Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 23 issue 4 (december 2002) : 281-288

BIOMOLECULES AND THEIR MODE OF ACTION IN THE SUPPRESSION OF PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODES - A REVIEW

I. Cannayane*, G. Rajendrant
1National Research Centre for Banana (ICAR), Vayalur Road, Tiruchirappalli - 620 017, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Cannayane* I., Rajendrant G. (2024). BIOMOLECULES AND THEIR MODE OF ACTION IN THE SUPPRESSION OF PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODES - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 23(4): 281-288. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Realising that chemical nematicides are too toxic and hazardous to use in nematode control by ordinary farmers, the researchers recognized the natural or biological control as safer and also best alternative for nematode management. Large groups of bioagents are isolated and identified as potential biomolecules in reducing the plant parasitic nematode menace. Biomolecules such as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (Pseudompnas spp. and Bacillus spp.), obligate parasite (Pasteuria spp.), opportunistic fungi (Paecilomyces lilacinus, Verticillium spp. and Trichoderma spp.), predaceous fungi (Arthrobobys spp.) and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae fungi have been recognized as most important candidates for reducing different plant parasitic nematode in several crops under varied agroclimatic conditions. Their effectiveness, mode of action against plant parasitic nematodes and characteristics of a successfull biomolecule is reviewed.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Altomare. C. et a! (1999). App! &w. Microbial., 65: 2926-2933.
    2. Baath, E. and Sonderstrom, B. (1980). Can. J. Bot., 58: 422-425.
    3. Broadbent, P. eta! (1977). Phytopath., 67: 1027-1034.
    4. Vol. 23, No.4, 2002 287
    5. Bursnall, L.A. and Tribe, H.T. (1974). Trans. British Mycol Soc. 62: 595-601.
    6. Cannayane, I. and Sivakumar, C.v. (2001). Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci., 9: 351-354.
    7. Cannayane, I. etal. (2001 a). Crop Res., 21: 164-167.
    8. Cannayane, I. et al. (2001 b). J. Ecobiol., 13: 217-221.
    9. Cayrol, J.c. et al. (1978). Rev. Horticulture, 184: 23-30.
    10. Cayrol, J.C. et al. (1989). Rev. Nematol., 12: 331-336.
    11. Cooke, RC. (1977). The Biology ofthe Symbiotic Fungi. Willey, London, 244 p.
    12. David, RG. and Zorrilla, R.A. (1995). Biocontrol., 1: 63-75.
    13. De Leiji, EA.A.M. etal. (1992). Nematologica., 38: 112-122.
    14. Domsch, KH. et al. (1980). Compendium ofSoil Fungi. Vol I. Academic Press, London, 859 p.
    15. Duponnois, R and Sa, A.M. (1998). Nematologica., 44: 331-343.
    16. Duponnois, R. eta/. (1995). Pis. BiocontrolSci. Tech., 5: 517-525.
    17. Gintis, S. et al. (1983). Nematropica., 13: 181-200.
    18. Godoy, G. etal. (1982). Nemafropica., 12: 111-119.
    19. Gokte, N. and Swarup, G. (1988).lndianJ. Nematol., 18: 152-153.
    20. Gunther, KH. etal. (1998). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 21: 511-517.
    21. Hall. RA. (1980). Trans. British Mycol. Soc., 74: 445-446.
    22. Hanssler, G. (1990). J. Pl. Dis and Protec., 97: 194-201.
    23. Hanssler, G. and Hermanns, M. (1981). J. P! DisProtec., 88: 678-681.
    24. Harman, G.E. and Kubicek, c.P. (1998). Trichoderma and Glioc/adium Vol 2: Enzymes. Biological Control and
    25. Commercial Application. Taylor and Francies, London. 393 p.
    26. Hoffmann. H.S. and Sikora, SA (1995). Nematologica., 41: 309-310.
    27. Hollis, J. P. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1967). Phytopath., 57: 841-847.
    28. Hussey, RS. and Rancodory, RW. (1987). Plant Dis., 66: 9-14.
    29. Jackson, RM. (1965). NZJ. Agric. Res., 8: 878-888.
    30. Jaffee, B.A. et a! (1993). Biological Cont., 3: 329-336.
    31. Jatala, P. (1986). Phytopath., 24: 453-489.
    32. Jatala, P. eta! (1980). J. Nematol., 12: 226-227.
    33. Jonathan, E.1. and Rajendran, G. (2000). J. Bioi. Control., 14: 67-69.
    34. Jonathan, E.1. eta! (2000). Nematropica., 30: 231-240.
    35. Kamra, A. and Ganguly, S. (2000).lndianJ. Nemato!, 30: 106-107.
    36. Katz, E. and Demain. A.L. (1977). Bacterio/. Rev., 41: 449-474.
    37. Kceken, O. and Sikora, RA. (1995). Nematologica., 41: 315.
    38. Kerry, BR etal. (1984). Ann. App! Bioi., 105: 509-516
    39. Khan, M.R and Goswami, B.K. (2000).lndianJ. Nematol., 30: 5-7.
    40. Kloepper, J.w. anc! Schroth, M.N. (1981). Phytopath., 71: 643-644.
    41. Kumar, S. (2001). In: Proc. Emerging Trends in Pests and Diseases Management, TNAU,
    42. p. 182-183.
    43. Lawton, J.R. (1957). J. Expt. Bot., 8: 50-54.
    44. Mankau, R. (1981). In: Plant Parasitic Nematodes (Zuckerman, B.M and Rohde, R.A. Eds.)
    45. VoL III. Academic Press, London, pp. 475-494.
    46. Meyer, S.L.E (1994). Fundam. App! Nematol., 17: 563-567
    47. Meyer, S.L.E et al. (1990). J. Nemato!, 22: 532-535.
    48. Morgan-Jones, G. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1981). Nematropica., 11: 69-74.
    49. Morgan-Jones, G. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R (1985). Nematropica., 15: 107-114.
    50. Morgan-Jones, G. etal. (1984). Nematropica., 14: 57-71.
    51. Morgan-Jones, G. eta! (1985). Nematropica., 13: 245-260.
    52. Oka, K et al. (1993). Biocontrol Sci. Tech.. 3: 115.
    53. Oostendorp, M. and Sikora, RA. (1989). Rev. Nematol., 12: 77-83.
    54. Oostendorp, M. and Sikora, RA. (1990). Rev. Nemato!, 13: 269-274.
    55. Pramer, D. and Stoll, N.R. (1959). Science, 129: 966-967.
    56. Prasad, S.S.v. and Tilak, KV.BR (1972). IndianJ. Microbiol, 11: 59-60.
    57. Rajeswari, S. etal. (1997) J. Bio! Control. 11: 49-52.
    58. Rao, M.s. and Reddy, P.P. (1992 b). Indian Phytopath., 46: 337.
    59. Recke, J. and Sikora, RA. (1992). Soil Bioi. Bioch., 24: 521-526.
    60. Rodriguez-Kabana, R etal. (1965). Science, 148: 524-526.
    61. 288 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    62. Sankaranarayanan, C. etal. (2000). IndianJ. Nematol., 30: 157-16l.
    63. Sasser, J.N. and Freckman, D.W. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology (Veech, J.A. and
    64. Dickson, OW. Eds.). pp. 7-14, Society of Nematologiest Inc., Hyattsville, USA.
    65. Sayre, RM. (1986). Proc. 1st Inter. Congo Nematol. Guelph, Canada, p, 8l.
    66. Sayre, RM. and Starr, M.P. (1988). Annaiesde1lnstitutePasteru/Microbiology, 11: 31.
    67. Schippers, BA eta/. (1987). Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 25: 339-358.
    68. Shanthi, A. and Sivakumar, C.v. (1995). J. Bioi. Control, 9: 113-115.
    69. Sharma, RD. and Stirling, G.R. (1991). Nematologica., 37: 483-484.
    70. Siddiqui, Z.A. and Mahmood, I. (1994). Bioresource Tech., 49: 187-189.
    71. Siddiqui, ZA and Mahmood, I. (1995). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 18: 71-76.
    72. Siddiqui, Z.A. etal. (1996). ThailandJ. Agric. Sci., 29: 115-123.
    73. Simonen, M. and PaIva, I. (1993). Microbiol. Rev., 57: 107-137.
    74. Sitaramaiah, K. and SikQra, RA (1982). Nematologica., 28: 412-419.
    75. Smith, G.S. (1987). In: Vistas on Nematology (Veech, J.A and Dickson, D. W. Eds.), Society of Nematologist,
    76. Hyatsville, pp. 292-300.
    77. Smith, S.E. and Pearson, GV (1988). Plant Mol. B~ol., 39: 221-244.
    78. Spiegel, Y. etal. (1991). BiocontrolSci. Tech.,I: 115-125.
    79. Stirling, G.R. and Mankau, R. (1979). J. Nematol., 11: 282-288.
    80. Stirling, G.R. (1984). Phytopath., 74: 55-60.
    81. Stirling, Rand Mani, A. (1995). Nematologica., 41: 240-250.
    82. Sturhan, D. (1985). Mitfelungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt fur Landund Rortwirtschaft, Berlin, 226-275.
    83. Sturhan, D. etal. (1994). Fundam. Appl. Nematol., 17: 29-42.
    84. Suresh, C.K and Bagyaraj, D.J. (1984). Nematol. Medit., 12: 31-39. .
    85. Usha Rani, B. and Kumar, S. (2001). In: Proc. Emerging Trends in Pests and Diseases
    86. Management, TNAU, p. 173.
    87. Uziel, A. and Sikora, RA. (1992). Nematologica, 38: 123-130.
    88. Weller, K.M. (1988). Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 26: 379-407.
    89. Westcott, S.w.I. and K1ooI2Jel, DA (1993). Phytopath., 83: 1245-1249.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)