Weed management in onion: A review

DOI: 10.18805/ag.v0iOF.7311    | Article Id: R-1573 | Page : 76-80
Citation :- Weed management in onion: A review .Agricultural Reviews.2017.(38):76-80

M. Dhananivetha*,  M. Mohammed Amnullah1, P. Murali Arthanari2 and S. Mariappan3

dhananivetha@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai-625 104, India.

Submitted Date : 30-10-2015
Accepted Date : 7-10-2016

Abstract

The bulbous vegetable onion Allium cepa Var. aggregatum L. (2n=16) is the most important species of Allium group and is regarded as the single most important vegetable spices as it forms an indispensable part of many diets, both vegetarian and non-vegetarian. Onion is valued for its bulbs having characteristic odour, flavor and pungency. Onion is regarded as a highly export oriented crop and earns a valuable foreign exchange for the country. Weeds are of great menace as they interfere with production of crop and add to the cost of cultivation. The reduction in crop yield has direct correlation with weed competition. Onion exhibits greater susceptibility to weed competition as compared to other crops due to its inherent characteristics such as their slow growth, small stature, shallow roots and lack of dense foliage. The effective weed control involves identification of weed flora, method of weed control and judicious combination of effective weed control methods. Hand weeding in onion is a common practice in India, but it is a tedious, expensive and time consuming task due to closer spacing and shallow root system. Non-availability of labourers during critical period of crop makes hand weeding difficult leading to heavy yield losses. Spraying of pre-emergence herbicides keeps the crop in weed free conditions during the early stages. At later stage, second flush of weeds will affect the bulb formation. Hand weeding helps to keep the weed population below economic threshold level throughout the crop growth period. Pre-emergence combined with hand weeding may be costly because of the reduced labour availability and higher labour cost. After bulb formation manual or mechanical methods of weed control will damage the bulb. Application of early post emergence may be helpful to reduce damage to the bulb, weed competition and cost of weeding. Hence a brief review was presented to find out the effect of different weed management method in onion.

Keywords

Growth Onion Weed management Yield attributes.

References

  1. Amrutkar, S.D., Patil, B.M., Karunakar, A.P., Sethi, H.N. and Jiotode, D.J. (1998). Efficacy of herbicides for control of weeds and their effects on yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). Crop Res., 16: 372-374.
  2. Calamai, P. and Martini, A. (1994). Technique of burning weeds for control of infestation in onion and pepper. Informatore Agrario. 50: 17, 87-92.
  3. Chaitanya, S., Shankaranarayana, V. and Nanjappa, H.V. (2012). Chemical weed management in kharif groundnut. Mysore J. Agric Sci., 46: 315-319.
  4. Channappagoudar, B.B. and Biradar, N.R. (2007). Physiological studies on weed control efficiency in direct sown onion. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20 : 375-376.
  5. Dawale, J.S., Zalate, P.Y., Padmini, D.R. and Nikam, D.R. (2009). Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield, Yield Attributing Characters and Oil Content of Sesamum (Sesamum Indicum L.). Bioinfolet. 6: 331-333.
  6. Dhananivetha, M., Mohammed Amanullah, M. and Murali Arthanari, P. (2015a). Effect of weed management methods on weed control and productivity of onion. Annals of Soil and Plant Res., 7:301-303.
  7. Dhananivetha,M., Mohammed Amanullah, M. and Murali Arthanari, P. (2015). Bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity evaluation of quizalofop-ethyl (5% EC) for management of weed in onion. Trends in Biosciences. 8: 1873-1877.
  8. Gore, A.K., Gadade, G.D. and Jadhav, J.K. (2010). Performance of mechanical weeders on vertisols of Marathwada region in soybean. In: Biennial conference of Indian society of weed science on Recent Advances in Weed Science Research-2010, 25-26 February. IGKV, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. pp: 106
  9. Gowsalya, S., Latha, K.R., Prabhakaran, N.K. and Asokan, D. (2010). Mechanical weed control in rainfed pigeonpea. M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 
  10. Hussain, Z., Marwat, K.B., Shan, S.I.A., Arifullah, S.A. and Khan, N.M. (2008). Evaluation of different herbicides for weed control in onion. Sharad J. Agric., 24: 453-456.
  11. Ishwar Singh, H.S., Dungarwal and Singh, I. (2000). Management of wild onion (Asphodelus tenuipholius) in irrigated mustard. Indian J. Agrl. Sci., 70: 799-800.
  12. James, R.L. and Harlen, M.H.V. (2010). Multiplication of reduced rate herbicides for weed control in onion. Weed Tech., 24: 153-159.
  13. Karimi, M.I., Hassan, N., Khan, M.I., Khan, I., Khan, I.A. and Bibi, S. (2012). The impact of chemical and non-chemical weed control methods on weeds dynamics on the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 18: 255-263.
  14. Kolhe, S.S. (2001). Integrated weed management in onion (Allium cepa L.). Indian J. Weed Sci., 33: 26-29.
  15. Meena, D.S., Baldev, R. and Chaman, K.J. (2009). Effect of integrated weed management on growth and productivity of soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci., 41: 93-95.
  16. Melander, B. and Hartvig, P. (1997). Yield responses of weed free seeded onions (Allium cepa L.) to hoeing close to the row. Crop Prot., 16: 687-691.
  17. Melander, B. and Rasmussen. (2001). Effect of cultural methods and physical weed control on intra row weed numbers, manual weeding and marketable yield in direct-sown leek and bulb onion. Weed Res., 41: 491-508.
  18. Mondal, D.C., Hossiain, A. and Duary, B. (2005). Chemical weed control in onion (Allium cepa L.) under lateritic belt of West Bengal. Indian J. Weed Sci., 37: 281-282.
  19. Nandal, T.R. and Ravinder Singh, R. (2002). Integrated weed management in onion (Allium cepa L.) under Himachal Pradesh conditions. Indian J. Weed Sci., 34 : 72-75.
  20. Patel, J.C., Patel, B.M. and Patel, H.F. (2009). Weed control in kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogea). Current Advances in Agric. Sci., 1: 128-129.
  21. Patel, T.U., Patel, C.L., Patel, D.D., Thanki, J.D., Patel, P.S. and Jat, R.A. (2011). Effect of weed and Fertilizer management on weed control and productivity of onion (Allium cepa). Indian J. Agron., 56: 267-272.
  22. Priyadharshini, H.V. and Anburani, A. (2004). Efficiency of integrated weed management on weed control in onion (Allium cepa var. aggregatum) cv. Gnanamedu Local. Indian. J. Weed Sci., 36 : 155-156.
  23. Rahman, H.U., Ullah, K., Sadiq, M., Zubiar, M., Javaria, S., Khan, M.A. and Khattak, A.M. (2011). Relative efficacy of different weed control methods in onion (Allium cepa L.) crop. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 17 : 343-350.
  24. Rahman, H.U., Ullah, K., Sadiq, M., Javaria, S., Ullah, I., Rahman, H.U. and Khan, M.A. (2012). Relationship between manual weeds removal timings and onion yield. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 18 : 201-207.
  25. Rajakumar, D. (2008). Study on the effect of nitrogen fertililzation, green manure intercropping and weed management in aerobic rice. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural Uni., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  26. Ranpise, S.A. and Patil, B.T. (2001). Effect of herbicides on weed intensity and yield of summer onion cv. N-2-4-1. Pestol., 25 : 59-60.
  27. Ravinder Singh., Nandal, T.R. and Shukla, Y.R. (2001). Weed intensity and onion bulb yield as influenced by different weed management practices. Crop Res., 22: 32-37.
  28. Saini, M.K. and Walia, U.S. (2012). Effect of land configuration and weed management in onion (Allium cepa ). Indian J. Agron., 57: 275-278.
  29. Sanjeev, A., Sandhu, K.S. and Ahuja, S. (2003). Weed management through the use of herbicides in cabbage - onion relay cropping system. Ann. Biol., 19: 27–30.
  30. Saraf, R.K., Tiwari, J.P. and Yadav, S.K. (1994). Productivity and Economic viability of kharif onion as influenced by herbicidal weed control in Satpura plateau of Madhya Pradesh. World Weeds. 1: 89-94.
  31. Sathya Priya, R., Chinnusamy, C., Manickasundaram, P. and Murali Arthanari, P. (2013). Evaluation of new formulation of oxyfluorfen (23.5% EC) for weed control efficacy and bulb yield in onion. American J. Pl. Sci., 4: 890-895.
  32. Shah, S.N., Agnihotri, N.P. and Gajbhiye, V.T. (1996). Field evaluation of pendimethalin for weed control in onion and pesticides in plant and soil. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 4: 71-75.
  33. Sharma, R. and Mehta, H.M. (1994). Chemical weed control in onion. Indian J. Weed Sci., 26: 44-45.
  34. Sharma, R.C. and Khandwe, R. (2008). Response of weed control measures in kharif onion. Res. Crops. 9 : 348-349.
  35. Sharma, R.C. and Khandwe, R. (2008). Response of weed control measures in kharif onion. Res. Crops. 9 : 348-349.
  36. Singh, M.P. and Singh, K.P. (1994). Effect of crop weed competition on growth and yield of kharif onion. Indian J. Weed Sci., 26: 18-21.
  37. Stall, W.O. and Gilreath, J.P. (2002). Estimation effectiveness of recommended herbicides on selected common weeds in Florida vegetables. In: W.M. Stall (ed.), Weed Management in Florida Fruits and Vegetables, 2002-2003. Gainesville, FL: IFAS, 59-64.
  38. Tewari, A.N., Rathi, K.S., Hussian, K., Singh, S.K. and Singh, B. (1999). Integrated weed management in onion (Allium cepa L.). Indian J. Weed Sci., 31: 53-55.
  39. Ved Prakash, A., Pandey, K., Singh, R.D. and Mani, V.P. (2000). Integrated weed management in winter onion (Allium cepa L.) under mid hill conditions of North-Western Himalayas. Indian J. Agron., 45: 816-821.
  40. Vinay Singh., Singh, J., Bisen, R.K. and Agrawal, H.P. (1997). A note on weed management in onion. Veg. Sci., 24: 157-158.
  41. Yadav, R. and Pond, S. (2007). Development and agronomic evaluation of manual weeder. Agrl. Engineering International: CIGRE journal. Manuscript PM 07 022. Vol 9.
  42. Zubiar, M., Rahman, H.U., Jailani, M.S., Kiran, M., Waseem, M.K., Rahim, A., Khan, A.A., Qayyum, A. and Wahab, A. (2009). Comparision of different weed management practices in onion (Allium cepa L.) under agro-climatic conditions of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 15: 45-51.
     

Global Footprints