Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 23 issue 3 (september 2002) : 202 - 207

SOIL SOLARIZATION-TEMPERATURE DYNAMICS OF SOIL - A REVIEW

B
B.M. Chitlapur
1University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad - 580 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Chitlapur B.M. (2025). SOIL SOLARIZATION-TEMPERATURE DYNAMICS OF SOIL - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 23(3): 202 - 207. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Soil solarization through temperature effects influences soil physical, chemical and biological properties and crop performance in the post solarization period. Temperature dynamics under solarization depend on variety of factors. Solarization during summer months results in higher soil temperature maxima compared to non-solarized treatment. The magnitude of rise in the temperature maxima varied with transparency and thickness of polyethylene, placement height, duration of solarization and residue incorporation. This paper reviews the work done on the subject.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Alai, B. and Nveiollo, C. (1982). Annales della Facolta. di..suez Agraria della.. , 16:151-158.
    2. Baker, KF. and Reistacher (1957). California Agricultural Expetiment Station Manual, 23 (KF. Baker ed.).
    3. Barakat, R.M. (1987). M.Sc. (AgJi.) Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman.
    4. Baskin. J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1989). Weed Res., 29:205-212.
    5. Biradar, 1.13. (1996). M.Sc. (Ag/i.) Thesi$, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad, India,
    6. Blackshaw, R.E. (1990). Weed Sci., 38:518-521.
    7. Blackshaw, R.E. (1992). Weed Sci. 40:204-207.
    8. Braun. M. eta/. (1987). In: Soil Solarization (Katan. J. and De Vay, J. E. eds) CRC Press, Boca Raton, (1991): 61-73.
    9. Braun, M. eta/. (1988). In: Weed Control in Vegetable Productfon, (Cavallaro, Ketal. eds) Rotterdam, 169.
    10. Brighton, CA (1972). Afth Int.Tolloquim on Plastics inAgJicUlture, Budapi:!st, June, 1972,1:203-208.
    11. Cartia. G. (1987). Difesadelleplante, 10:180-184. .
    12. Chauhan. YS. et a/. (1988). ICR/SAT, Research Bulletin, 11: 1.
    13. Chittapur. 13.M. (1998). PhD. Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., DhalWad, India
    14. Devay. J.E. (1991). FAD Plant Production and Portectian Paper, 109:1"15.
    15. lJ\vivcdi. R5. and Dubey, R.c. (1987). Int. J. Trop. Plant Diseases, 5:67-73.
    16. Egley, G.H. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:404-409. .
    17. Egley. G.H (1990). Weed Sci. 38:429-435.
    18. Garibaldi, A. and Tamietti, C. (1989). Acta Hort. 235: 125-130.
    19. Grinstein, A. et a/. (1979). Plant Disease Reporter, 63: 1056-59.
    20. Habeeburrahaman. P. (1992). PhD. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad-5, India
    21. Hartz, T.K. et a/. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20:699-701.
    22. Hildebrand, D.M.M. (1985). Tree Planter's Notes, 36:28-34.
    23. Horowitz, M. (1980). WeedSci. 28:457.
    24. Horowitz. M. eta/. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:170-179.
    25. Horowitz, M. and Taylorson. R.B. (1984). Weed Sci., 32: 111-115.
    26. Jacobsohn. R. et a/. (1980). Weed Sci., 28:312-328.
    27. Kacwrauanc, W. et a/. (1989). Bio. Fertil. Soils, 8;38-47.
    28. Katan. J. (1980). P/. Disease, 64(5): 450-454.
    29. Katan. J. (1981). Annu. Rev. P/. Patho/.. 19:211-236.
    30. Katon. J. et a/. (1976). Phytopathology, 66:685-688.
    31. Khbndar. RR. and Bhowmik, T.P. (1990). Proc. XI Int. Cng. use ofPlastics in Agriculture, New Delhi, E: 128-133.
    32. Kodama. T. and Fukui, T. (1982). Ann. Phytopatho/. Soc. Japan, 48:699-701.
    33. Kumar: B. etal. (1993). Weed Res., 33:423429.
    34. Leon. C.S. eta/. (1984). Weed Sci., 32:5,69-573..
    35. Lodha. S. (1989). Indian Pathology, 42: 170-171.
    36. Lodhd, S. et al. (1991). Indian Farming, 40(10): 12-13.
    37. Lodha. S. and Vaidya. A. (1990). AJid Soil Res. Rehabilitation, 4: 199-202.
    38. Melero, J.M. eta/. (1989). Plasticulture, 82:73-82.
    39. Meron, M. eta/. (1989). Acta Horticulture, 255:117-124.
    40. METI, S.S. (1993). MSc. fAg/i.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad (India).
    41. Ojeda, H. and Trione, S.O. (1990). Seed Sci. Techno/.. 18:681-691.
    42. Osman, A.R. and Sahab, A.F. (1983). Acta Horticu/t1l1'l.'. 152:285-291.
    43. Pimpini, F. eta/. (1993). SeedSci. Techno/., 21:69-83.
    44. Pullman, G.S. eta/. (1981). Phytophathology, 71:954.
    45. Hacone. D. and Wilson, J.E. (1988). Alafua AgJiclIltural Bulletin, 13: 13-20
    46. Rubin. B. and Benjamin, A. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:819-825.
    47. Kubin, B. and Benjamin. A. (1984). Weed Sci., 32: 138.
    48. Sauerbom, J. et a/. (1989). Weed Res., 29:391-397.
    49. Sdurbom. J. and Saxena, MA (1987). Ave. Parasitic FloweJing Plants 4th ISPFp, Marburg, pp. 733-744.
    50. ;hi\·okumar. M. and Marimuthu, T. (1987). Indian J. Nematoilogy, 17:58-59.
    51. "lilith, CA et al. (1992). Weed Res., 32: 103-110.
    52. Stapleton. J.J. et a/. (1989). Acta Hort., 255: 161-168.
    53. Stapleton, J.J: (1991). FAD, Plant A'odur::tion and Protection Paper, No.109,202-228.
    54. Stapleton, J.J. and Devey, J.E. (1982). Phytopathology, 72(3):323-326.
    55. Stapleton, J.J. and Devay, J.E. (1984). Phytopathology, 74:255-259.
    56. Stapleton, J.J. and Devay, J.E. (1986). Crop Protection, 5;190.
    57. Stapleton, J.J. and Garza-lopez, J.G. (1988). Trop. Ag/ic. UK 65:29-33.
    58. Stoller, E.W. and Wax, L.M. (1973). Weed Sci., 21:76-81.
    59. Stevens, C. et al. (1990). Hort. Sci., 25(10);1260-1262.
    60. Sztenjberg, A. et a/. (1987). PI. Disease, 71:365-369.
    61. Tamietti, G. and Garibaldi, A. (1989). Informatore Atopathologico, 39:43-45.
    62. ThompsOn, K eta/. (1977). Natllre, 267(12):147-149
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 23 issue 3 (september 2002) : 202 - 207

      SOIL SOLARIZATION-TEMPERATURE DYNAMICS OF SOIL - A REVIEW

      B
      B.M. Chitlapur
      1University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad - 580 005, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Chitlapur B.M. (2025). SOIL SOLARIZATION-TEMPERATURE DYNAMICS OF SOIL - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 23(3): 202 - 207. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Soil solarization through temperature effects influences soil physical, chemical and biological properties and crop performance in the post solarization period. Temperature dynamics under solarization depend on variety of factors. Solarization during summer months results in higher soil temperature maxima compared to non-solarized treatment. The magnitude of rise in the temperature maxima varied with transparency and thickness of polyethylene, placement height, duration of solarization and residue incorporation. This paper reviews the work done on the subject.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Alai, B. and Nveiollo, C. (1982). Annales della Facolta. di..suez Agraria della.. , 16:151-158.
        2. Baker, KF. and Reistacher (1957). California Agricultural Expetiment Station Manual, 23 (KF. Baker ed.).
        3. Barakat, R.M. (1987). M.Sc. (AgJi.) Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman.
        4. Baskin. J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1989). Weed Res., 29:205-212.
        5. Biradar, 1.13. (1996). M.Sc. (Ag/i.) Thesi$, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad, India,
        6. Blackshaw, R.E. (1990). Weed Sci., 38:518-521.
        7. Blackshaw, R.E. (1992). Weed Sci. 40:204-207.
        8. Braun. M. eta/. (1987). In: Soil Solarization (Katan. J. and De Vay, J. E. eds) CRC Press, Boca Raton, (1991): 61-73.
        9. Braun, M. eta/. (1988). In: Weed Control in Vegetable Productfon, (Cavallaro, Ketal. eds) Rotterdam, 169.
        10. Brighton, CA (1972). Afth Int.Tolloquim on Plastics inAgJicUlture, Budapi:!st, June, 1972,1:203-208.
        11. Cartia. G. (1987). Difesadelleplante, 10:180-184. .
        12. Chauhan. YS. et a/. (1988). ICR/SAT, Research Bulletin, 11: 1.
        13. Chittapur. 13.M. (1998). PhD. Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., DhalWad, India
        14. Devay. J.E. (1991). FAD Plant Production and Portectian Paper, 109:1"15.
        15. lJ\vivcdi. R5. and Dubey, R.c. (1987). Int. J. Trop. Plant Diseases, 5:67-73.
        16. Egley, G.H. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:404-409. .
        17. Egley. G.H (1990). Weed Sci. 38:429-435.
        18. Garibaldi, A. and Tamietti, C. (1989). Acta Hort. 235: 125-130.
        19. Grinstein, A. et a/. (1979). Plant Disease Reporter, 63: 1056-59.
        20. Habeeburrahaman. P. (1992). PhD. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad-5, India
        21. Hartz, T.K. et a/. (1985). Hort. Sci. 20:699-701.
        22. Hildebrand, D.M.M. (1985). Tree Planter's Notes, 36:28-34.
        23. Horowitz, M. (1980). WeedSci. 28:457.
        24. Horowitz. M. eta/. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:170-179.
        25. Horowitz, M. and Taylorson. R.B. (1984). Weed Sci., 32: 111-115.
        26. Jacobsohn. R. et a/. (1980). Weed Sci., 28:312-328.
        27. Kacwrauanc, W. et a/. (1989). Bio. Fertil. Soils, 8;38-47.
        28. Katan. J. (1980). P/. Disease, 64(5): 450-454.
        29. Katan. J. (1981). Annu. Rev. P/. Patho/.. 19:211-236.
        30. Katon. J. et a/. (1976). Phytopathology, 66:685-688.
        31. Khbndar. RR. and Bhowmik, T.P. (1990). Proc. XI Int. Cng. use ofPlastics in Agriculture, New Delhi, E: 128-133.
        32. Kodama. T. and Fukui, T. (1982). Ann. Phytopatho/. Soc. Japan, 48:699-701.
        33. Kumar: B. etal. (1993). Weed Res., 33:423429.
        34. Leon. C.S. eta/. (1984). Weed Sci., 32:5,69-573..
        35. Lodha. S. (1989). Indian Pathology, 42: 170-171.
        36. Lodhd, S. et al. (1991). Indian Farming, 40(10): 12-13.
        37. Lodha. S. and Vaidya. A. (1990). AJid Soil Res. Rehabilitation, 4: 199-202.
        38. Melero, J.M. eta/. (1989). Plasticulture, 82:73-82.
        39. Meron, M. eta/. (1989). Acta Horticulture, 255:117-124.
        40. METI, S.S. (1993). MSc. fAg/i.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad (India).
        41. Ojeda, H. and Trione, S.O. (1990). Seed Sci. Techno/.. 18:681-691.
        42. Osman, A.R. and Sahab, A.F. (1983). Acta Horticu/t1l1'l.'. 152:285-291.
        43. Pimpini, F. eta/. (1993). SeedSci. Techno/., 21:69-83.
        44. Pullman, G.S. eta/. (1981). Phytophathology, 71:954.
        45. Hacone. D. and Wilson, J.E. (1988). Alafua AgJiclIltural Bulletin, 13: 13-20
        46. Rubin. B. and Benjamin, A. (1983). Weed Sci., 31:819-825.
        47. Kubin, B. and Benjamin. A. (1984). Weed Sci., 32: 138.
        48. Sauerbom, J. et a/. (1989). Weed Res., 29:391-397.
        49. Sdurbom. J. and Saxena, MA (1987). Ave. Parasitic FloweJing Plants 4th ISPFp, Marburg, pp. 733-744.
        50. ;hi\·okumar. M. and Marimuthu, T. (1987). Indian J. Nematoilogy, 17:58-59.
        51. "lilith, CA et al. (1992). Weed Res., 32: 103-110.
        52. Stapleton. J.J. et a/. (1989). Acta Hort., 255: 161-168.
        53. Stapleton, J.J: (1991). FAD, Plant A'odur::tion and Protection Paper, No.109,202-228.
        54. Stapleton, J.J. and Devey, J.E. (1982). Phytopathology, 72(3):323-326.
        55. Stapleton, J.J. and Devay, J.E. (1984). Phytopathology, 74:255-259.
        56. Stapleton, J.J. and Devay, J.E. (1986). Crop Protection, 5;190.
        57. Stapleton, J.J. and Garza-lopez, J.G. (1988). Trop. Ag/ic. UK 65:29-33.
        58. Stoller, E.W. and Wax, L.M. (1973). Weed Sci., 21:76-81.
        59. Stevens, C. et al. (1990). Hort. Sci., 25(10);1260-1262.
        60. Sztenjberg, A. et a/. (1987). PI. Disease, 71:365-369.
        61. Tamietti, G. and Garibaldi, A. (1989). Informatore Atopathologico, 39:43-45.
        62. ThompsOn, K eta/. (1977). Natllre, 267(12):147-149
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)