Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 23 issue 4 (december 2002) : 281-288
BIOMOLECULES AND THEIR MODE OF ACTION IN THE SUPPRESSION OF PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODES - A REVIEW
1National Research Centre for Banana (ICAR),
Vayalur Road, Tiruchirappalli - 620 017, India
ABSTRACT
Realising that chemical nematicides are too toxic and hazardous to use in nematode control by ordinary farmers, the researchers recognized the natural or biological control as safer and also best alternative for nematode management. Large groups of bioagents are isolated and identified as potential biomolecules in reducing the plant parasitic nematode menace. Biomolecules such as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (Pseudompnas spp. and Bacillus spp.), obligate parasite (Pasteuria spp.), opportunistic fungi (Paecilomyces lilacinus, Verticillium spp. and Trichoderma spp.), predaceous fungi (Arthrobobys spp.) and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae fungi have been recognized as most important candidates for reducing different plant parasitic nematode in several crops under varied agroclimatic conditions. Their effectiveness, mode of action against plant parasitic nematodes and characteristics of a successfull biomolecule is reviewed.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
- Altomare. C. et a! (1999). App! &w. Microbial., 65: 2926-2933.
- Baath, E. and Sonderstrom, B. (1980). Can. J. Bot., 58: 422-425.
- Broadbent, P. eta! (1977). Phytopath., 67: 1027-1034.
- Vol. 23, No.4, 2002 287
- Bursnall, L.A. and Tribe, H.T. (1974). Trans. British Mycol Soc. 62: 595-601.
- Cannayane, I. and Sivakumar, C.v. (2001). Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci., 9: 351-354.
- Cannayane, I. etal. (2001 a). Crop Res., 21: 164-167.
- Cannayane, I. et al. (2001 b). J. Ecobiol., 13: 217-221.
- Cayrol, J.c. et al. (1978). Rev. Horticulture, 184: 23-30.
- Cayrol, J.C. et al. (1989). Rev. Nematol., 12: 331-336.
- Cooke, RC. (1977). The Biology ofthe Symbiotic Fungi. Willey, London, 244 p.
- David, RG. and Zorrilla, R.A. (1995). Biocontrol., 1: 63-75.
- De Leiji, EA.A.M. etal. (1992). Nematologica., 38: 112-122.
- Domsch, KH. et al. (1980). Compendium ofSoil Fungi. Vol I. Academic Press, London, 859 p.
- Duponnois, R and Sa, A.M. (1998). Nematologica., 44: 331-343.
- Duponnois, R. eta/. (1995). Pis. BiocontrolSci. Tech., 5: 517-525.
- Gintis, S. et al. (1983). Nematropica., 13: 181-200.
- Godoy, G. etal. (1982). Nemafropica., 12: 111-119.
- Gokte, N. and Swarup, G. (1988).lndianJ. Nematol., 18: 152-153.
- Gunther, KH. etal. (1998). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 21: 511-517.
- Hall. RA. (1980). Trans. British Mycol. Soc., 74: 445-446.
- Hanssler, G. (1990). J. Pl. Dis and Protec., 97: 194-201.
- Hanssler, G. and Hermanns, M. (1981). J. P! DisProtec., 88: 678-681.
- Harman, G.E. and Kubicek, c.P. (1998). Trichoderma and Glioc/adium Vol 2: Enzymes. Biological Control and
- Commercial Application. Taylor and Francies, London. 393 p.
- Hoffmann. H.S. and Sikora, SA (1995). Nematologica., 41: 309-310.
- Hollis, J. P. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1967). Phytopath., 57: 841-847.
- Hussey, RS. and Rancodory, RW. (1987). Plant Dis., 66: 9-14.
- Jackson, RM. (1965). NZJ. Agric. Res., 8: 878-888.
- Jaffee, B.A. et a! (1993). Biological Cont., 3: 329-336.
- Jatala, P. (1986). Phytopath., 24: 453-489.
- Jatala, P. eta! (1980). J. Nematol., 12: 226-227.
- Jonathan, E.1. and Rajendran, G. (2000). J. Bioi. Control., 14: 67-69.
- Jonathan, E.1. eta! (2000). Nematropica., 30: 231-240.
- Kamra, A. and Ganguly, S. (2000).lndianJ. Nemato!, 30: 106-107.
- Katz, E. and Demain. A.L. (1977). Bacterio/. Rev., 41: 449-474.
- Kceken, O. and Sikora, RA. (1995). Nematologica., 41: 315.
- Kerry, BR etal. (1984). Ann. App! Bioi., 105: 509-516
- Khan, M.R and Goswami, B.K. (2000).lndianJ. Nematol., 30: 5-7.
- Kloepper, J.w. anc! Schroth, M.N. (1981). Phytopath., 71: 643-644.
- Kumar, S. (2001). In: Proc. Emerging Trends in Pests and Diseases Management, TNAU,
- p. 182-183.
- Lawton, J.R. (1957). J. Expt. Bot., 8: 50-54.
- Mankau, R. (1981). In: Plant Parasitic Nematodes (Zuckerman, B.M and Rohde, R.A. Eds.)
- VoL III. Academic Press, London, pp. 475-494.
- Meyer, S.L.E (1994). Fundam. App! Nematol., 17: 563-567
- Meyer, S.L.E et al. (1990). J. Nemato!, 22: 532-535.
- Morgan-Jones, G. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1981). Nematropica., 11: 69-74.
- Morgan-Jones, G. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1985). Nematropica., 15: 107-114.
- Morgan-Jones, G. etal. (1984). Nematropica., 14: 57-71.
- Morgan-Jones, G. eta! (1985). Nematropica., 13: 245-260.
- Oka, K et al. (1993). Biocontrol Sci. Tech.. 3: 115.
- Oostendorp, M. and Sikora, RA. (1989). Rev. Nematol., 12: 77-83.
- Oostendorp, M. and Sikora, RA. (1990). Rev. Nemato!, 13: 269-274.
- Pramer, D. and Stoll, N.R. (1959). Science, 129: 966-967.
- Prasad, S.S.v. and Tilak, KV.BR (1972). IndianJ. Microbiol, 11: 59-60.
- Rajeswari, S. etal. (1997) J. Bio! Control. 11: 49-52.
- Rao, M.s. and Reddy, P.P. (1992 b). Indian Phytopath., 46: 337.
- Recke, J. and Sikora, RA. (1992). Soil Bioi. Bioch., 24: 521-526.
- Rodriguez-Kabana, R etal. (1965). Science, 148: 524-526.
- 288 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
- Sankaranarayanan, C. etal. (2000). IndianJ. Nematol., 30: 157-16l.
- Sasser, J.N. and Freckman, D.W. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology (Veech, J.A. and
- Dickson, OW. Eds.). pp. 7-14, Society of Nematologiest Inc., Hyattsville, USA.
- Sayre, RM. (1986). Proc. 1st Inter. Congo Nematol. Guelph, Canada, p, 8l.
- Sayre, RM. and Starr, M.P. (1988). Annaiesde1lnstitutePasteru/Microbiology, 11: 31.
- Schippers, BA eta/. (1987). Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 25: 339-358.
- Shanthi, A. and Sivakumar, C.v. (1995). J. Bioi. Control, 9: 113-115.
- Sharma, RD. and Stirling, G.R. (1991). Nematologica., 37: 483-484.
- Siddiqui, Z.A. and Mahmood, I. (1994). Bioresource Tech., 49: 187-189.
- Siddiqui, ZA and Mahmood, I. (1995). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 18: 71-76.
- Siddiqui, Z.A. etal. (1996). ThailandJ. Agric. Sci., 29: 115-123.
- Simonen, M. and PaIva, I. (1993). Microbiol. Rev., 57: 107-137.
- Sitaramaiah, K. and SikQra, RA (1982). Nematologica., 28: 412-419.
- Smith, G.S. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology (Veech, J.A and Dickson, D. W. Eds.), Society of Nematologist,
- Hyatsville, pp. 292-300.
- Smith, S.E. and Pearson, GV (1988). Plant Mol. B~ol., 39: 221-244.
- Spiegel, Y. etal. (1991). BiocontrolSci. Tech.,I: 115-125.
- Stirling, G.R. and Mankau, R. (1979). J. Nematol., 11: 282-288.
- Stirling, G.R. (1984). Phytopath., 74: 55-60.
- Stirling, Rand Mani, A. (1995). Nematologica., 41: 240-250.
- Sturhan, D. (1985). Mitfelungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt fur Landund Rortwirtschaft, Berlin, 226-275.
- Sturhan, D. etal. (1994). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 17: 29-42.
- Suresh, C.K and Bagyaraj, D.J. (1984). Nematol. Medit., 12: 31-39. .
- Usha Rani, B. and Kumar, S. (2001). In: Proc. Emerging Trends in Pests and Diseases
- Management, TNAU, p. 173.
- Uziel, A. and Sikora, RA. (1992). Nematologica, 38: 123-130.
- Weller, K.M. (1988). Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 26: 379-407.
- Westcott, S.w.I. and K1ooI2Jel, DA (1993). Phytopath., 83: 1245-1249.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Agricultural Reviews