Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 22 issue 3 & 4 ( 2001) : 222-227

STUDIES ON ROTYLENCHULUS RENIFORMIS - A REVIEW

I. Vadhera, B.N. Shukla, Jayant Bhatt
1Department of Plant Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur - 482004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Vadhera I., Shukla B.N., Bhatt Jayant (2024). STUDIES ON ROTYLENCHULUS RENIFORMIS - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 22(3): 222-227. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Rotylenchulus reniforrnis is semiendoparasite attacking the roots of pulse and vegetable crops. It feeds on pericycle and complete its life cycle within 22–32 days. The embryonic development lasts for 5–6 days, post embryonic development in water without feeding with 4 juvenile stage and young female. The young female is only infective stage which attains reniform shape within 8–10 days. It causes reduction in plant height, nodulation and yield coupled with lower protein content of the seed. The four weed plants viz; Ammonia baccifera, Ludwigia, Corchorus acutunglutis and Aeschynonene indica are considered to be non host plants. The races are identified as A and B. It interacts with Fusarium solani, Macrophomina phaseolina and causes considerable losses. It can be effectively managed by using pesticides.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ayala, A.J. (1962). Agric. Univ. P. Rico. 46 (1): 73- 82.
    2. Anver, S. et al. (1991). Pakistan J. Nematode 9 (2) : 127-130.
    3. Brichfield, W. and Brister L.R (1962). Phytopathology 52: 725.
    4. Brichfield, W. (1962). Phytopathology 52: 862- 865. (
    5. Brathwite, c.W.o. and Duncan, E.J. (1974). Trop. Agric. 51: 437- 441.
    6. Chhabra, HK (1978). Indian J. Nematol8 (1) : 62.
    7. Chande, Y.S. and Sharma, NK (1989). Indian J. Nemato119 (1) : 21-24.
    8. Chahal, P.P.K. and Chahal, v.P.S. (1989). Indain J. Nematol 19 (2) : 177- 179.
    9. Chandrasakharan, M.M. (1964). Madras Agric. J. 51: 443.
    10. Cohn, E. (1973). Nematologica 19: 455-458.
    11. Dasgupta, D.R and Raski, D.J. (1968). Nematologica 14 : 429-440.
    12. Dasgupta, D.R and Seshadri, A.R (1971). Indian J. Nematol, 1 : 128-144.
    13. Gupta, D.C. and Yadav, B.S. (1979). IndianJ. Nematol9 (1): 48-50.
    14. Gupta, D.C. and Yadav, B.S. (1982). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 52 (1): 41-42.
    15. Heald, C.M. (1975). J. Nematol, 7: 149-152.
    16. lreholn, A. (1988). Virological and Zoological section.
    17. Khan, FA and Khan, A.M. (1969). All Indian Nematol Symp. August 21-22 New Delhi pp 37-38.
    18. Khan, FA and Khan, A.M. (1973). Indian J. Nematol3 : 24-30.
    19. Khan, T.A. and Husain, S.1. (1988). Indian J. Nematol18 : 192-198.
    20. Khan, T.A. and Husain, S.1. (1989a). Indian J. Nematol19 (1) : 35-40.
    21. Khan, T.A. and Husain, S.1. (l989b). Pakistan J. Nematol, 7 (2); 109-113.
    22. Kumar, S. and Sivakumar, C.v. (1981). Nematologia mediterranea 9 (2) : 145-149.
    23. Linford, M.B. and Oliveira, J.M. (1940). Proc. Helminth Soc. Wash. 7: 35-42.
    24. Mani, A. and Sethi, C.L (1987). Indian J. Nematol17 (1) : 1-6.
    25. Mehta, N. and Gupta, D.C. (1990). Har. Agric. Res. J. 4 : 287-290.
    26. Midha, RL. and Trivedi, P.c. (1990). Pakistan J. Nemato/8 (1) : 23-24.
    27. Mishra, S.D. and Gaur, H.S. (1981). Indian J. Nematol, 11 (2) : 228-230.
    28. Nath, RP. et al. (1969). Indian Phytopath. 22 : 99-104.
    29. Nath, RP. etal. (1976). Indian. J. Nematol6: 175-177.
    30. Oteifa, B.A. and Salem, A.A. (1972). Proc. 3rd Congo Medit Phyto, Union Ceiras, Portugal Oct. 22-28.
    31. Padhi, N.N. and Mishra, RP. (1987). Indian J. Nemato/17 (1) : 128-129.
    32. Vol. 22, No. 3/4, 2001 227
    33. Patel. HR etal. (1985). IndianPhytopath, 15 (1): 98-99.
    34. Patel, D.J. (1986). Pakistan J. Nematol, 4 (2) : 75-76.
    35. Patel, D.S. and Thakar. NA (1988). Indian J. Nemato/18 (2) : 332-333.
    36. Rajendran. G. and Naganathan, T.e. (1981). Indian J. Nematol. 11 : 130.
    37. Rebois. RV. et at. (1973). J. Nematol 5 (1) : 1-6.
    38. Reddy, D.DR and Seshadri, A.K. (1972). Indian J. Nematol 2 : 182-190.
    39. Reddy. P.P. et al. (1979). Indian Phytopath 32 : 651-652.
    40. Sakhuja, PK eta!. (1981). IndianJ. Nemato/ll (2): 219.
    41. Seshadri, A.R and Sivakumar, C.v. (1963). MadrasAgric. J. 50: 134-37.
    42. Shukla. V.N. and Gopal Swarup (1974). Indian J. Nematol4 : 234-235.
    43. Siddique, MR (1961). Indian Proc. 48h Indian Sci. Congo Part fflp 404.
    44. Singh. N.D. (1975). Nematropica 5 : 46 - 51.
    45. Sivakumar, C.v. and Seshadri, S.R (1971). Indian J. Nemato/l : 7 - 20.
    46. Sivakumar, C.v. and Seshadri, S.R (1971a). Indian J. Nematoll : 227-236.
    47. Sivakumar. C.v. and Seshadri, S.R. (1972). Indian J. Nematol2 : 173-181.
    48. Swarup, Gopal, etal. (1967). Indian Phytopath 22 (2): 118-123.
    49. Tiyagi, SA and Alam, M.M. (1987). Intr. Nematol Network News!. 4 (1) : 19 - 21.
    50. Vadhera, I. (1993). Ph. D. Thesis Dept!. of Botany, University of Jabalpur, M. P.
    51. Vadhera, I. et al. (1995). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 60 (10) : 774-777.
    52. Vadhera, I. et al. (1995). Indian J. Mvcol. P!. Path. 25 (3) : 318-320.
    53. Vadhero, I. eta!' (1997). Ad. PI. Sci 10 (1): 181-185.
    54. Vadhera, I. et al. (1999). Indian J. Mycol PI.. Path. 29 (1) : 32-33.
    55. Vadhera, I. and Dave, G.S. (2000). Indian Phytopath, 53 (3) : 266-268:
    56. Varaprasad, K.S. (1986). Problem and Progress Ed. Gopal SlNarup and Dr. Dasgupta pp 194-209.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)