Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 26 issue 3 (september 2005) : 223 - 228

SILICON NUTRITION IN RICE - A REVIEW

K.K. Singh, Kalyan Singh, R.S. Singhl, Raghavendra Singh2, R.S. Chandel
1Department of Agronomy. Institute of Agricultural Sciences. B.H.U .. Varanasi - 221 005. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh K.K., Singh Kalyan, Singhl R.S., Singh2 Raghavendra, Chandel R.S. (2024). SILICON NUTRITION IN RICE - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 26(3): 223 - 228. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Present trends toward intensive rice cultivation by growing more than one crop of fertilizer responsive high-yielding cultivars in a year may result in a decrease in plant available Si in the soil. Silicon has been described as being absorbed actively and passively by roots. Large amount of Si as monocilicic acid is absorbed by the rice plant. Si nutrition has direct and indirect beneficial effects on rice growth largely due to its unique physiological role. Silicon promoted growth attributes, photosynthetic activity of the lower leaves and improved leaf and stalk erectness of rice. Silicon improved the plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses such as soil aluminium (AI) manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe) toxicities alleviation, plant pests and disease resistance and increased phosphorus availability. Application of Si with nitrogen has been found to raise the optimum nitrogen dose from its existing level due to its synergistic effect and addition of nitrogen enhances lodging because of enhanced plant growth while Si as well as high N has greater resistance to lodging. The review covers the relationship of silicon to rice crop production, including growth, yield attributes, yield, quality and nutrient uptake.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Agarie. S. W. et al. (1992). Jpn. J Crop Sci.. 61: 200-206
    2. Aleshin. N.E. (1988). Vestnik Sel Skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki. Moskva. 10: 77-85.
    3. Aleshin. N.E. and Avakyan. EX (1983). Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. BioI.. 3 451-454.
    4. Burbey. AB. et al. (1988) Pemberifaan Penetition Sukarami. 15: 26-31.
    5. Chen. CH. and Lewin. J.e. (1969). Can. J Bot. 47: 125-131.
    6. Cheng. B.T. (1982). J Plant Nutr, 5: 1345-1353.
    7. Datnoff. LE. et al. (1997). Plant Dis., 75: 729-732.
    8. Datnoff. LE. et al. (1997). Crop Prot.. 16: 525-531.
    9. Datta. NP. et al. (1962). Indian J Agric Sci, 32: 219-227.
    10. Deren. CW (1997) J Plant Nutri .. 20: 765-771.
    11. Deren. e.w. et al. (1994). Crop Sci. 34: 733-737.
    12. Ding, F. et al. (2000) ,jiangsu Agric Sci .. 3: 43-45.
    13. Elawad. SH. et al. (1982) Agron. J. 74 481-484.
    14. Epstein, E. (1994). Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci U.SA. 91: 11-17.
    15. Flinn. J.e. and DeDatta. SK (1984). Field Crop Res.. 9: 1-15
    16. Hodson. M.H. and Evans, OJ. (1995). J Expt. Bot., 46: 161-171.
    17. Hossain, KA et al. (1998). Acta Aronomica Hungarica. 46: 273-281.
    18. IRRI (1965) Annual Report 1964. IRRI Los Banos. Laguna, Philippines.
    19. IRRI (1966) Annual Report 1965. IRRI Los Banos, Laguna. Philippines.
    20. Islam. A and Saha, K (1969). PI. Soil., 30: .446-458
    21. Kang, YK (1981). Dissertation Abstracts Int, B 42: 2170.
    22. Kang. YK and Stutte. CA (1982). Res. Rep. Office Rural. Devel. Crop. 24: 1-17.
    23. Kang. YS. (1985). Res. Rep. Rural Dev. Admin. Plant Environ. Mycol. Farm Product Utilization Korea Republic,
    24. 27 57-72
    25. Kim. e.B. et al. (1985). Res. Rep. Rural Dev. Admin. Plant Environ. Mycol. Farm Product Utilization. Korea
    26. Republic, 27: 41-60.
    27. Klaveness, D. and Guillard, KKL (1975). J. Physiol., 11: 349-355.
    28. Lee, B. et al. (1990). Res. Rep Rural Dev. Admin. Soils Pert. 32: 15-23.
    29. Lee, EN. et al. (1998). Res.5eries Arkansas Agric. Exp. Station.. 132-136.
    30. Lee, EN. et al. (2000). Res. Series Arkansas AgricExp. Station.. 474-476.
    31. Lewin. J. and Reimann, B.E.F (1969) Annual Rev. Plant Physiol., 20: 289-304.
    32. Liang. ye. et al. (1994). Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 25: 2285-2297
    33. Ma, J. et al. (1989). Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 35: 347-356.
    34. Marschner. H. et al. (1990). Plant Soil. 124: 211-219.
    35. Miah, MN.H. et al. (1990). Pak. J Sci.. 33: 389-392.
    36. Miyake. Y and Takahashi. E. (1983) Soil Sci Plant Nutr., 29: 71-83.
    37. Moore. LE and Traquair. J.F (1976). Plant, 128: 179-182.
    38. Nayar, PK et al. (1982). Oryza. 19: 88-92.
    39. 228 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    40. Okuda, A and Takahashi. E. (1965). In "The mineral Nutrition of the rice plant" JohanHopkins Press -Baltimore.
    41. M. D. 126-146.
    42. Pawar, KB. and Hegde, BA (1978). Indian J. Plant Phys., 21: 12-16.
    43. Pershin. B.M. et al. (1995). Agrokhimiya, 10: 68-74
    44. Radrigo. D.M. (1964). Trap. Agric" 120: 219-226.
    45. Rani. AY and Narayanan. A. (1994). Ann. Rev. Pl. Physio!.. (B & A). 1: 243-262.
    46. Rani. AY et al. (1997) Ann. Plant Physiol., 11: 123-128.
    47. Rao, l.H. et al. (1986). Plant Physi. Comm, 3: 20-24.
    48. Sadanandan. AK and Varghese, E.J. (1968). Madras Agric. J" 261-264.
    49. Savant. N.K. et al. (1999). J. Plant Nutr., 22: 1858-1903.
    50. Savant. N.K. et al. (1997). Adv. Agron., 58: 151-199.
    51. Sawant. AS. et al. (1994). Int. Rice Notes, 19: 21-22.
    52. Schelhass. R.M. and Muller. A (1977). Internal Report. Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, No. AO-BO. 77-212
    53. Seebold. KW. et al. (2001). Phytopathology, 91: 63-67.
    54. Seo. S.w. and Ota. Y. (1983). Nippon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji .. 52: 73-79. (In: Japanese Chem. Abstract. 99:
    55. 21469: 1985)
    56. Singh. A.K. et al. (2002b). 2'" International Agronomy Congress. Nov. 26-30. 2002, New Delhi. India, 390-391.
    57. Singh. K et al. (2000). In: Advances in Plant Physiology 3 (Ed.) Hemantranjan. A Scientific Publisher, Jodhpur,
    58. 443-463.
    59. Singh. KK et al. (2002a). 2'" International Agronomy Congress. Nov. 26-30. 2002, New Delhi. India. 389-390.
    60. Sistani. KR. et al. (1997). J. Plant Nutri., 20: 195-201.
    61. Subramaniam. S. and Gopalswamy, A (1991). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci" 39: 99-103.
    62. Takahashi. E. (1995) Sci. Rice Plant, 2: 58-71.
    63. Takahashi. E. and Miyake. Y. (1977). In: Proceeding and International Seminar on Environment and Fertility
    64. management in Intensive Agriculture (SEFMIA), 603-611. Tokyo, Japan
    65. Takahashi. E. and Miyake. Y. (1982). In: Plant Nutrition. (Scaife. A. ed.). Proceedings of the lXth International.
    66. Colloqium (Covently). Common Wealth Agriculture Bureaux. Slough. u.K.
    67. Takahashi. E. et al. (1990). Comments Agric. and Food Chem" 2: 99-122.
    68. Takahashi. J. et al. (1980). In: Proc. Symposium on Paddy Soils. Oct. 19-24. 1980.82-83. Najing. China
    69. Takahashi, R. (1961). J. Soil Sci. Japan" 22: 31-34.
    70. Tasman. N. (1988). Pemberitaan Penelitian Sukarnami" 13: 36-41.
    71. Vchimura. Y. et al. (2000). Japanese J. Crop Sci., 69: 487-492.
    72. Verma. T.S. and Minhas. R.S. (1989). Soil Sci., 147: 107-115.
    73. Wang. e.B. et al. (1999) Acta Agriculture Shanghai" 15: 65-69.
    74. Yoshida. S. (1975). Technical Bulletin No. 25. Food Fert. Tech. Centl'.. Taipei. Taiwan.
    75. Yoshida. S. (1981). International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna. Philippines.
    76. Zang. H.l. and Wang. Y.Q. (1986). J. Soil Sci. China. 17(1): 20-21.
    77. Zhao. Q. et al. (1998). Acta. Agric.Universitatis Henanensis, 32: 308-313.
    78. Zhao. T.F. and Jiang. N.J. (1987). J. Soil Sci. China. 18: 44-45.
    79. Zhiquan. G. et aJ (1999). Jiangsu Agri. Sci.. 3: 50-52.
    80. Zhu e.M. et al. (199')). Zhejiang Nongye Kexue" 2: 79-80.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)