Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 24 issue 1 (march 2003) : 75-78

INFLUENCE OF NUTRITION AND SEASON ON BREEDING VALUES OF BULL - A REVIEW

N. Girdhar
1Project Directorate on Cattle Grass Farm Road, Post Box No. i 7, Meerut Cantt - 250001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Girdhar N. (2024). INFLUENCE OF NUTRITION AND SEASON ON BREEDING VALUES OF BULL - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 24(1): 75-78. doi: .
The maintenance of sire, suitable for breeding in healthy condition is essential for success of breeding programme. Malnutrition of bull calves can delay the sexual maturity and lessen the quantity and quality of their semen. The inter-relationship between nutrition, growth rate and age at puberty in the male are very similar to those in the female. Thus, male reared on high as opposed to low plane of nutrition reach puberty at early ages and heavier body weights.
    1. Alkass, J.E. eta/. (1982). Anim. Prod., 34: 265-277.
    2. Bhosrekar, M.R. eta/. (1986).lndianJ.DairySci., 39: 215-220.
    3. Bhosrekar, M.R. eta/. (1988)./ndianJ. Anin1. Sci., 58: 510-514.
    4. Bhosrekar, M.R. and Rajdan, M.N. (1973)./ndianJ. Anim. Sci., 43: 196-200.
    5. Castille, E. (1980). Anim. Breeding Abstr. 48: 5904.
    6. Chase, C.C. Jr. etal (1993). Theriogenology, 41: 43-61.
    7. Ershoff, B.H. (1948). Physiol. Rev., 28: 107.
    8. Aipse, R.J. and Almaquist, J.O. (1961). J. VairySci., 40: 1612.
    9. Fonseca, Vo. etal. (1993). Revista-Brasileria-de-Reproducao-AiJimal, 17: 135-145.
    10. Foote, R.H. (1978). J. Anim. Sci., 47 (Suppl. 2): 1-11.
    11. Godfrey, R.W cf 0.: (1990). J. Anim. Sci., 68: 734-749.
    12. Goswami, S.C. et al. (1991). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 61:' 579-583.
    13. Hurley, W.L. and Doane, RM. (1989).J. Dairy Sci. , 72: 784-804.
    14. Ketut Sutama and Edey, T.N. (1985). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 36: 461467.
    15. Undsay, J A et al. (1982). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Production. 14, 594.
    16. Milave~, V.K. and Basinov, E.B. (1965), Anim. BreedingAbstract, 33: 1228.
    17. NoIQI1" C.J. eta/. (1990). J Anim. Sci., 68: 1087-1096.
    18. Olallam, C.M. et ai. (1978). Aust. J Agric. Res., 29: 173-179.
    19. Perry, V.EA etai. (1991). Theriogenology, 35: 473486.
    20. Rekwot, P.1. et a! (1994). Theriogeneology, 42: 287-295.
    21. Rekwot, P.I. eta/. (1988). Anim. Prod. Sci., 16: 1-9.
    22. Rekwot,P./. eta/. (1987). Theriogenology, 28: 427434.
    23. Salisbury G.W eta/. (1978). In: Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle. (2'>

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)