Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 26 issue 3 (september 2005) : 210 - 216

INFLUENCE OF AGRONOMIC FACTORS ON THE PERSISTENCE OF HERBICIDES - A REVIEW

5.5. NooH, B.M. Chittapur, M.M. Hongal
1Agronomy Division. Agriculture Research Station. Dharwad Farm. Dharwad - 580 007, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- NooH 5.5., Chittapur B.M., Hongal M.M. (2024). INFLUENCE OF AGRONOMIC FACTORS ON THE PERSISTENCE OF HERBICIDES - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 26(3): 210 - 216. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Herbicide persistence is very important because it determines the risk of carryover on succeeding crops. This is very difficult to predict, because the dissipation rate of herbicide depends on agronomic practices (selection of herbicides, rate and method of application, tillage, irrigation, addition of organic amendments, etc.), apart from the herbicide characteristics and environmental conditions (rainfall and photoperiod). Therefore, a thorough understanding of agronomic factors may be useful in management of this phenomena to the advantage of crop production.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anderson, AH. (1968). Weed Res., 8: 58-60.
    2. Assaf, NA and Turbo, R.F. .(1994). Biodegradation, 5: 29-35.
    3. Baughman, T.A et al. (1996~ Weed Sci., 44: 102-165.
    4. Bottomley, P.J. et al. (1999). Soil Bioi Biochem.. 31: 849-957.
    5. Bowman. B.T. (1993). Can. 1. Soil Sci., 73: 309-316.
    6. Brown, BA etal. (1996). Weed Sci., 44: 171-175.
    7. Coveralli, G. (1993). Proc. Int. Symp. Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture, 18-20 Nov.,
    8. 1993, held at CCSHAU, Hisar.
    9. Gan, J. etal. (1996). J. Environ. Qtly., 25:1064-1072.
    10. Goetz, AJ. et al. (1990). Weed Sci., 38: 421-428.
    11. HalL J.K. et al. (1983). 1. Environ. Qtly., 12: 336-340.
    12. Johnson. D.H. and Talbert. RE. (1996). Weed Sci., 44: 156-161.
    13. Kaufman, D.o. and Blake. J. (1970). Weed Sci., 20: 73-80.
    14. Mersie, W. et al. (1999). 1. Environ. Qtly., 28: 816-821.
    15. Monks, C.D.and Banks, PA (1993) Weed Sci., 41: 133-137.
    16. Moyer, J.R. and Esau, R. (1996). Weed Technol., 10: 100-106.
    17. Padmavatidevi, M. et al. (1998). Indian 1. Weed Sci., 30: 214-215..
    18. PateL RB. et al. (1996). Weed News, 3: 15-17.
    19. Prakash, N.B. et al. (2000). Kamataka J. Agric. Sci., 13: 575-580.
    20. Renner, KA et al. (1988). Weed Sci., 36: 90-95.
    21. Sadeghi. AM. and Isensee, AR. (1997). Soil Sci., 162: 430-438.
    22. Sandhu, K.1. etal. (1994). Weed Sci.. 321-324.
    23. Savage. K.E. (1978). Weed Sci., 26: 405-471.
    24. Shelton, D.R. et al (1996). Biodegradation, 7: 129-136.
    25. Smith. AE. et al. (1990). Can. 1. Soil Sci., 70: 485-491.
    26. Starretti. G.K. etal. (1996). J. Environ. Qtly., 25: 566-571.
    27. Topp, E. etal. (1996). Can. 1. Soil Sci , 76: 403-409.
    28. Toth, J. and Milham, P.J. (1975). Weed Res., 15: 171-176.
    29. Vail, G.o. etal (1997). Weed Sci., 45: 842-847.
    30. Webster, E.P. and Shaw..o.R. (1996a). Weed Techno!.. 10: 140-144.
    31. Webster, E.P. and Shaw. D.R. (1996b). Weed Sci.. 44: 662-671
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)