Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 24 issue 2 (june 2003) : 130 - 135

GREEN MANURING IN SUGARCANE - A REVIEW

T. Ramesh, C. Chinnusamyand C. Jayanthi
1Department of Agronomy ., Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ramesh T., Jayanthi C. Chinnusamyand C. (2024). GREEN MANURING IN SUGARCANE - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(2): 130 - 135. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Green manures play an important role in the nutrition of sugarcane productivity. Intercropping and incorporation of green manure legumes in sugarcane, not only increased the cane productivity, but also improved the soil fertility for sustainable cane production. Growing of green manure crops in between the rows of cane and incorporated at 45 days after sowing will supply nitrogen by adding organic matter and besides increasing the phosphorus availability through release of organic acids during decomposition and mcrease the nutrient use efficiency. Incorporation of green manure legumenous crops viz., sunhemp, daincha, gur, mung and soybean etc. into the soil have the beneficial effect on cane productivity and soil fertility. Research information on various studies all over India indicate the significant favourable influences on cane productivity and on soil fertility are reviewed in this paper

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bawasakar, V.S. et a! (1977). Indian Sug., 2(7): 35-38.
    2. Buragohain, S.K. and Medhi, D.N. (1999). Indian Sug.; 11: 923-926.
    3. Chauhan, RS. and Yadav, RL. (1988). Coop. Sug., 20: 315-317.
    4. Dhoble, M.V. and Khuspe, V.S. (1983). Indian Sug., 33: 255-258.
    5. Dixit, L. and Misra, A. (1991).. Indian. J. Agron.; 36: 261-262.
    6. Durai, Rand Ravichandran, V.K. (1999). SISSTA SugarJ., 24: 39-40.
    7. Ethirajan, A.S. eta! (1981). hldianFmg., 31(8): 25-27.
    8. Ghosh, S.c. et al. (1981). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 29: 332~336.
    9. Jafri, S.M.W. and Pandit, S.N. (1986). J.lndian. Soc. Soil Sci., 34: 414-416.
    10. Jayapal, V. (1988). M:Sc (Ag.) Thesis, Dept. of Agro\1. TNAU, Coimbatore..
    11. Jayapal, V. et a! (1989). Bharatiya Sug., 14(12): 53-55.
    12. Jayapaul, G.P. et al.(2000). Indian Sug., 50(2): 989-991.
    13. Kathiresan, ·G. et a! (1996). SAIL Newsl.. 6(3): 4.
    14. Kathiresan, G. and Ayyamperumal, A. (1996). Coop. Sug., 28: 126:128.
    15. Khind, C.S and Maskina, M.S. (1986). Int. Rice Res. News!, 11(5): 45.
    16. Lakshmikanthan, M. (1983). J. Soil Sci., 38:199-209.
    17. Lamare, P.H. eta/. (1987). J. Soi/Sci., 38:199-209.
    18. Linge Gowda, B.K. (1965). M.Sc (Ag) Thesis. Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore.
    19. Mahendran, S. (1994). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
    20. Mahendr.an, S. eta/. (1997).' Bharatiya Sug., 22(3): 41-45.
    21. Matiakulahdai, A. and Morachan, Y.B. (1964). Madras Agric. J., 51: 127.
    22. Mathukia, RK. et a! (1999). Indian Sug., 10: 839-842.
    23. Menhilal, A.K. eta! (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources, New Delhi,India. Feb. 14-18th .pp 927-928.
    24. Nasir Ahmed, S. et a/. (1991). Bharatiya Sug., 16(5): 9-10.
    25. . Nasir Ahmed, S. and Singarlilvelu, P. (1986). SISSTA SugarJ., 12(3): 21-22.
    26. Nasir Ahmed, S. (1999). SISSTA SugarJ., 24: 51-54.
    27. Palaniappan, S. P. et a! (1990). Natural Resources Management for Sustainable Agricultural Research held on 6-10'h
    28. February at Indian Agric. Inst.; New Delhi. .
    29. Ramesh, T. (2001). M.Sc (Ag) thesis, Dept. of Agron. TNAU, Coimbatore. Vo!. 24, No.2, 2003 135
    30. Sathyavelu, A et a/. (1991). Bharab'ya Sug., 16(11): 23-25.
    31. Shahi, H.N. (2000). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. 97p.
    32. Shankaraiah, C. eta/. (1999). Coop. Sug., 30: 965-969.
    33. Singh, G.B. eta/. (1994). Indian J. Sugarcane Tech., 8: 5-19.
    34. Singh, AK. et a/. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources. New Delhi, India. Fib. 14-18th .pp 927-928.
    35. Srinivas, S. (1996). Coop. Sug., 29: 117-123.
    36. Srivastava, S.C and Pandit,S.N. (1981). In : FAI Seminar held at NBRI, Lucknow, March 11-12.
    37. Subbiah, B.V. and Mannikar, M.D. (1964)./ndianJ. Agric. Sci., 34: 21-27.
    38. Sundara, B. and Rakkiappan, P. (1994). The Hindu Newspaper dated 8.6.1994 p28.
    39. Swarup, A (1991). J. Indian Soc Soil Sci. , 39: 77-78.
    40. Talashiltar, EC. and PaW, S. (1979). J.lndianSoc. Soil Sci. , 27: 201-202.
    41. Venkatakrishnan, S. (1980). P/. Soil, 54: 149-152.
    42. Verma, R.D.N. etal. (1999). Proc. 61" AnnualConv. Sugarcane Techno!. Assoc. of India, New Delhi, Sept, 7 to 9, 1999: 10-17.
    43. Vijay Kumar eta/. (1999). Coop. Sug., 30: 669-674.
    44. Yadav, R.L. and Prasad, S.R. (1986).lndianJ. Sug. Tech., 3: 24-28.
    45. Yadav, R.L. eta/. (1987). IndianJ. Agron., 32: 80-84.
    46. Yadav, R.L. et a/. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources, New Delhi, India. Feb. 14-18'h pp 928-931.
    47. Yadav, R.L. (1987). Ferti/. News, 32(10): 29-31.
    48. Yashpal, AC. and Milapochand (1993). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 47-50.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)