Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 21 issue 2 (june 2000) : 125·128

BREEDING FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE IN VEGETABLES: A REVIEW

M
M.K. Agrawal. M.S. Fageria
R
R.S. Dhaka
1Department of Horticulture, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner-303 329, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Fageria M.S. Agrawal. M.K., Dhaka R.S. (2025). BREEDING FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE IN VEGETABLES: A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 21(2): 125·128. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Vegetable crops are attacked by large number of diseases. Control of these diseases through the agronomical measures and chemical control leads to several disadvantages like higher cost of production, environmental pollution, development of vector resistance to the fungicides and some times chemicals has carcinogenic effect to the human being. Hence development of multiple disease resistant variety is only solution to overcome these problems. In the literature different genetic sources having resistance to important diseases of different vegetables have been reported. The inheritance of resistance to different diseases is may be of monogenic or oligogenic or polygenic in nature. When resistance is governed by single dominant gene. It is very easy to exploit it in heterosis breeding programme. The back cross method is generally used to transfer such type of resistance. When resistance is governed by polygenes generally pedigree method is followed to select resistant plants in the segregating generations. For accumulating more number of resistant genes in to a single cultivar, three way or double crosses are followed. The most important multiple disease resistant varieties include Rodade. Florida-11011 of tomato, JP-9 and JP-179 varieties of pea, Arka Manik of water melon, Punjab Lal and CH-1 (F1) of chilli which has resistance against two or more diseases.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (1996). Third Annual Report of ICAR Adhoc project. Deptt. of Y.egetable Crops. UHF,
    2. Solan-173230 H.P.
    3. Barnes, w.e. (1961). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77 : 417-423.
    4. Bilfen R.H. (1905). ,J. Agric. Sci. 1: 4-48.
    5. Bohn, GW and Whitaker, TW (1964). Phytopathology, 54 : 587.
    6. Bosch, S.L et 01. (1990). Hort. Sci. 25 : 1313-1314.
    7. Bosch, S.E. et 01. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20: 634.
    8. Chauhan, YS. (1987). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Vegetable Crops, UliF- Solan, H.P.
    9. Cohen, Y et 0/. (1985). Pep Cucurbit Genet Coop, 8 : 36.
    10. Copeland, J. (1957). Seed World, 81 (9) : 8.
    11. Decker, P. (1951). Phytopathology. 41 : 9.
    12. Fageria, M.S. (1994). Ph.D. Thesis. Dr. YS. Parmar Univ. of Hort. & Forestry, Solan (H.P.).
    13. Galmarini, H. (1975). Agron. Y. Zoot. Univ. Nat. Tucuman 54 : 95.
    14. Gardner, R.G. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20 (4): 787.
    15. Grafton, KF. et 0/. (1997). Crop. Sci. 37 : 288.
    16. Kaan, F. (1973). In: Meeting of the Melon Working Group of Eucarpia, Avignon Mont Favet (France) June 19 to 27.
    17. Kalda, T.S. et 0/. (1976). Veg. Sci. 3 : 65~70.
    18. Kenlgsbuch and Cohen, Y. (1992). Plant Disease 76 : 615-617.
    19. Kesavan, V. and Choudhary, B. (1977). SABRAO, J., 9 : 57-65.
    20. Khush, G.S. (1977). Adv. Agron. 29 : 265-333.
    21. Khrustaleva, V.V. and Shecherbakov, V.E. (1987). Mutation breeding News letter 29: 9-12.
    22. Kohli, UK et 01. (1996). Ann. Agric. Res. 17 : 244-248.
    23. Obero, F.e. and Aragabi, M. (1965). PI. Dis. Reptr.49: 327-33l.
    24. Peerson, e. and Sidhu, G. (1971). In : Proc. Symp. Mut. Breed. Dis. REs. I.A.E.A. Vienna, pp. 25-3l.
    25. Peter, KV. and Joseph, M. (1986). Veg. ScI. 13 : 250-283.
    26. Peterson, C.E. et 01. (1982). Wisconsis 2757 cucumber. Hort. ScI. 17 : 268.
    27. Rattan, R.S. and Saini S.S. (1979). Euphytica 28 : 315-317.
    28. Sharma, J.P. and Kumar, S. (1995). Indian. Phytopathol. 48 : 81-83.
    29. Sharma, P.P. (1997). In: Proceeding of Centre of Advanced Studies, Hort. Veg. UHF. Solan, pp. 25-3l.
    30. Sharma, S.R. et 01. (1997). Indian J. Hort. 54 : 86-90.
    31. Singh, D.P. (1986). Breeding for resistance to Disease and Insect Pests. Narcisa Publishing House, New Delhi,
    32. pp. 144-145.
    33. Singh, P.P. et 01. (1996). Indian Phytopathol. 49 : 188-190.
    34. Som, M.G. and Chaudhary, B. (1975). Veg. ScI. 2 : 93-99.
    35. Swamlnathan, M. and Sreenlvasan, K (1971). Agric. Res. J. Kerala. 9 : 11-13.
    36. Van den Berkmortel, L.G. (1971). Report 3rd Eucarpla Congr. Genetics Breeding Red Pepper. pp. 25-26.
    37. Volin, R.B. et 0/. (1977). Hort. ScI. 12: 508-509.
    38. Walker, M.N. (1941). Vnlv. Aa. Agric. Exp. S1o. Bull. 363.
    39. Wiliams, R.J. (1977). Trop. Agric. 54 : 53-59.
    40. Yang, C. (1978). In: 1st International Symposium on Tropical Tomato AVRDC, Taiwan, Oct. 23-27 pp. 111-130.
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 21 issue 2 (june 2000) : 125·128

      BREEDING FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE IN VEGETABLES: A REVIEW

      M
      M.K. Agrawal. M.S. Fageria
      R
      R.S. Dhaka
      1Department of Horticulture, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner-303 329, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Fageria M.S. Agrawal. M.K., Dhaka R.S. (2025). BREEDING FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE IN VEGETABLES: A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 21(2): 125·128. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Vegetable crops are attacked by large number of diseases. Control of these diseases through the agronomical measures and chemical control leads to several disadvantages like higher cost of production, environmental pollution, development of vector resistance to the fungicides and some times chemicals has carcinogenic effect to the human being. Hence development of multiple disease resistant variety is only solution to overcome these problems. In the literature different genetic sources having resistance to important diseases of different vegetables have been reported. The inheritance of resistance to different diseases is may be of monogenic or oligogenic or polygenic in nature. When resistance is governed by single dominant gene. It is very easy to exploit it in heterosis breeding programme. The back cross method is generally used to transfer such type of resistance. When resistance is governed by polygenes generally pedigree method is followed to select resistant plants in the segregating generations. For accumulating more number of resistant genes in to a single cultivar, three way or double crosses are followed. The most important multiple disease resistant varieties include Rodade. Florida-11011 of tomato, JP-9 and JP-179 varieties of pea, Arka Manik of water melon, Punjab Lal and CH-1 (F1) of chilli which has resistance against two or more diseases.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Anonymous (1996). Third Annual Report of ICAR Adhoc project. Deptt. of Y.egetable Crops. UHF,
        2. Solan-173230 H.P.
        3. Barnes, w.e. (1961). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77 : 417-423.
        4. Bilfen R.H. (1905). ,J. Agric. Sci. 1: 4-48.
        5. Bohn, GW and Whitaker, TW (1964). Phytopathology, 54 : 587.
        6. Bosch, S.L et 01. (1990). Hort. Sci. 25 : 1313-1314.
        7. Bosch, S.E. et 01. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20: 634.
        8. Chauhan, YS. (1987). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Vegetable Crops, UliF- Solan, H.P.
        9. Cohen, Y et 0/. (1985). Pep Cucurbit Genet Coop, 8 : 36.
        10. Copeland, J. (1957). Seed World, 81 (9) : 8.
        11. Decker, P. (1951). Phytopathology. 41 : 9.
        12. Fageria, M.S. (1994). Ph.D. Thesis. Dr. YS. Parmar Univ. of Hort. & Forestry, Solan (H.P.).
        13. Galmarini, H. (1975). Agron. Y. Zoot. Univ. Nat. Tucuman 54 : 95.
        14. Gardner, R.G. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20 (4): 787.
        15. Grafton, KF. et 0/. (1997). Crop. Sci. 37 : 288.
        16. Kaan, F. (1973). In: Meeting of the Melon Working Group of Eucarpia, Avignon Mont Favet (France) June 19 to 27.
        17. Kalda, T.S. et 0/. (1976). Veg. Sci. 3 : 65~70.
        18. Kenlgsbuch and Cohen, Y. (1992). Plant Disease 76 : 615-617.
        19. Kesavan, V. and Choudhary, B. (1977). SABRAO, J., 9 : 57-65.
        20. Khush, G.S. (1977). Adv. Agron. 29 : 265-333.
        21. Khrustaleva, V.V. and Shecherbakov, V.E. (1987). Mutation breeding News letter 29: 9-12.
        22. Kohli, UK et 01. (1996). Ann. Agric. Res. 17 : 244-248.
        23. Obero, F.e. and Aragabi, M. (1965). PI. Dis. Reptr.49: 327-33l.
        24. Peerson, e. and Sidhu, G. (1971). In : Proc. Symp. Mut. Breed. Dis. REs. I.A.E.A. Vienna, pp. 25-3l.
        25. Peter, KV. and Joseph, M. (1986). Veg. ScI. 13 : 250-283.
        26. Peterson, C.E. et 01. (1982). Wisconsis 2757 cucumber. Hort. ScI. 17 : 268.
        27. Rattan, R.S. and Saini S.S. (1979). Euphytica 28 : 315-317.
        28. Sharma, J.P. and Kumar, S. (1995). Indian. Phytopathol. 48 : 81-83.
        29. Sharma, P.P. (1997). In: Proceeding of Centre of Advanced Studies, Hort. Veg. UHF. Solan, pp. 25-3l.
        30. Sharma, S.R. et 01. (1997). Indian J. Hort. 54 : 86-90.
        31. Singh, D.P. (1986). Breeding for resistance to Disease and Insect Pests. Narcisa Publishing House, New Delhi,
        32. pp. 144-145.
        33. Singh, P.P. et 01. (1996). Indian Phytopathol. 49 : 188-190.
        34. Som, M.G. and Chaudhary, B. (1975). Veg. ScI. 2 : 93-99.
        35. Swamlnathan, M. and Sreenlvasan, K (1971). Agric. Res. J. Kerala. 9 : 11-13.
        36. Van den Berkmortel, L.G. (1971). Report 3rd Eucarpla Congr. Genetics Breeding Red Pepper. pp. 25-26.
        37. Volin, R.B. et 0/. (1977). Hort. ScI. 12: 508-509.
        38. Walker, M.N. (1941). Vnlv. Aa. Agric. Exp. S1o. Bull. 363.
        39. Wiliams, R.J. (1977). Trop. Agric. 54 : 53-59.
        40. Yang, C. (1978). In: 1st International Symposium on Tropical Tomato AVRDC, Taiwan, Oct. 23-27 pp. 111-130.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)