries, T.J. (2010). Effect of water addition to a total mixed ration on feed temperature, feed intake, sorting behavior and milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 93(6): 2651-2660. DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-3009.

  28. Gaafar, H.M.A., Abdel-Raouf, E.M. and El-Reidy, K.F.A. (2010). Effect of fibrolytic enzyme supplementation and fibre content of total mixed ration on productive performance of lactating buffaloes. Slovak Journal of Animal Science. 43(3): 147-153.

  29. Garnsworthy, P.C., Lock, A., Mann, G.E., Sinclair, K.D. and Webb, R. (2008). Nutrition, metabolism and fertility in dairy cows: 1. Dietary energy source and ovarian function. Journal of Dairy Science. 91(10): 3814-3823. DOI:10.3168/jds. 2008-1031.

  30. Geppert, T.C., Meyer, A.M., Perry, G.A. and Gunn, P.J. (2017). Effects of excess metabolizable protein on ovarian function and circulating amino acids of beef cows: 2. Excessive supply in varying concentrations from corn gluten meal. Animal. 11(4): 634-642. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116001890.

  31. Gilbert, R.O., Shin, S.T., Guard, C.L., Erb, H.N. and Frajblat, M. (2005). Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology. 64(9): 1879-1888. DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005. 04.022.

  32. Gong, J.G., Lee, W.J., Garnsworthy, P.C. and Webb, R. (2002). Effect of dietary-induced increases in circulating insulin concentrations during the early postpartum period on reproductive function in dairy cows. Reproduction. 123: 419-427. DOI:10.1530/rep.0.1230419.

  33. Gordon, F.J., Patterson, D.C., Yan, T., Porter, M.G., Mayne, C.S. and Unsworth, E.F. (1995). The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen. Animal Science. 61(2): 199-210. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800013722.

  34. Grummer, R.R. (1991). Effect of feed on the composition of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(9): 3244-3257. DOI:10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(91)78510-X.

  35. Houwers, W., Wouters, B. and Vernooij, A. (2015). Sri Lanka fodder study. Livestock Research Report. 26(3): 33-41.

  36. Hristov, A.N., Harper, M., Oh, J., Giallongo, F., Lopes, J.C., Cudoc, G., Clay, J., Ward, R. and Chase, L.E. (2018). Short communication: Variability in milk urea nitrogen and dairy total mixed ration composition in the northeastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(2): 1579-1584. DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-12925.

  37. Humer, E., Petri, R.M., Aschenbach, J.R., Bradford, B.J., Penner, G.B., Tafaj, M., Südekum, K.H. and Zebeli, Q. (2018). Invited review: Practical feeding management recommendations to mitigate the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(2): 1-17. DOI:10.3168 /jds.2017-13191.

  38. Hundal, J.S., Gupta, R.P., Wadhwa, M. and Bakshi, M.P.S. (2004). Effect of feeding total mixed ration on the productive performance of dairy cattle. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology. 4: 179-186. DOI:10.33785/ijds.2020.v73i 05.018.

  39. Ibrahim, M.N.M. and Jayatileka, T.N. (2000). Livestock production under coconut plantations in Sri Lanka: Cattle and buffalo production systems. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 13(1): 60-67. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2000.60.

  40. Ingvartsen, K.L., Aaes, O. and Andersen, J.B. (2001). Effects of pattern of concentrate allocation in the dry period and early lactation on feed intake and lactational performance in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science. 71(2-3) : 207-221. DOI:10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00192-0.

  41. Istasse, L., Reid, G.W., Tait, C.A.G. and Orskov, E.R. (1986). Concentrates for dairy cows: Effects of feeding methos, proportion in diet and type. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 15: 167-182.

  42. Jonker, J.S., Kohn, R.A. and High, J. (2002). Dairy herd management practices that impact nitrogen utilization efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(5): 1218-1226. DOI:10.3168/jds.S00 22-0302(02)74185-4.

  43. Khan, N., Sultan, S., Shah, S., Ali, J. and Khan, S. M. (2018). Effect of variable dietary energy levels on reproductive hormonal profile, body condition score, body weight and blood metabolites concentration of early lactating cows. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 6(2): 1172-1176.

  44. Kolver, E.S. and Muller, L.D. (1998). Performance and nutrient intake of high producing holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science. 81(5): 1403-1411. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75704-2.

  45. LeBlanc, S.J., Duffield, T.F., Leslie, K.E., Bateman, K.G., Keefe, G.P., Walton, J.S. and Johnson, W.H. (2002). Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(9): 2223-2236. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(02)74302-6.

  46. Leonardi, C. and Armentano, L.E. (2003). Effect of quantity, quality and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 86(2): 557-564. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73634-0.

  47. Li, X.Z., Park, B.K., Yan, C.G., Choi, J.G., Ahn, J.S. and Shin, J.S. (2012). Effect of alcohol fermented feed on lactating performance, blood metabolites, milk fatty acid profile and cholesterol content in holstein lactating cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 25(11): 1546-1552. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2012.12248.

  48. Löf, E., Gustafsson, H. and Emanuelson, U. (2007). Associations between herd characteristics and reproductive efficiency in dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(10): 4897- 4907. DOI:10.3168/jds.2006-819.

  49. Loor, J.J., Soriano, F.D., Lin, X., Herbein, J.H. and Polan. C.E. (2003). Grazing allowance after the morning or afternoon milking for lactating cows fed a total mixed ration (TMR) enhances trans 11-18: 1 and cis9, trans 11-18: 2 (rumenic acid) in milk fat to different extents. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 109: 105-119. DOI:10.1016/S0377- 8401(03)00175-5.

  50. Mackle, T.R., Kay, J.K., Auldist, M. J., McGibbon, A.K.H., Philpott, B.A., Baumgard, L.H. and Bauman, D.E. (2003). Effects of abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acid on milk fat concentration and yield from pasture-fed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 86: 644-652. DOI:10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(03)73642-X.

  51. Mendoza, A., Cajarville, C. and Repetto, J. L. (2016). Short communication: Intake, milk production and milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows fed diets combining fresh forage with a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science. 99(3): 1938-1944. DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-10257.

  52. Metzler-Zebeli, B.U., Schmitz-Esser, S., Klevenhusen, F., Podstatzky- Lichtenstein, L., Wagner, M. and Zebeli, Q. (2013). Grain- rich diets differently alter ruminal and colonic abundance of microbial populations and lipopolysaccharide in goats. Anaerobe. 20: 65-73. DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.02.005.

  53. Mikus, J.H. (2012). Diet consistency: Using TMR Audits TM to deliver more from your feed, equipment and people to the bottom line. High Plains Dairy Conference. 27-36.

  54. Mohammad, M., Gorgulu, M. and Goncu, S. (2017). The effects of total mixed ration and separate feeding on lactational performance of dairy cows. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture: 5(2): 1–7. DOI:10.9734/arja/2017/33663.

  55. Moore, G. and Varga, D.A. (1996). BUN and MUN: Urea nitrogen testing in dairy cattle. Compendium Continuing Education Veterinary. 18: 712-721.

  56. Morales-Almaráz, E., Soldado, A., González, A., Martínez-Fernández, A., Domínguez-Vara, I., De La Roza-Delgado, B. and Vicente, F. (2010). Improving the fatty acid profile of dairy cow milk by combining grazing with feeding of total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Research. 77(2): 225-230. DOI:10.1017/S002202991000004X.

  57. Moujahed, N., Dabboussi, S., Ammar, S.B.H. and Darej, S. (2009). Effect of concentrate feeding strategy on milk production. Research Journal of Dairy Sciences. 3(1): 3-7.

  58. NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. In Seventh Revised Edition. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. DOI:10.1201/b11653.

  59. Nissanka, N.P.C., Bandara, R.M.A.S. and Disnaka, K.G.J.S. (2010). A comparative study on feeding of total mixed ration vs conventional feeding on weight gain in weaned friesian heifers under tropical environment. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 5(1): 42-51.

  60. Nousiainen, J., Shingfield, K. J. and Huhtanen, P. (2004). Evaluation of milk urea nitrogen as a diagnostic of protein feeding. Journal of Dairy Science. 87: 386-398. DOI:10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(04)73178-1.

  61. Overton, T.R. and Waldron, M.R. (2004). Nutritional management of transition dairy cows: Strategies to optimize metabolic health. Journal of Dairy Science. 87(SUPPL. 1): E105- E119. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70066-1.

  62. Perera, B.M.A.O. and Jayasuriya, M.C.N. (2008). The dairy industry in Sri Lanka. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka. 36: 115-126.

  63. Prayitno, C. H., Mukminah, N. and Jayanegara, A. (2017). Effects of different feeding methods on feeding behavior, feed intake and digestibility of lactating dairy cows. International Journal of Dairy Science. 12(1): 73-80. DOI:10.3923/ ijds.2017.73.80.

  64. Premarathne, S. and Samarasinghe, K. (2020). Animal feed production in Sri Lanka: Past, present and future. In: Agricultural Research for Sustainable Food Systems in Sri Lanka (Vol. 1, pp. 277-301). DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-2152- 2_12.

  65. Rego, O.A., Portugal, P.A., Sousa, M.B., Rosa, H.J.D.  and Vouzela, C.M. (2004). Effect of diet on the fatty acid pattern of milk from dairy cows. Animal Research. 53: 213-220. DOI:10.1051/animres:2004010.

  66. Rego, O.A., Cabrita, A.R.J., Rosa, H. J.D., Alves, S.P., Duarte, V., Fonseca, A.J.M., Vouzela, C.F.M., Pires, F.R. and Bessa, R.J.B. (2016). Changes in milk production and milk fatty acid composition of cows switched from pasture to a total mixed ration diet and back to pasture. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 15(1): 76-86. DOI:10.1080/1828051X. 2016.1141330.

  67. Rehak, D., Barton, L., Vodkova, Z., Kubešová, M. and Rajmon, R. (2012). Relationships among body condition score, milk yield and reproduction in Czech Fleckvieh cows. Czech Journal of Animal Science. 57(6): 274-282.

  68. Roche, J.F. (2006). The effect of nutritional management of the dairy cow on reproductive efficiency. Animal Reproduction Science. 96(3-4): 282-296. DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci. 2006.08.007.

  69. Roche, J.R., Bell, A.W., Overton, T.R. and Loor, J.J. (2013). Nutritional management of the transition cow in the 21st century-a paradigm shift in thinking. Animal Production Science. 53: 1000-1023. DOI:10.1071/AN12293.

  70. Sarker, N.R., Yeasmin, D., Habib, M.A. and Tabassum, F. (2019). Feeding effect of total mixed ration on milk yield, nutrient intake, digestibility and rumen environment in Red Chittagong cows. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 5(1): 71-77. DOI:10.3329/ajmbr.v5i1.41048.

  71. Schingoethe, D.J. (2017). A 100-Year Review: Total mixed ration feeding of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 100: 10143-10150. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12967.

  72. Schröder, B. and Breves, G. (2006). Mechanisms and regulation of calcium absorption from the gastrointestinal tract in pigs and ruminants: Comparative aspects with special emphasis on hypocalcemia in dairy cows. Animal Health Research Reviews. 7: 31-41. DOI:10.1017/S1466252307001144.

  73. Schroeder, G.F., Couderc, J. J., Bargo, F. and Rearte, D. H. (2005). Milk production and fatty acid profile of milkfat by dairy cows fed a winter oats (Avena sativa L.) pasture only or a total mixed ration. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(2): 187-195. DOI:10.1080/00288233.2005. 9513649.

  74. Schroeder, G.F., Delahoy, J.E., Vidaurreta, I., Bargo, F., Gagliostro, G.A. and Muller, L.D. (2003). Milk fatty acid composition of cows fed a total mixed ration or pasture plus concentrates replacing corn with fat. Journal of Dairy Science. 86: 3237-3248. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73927-7.

  75. Sharifi, K. (2014). Rumen health care for sustained productivity. Energy. 1: 1-8.

  76. Soriano, F.D., Polan, C.E. and Miller, C.N. (2001). Supplementing pasture to lactating Holsteins fed a total mixed ration diet. Journal of Dairy Science. 84: 2460-2468. DOI:10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(01)74696-6.

  77. Sova, A.D., LeBlanc, S.J., McBride, B.W. and DeVries, T.J. (2014). Accuracy and precision of total mixed rations fed on commercial dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(1): 562-571. DOI:10.3168/jds.2013-6951.

  78. Staples, C.R., Thatcher, W.W. and Clark, J.H. (1990). Relationship Between ovarian activity and energy status during the early postpartum period of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 73(4): 938-947. DOI:10.3168/ jds.S0022-0302(90)78750-4.

  79. Stone, W.C. (2004). Nutritional approaches to minimize subacute ruminal acidosis and laminitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 87: E13-E26. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(04)70057-0.

  80. Storm, A.C. and Kristensen, N.B. (2010). Effects of particle size and dry matter content of a total mixed ration on intraruminal equilibration and net portal flux of volatile fatty acids in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 93(9): 4223-4238. DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-3002.

  81. Swanepoel, N. and Robinson, P.H. (2019). Impacts of feeding a flax-seed based feed supplement on productive and reproductive performance of early lactation multiparous Holstein cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 251: 134-152. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.03.008.

  82. Tafaj, M., Junck, B., Maulbetsch, A., Steingass, H., Piepho, H.P. and Drochner, W. (2004). Digesta characteristics of dorsal, middle and ventral rumen of cows fed with different hay qualities and concentrate levels. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 58(4): 325-342. DOI:10.1080/000394204 1233 1273259.

  83. Teshome, D., Fita, L., Feyissa, F., Kitaw, G. and Wondatir, Z. (2017). Effect of Total mixed ration on dry matter intake, milk yield and composition of early lactating jersey cows. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 7(9): 19-24.

  84. Tomas, F.M. and Potter, B.J. (1976). The site of magnesium absorption from the ruminant stomach. British Journal of Nutrition. 36(1): 37-45. DOI:10.1079/bjn19760056.

  85. Tucker, W.B., Rude, B.J. and Wittayakun, S. (2001). Performance and economics of dairy cows fed a corn silage-based total mixed ration or grazing annual ryegrass during mid to late lactation. The Professional Animal Scientist. 17(3): 195-201. DOI:10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31622-3.

  86. Vibart, R.E., Fellner, V., Burns, J.C., Huntington, G.B. and Green, J.T. (2008). Performance of lactating dairy cows fed varying levels of total mixed ration and pasture. Journal of Dairy Research. 75(4): 471-480. DOI:10.1017/S0022 029908003361.

  87. Wachirapakorn, C., Puramongkol, T. and Seepuang, V. (1997). Total mixed ration (TMR) or complete ration (CR) for dairy cows. Journal Dairy Cows. 5: 53.

  88. Washburn, S.P., White, S.L., Green, J.T. and Benson, G.A. (2002). Reproduction, mastitis and body condition of seasonally calved holstein and jersey cows in confinement or pasture systems. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(1): 105-111. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74058-7.

  89. White, S.L., Bertrand, J.A., Wade, M.R., Washburn, S.P., Green, J.T. and Jenkins, T.C. (2001). Comparison of fatty acid content of milk from jersey and holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science. 84(10): 2295-2301. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74676-0.

  90. Wongnen, C., Wachirapakom, C., Patipan, C., Panpong, D., Kongweha, K., Namsaen, N., Gunun, P. and Yuangklang, C. (2009). Effects of fermented total mixed ration and cracked cottonseed on milk yield and milk composition in dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 22(12): 1625-1632. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2009.80668.

  91. Yan, T., Gordon, F.J., Agnew, R.E., Porter, M.G. and Patterson, D.C. (1997). The metabolisable energy requirement for maintenance and the efficiency of utilisation of metabolisable energy for lactation by dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets. Livestock Production Science. 51(1-3): 141-150. DOI:10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00065-1.

  92. Zebeli, Q., Aschenbach, J.R., Tafaj, M., Boguhn, J., Ametaj, B.N. and Drochner, W. (2012). Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 95(3): 1041-1056. DOI:10.3168/jds.2011-4421.

  93. Zebeli, Q., Ghareeb, K., Humer, E., Metzler-Zebeli, B.U. and Besenfelder, U. (2015). Nutrition, rumen health and inflammation in the transition period and their role on overall health and fertility in dairy cows. Research in Veterinary Science. 103: 126-136. DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.09.020.

  94. Zerbini, E., Polan, C.E. and Herbein, J.H. (1988). Effect of dietary soybean meal and fish meal on protein digesta flow in Holstein cows during early and midlactation. Journal of Dairy Science. 71(5): 1248-1258. DOI:10.3168/jds.S00 22-0302(88)79680-0.

Editorial Board

View all (0)