Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 24 issue 3 (september 2003) : :217-222

WEED MANAGEMENT IN PEAS (PISUM SATIVUM L.) - A REVIEW

GUriqbal Singh
1Department of Plant Breeding, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh GUriqbal (2024). WEED MANAGEMENT IN PEAS (PISUM SATIVUM L.) - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(3): :217-222. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Weeds compete with the crop plants for nutrients, moisture, light and space and thus reduce crop yields. For getting higher yields itis essential to control weeds at appropriate time with suitable methods. This review discusses weed management in pea crop. Major weeds associated with this crop, losses caused by weeds, nutrient removal by weeds, crop-weed competition and methods of weed control are covered in this review.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ali, M. and LaI, S. (1989). Ferti/. News, 34: 17·21. .
    2. Blackshaw, RE. and O'Donovan, J.T. (1993). In : Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conference. Weeds. Brighton.
    3. U.K 22-25Novembet; 1993,3: 1003·1008.
    4. Chau~an, D.R eta/. (1992). Trop. Pest. Mgmt, 38: 14.
    5. Dessamt, F. et al. (1990). Weed Res. Oxford, 30: 297-306. .
    6. FAO (1994). Production }i>arbookVol. 48. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Romp., Italy.
    7. Garrett, H.J. and Orson, J.H. (1989). In : Pnx. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds, Brighton, 3: 811-816.
    8. Gill, H.S. eta/. (1988). PAUJ. Res., 25: 175-180.
    9. Giltrap, N.J. and Roebuck, J.E (1989). In : Pnx. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds, Brighton, 3: 835-840.
    10. Gogol, AK eta/. (1991)./ndianJ. Agron., 36: 287·288.
    11. Heath, M.C. (1990). Crop Protection. NorthemBritain, 313-318.
    12. Jensen, PK (1992). Weed Res. Oxford, 32: 295-302.
    13. Knott, C.M. and Eke, K.R (1989). In: Pnx Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds, Brighton, 3: 829-834.
    14. Kolar, J.S. and Sandhu, K.S. (1989). lndillJ1Fmg., 34: 17·18.
    15. Kudsk,P. (1992). ShelIAgric., 13: 29-30.
    16. Kumar, R etal. (1994). Crop Res. Hisar; 7: 3943.
    17. Kumar, Rand Katyal, SK (1993). In: Pnx.lnt. SjIl11p. on Integrated WeedManagement for Sustainable Agriculture,
    18. Hisar; India, 18-20November; 1993, D: 4648.
    19. 222 AGRICULTURAL·REVIEWS
    20. Kundra, H.C. et al(1993).In: Proc.lnt. Symp.ari /nttigrated Weed MarJilgemenf for Sustainable Agriculture, Hisar;
    21. India, Novemlfer, 1993, B: 49-51. . . ." ..
    22. Kundra, H.C. and Gill, H.S. (1990). PAUJ. Res., 27: 207-212.
    23. Unke, KH. eta/. (1CJ91).1n: PrrJc.FmJnt. Ca1I. On SQi/SQ/arjzation, Amman, JotrJan, 19-25FeburaJy 1990, 139-154.
    24. Lutman, P.J.w. efaJ. U994). W~Res. OJdoro; 34: 137-146.
    25. Malik. N. and TOIAInley-Smith"L. (1994), W~ Technol, 4: 79H98.
    26. O9g, A.G. eta/. (1994). weedSci., 42: $79'585. ",.c .
    27. 099, A.G. eta/. (1993). W~Sci.; 41: 394'-402.. .
    28. Ramussen, J. (1992). In': gh CoIloqtie Int Sur fa bidlOj;JWdesdtauvaisesherOs,'16"18September 1992,.lJijoiJ, France;
    29. 129-138: . . ' ..'. :".i(lt
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)