Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2011) : 277 - 283


Mohan Lal, Love Kumar Singh, Munmun Rai,
1Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal - 132 001 India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Lal Mohan, Singh Kumar Love, Rai Munmun (2024). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES RIGHTS-A STRONG DETERMINANT OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN AGRICULTURE- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 32(4): 277 - 283. doi: .
In the past few decades the subject of intellectual property rights (IPRs) has occupied center stage in debates about globalization, economic development and poverty elimination. This study concerns the strengthening of IPRs in the plant breeding industry and its effect on agriculture in India. In India, most of the population relies on agricul­ture for its livelihood. India is self-sufficient in wheat and paddy, but deficient in other agricultural products. Pat­ents are good indicators of research and development output. Patent analysis makes it possible to map out the trend of technological change and life cycle of a technology - growth, development, maturity and decline. Patent infor­mation and patent statistical analysis have been used for examining present, technological status and to forecast future trends. One can determine the directions of corporate R&D and market interests by analyzing patent data. The present study is an attempt to analyze patents granted in India in the field of agriculture and importance of biotechnology-based innovations in agriculture
  1. Agriculture Statitics at a Glance (2007), Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Minister of Agriculture ,New Delhi,2007
  2. Frame JD (1977), Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia,; 2 : 143. 
  3. Gazette of India, Part III Section 2, Controller of Publications, Government of India,
  4. Guruprasad K. Analysis of US patents granted to Indian inventors. IPR, (2004); 8: 205– 212. Cited on 2010, Mar 05 
  5. James C, (2001). Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops, 2000, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) Briefs, No. 23, New York. 
  6. Karki MMS and Garg KC (1997), Bibliometrics of alkaloid chemistry research in India. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 47: 157– 161.
  7. Koo B, Nottenburg C, Pardey PG, (2004) Plants and intellectual property: An international appraisal. Science,; 306: 1295– 1297. 
  8. Mittal R, Singh G, (2005) Patenting activities in agriculture from India. JIPR, 10: 315– 320. 
  9. Qaim M, (2001) Transgenic crops and developing countries, Economic and Political Weekly 36, 32: 3064– 3070 
  10. Schubert A, Braun T, (1986) Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9: 281. 
  11. Sharma AB, (2005) Diversifying agriculture. Yojana, March 18– 20 
  12. Sharma M, Charak KS, Ramanaish TV, Agricultural Biotechnology Research in India: Status and Policies, Current Science, 2003; 86(9): 297– 302. 
  13. The protection of plant varieties and Farmer2 s Right bill (PPVFR) 2001(as passed by Lok Sabha. 
  14. Watal J, Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries, Oxford Univ. Press, New Delhi (2001). 
  15. Wu C, Liu Y, (2004) Use of the IPC and various retrieval systems to research patent activities of US organizations in the People2 s Republic of China. World Patent Information, 2004; 26: 225– 233.

Editorial Board

View all (0)