Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 21 issue 1 (march 2000) : 16-25

STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF NEMATODE RESISTANCE IN CROP PLANTS - A REVIEW

Archana Mittal, Vinod Kumar, Imtiyaz Ahmad
1Division of Nematology Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-ll 0 012, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mittal Archana, Kumar Vinod, Ahmad Imtiyaz (2024). STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF NEMATODE RESISTANCE IN CROP PLANTS - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 21(1): 16-25. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Resistance to nematodes is conferred by major, dominant genes and their use has usually revealed complementary virulence in nematode. Tolerance of nematode damage is a desirable character in resistant cultivars, many of which have an unacceptable degree of intolerance. Equally, as tolerant, susceptible cultivars have the potential to increase nematode populatlon densities to extremely damaging levels, tolerance should be combined with resistance. Overall, for crops to perform well in nematode-infested soil, it has been found that tolerance is a useful and necessary adjunct to resistance. Even without resistance, tolerance is an important attribute of many low value crops especially in regions where nematicide and resistance cultivars are not available.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bakker, J., Bouwman Smits, L. (1988). Phytopathology 78:894-904.
    2. Ballvora, A.et al., (1995) Molecular Gen. Genet. 249:82-90.
    3. Baum, T.J. et al., (1996). Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 9:382-387.
    4. Bingefors, S. (1982). In:Pathogens. Vectors and Plant Diseases: Approaches to Control (KF.
    5. Harris and KMar-amorosch Eds) pp. 187-218, New York:Academic Press, 310pp.
    6. Bird, D.Mc K. (1997). J. Parasito/. 82:881-888.
    7. Cook, R. (1974). J. Nemato/. 6: 165-174.
    8. Cook, R. and Evans, K. (1987). In : Principles and Practice of Nematode Control in Crops
    9. (R.H. Brown, and B.R. Kerry Eds.), pp. 179-231. Academic, Sydney. 447 pp.
    10. DeBoer, J.M. et al., (1996). Mol. PI. Microbe Interaction 9:39-46.
    11. Dixon, R.A. and Lamb, C.J. (1990). Annu. Rev. Pl. Physiol. Pl. Mol. Bioi. 41:339-367.
    12. Dropkin, V.H. et al., (1969). J. Nematol. 1:55-61.
    13. Endo, B.Y. (1987). In:Vistas on Nematology. Maryland Soc. Nematol; Hyattsville, 196-210.
    14. Evans, K.and Haydock, P.P.J. (1990). Ann.appl. Bioi. 117:703-740.
    15. Ferris, V.R. et al. (1989). Phytopathology 79:927-933.
    16. Flor, H.H. (1942). Phytopathology. 32:653-669.
    17. Ganal, M.W. et al. (1995). Mol. PI. Microbe Interaction 8:886-891.
    18. Gebhardt, C., (1993). Theor. Applied Genet. 85:541-544.
    19. Giebel, J. (1982). Annu. Rev. Phytopathol..20:275-279.
    20. Gommers, F.J. (1981). Helminth. Ab~tr. Ser. B. 50:9-24.
    21. Griffiths, B., and Robertson, W.M. (1989). Nematologica 34: 198-207.
    22. Hilder, V.A., et al., (1987). Nature 330:160-163.
    23. Hussey, R.S. (1987). In:Vistas on Nematology, Maryland Soc. Nematol, Hyattsville, 221-228.
    24. Hussey, R.S. (1989). Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:123-141.
    25. Jones, M.G.K (1981). In:Plant Parasitic Nematodes (Zuckerman, B.M., Rohde, R.A. Eds.), Vol.
    26. 3, Academic, New York 255-278.
    27. Vol. 21, No.1, 2000 25
    28. Jung, C., et al. (1992). Mol. Ge·n. Genet. 232:271-278.
    29. Kaplan, D.T. and Davis, E.L. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology, Maryland Soc. Nematol,
    30. Hyattsville, 267-276.
    31. Kortisas, V.M. and Atkinson, H.J.(1994). Parasitology 109:357-367.
    32. Lamberti, F. and Taylor, C.E. (1983). In:Durable Resistance in Crops (Lamberti F. Waller J.M.
    33. and Vander Graaf N.A. Eds.) Plenum Press, New York pp. 197-206.
    34. Luedder, V.D. (1989). Crop Sci. 29:259-262.
    35. Michanol, D. et al., (1996). Electrophoresis 17:1373-1379.
    36. Parlevliet, J.E. and Zadockss, J.L. (1977). Euphytica 26:5-21.
    37. Paulson, R.E. and Webster, J.M. (1972). PhysioI.Plant Pathol. 2:227-234.
    38. Pineda, O. et al., (1993). Genome 36:152-156.
    39. Phillips, M.S. et al., (1988).' Nematologica 35:187-196.
    40. Robinson, R.A. (1969). Rev. Appl. Mycol. 48:593-606.
    41. Ryan, C.A. (1990). Annu. Rev. Phytopath. 28:425-449.
    42. Sasser, J.N. (1980). PI. Dis. 64 : 36-41.
    43. Sidhu, G.S. (1975). Sci. Prog. Ox!. 62:467-485.
    44. Sidllll, G.S. and Webster, J.M. (1981). Genetics of plant nematode interactions.
    45. Trud!cJill, D.L. (1986). Ann. appl. BioI. 108:189-198.
    46. Vander Eycken, W. et al., (1996). PI. J. 9:45-54.
    47. Vander Plank, J.E. (1975). Principles of Plant Infection. Academic, New York 216 pp.
    48. Veech, J.A. (1981). Plant resistance to nematodes. In : Plant parasitic nematodes (Zuckerman,
    49. B.M., Rohde, R.A. Eds.) Vol. 3, Acqdemic, New York 377-403 pp.
    50. Vierling, R.A. et al., (1996). Theor. Applied Genet. 92:83-86.
    51. Williams, K.J. et al., (1994). Theor Applied Genet. 89:927-930.
    52. Williamson, V.M. et al., (1992). J. Nematol. 24:234-241.
    53. Wyss, U. (1981). In: Plant Parasitic Nematodes (Zuckerman, B.M., Rohde, R.A. eds.), Vol. 3,
    54. Academic, New York 325-351 pp.
    55. Wyss, U. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology. Maryland, Soc. Nematol I'lyattsville. 211-220 pp.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)