Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 42 issue 3 (september 2021) : 284-291

Vegetable Grafting: Methods, Uses and Opportunities for Nepal: A Review

S. Kharal1,*, A.K. Shrestha2, H.N. Giri2, S. Pandey3
1Karma Chemicals Co. Pvt. Ltd., Sitapaila, Kathmandu, Nepal.
2Department of Horticulture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
3Department of Pathology, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
Cite article:- Kharal S., Shrestha A.K., Giri H.N., Pandey S. (2021). Vegetable Grafting: Methods, Uses and Opportunities for Nepal: A Review . Agricultural Reviews. 42(3): 284-291. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-160.
Grafted vegetable seedlings have been used from the early 20th century. This technique has been utilized extensively in East Asia and the European countries where it has developed as a multimillion-dollar industry. The increase in land area under protected cultivation, intensive use of land, scarcity of production resources and changing climate leading to unpredictable weather has caused a rapid increase in the use of grafted vegetables. However, in Nepal, where the productivity of vegetable crops is quite low and the breeding activities are inadequate, use of grafted vegetables is still unexploited. Therefore, this technique can be an important intervention to improve the overall production system of Solanaceous and Cucurbitaceous vegetables. Methods of vegetable grafting, their current uses, research carried out in Nepal and the possible opportunities are discussed in this review paper. Cleft, splice, tongue approach, hole- insertion and pin grafting are the methods currently in use. Grafting can be used to overcome the problems caused by various soil borne disease and nematodes and abiotic stresses like, low and high temperature stress, water stress, salinity, metal and organic pollutants while increasing the yield and extending crop duration in vegetable production. In Nepal, few research have been carried out on vegetable grafting with majority of them on assessment of tolerance to soil borne diseases. Utilization of this technique in Nepalese conditions provide ample opportunities for researchers and academicians to conduct researches and for breeding companies to develop resistant rootstocks. By implementing this method, vegetable industry can improve the overall yield, its quality and reduce hindrances in production.
Grafting may be defined as the natural or artificial union of plant parts to produce a single plant. When plant parts unite, vascular continuity is established between them resulting in a genetically composite organism which functions as a single plant (Davies et al., 2011). In fruit trees, it is a centuries old practice done to enhance the quality and quantity of produce by Chinese, Romans and Europeans even in the ancient times (Oda and Lee, 2003). However, in vegetables, it is a fairly new practice developed in the early 20th century although literature regarding vegetable grafting can be dated back to 17th century. The earliest grafted vegetable seedlings were produced in Japan and Korea when watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) were grafted into pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) rootstocks to introduce resistance against Fusarium wilt in water melons (Sakata et al., 2005). Since then, the use of grafted cucurbit seedlings took pace and it rapidly developed and spread since 1930 when bottle gourd (Lagenaria ciceraria) was developed as a stable rootstock for watermelon (Oda and Lee, 2003). In 1959, Solanum integrifolium (scarlet eggplant) was used as rootstock for scions of eggplant (Solanum melongena) in large scale production to overcome soil-borne diseases such as verticillium wilt, fusarium wilt, bacterial wilt and nematodes (Oda, 1999). From Japan and Korea, the use of grafted seedlings spread to the European nations in the late 1900’s and from there, throughout the world. Nowadays, the use of grafted tomatoes, peppers, watermelon and cucumbers is quite high in developed nations for greenhouse production.
       
The use of grafted vegetable plants is done to enhance plant vigor, increase the yield (Ropokis et al., 2019), tolerance to diseases, tolerance to temperature stress, enhance uptake of nutrients (Nawaz et al., 2017), improve drought tolerance (Kumar et al., 2017), increase tolerance to metal and organic pollutants, extend the crop duration, increase salt tolerance etc. (Bletsos et al., 2003; Edelstein, 2004; Khah et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010; Schwarz et al., 2010). The researches done on grafting of tomato, eggplant and cucurbits have shown significant positive effect upon the yield, quality, resistance to soil borne diseases, water stresses, salinity and tolerance to toxic chemicals in the soil due to grafting (Yassin and Hussen, 2015). Because of this, the use of grafted seedlings as propagules for cultivation is progressively increasing in the vegetable industry sector  throughout the world. The increment in area under protected cultivation, intensive land use (Edelstein, 2004), advantages in yield, limited options for controlling soilborne diseases (Kubota et al., 2017) and the development of new techniques and methods for grafting (Gaion et al., 2018) has also resulted in increased use of this technique. To illustrate, in Korea and Japan alone, about 92 and 95% of all cultivated watermelon are grafted plants (Lee et al., 2010). In Italy, 100% of melons, 78% of cucumber and 85% of eggplants cultivated in greenhouse are grafted plants (Miles et al., 2016). Although the use of grafted seedlings for vegetable production is already developed as a multimillion dollar industry in the East Asia and the West, it still hasn’t been started commercially in Nepal.
       
Nepal has a significant variation in altitude from 60 masl to 8848  masl which results in a great diversity in agro-climate from tropical areas to the temperate where almost all types of vegetables can be grown year-round. The uncultivated arable land is abundant (6.99% of total land area) and the water resources are also plenty (AICC, 2019) which can be utilized for the expansion of vegetable cultivation. The area under commercial vegetable farming is increasing every year. The area used for vegetable cultivation was 2,84,135 hectares in 2016/17 which escalated to 2,86,864 hectares in 2017/18 (AICC, 2019). Also, in recent years, the production of vegetables under protected cultivation is getting exponential momentum in Nepal (Atreya et al., 2020).
       
Nonetheless, the productivity is quite low compared to neighboring nations. In India, the average productivity of vegetables is 17. 97 Mt/ ha (GOI, 2018) and in China, it was 27.8 tons/ha with annual increment of 0.44% in 2001 (Liu et al., 2004) while it is only 13.79 M t/ha in Nepal in 2018 (AICC, 2019). The incidence of pests and diseases (Lamichhane et al., 2011; Pretty and Barucha, 2015), inadequate disease and pest resistant cultivars (Welbaum, 2015), biotic and abiotic stresses, exposure of plants to extreme weather events due to climate change (Ahuja et al., 2010; Phphi et al., 2017), poor soil management (Kharal et al., 2018) and low fertilizer use are some reasons for low productivity of vegetables. Besides this, the incidence of soil borne diseases, stresses, soil acidity and alkalinity increases with increased crop intensity in protected cultivation (Lee et al., 2010) also leads to low yields. Thus, the use of high-yielding, disease resistant cultivars and quality planting material that can tolerate stress are the primary requisites for increasing the productivity of vegetables.
       
However, in a country like Nepal, where modern techno-logical advances in vegetable breeding are not adopted and negligible portion of agricultural investment is on breeding (Joshi, 2017), it is quite difficult to develop and release superior plant varieties with desired characteristics. Thus, the grafted vegetables can play a major role to increase the vegetable production by introducing resistance to pest and diseases and increasing tolerance to stresses since it is a proven technique for enhancing the potential of a crop.
       
Thus, this review paper aims to discuss and review the methods of vegetable grafting followed around the world, review the uses of grafted vegetable plants and their advantages. It also targets to study the researches on vegetable grafting done in Nepal and suggest the opportunities offered by vegetable grafting for academicians, vegetable seed industry and the producers in Nepalese scenario.
 
Methods of vegetable grafting
 
Currently, vegetable grafting is practiced on the fruit vegetables belonging to family Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae but the selection of a particular grafting method depends primarily on the type of crop used (Lee, 1994), the grower’s experience, personal choice, purpose of grafting (Lee et al., 2010) and the cost incurred (Maurya, 2019). Conventionally, splice and cleft grafting is more popular with Solanaceous vegetables while tongue approach grafting ensures higher survival of Cucurbitaceous vegetables when grafted (Yassin and Hussen, 2015). The various methods used for grafting different rootstocks in different vegetables is shown in Table 1.
 

Table1: Grafting methods employed for various vegetable crops.


 
Cleft grafting
 
It is also known as wedge or apical grafting and it is mostly used for solanaceous vegetables. In this method, a vertical incision of about 0.5 cm is made at the center of rootstock after decapitating it and a scion with wedge shaped end is inserted at the center of the incision before tying the graft union with a plastic clip or parafilm (Johnson et al., 2011) (Fig 1 A, B).
 

Fig 1: Grafting method in vegetables.


 
Splice grafting
 
It is also known as top grafting or tube grafting and is one of  the most popular grafting method for solanaceous vegetables. In cucurbits, it is slightly modified and called one cotyledonsplice grafting (Lee et al., 2010). According to Johnson et al., (2011), both the rootstock and scion are cut at 450 angle with matching cut and are clipped together with a grafting clip (Fig 2  A, B). The major advantage of this method is that sturdy and healthy grafted seedlings are produced due to proper attachment of the vascular bundles (Oda and Lee, 2003).
 

Fig 2: Splice grafting (A and B).


 
Tongue approach grafting / side grafting
 
Although this method is applicable for both Solanaceous and Cucurbitaceous vegetables, it is most widely practiced on the latter. In this method, a slanting cut is made on the rootstock stem in downward direction and upward direction in the scion stem at 30°-45° angle (Fig 3). The rootstock and scion are then attached together at the point of cut and held together with grafting clips. This method requires rootstock and scion of equal diameter so, sowing time of scion and rootstock seedlings should be adjusted accordingly.
 

Fig 3: Tongue approach grafting. Source: Hassel and Memmott (2008).


 
Hole insertion grafting
 
This method is most popular among Cucurbits when the rootstock and scion have hollow hypocotyls. A hole is made on the rootstock and scion is inserted inside it (Fig 4). It is most popular with watermelon seedlings when they are grafted unto rootstocks of bottle gourd or squash (Maurya et al., 2019). Although this method requires higher skill, it is more popular among the commercial growers because it does not require additional labour for clipping, transplanting, cutting and removal of the grafting clip (Lee et al., 2010).
 

Fig 4: Hole insertion grafting. Source: Hassel and Memmott (2008).


 
Pin grafting
 
This method is quite similar to splice grafting but especially designed pins are used for holding the grafted seedlings instead of the grafting clips (Lee et al., 2010) (Fig 1B).
 
Utilization of grafting on vetetables
To improve the yield and fruit quality
 
Several research trials conducted on grafting of Cucurbits and Solanaceous vegetables have shown an increase in the yield of crops. Khah et al., (2006) demonstrated a yield increment in plants grafted unto “Henan” rootstock by 32.5% and 12.8% in greenhouse and open field cultivation respectively compared to self-grafted plants in “Big Red” tomato variety. Similarly, Moreno et al., (2016) conducted an experiment in watermelon using “Marathon” (Cucurbita maxima x Cucurbita moschata hybrid) and Bottle Gourd (Lagenariasiceraria) as rootstocks and found yield to increase by 136% and 159% in grafted plants than the non-grafted ones also with an improvement in fruit quality in the former. Similar results have been observed on eggplants (Sabatino et al., 2018), cucumber (Noor et al., 2019), sweet pepper (del Amor et al., 2008) and other cucurbits (Salam et al., 2002; Lee and Oda, 2003; Colla et al., 2006).
       
The previous studies on the effect of grafting on fruit quality are not consistent. While many fruit qualities have been reported to improve, some fruit quality parameters are unaffected while some are hindered due to grafting. The physical quality attributes like size, shape, colour and absence of defects have improved (Pogonyi et al., 2005; Pradhan et al., 2017). Fredes et al., (2017) reported an increase in the glucose and malic acid content of watermelon when grafted with citron melon rootstocks. However, they reported no significant difference on flesh sugars and acid content due to the intervention. Dijdonou et al., (2016) recorded no difference in total titratable acidity and the ratio of soluble solid content (SSC) to TTA in field grown tomatoes grafted onto “Beaufort” or “Multifort” rootstocks compared to non- or self-grafted plants. Nonetheless, they found reduction in the Vitamin C content by 22%.
       
While some authors have reported a decrease in total sugar content in grafted vegetable crops (Qian et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006), others have obtained an increase in soluble solids, Vitamin C content, total soluble sugars and sugar- acid ratio (Proietti et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2009; Gan et al., 2018). Therefore, more extensive researches need to be carried out in the future to understand the effect on fruit quality and development of possible techniques to improve the fruit quality in grafted plants.
 
To combat soil borne diseases
 
Grafting of vegetables have been used most extensively and successfully for the control and management of soil borne diseases in both open and protected cultivation since grafted plants have proved to offer resistance to a large number of diseases. A large number of studies on vegetable grafting have exhibited successful control of major soil borne diseases like Verticillium wilt (Curuk et al., 2009; Papadaki et al., 2017), Fusarium wilt (Yetisir et al., 2003; Sakata et al., 2008), Bacterial wilt (McAvoy et al., 2012) and root knot nematodes (Lian et al., 2007).
 
To improve tolerance to abiotic stresses
 
Grafting has also been utilized to improve tolerance and improve yield under various environmental stress conditions like water stress (Lopez-Marin et al., 2017), salinity stress (Wahb-Allah and Mahmoud, 2014), low and high temperature stress (Schwarz et al., 2010) and soil pollutants in both Cucurbits and Soalanceous vegetables. For example, the use of eggplants as rootstocks for tomato plants has exhibited more tolearance to higher soil temperature (Abdelmageed and Gruda, 2009). Thus, the utilization of this method has helped to improve productivity under sub-optimal conditions.
 
Research on vegetable grafting in nepal
 
Not much of research has been carried out in Nepal with regards to vegetable grafting. It was initiated in Nepal with the conduction of training to scientists and technicians in Khumaltar, NARC in 2007 (Timila and KC, 2014). Subsequently, researches were carried out in Agriculture Research Station, Malepatan, Pokhara on brinjal and tomato by using wild rootstocks for grafting. It included testing of rootstocks and the evaluation of the grafted plants (Timila and KC, 2014). Specifically, the grafting experiments till date has been carried merely on solanaceous vegetables for management of two prominent soil borne disease in Nepal, Bacterial wilt and Root Knot Nematode (Timila et al., 2016).
       
In an experiment to evaluate wild eggplant species/genotypes as rootstock against bacterial wilt, Timila et al., (2016) found indigenous wild eggplant (Solanum turvom), exotic wild eggplant (S. sisymbriifolium) and exotic eggplant genotype, EG 195 from AVRDC to be resistant to bacterial wilt. Following through on another experiment, Timila and Manandhar (2016) reported bacterial wilt susceptible tomato variety Pusa Ruby grafted on wild eggplant showed 100% survival until 12 weeks after inoculation of bacterial wilt pathogen compared to cent percent mortality of non-grafted ones within 3 weeks.
 
At another stance, Baidya et al., (2017) found wild eggplant S. sisymbriifolium as a prominent rootstock for resistance against root knot nematode along with bacterial wilt. In experiments carried out for 2 consecutive years, 2009/10, at Hemza, Kaski, the author co. found presence of no nematode galls on root system of tomato grafted on S. sisymbriifolium, while 75% of root system were galled in case of non-grafted tomatoes. In addition, significantly higher yield (37%) and increased crop life span was observed in grafted tomatoes.
       
KC et al., (2012) while assessing reaction of various rootstocks of eggplant, tomato and chili to root knot nematode, found out no presence of root knot nematode galls in root system of wild eggplant; S. torvum, S. sisymbriifolium and AVRDC Chilli accession PP 02337-750 among many. They also reported 22-37% yield increase in grafted tomatoes compared to non-grafted ones.
       
Inspired by the research findings, various farmers groups and individual growers of Syangja and Hemja, Kaski are commercially producing and selling grafted seedlings of tomato on rootstocks: S.  sisymbriifolium and S. torvum on demand basis.      
       
While these researches have shown promise and paved a path for vegetable grafting in Nepal, the exploitation of this method to manage diseases, overcome stresses, increase yield and quality of fruits is still untapped in our scenario. It is difficult to find documented reports on the use of grafted vegetables in the farmer’s level.
 
Need for vegetable grafting in nepal
 
Intensive vegetable farming started gaining pace and uprise in Nepal since last two decades with better availability of quality input materials, technology transfer and adoption of protected cultivation (Thapa and Dhimal, 2017). Many areas like peri urban parts of Kathmandu valley, Chitwan plains, Lalbandi, Dang valley have developed into a prominent vegetable hub. In Kathmandu valley alone, 570 hectares of land is utilized for protected cultivation of tomato (MoALD, 2017/18). Mono cropping has been a basic feature of these land farms which in turn have prompted ever increasing soil borne disease incidence. Bacterial wilt, Root knot nematode, Fusarium wilt, Phytophthora wilt have been a regular turmoil of soils of these vegetable hubs (Timila and KC, 2014). Although some tomato and eggplant varieties are recognized and cropped as bacterial wilt resistant crop, their resistance is limited to selective strains and biovars only. In case of sweet pepper, breeding for resistance against the soil borne pathogens has not been expectedly successful (Cerkauskas, 2004).
       
Recently, crops like sweet peppers and eggplants are being promoted to grow in semi determinate and indeterminate fashion. This requires the crops to be grown for a longer time period which makes them more prone to soil borne diseases and extreme climatic conditions. In such scenario, grafting of vegetables can play a major role in preventing disease susceptibility and to ensure crop longevity. Grafting on resistant rootstocks doesn’t merely stand as a choice for solanaceous crops but the only alternative to overshadow pathogens of soil.
       
Summer gourds and melons are grown extensively in eastern and central plains of Nepal. The area under cucurbitaceous vegetables has also increased significantly in recent decades (MoALD, 2017/2018). These crops suffer tremendously with consequences of climatic uncertainty, persistent drought or abrupt flooding. Grafting can be seen as a better option to manage the abiotic stress on these gourds and melons.
       
Government of Nepal has been promoting organic farming in last few years. Karnali Province is taking measures to develop itself into organic province of Nepal. In this case, vegetable grafting remains as the best management tool to drive organic farming in a sustainable path since it can help avoiding the use of chemical pesticides for pest control (Pérez-Alfocea, 2014).
 
Opportunities for vegetable grafting
 
Since works on vegetable grafting is quite limited, there are ample opportunities for researchers, professors and academicians to make studies. Surveys can be made to dentify the largely untapped wild and resistant rootstocks. Researches can be done on biotic stresses, soil borne diseases, environmental stresses, plant vigor, fruit yield and quality. Activities like verification of rootstocks and developing grafting as a method of reducing pesticide use are also largely unexploited thus, provide an opportunity. The breeders can also work on the development of resistant rootstocks. For the entrepreneurs and growers, this can be an effective tool to improve overall yield and quality of vegetables while avoiding the hindrances in vegetable production.
 
Challenges in vegetable grafting
 
The main challenge in adoption of vegetable grafting in production is the higher cost of the seedlings. The production of these seedlings requires rootstock and scion seed, extra labour for grafting as well as special care to seedlings after grafting which in turn, raise the price for grafted seedlings (Edelstein., 2004; Lee et al., 2010; Yassin and Hussen, 2015) although several studies have shown higher overall benefit associated with the use of grafted vegetable seedlings (Djidonou et al., 2013; Genova et al., 2013; Genova et al., 2015). Another challenge may be the lack of diffusion and adoption of this technology due to poor extension practices. Since researches for the recommendation of proper stock/scion combinations and breeding for development of suitable rootstocks are still lacking in Nepal, this technique is difficult to adapt by potential growers without extensive research beforehand.
Grafted vegetable seedlings have been used to increase the yield as well as to overcome the various biotic and abiotic stresses in vegetable production throughout the world. The increase in protected cultivation of vegetables, intensive cropping cycles, scarcity of production resources and changing climate has led to rapid increase in the use of grafted vegetables.Since Nepal has low vegetable productivity, this technique can be an important intervention to improve the overall production system of Solanaceous and Cucurbitaceous vegetables by overcoming various constraints in production. For this, site specific rootstocks recommendation based on field-based research and development seems necessary. Meanwhile, the research on various aspects of this technology is quite limited and almost unexploited in Nepal. Therefore, there are ample opportunities for researchers, academicians, breeding companies and the vegetable industry to use its advantages.
The authors would like to acknowledge faculty of Horticulture at Agriculture and Forestry University for their guidance and support to authors during the writing of the manuscript.
The authors declare no conflict of interest with anyone.

  1. Abdelmageed, A.H.A. and Gruda, N. (2009). Influence of grafting on growth, development and some physiological parameters of tomatoes under controlled heat stress conditions. European Journal of Horticultural Science. 74(1): 16-20.

  2. Ahuja, I., de Vos, R.C., Bones, A.M. and Hall, R.D. (2010). Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends in Plant Science. 15(12): 664-674.

  3. AICC. (2019). Agriculture Information and Communication/Ministry of Agriculture, Land Management and Cooperatives. Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur, Nepal. Available online: http://www.aicc.gov.np/home/ (accessed on 02 December 2019). 

  4. Atreya, P.N., Kafle, A., Suvedi, B.D. and Shrestha, S.B. (2020, February 6-7). Precision and Protected Horticulture in Nepal [Paper presentation]. 11th National Horticulture Seminar, 2020; Kathmandu, Nepal.

  5. Baidya, S., Timila, R.D., Ram Bahadur, K.C., Manandhar, H.K. and Manandhar, C. (2017). Management of Root Knot Nematode on Tomato through Grafting Root Stock of Solanum sisymbriifolium. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 3: 27-31.

  6. Bletsos, F., Thanassoulopoulos, C. and Roupakias, D. (2003). Effect of grafting on growth, yield and verticillium wilt of eggplant. Hort Science. 38(2): 183-186.

  7. Cerkauskas, R. (2004). Pepper Diseases: Bacterial Wilt. AVRDC Publication .

  8. Chung, H.D., Lee, J.M., (2007). Rootstocks for grafting. In: Horticulture in Korea. Korean Society for Horticultural Science. pp. 162-167.

  9. Çürük, S., Dasgan, H.Y., Mansuroğlu, S., Kurt, Ş., Mazmanoğlu, M., Antaklı, Ö. and Tarla, G. (2009). Grafted eggplant yield, quality and growth in infested soil with Verticillium dahliae and Meloidogyne incognita. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 44(12): 1673-1681.

  10. Colla, G., Roupahel, Y., Cardarelli, M. and Rea, E. (2006). Effect of salinity on yield, fruit quality, leaf gas exchange and mineral composition of grafted watermelon plants. Hort Science. 41(3): 622-627.

  11. Davies, F.T., Geneve, R.L., Kester, D.E. and Hartmann, H.T. (2011). Hartmann and Kester’s Plant Propagation: Principles and Practice. 8th  Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  12. del Amor, F.M., Lopez-Marin, J. and Gonzalez, A. (2008). Effect of photoselective sheet and grafting technique on growth, yield and mineral composition of sweet pepper plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 31(6): 1108-1120.

  13. Djidonou, D., Simonne, A.H., Koch, K.E., Brecht, J.K. and Zhao, X. (2016). Nutritional quality of field-grown tomato fruit as affected by grafting with interspecific hybrid rootstocks. Hort Science. 51(12): 1618-1624.

  14. Djidonou, D., Gao, Z. and Zhao, X. (2013). Economic analysis of grafted tomato production in sandy soils in northern Florida. Hort Technology. 23(5): 613-621.

  15. Edelstein, M. (2004). Grafting vegetable-crop Plants: Pros and Cons. In VII International Symposium on Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climates: Production, Pest Management and Global Competition. 659 (pp. 235-238).

  16. Fredes, A., Roselló, S., Beltrán, J., Cebolla Cornejo, J., Pérez de Castro, A., Gisbert, C. and Picó, M.B. (2017). Fruit quality assessment of watermelons grafted onto citron melon rootstock. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 97(5): 1646-1655.

  17. Gaion, L.A., Braz, L.T. and Carvalho, R.F. (2018). Grafting in vegetable crops: A great technique for agriculture. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 24(1): 85-102.

  18. Gan, G., Yu, K., Jiang, Y., Mo, Y., Li, W., Wu, Y. and Wang, Y. (2018). Effects of Solanum lycopersicum Rootstock Grafting on Tomato Resistance and Quality. Agricultural Biotechnology. 7(5): 41-47.

  19. Genova, C., Schreinemachers, P. and Afari-Sefa, V. (2013). An impact Assessment of AVRDC’s Tomato Grafting in Vietnam. AVRDC-World Vegetable Center.

  20. Genova, C., Schreinemachers, P. and Afari-Sefa, V. (2015). Adoption, Yield and Profitability of Tomato Grafting Technique in Vietnam. AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. AVRDC Publication No. 15-785. 

  21. Government of India. (2018). Horticultural Statistics at a Glance Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi, India.

  22. Huang, Y., Tang, R., Cao, Q. and Bie, Z. (2009). Improving the fruit yield and quality of cucumber by grafting onto the salt tolerant rootstock under NaCl stress. Scientia Horticulturae. 122(1): 26-31.

  23. Johnson, S.J., Kreider, P. and Miles, C.A. (2011). Vegetable Grafting: Eggplants and Tomatoes. Washington State University Extension.

  24. Joshi, B.K. (2017). Plant breeding in Nepal: Past, present and future. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University. 1: 1-33.

  25. KC, R., Timila, R., Baidya, S. and Lalchan, C. (2012). Verification of Resistant Rootstocks against Root-knot Nematodes and Grafting Technology on Tomato. Proceedings of the 4th SAS-N Convention. Society of Agricultural Scientists. (pp. 363-365).

  26. Khah, E.M., Kakava, E., Mavromatis, A., Chachalis, D. and Goulas, C. (2006). Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open- field. Journal of Applied Horticulture. 8(1): 3-7.

  27. Kharal, S., Khanal, B. and Panday, D. (2018). Assessment of soil fertility under different land-use systems in Dhading District of Nepal. Soil Systems. 2(4): 57.

  28. Kubota, C., Meng, C., Son, Y.J., Lewis, M., Spalholz, H. and Tronstad, R. (2017). Horticultural, systems-engineering and economic evaluations of short-term plant storage techniques as a labor management tool for vegetable grafting nurseries. PloS one. 12(2): e0170614.

  29. Kumar, P., Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M. and Colla, G. (2017). Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8: 1130.

  30. Lamichhane, J.R., Balestra, G.M., Mazzaglia, A., Kshetri, M.B. and Varvaro, L. (2011). An Overview on Bacterial diseases of the most important agricultural crops in Nepal. Acta Hortic. 917, 203-210. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic. 2011.917.26.

  31. Lee, J.M. (1994). Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods and benefits. Hort Science. 29(4): 235-239.

  32. Lee, J.M., Kubota, C., Tsao, S.J., Bie, Z., Echevarria, P.H., Morra, L. and Oda, M. (2010). Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae.127(2): 93-105.

  33. Lian, D., Lingzhi, Z., Liying, L. and Hua-zhong, R. (2007). Effects of different rootstocks with resistance to root-knot nematode on growth, quality and yield of tomato in greenhouse. China Vegetables. 6: 13-16.

  34. Liu, H., Zhu, Z. and Diao, M. (2006). Characteristics of the sugar metabolism in leaves and fruits of grafted watermelon during fruit development. Plant Physiology Communications. 42(5): 835.

  35. Liu, Y.M., Jinsong, C., XiaoYong, X.Z. and Kamphuis, B.M. (2004). The Vegetable industry in China; Developments in policies, production, marketing and international trade. LEI.

  36. López-Marín, J., Gálvez, A., del Amor, F.M., Albacete, A., Fernández, J.A., Egea-Gilabert, C. and Pérez-Alfocea, F. (2017). Selecting vegetative/generative/dwarfing rootstocks for improving fruit yield and quality in water stressed sweet peppers. Scientia Horticulturae. 214: 9-17.

  37. Maurya, D., Pandey, A.K., Kumar, V., Dubey, S. and Prakash, V. (2019). Grafting techniques in vegetable crops: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7(2): 1664-1672.

  38. McAvoy, T., Freeman, J.H., Rideout, S.L., Olson, S.M. and Paret, M.L. (2012). Evaluation of grafting using hybrid rootstocks for management of bacterial wilt in field tomato production. Hort Science. 47(5): 621-625.

  39. Miles, C., Kubota, C. and Zhao, X. (2016). Vegetable Grafting International Field Trip Report–Part II: Sicily, Italy.

  40. MoALD. (2017/18). Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture 2074-75. Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.

  41. Moreno, B., Jacob, C., Rosales, M., Krarup, C. and Contreras, S. (2016). Yield and quality of grafted watermelon grown in a field naturally infested with fusarium wilt. Hort Technology. 26(4): 453-459.

  42. Nawaz, M. A., Wang, L., Jiao, Y., Chen, C., Zhao, L., Mei, M., et al (2017). Pumpkin rootstock improves nitrogen use efficiency of watermelon scion by enhancing nutrient uptake, cytokinin content and expression of nitrate reductase genes. Plant Growth Regulation. 82(2): 233-246.

  43. Noor, R.S., Wang, Z., Umair, M., Yaseen, M., Ameen, M., Rehman, S.U. and Sun, Y. (2019). Interactive Effects of Grafting Techniques and Scion-Rootstocks Combinations on Vegetative Growth, Yield and Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Agronomy. 9(6): 288.

  44. Oda, J.L. M. and Lee, M. (2003). Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews. 28: 61-124.

  45. Oda, M. (1999). Grafting of vegetables to improve greenhouse production. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletin. 480: 1-11

  46. Papadaki, A.M., Bletsos, F.A., Eleftherohorinos, I.G., Menexes, G. and Lagopodi, A.L. (2017). Effectiveness of seven commercial rootstocks against verticillium wilt and their effects on growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato. Crop Protection.102: 25-31.

  47. Pérez-Alfocea, F. (2014, March). Why should we investigate vegetable grafting? In International Symposium on Vegetable Grafting. 1086 (pp. 21-29).

  48. Phophi, M.M. and Mafongoya, P.L. (2017). Constraints to vegetable production resulting from pest and diseases induced by climate change and globalization: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto). 9(10): 11-25.

  49. Pogonyi, A., Pék, Z., Helyes, L. and Lugasi, A. (2005). Effect of grafting on the tomato’s yield, quality and main fruit components in spring forcing. Acta Alimentaria. 34(4): 453-462.

  50. Proietti, S., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., De Agazio, M., Zacchini, M., et al. (2008). Fruit quality of mini watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 88(6): 1107-1114.

  51. Pradhan, S.R., Sahu, G.S., Tripathy, P., Dash, S.K., Mishra, B., Jena, R. and Sahoo, T.R. (2017). Vegetable Grafting: A Multidimensional Approach for Crop Management in Vegetables. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(10): 3332-3345.

  52. Pretty, J. and Bharucha, Z. (2015). Integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa. Insects. 6(1): 152-182.

  53. Qian, Q.Q., Liu, H.Y. and Zhu, Z.J., 2004. Studies on sugar metabolism and related enzymesactivity during watermelon fruit development as influenced by grafting. Journal of  Zhejiang University. 30: 285-289.

  54. Ropokis, A., Ntatsi, G., Kittas, C., Katsoulas, N. and Savvas, D. (2019). Effects of temperature and grafting on yield, nutrient uptake and water use efficiency of a hydroponic Sweet Pepper Crop. Agronomy. 9(2): 110.

  55. Sabatino, L., Iapichino, G., D’Anna, F., Palazzolo, E., Mennella, G. and Rotino, G.L. (2018). Hybrids and allied species as potential rootstocks for eggplant: Effect of grafting on vigour, yield and overall fruit quality traits. Scientia Horticulturae. 228: 81-90.

  56. Sakata, Y., Ohara, T. and Sugiyama, M. (2005). The history and present state of the grafting of cucurbitaceous vegetables in Japan. In III International Symposium on Cucurbits. 731 (pp. 159-170).

  57. Salam, M.A., Masum, A.S.M.H., Chowdhury, S.S., Dhar, M., Saddeque, M.A. and Islam, M.R. (2002). Growth and yield of watermelon as influenced by grafting. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2(5): 298-299.

  58. Schwarz, D., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G. and Venema, J.H. (2010). Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Scientia Horticulturae. 127(2): 162-171.

  59. Thapa, M.B. and Dhimal, S. (2017). Horticulture development in Nepal: Prospects, challenges and strategies. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research. 5(3): 177-189.

  60. Timila, R., Baidya, S. and Mahto, B. (2016). Prospects of Grafting Technology for the Management of Bacterial Wilt and Root Knot Nematode on Tomato. Science Technology and Innovation for Nepal’s Graduation to Developing Country Status: Abstracts, Kathmandu: Nepal Academy of Science and Technology. (pp. 35-36).

  61. Timila, R.D., KC, R.B. (2014). Bacterial Wilt Management and Grafting Technology in Nepal. 

  62. Timila, R.D. and Manandhar, S. (2016). Biovar Differentiation and Variation in Virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum Isolates Infecting Solanaceous Vegetables. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 2: 22-26.

  63. Wahb-Allah, M.A. (2014). Effectiveness of grafting for the improvement of salinity and drought tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). Asian Journal of Crop Science. 6(2): 112-122.

  64. Welbaum, G. E. (2015). Vegetable Production and Practices. CABI.

  65. Yassin, H. and Hussen, S. (2015). Reiview on role of grafting on yield and quality of selected fruit vegetables. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research. 15(1): 1-16.

  66. Yetışır, H., Sari, N. andYücel, S. (2003). Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica. 31(2): 163-169.

Editorial Board

View all (0)