Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Agricultural Reviews
Print ISSN: 0253-1496
Online ISSN: 0976-0741
NASS Rating
4.84

Chief Editor:
Pradeep K. Sharma
Sher-e-Kashmir Uni. of Agri. Sciences and Technology, J&K, INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abs...

Agricultural Reviews, volume 24 issue 4 (december 2003) : 265 - 274

WIDE HYBRIDIZATION AND ITS GENETIC AND CYTOGENETIC .CONSEQUENCES IN PIGEONPFA - A REVIEW

G.C. Bajpai, Jogendra Singh, S.K. Tewari
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, G.B. Pant University of Agrlcu1ture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263 145, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bajpai G.C., Singh Jogendra, Tewari S.K. (2025). WIDE HYBRIDIZATION AND ITS GENETIC AND CYTOGENETIC .CONSEQUENCES IN PIGEONPFA - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(4): 265 - 274. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Genetic wealth of wild species of cajanus group and their transfer in improvement of pigeonpea has been reviewed in the present study. Meiotic behaviour of chromosomes in hybrids, fertility level and phylogenetic implications have been discussed among hybrids made using Cajimus sericeus, Cajanus platycarpus, Cajanus cajanifollus, Cajanus scarabaeoids, Cajanus volubilis, Cajanus trinervius, Cajanus pluriflora, Cajanus lineatus,Cajanus albicans and Cajanus acutifolius wild species. Cajanus cajanifolius appeared phylogenetically very close to Cajanus cajan, Cajanus cajan and Cajanus scarabaeoides were most widely distributed species showing close relationship. A collective evaluation of cytogenetical data suggested that Cajanus Cajanifolius is the closest wild relative followed by scarabaeoides, albicans, trinervius etc.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. AkInola, J.D. et al. (1975). Review series No. 1/1975. CAB, UK, 57 pp.
    2. Ariyanayagam, R.P. and Spence, J.A. (1978). Euphytica., 27: 505-509.
    3. Ariyanayagam, R.P. and Rao, Nageshwar, A. (1993)./nt. Pigeonpea NewsI., 18: 15-16.
    4. Ariyanayagam, R.P. etlJl. (1993)./nt. PigeonpeaNewsl., 18: 7-11.
    5. Dharige, A.M. and Wanjari, K.B. (1998). In: National Symposium on Management of BIotic and Abiotic Stresses In
    6. Pulse Crops (Abstract). 26'" to 28'" June, 1998. IIPR, Kanpur. (1.0. 22. 119 p.).
    7. Dodia, D.A. et aL (1996). Int Chickpea andPigeonpea NewsJ., 3: 100-101.
    8. Dhanju, M.S. and Gill, B.S. (1985). Ann. BioI., 1: 229-231.
    9. DhanJu, M.S. etal. (1985). Gun: Sci, 54: 1284-1286.
    10. Dundas, I.S. etal. (1987). J. Hered., 78: 261-265.
    11. Dundas, I.S. et al. (1988). J. Hered., 79(3): 175-178.
    12. Gill, L.S. and Husainl, S.W.H. (1986). WJbIdenowia, 15: 521-527.
    13. ICRISAT (1987). Annual Report 1986. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, p. 201.
    14. Jaya Prakash, P. andSarla, N. (2000). Int. Chickpea andPigeonpea NewsI., 7: 46-47.
    15. Kalpana Srivastava and Tripathi, S.N. (1988). J.lndian Bot. Soc., 67(1-2): 126-128.
    16. Kumar, P.S. etlJl. (1984). Can. J. Genet. CytoI., 26: 499-505.
    17. Kumar, P.S. etlJl. (1985). Cun: Sci, 54: 346-348.
    18. Kumar, P.S. etal. (1987). J. Hered., 78: 366-368.
    19. 'Maesen, L.J.G. Vander (1980a). India Is the Native Home of the Pigeonpea. Landbowhogesch wageningen M.Sc.
    20. Papers. 19 : 257-262.
    21. Maesen, L.J.G. Vander (198Ob). Wild Pigeonpea in Africa. AGP/PGR. 40: 8-10.
    22. Mannan, M.A. etlJl. (1991). Cytologia, 56: 511-515.
    23. MO!lS, J.P. et IJI. (1988). Proc. Int. Biotechnology Workshop, 12-15 January 1987, ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru.
    24. A.P., India, pp. 87-95.
    25. Mukhopadhyay, S. (1986). J./ndianBot. Soc., 65: 124-129.
    26. Naithanl, S.P. (1941). Proc. National Acad. Science, India. 11: 67·73.
    27. Nene, Y.L. et al. (1990). The Pigeonpea. CAB International Wallingford, Oxen, DX108DE, UK 489 p.
    28. Panigrahi, J. et IJI. (2001). In: Abstracts Diamond Jubilee Symp. Nov. 6-9, 2001, New Delhi, (PS VIII 28).
    29. Patel, M.C. et al. (1998). In: Abstracts National Symp. Management of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Pulse Crops.
    30. 26th to 28'" June, 1998, I1PR, Kanpur. (II F. 19 178 pl.
    31. Patel, D.P. et al. (1998). Indian J. Genet., 58: 327-336.
    32. Pichare, M.M. and Kachole, M.S. (1994). Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea NewsI., 1: 44-46.
    33. 274 AG,RICULTURAL REVIEWS
    34. '. .
    35. Pundir, R.P.S. and Sinljh, RB. (1985kmdianJ. Genet" 45: 194-198.
    36. PundiT, RP.~.:and Singh, R.B. (1985). 77ieor. Appl Genet,69: 531-534.
    37. Pundir,J~.P.S.and Singh, RI.3; (1986): 7heor. Appl.Gehet., 72: 307-313.
    38. Pundir, RP,S. arxi Singh, RB.U987). Euphytiqa, 36: 33-37.' .'
    39. Rajni Raina etallt993). Heterosis Breeding in Ci-opPlants Theory and Application, Symp., Ludhiana, 23-24
    40. February, 1993.140-141.
    41. Rangasamy, P. etal (1991). Croplmprov., 18: 152-153.
    42. Rangasamy, P. eta/. (1992). Ann. Agric. Res;, 13: 399-400.
    43. Rangasamy, P. et al (1992). mdian J. Pulses Res., 5(2): 183-184.
    44. Reddy, LJ. and De, D.N. (1983). mdianJ. 'Genet, 43: 96-103.
    45. Reddy; L. Janardhana (1984). Heredity, 53(2): 435-439.
    46. Reddy, MVeta/. (19%).mt. ChickpeaandPigeonpeaNewsI., 3: 52-53.
    47. SaKenci, KB. et al (1984): Pigeonpea Breeding Progress Report-7. Legumes Program, ICRISAT, Patancheru, AP.
    48. India, 99 pp.
    49. SCl){eha, KB. et al (1987). In!. Pigeonpea Newsl.,6: 33-34.
    50. ~ena, KB. et aI. (1987). Plant Fd. HwiJan-Nutrit, 36: 33&-340..
    51. ~ena, KB.. et al.(1987). QuabtasPlantarumPlilntFoods lor HtJITlM Nutrition, 36: 335-34\.
    52. ~ena, KB. elal (1996). Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea NewsI.,3:49-51. .
    53. Shivaramakrishnan, S. eta/. (1996).lnt Chickpea and Pigeonpea NewsI., 3: 103-106.
    54. Shrivastava, M.P. eta/. (1973); Cytologia, 38: 219-227. .
    55. Shrivastava,.D.P. et a/. (1997). Research and Development aforts. in Hybrid Pigeonpea. Indian Institute of Pulses
    56. Research, ICAR, Kanpur-20B 024. ..' .
    57. Singh, Jaswjnder eta/. (1993). Crop Improvement 20 : 27-30.
    58. Subbarao, G.v. (198B). Ph.D. Thesis,1ndianlnstitilteofTechnology, Kharagpur, India. 217 pp.
    59. Tripathi; S.N. (1986). Journal ofthe Indian BotanicalSoclety65: 77.
    60. Vander Maesen, LJ.G. (1986). CajanusDC and AtylosiaWand A(Leguminosae). Agricultural University Wageningen Papers.85-~ (1985). Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 225'p. .
    61. VeenaSrivastava (1978). Grana,I7: 107-109. .
    62. Verulkar, S.B. et al (1997). TheOl: App/. Genet., 95: 506-508.
    63. Wilnjari" KBela/. (1995). Indian J. PulsesRes., 8: 169-171. .
    64. YadilV,TS.(1986).J. Indian Bot. Soc., 65: 77-78.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)