Global research paradigms in chickpea economics: An approach with Indian scenario

DOI: 10.18805/ag.R-1350    | Article Id: R-1350 | Page : 261-271
Citation :- Global research paradigms in chickpea economics: An approach with Indian scenario.Agricultural Reviews.2018.(39):261-271
Farha Naz, Mohammad Mazid and Khalil Khan mazid@invertis.org
Address : Faculty of Science, Invertis University, Bareilly-243 123, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Submitted Date : 13-01-2018
Accepted Date : 17-12-2018


Economics of pulse production is still in its infancy, even though literature on the subject has grown in tandem with the volume of business and attention received by the export-import culture, consumed and traded amount. With a distinct shift in the trend of chickpea production within India and obtained high yield productivity, new constraints have cropped up in the productivity sector of chickpea. In spite of these constraints, innovations in chickpea production have come up; for example, low input livelihood pulse based agriculture systems, sustainable and ecological agriculture, etc. in many parts of the world. These have a definite bearing on the long-run payoffs from small-scale agriculture. Moreover, Chickpea production in tropical countries has been found to be economically viable as a farm diversification strategy and as an independent commercial activity, turning our attention on bio-economic modelling. Cross-price effects of chickpea based agriculture products, effects of trade and non-trade barriers on these products, potential conflicts between the development of chickpea production for export and agriculture for subsistence consumption are the other serious concerns that need to be addressed. With the ever-increasing demand for varietal items based on chickpea in the international market, more research on demand-elasticities and its analysis would be appropriate, especially in the Indian context for the evaluation of the current status and prediction of future scenario of chickpea production. Evaluation of the prevalent chickpea based agriculture technologies can be strengthened by specific farm technical-efficiency studies, which is another area that demands attention in the chickpea economics research. To address such leads and lags, global pulse economists in the country need to take up these challenges by having real time field exposure to different segments of chickpea production.


Agriculture economics Pulse International trade Market value and demand-supply analysis.


  1. Agbola, F.W., Kelley, T.G., Bent, M.J. and Parthasarathy Rao, P. (2002). Eliciting and valuing market preferences with traditional food crops: the case of chickpea in India. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 5(1):7-21.
  2. Ali, M. and Byerlee, D. (2006). Economic efficiency of small farmers in a changing world: A survey of recent evidence. Journal of International Development, 3(1):1-27.
  3. Chikozho, C. (2005). Policy and institutional dimensions of small-holder farmer innovations in the Thukela River Basin of South Africa and the Pangani River Basin of Tanzania: A comparative perspective. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/    C, 30(11):913-924.
  4. Conforti, P. (2004). Price transmission in selected agricultural markets. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper, 7.
  5. Gregory, P.J., Simmonds, L.P. and Warren, G.P. (1997). Interactions between plant nutrients, water and carbon dioxide as factors limiting crop yields. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 352:987-996.
  6. Guerrero III, R.D. (2006). Eco-Friendly Fish Farm Management and Production of Safe Aquaculture Foods in the Philippines. Aquaculture,    1:896-445.
  7. Gujarati, Damodar N. (1978). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  8. Harwood, R.R. (1998). Sustainability in Agricultural Systems in Transition: At what Cost?. Michigan State University.
  9. Hiremath, P.J., Farmer, A., Cannon, S.B., Woodward, J., et al., (2011). Large-scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi-arid tropics of Asia and Africa. Plant Biotechnology J: 9:922-931.
  10. Hussain, N., Mehdi, M. and Kant, R.H. (2011). Response of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Growth and Yield Attributes of Black Gram (Vigna mungo). Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(2):334-336.
  11. Iqbal, A., Iqtidar, A., Khalil, Ateeq, N. and Khan, M.S. (2006). Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chemistry, 97:331-335.
  12. Jaffe, A., Newell, R. and Stavins, R. (1999). Energy-efficient technologies and climate change policies: issues and evidence.
  13. Jahansooz, M.R., Yunusa, I.A., Coventry, D.R., Palmer, A.R. and Eamus, D. (2007). Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. Europ. J. Agronomy, 26:275-282.
  14. Johns, T. and Eyzaguirre, P.B. (2007). Biofortification, biodiversity and diet: A search for complementary applications against poverty and malnutrition. Food Policy, 32(1):1-24.
  15. Joshi, P.K., Rao, P.P., Gowda, C.L.L., Jones, R.B., Silim, S.N., Saxena, K.B. and Kumar, J. (2001). The World Chickpea and Pigeonpea Economies Facts, Trends, and Outlook. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics.
  16. Kelley, T.G., Ryan, J.G. and Patel, B.K. (1995). Applied participatory priority setting in international agricultural research: Making trade-offs transparent and explicit. Agricultural Systems, 49(2):177-216.
  17. Khan, T.A. and Mazid, M. (2011). Nutritional significance of sulphur in pulse cropping system. Biology and Medicine, 3(2):114-133.
  18. Khan, T.A. and Naeem, A. (2011). An alternate high yielding inexpensive procedure for the purification of concanavalin A. Biology and Medicine, 3(2):250-259.
  19. Khan, T.A., Amani, S. and Naeem, A. (2012a). Glycation promotes the formation of genotoxic aggregates in glucose oxidase. Amino Acids, 43(3):1311-1322.
  20. Khan, T.A., Mazid, M., Ansari, S.A., Azam, A. and Naeem, A. (2012b). Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Promote the Aggregation of Concanavalin A. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, doi: 10.1007/s10989-012-9324-x.
  21. Khan, T.A., Saleemuddin, M. and Naeem, A. (2011). Partially Folded Glycated State of Human Serum Albumin Tends to Aggregate. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, 17:271-279.
  22. Khind, C.S. and Meelu, O.P. (1991). Leaching losses of urea-N applied to permeable soils under lowland rice. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 28(2):179-184.
  23. Kotler, P. (2008). Marketing Management, Prentice Hall.
  24. Koutsoyiannis, A. (2008). Modern Microeconomics, Macmillan.
  25. Kumbhar, V. (2011). Performance of Agriculture Sector in India: Special Reference to Post Reform Period. Available at SSRN 1748246.
  26. Lin, L. and Kulatilaka, N. (2007). Strategic growth options in network industries. Advances in Strategic Management, 24:177-198.
  27. Litsinger, J.A., Libetario, E.M. and Canapi, B.L. (2009). Eliciting Farmer Knowledge, Attitudes, and~ Practices in the Development of Integrated Pest Management Programs for Rice in Asia. Integrated pest management: dissemination and impact, 119-273.
  28. Lokuruka, M.N.I. (2012). Role of zinc in human health with reference to African elderly: a review. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 12(6):22-29.
  29. Maddala, G.S. (1992). Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd edition, Macmillan.
  30. Malek, M.A., Sarwar, C.D.M., Sarker, A. and Hassan, M.S. (1996). Status of grasspea research and future strategy in Bangladesh. Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia, 7.
  31. Mann, C.L. (1986). Prices, profit margins, and exchange rates. Fed. Res. Bull., 72:366-370.
  32. Matthews, R., Stephens, W., Hess, T., Middleton, T. and Graves, A. (2002). Applications of crop/soil simulation models in tropical agricultural systems. Advances in Agro., 76:31-124.
  33. Mazid, M., Khan, T.A. and Mohammad, F. (2011a). Effect of abiotic stress on synthesis of secondary plant products: a critical review. Agricultural Reviews, 32(3):172-182.
  34. Mazid, M., Khan, T.A. and Mohammad, F. (2011b). Potential of NO and H2O2 as signaling molecules in tolerance to abiotic stress in plants. Journal of Industrial Research and Technology, 1(1):56-68.
  35. Mazid, M., Khan, T.A. and Mohammad, F. (2011c). Response of crop plants under sulphur stress tolerance: A holistic approach. Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry, 7(3):23-57.
  36. Mazid, M., Khan, T.A. and Mohammad, F. (2011c). Role of secondary metabolites in defense mechanisms of plants. Biology and Medicine, 3(2):232-249.
  37. Mazid, M., Khan, T.A. and Mohammad, F. (2012). Role of nitrate reductase in nitrogen fixation under photosynthetic regulation. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 1(3):386-414.
  38. Miah, A.A., Maniruzzaman, A.F.M. and Rahman, M.M. (1989). Problems and prospects of pulses production. Advances in Pulses Research in Bangladesh, 87:18-25.
  39. Mishra, R.K. (2007). Livestock-Crop Production Systems and Livelihood Development. Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
  40. Mohammadi, K., Ghalavand, A., Aghaalikhani, M. and Eskandari, M. (2009). Increasing Chickpea Quality and Agroecosystm Sustainability Using Organic and Natural Resources. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 57:572-579.
  41. Mohammadi, K., Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Khalesro, S. and Majidi, M. (2012). Effective factors on biological nitrogen fixation. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(12):1782-1788.
  42. Mugabe, J. (2003). International trends in modern biotechnology: Entry by and implications for African countries (No. 15). African Technology Policy Studies Network.
  43. Naeem, A., Khan, T.A., Muzaffar, M., Ahmad, S. and Saleemuddin, M. (2011). A partially folded state of ovalbumin at low pH tends to aggregate. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 59:29-38.
  44. Nielsen, D.C. (2001). Production functions for chickpea, field pea, and lentil in the central Great Plains. Agronomy journal, 93(3):563-569.
  45. Norton, R.B., Parthasarathy, M. and Pomareda, C. (1978). The Importance of Risk in SWP-307 Agricultural Planning Models.
  46. Pal, M.S. (2007). Integrated Plant Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production. In International Conference on 21st Century Challenges to Sustainable Agri-Food Systems Biotechnology, Environment, Nutrition, Trade and Policy (pp. 15-17).
  47. Pande, S., Sharma, M., Ghosh, R., Rao, S.K., Sharma, R.N. and Jha, A.K. (2012). Opportunities for Chickpea Production in Rainfed Rice Fallows of India. Baseline Survey Report.
  48. Parthasarathy Rao, P., Birthal, P.S., Bhagavatula, S. and Bantilan, C.S. (2010). Chickpea and pigeonpea economies in Asia: facts, trends and outlook.
  49. Patil, S.V., Halikatti, S.I., Hiremath, S.M., Babalad, H.B., Sreenivasa, M.N., Hebsur, N.S. and Somanagouda, G. (2012). Effect of organics on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in vertisols. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(3):19-24.
  50. Pingali, P. (2007). Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: implications for research and policy. Food Policy, 32(3):281-298.
  51. Popelka, J.C., Terryn, N. and Higgins, T.J.V. (2004). Gene technology for grain legumes: can it contribute to the food challenge in developing countries? Plant Science, 167:195-206.
  52. Poudel, D.D., Horwath, W.R., Lanini, W.T., Temple, S.R. and Van Bruggen, A.H.C. (2002). Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in northern California.    Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, 90(2):125-137.
  53. Pullabhotla, H. and Ganesh-Kumar, A. (2012). Review of input and output policies for cereal production in Bangladesh (No. 1199). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  54. Reddy, A. (2009). Pulses production technology: Status and way forward. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(52):73-80.
  55. Russell, J.S., Cameron, D.M., Whan, I.F., Beech, D.F., Prestwidge, D.B. and Rance, S.J. (1993). Rainforest trees as a new crop for Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 60(1): 41-58.
  56. Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V. and Sultana, R. (2010). Quality nutrition through pigeonpea—a review. Health, 2:1335-1344.
  57. Shakya, M.S., Patel, M.M. and Singh, V.B. (2008). Knowledge Level of Chickpea Growers about Chickpea Production Technology. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu., 8:19-25.
  58. Siddhuraju, P., Vijayakumari, K. and Janardhanan, K. (1996). Chemical Composition and Protein Quality of the Little-Known Legume, Velvet Bean (Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 44:2636-2641.
  59. Singh, B. and Singh, U. (1991). Peanut as a source of protein for human foods. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (Formerly Qualitas Plantarum), 41:165-177.
  60. Singh, M.D.D., Singh, M.N.P. and UOCB, D. (2004). To Assess the Usage of Fertilizers in the Hill Districts of Uttaranchal. Study Conducted for Center for Organic Farming (COF) Part.
  61. Singh, R.P. (1990). Status of chickpea in the world. International Chickpea Newsletter, 22:10-16.
  62. Soltani, K., Ghassemi-Golezani, F.R., Khooie, M. and Moghaddam (1999). A simple model for chickpea growth and yield. Field Crops Research, 62:213-224.
  63. Suhasini, P., Kiresur, V.R., Rao, G.D.N. Bantilan, M.C.S. (2009). Adoption of chickpea cultivars in Andhra Pradesh: Pattern, trends and constraints. Draft report, Tropical Legumes, 2:11-17.
  64. Tripathi, P.K., Singh, M.K., Singh, J.P. and Singh, O.N. (2012). Effect of rhizobial strains and sulphur nutrition on mungbean (Vigna radiata (l.) wilczek) cultivars under dryland agro-ecosystem of Indo-Gangetic plain. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1):34-42.
  65. Upton, M. (2000). The ‘Livestock Revolution’–Implications for smallholder agriculture: A case study of milk and poultry production in Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
  66. Yadav, S.S., Redden, R., Chen, W. and Sharma, B. (2007). Chickpea Breeding and Management. Oxfordshire, OX: CABI Publication, p. 638.
  67. Zhao, F., Evans, E.J., Bilsborrow, P.E. and Syers, J.K. (2006). Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 63(1):29-37.

Global Footprints