Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 25 issue 3 (september 2004) : 201 - 210

BIO ORGANIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN SUGARCANE PRODUCTION - A REVIEW

T. Ramesh, C. Chinnusamy, C. Jayanthi
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 614 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ramesh T., Chinnusamy C., Jayanthi C. (2024). BIO ORGANIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN SUGARCANE PRODUCTION - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 25(3): 201 - 210. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Organic manures and biofertilizers application in the nutrient management programme is inevitable for achieving sustainable sugarcane production. Application of farmyard manure, cane trash, pressmud, vermicompost. and biocompost in combination with recommended inorganic fertilizers have recorded increased cane yield over inorganic fertilizer alone, besides improving the soil fertility and economizing the cane production. Intercropping and incorporation of green manures such as daincha, sunhemp and cowpea and pulses like greengram, blackgram, lentil and frenchbean have established beneficial effects of improving nitrogen use efficiency, cane yield and improving the physio-chemical properties of soil. Nitrogen fixing biofertilizers are useful to economise the nitrogenous fertilizers and to increase the cane yield. Phosphorus solubilising biofertilizers solubilize the unavailable phosphorus to available P form and increase the P use efficiency. Inclusion of biofertilizers in the nutrient management programme has found to increase the yield of sugarcane by 5–10%, besides increasing the nutrient use efficiency.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Acharya, C.N. (1954). Indian Farming, 4(8): 9.
    2. Banger, K.S. et al. (1993). Indian Sug., 43: 237-242.
    3. Bhanavase, D.B. et al. (1996). Indian Sug., 46: 411-413.
    4. Buragohain, S. Kr. (2000). Indian Sug., 50: 847-851.
    5. Buragohain, SK and Medhi, D.N. (1999). Indian Sug., 49: 923-926.
    6. Chauhan, RS. andYadav, RL. (1988). Coop. Sug., 20: 315-317.
    7. Dhoble, MV and Khuspe, V.S. (1983). Indian Sug., 33: 255-258.
    8. Dixit, L. and Misra, A (1991). Indian. J. Agron., 36: 261-262.
    9. Durai, Rand Ravichandran, v.K. (1999). Sugar J., 24: 39-40.
    10. Durai, R (1996). Proc. 58'h Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India. New Delhi.: 61-65.
    11. Hunshal, C.S. et al. (1996). Bharatiya Sug., 21(10): 17-19.
    12. Jadhav, S.B. et a1. (1993). Proc. Deccan Sugar Technologists Association, 43rd Annual Convention, Pune. Pp. SA-53.
    13. Jayapal, V. et a1. (1989). Bharatiya Sug., 14(12): 53-55.
    14. Jayapaul, G.P. et al. (2000). Indian Sug., 50: 989-991.
    15. Jenkinson, D.S. and Ladd, J.N. (1981). In "Soil Biochemistry". Vo1.5. (Paul, E.A. and Ladd, L.N. Eds.), Marcel
    16. Dekker, New York, P 415.
    17. Kambar, N.S. et al. (2000). Bharatiya Sug., 25(2): 23-24.
    18. Karamathullah, J. (1998). Ph.D Thesis., Dept. of Agron. TNAU, Coimbatore.
    19. Kathiresan, G. and Ayyamperumal, A (1996). Coop. Sug., 28: 126-128.
    20. Kathiresan, G. and Manoharan, M.L. (1999). Kisan World. April, 59p.
    21. Kathiresan, G. et al. (1995). Coop. Sug., 26: 629-631.
    22. Kathiresan, G. et al. (1996). SAIL. News, 6(3): 4.
    23. Kumaraswamy, K. and Rajasekaran, S. (1994). Coop Sug., 26:101-103.
    24. Kumaraswamy, K. et a1. (1992). Indian Sug., 42: 841-45.
    25. Linge Gowda (1965). M.Sc (Ag) Thesis, Dept. of Agron. TNAU, Coimbatore.
    26. Mahendran, S. et al. (1997). Bharatiya Sug., 22(3): 41-45.
    27. Manickam, G. et al. (2000). Madras. Agric.J., 86: 152-153.
    28. Manoharan, M.L. et al. (1991). Indian Sug., 41: 45-47.
    29. Mathukia, RK. et al. (1999). Indian Sug., 49: 839-842.
    30. Menhilal, AK. et a1. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources.
    31. New Delhi, India. Feb. 14-18'h, pp 927-928.
    32. Nagaraju, M.S. et al. (2000). Coop. Sug., 31: 391-395.
    33. Nasir Ahmed, S. et al. (1991). Bharatiya Sug., 16(5): 9-10.
    34. Nasir Ahmed, S. (1999). SugarJ., 24: 51-54.
    35. Nasir Ahmed, S. et al. (1997). Indian Sug., 47: 349-51.
    36. Ramalingaswamy, K. et a1. (1999). Coop. Sug., 27(5): 12-15.
    37. Ramesh, T. (2001). M.Sc (Ag) Thesis, Dept. of Agron. TNAU, Coimbatore-3.
    38. Rana, N.S. etal. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources.
    39. New Delhi, India. Feb. 14-18'h pp 931-932.
    40. Rangiah. P.K. et al. (1988). Proc. 50'h Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India. Kanpur.
    41. Pp 101-103.
    42. Sathyavelu, A. et al. (1991). Bharatiya Sug., 16(11): 23-25.
    43. Sathyavelu. A. et al. (1999). Sugar J., 24: 29-30.
    44. Shahi, H.N. (2000). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. 97p.
    45. Shankaraiah, C. et al. (1999). Coop. Sug., 30: 965-969.
    46. Shankaraiah, C. and Nagaraju, M.S. (1997). Fertil News., 42(11): 57-60.
    47. Sharma, RL. et a1. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Chern., 32(1): 1-5.
    48. Shinde, D.B. et al. (1992). Indian Sug., 42(3): 903-908.
    49. Singh, AK. et al. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources.
    50. New Delhi, India. 14-18'h Feb: 927-928.
    51. Snehal Joshi and Zende, N.A (1998). Proc. 60th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India.
    52. Shimla. 19-21" sep: Pp 105-113.
    53. Sreenivasa, M.N. (1999). Agro India, 1: 22.
    54. Srinivas, S. (1996). Coop. Sug., 29: 117-123.
    55. Sundara, B. (2000). In: Annual Report. Sugarcane Breeding Institute (ICAR): 37-38.
    56. •
    57. 210 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    58. !I
    59. Sundara, B. and Natarajan, V. (1997). Proc. 59'h Annual convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India.
    60. Goa.26-28'h sep. Pp 13-17.
    61. Thangaraju, M. and.Govindarajan, K. (2001). The Hindu dated 5.4.2001 BS-8.
    62. Thirugnanam, P.S. et ai. (1999). Proc. 61th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India. Ooty.
    63. Pp 100-105.
    64. Venkateswara Rao (1999). Sugar J., 24: 29-30.
    65. Verma, R.D.N. et al. (1999). Proc. 61th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologist Association of India. Ooty. Pp
    66. 10-17.
    67. Yadav, K. and Singh, Tripurari (1990). Bharatiya Sug., 15(3): 15-23.
    68. Yadav, R.L. et al. (1987). Indian J. Agron., 32: 80-84.
    69. Yadav, R.L. (1987). FertiJ. News., 32(10): 29-31.
    70. Yadav, R.L. and Prasad, S.R. (1992). Expl. Agric., 28: 57-62.
    71. Yadav, R.L. et ai. (2000). Extended Summaries: International Conference on Managing Natural Resources.
    72. New Delhi, India. Feb. 14-18th pp 928-931.
    73. Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. and Yadav, D.V. (1990). J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge, 114: 259-263.
    74. Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. and Yadav, DV (1991). Fertil. News., 36(4): 49-51.
    75. Zende, G.K. (1984). Proc. Deccan Sugar Technologists Association, 34,d Annual Convention. Pp. S-21.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)