Agricultural Reviews

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT IN COTTON - INDIAN SCENARIO - A REVIEW

Article Id: ARCC4181 | Page : 157 - 169
Citation :- INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT IN COTTON - INDIAN SCENARIO - A REVIEW.Agricultural Reviews.2006.(27):157 - 169
P. Radhika1 and G.V. Subbaratnam
Address : Department of Entomology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, College of Agriculture, Hyderabad - 500 030, A.P., India

Abstract

A large number of citrus species/progenitors of commercial citrus fruits are believed to have originated in India. Availability and wide gene pool in the form of genetic diversity is a prerequisite for crop improvement. Genetic diversity is the extent of genetic variability's among the individual in a single species and between the species. The diversity within a species needs to be preserved for improvement programme. Assessment of genetic vulnerability of any citrus species requires knowledge of the extent and distribution of genetic diversity. However, the number of citrus accessions worldwide are listed to be 6000 and in India 1495 inclusive of wild species, rootstock old cultivars, advanced cultivars, and breeding lines. In India collection and conservation of citrus species/types started long back. However, in mid of nineteen century it received major emphasis. In yesteryears, collection and conservation were primarily made for the quality fruits. While, the current research efforts are addressed to collection of gene pool with distinct desirable traits, which can be utilized for improvement of cultivars. Total 7 citrus species in India are reported as endangered citrus species. They needs special attention for future use.

Keywords

References

  1. Amerika Singh et al. (2002). Insecticide Resistance Management Technology for Rainfed cotton. NCIPM Technical Bulletin No. 11, pp. 7-8.
  2. Armes, N.J. et al. (1994). In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference Pests and Diseases – 1994, pp. 437-442.
  3. Armes et al. (1992). Pesticide Sci., 34: 355-364.
  4. Armes, N.J. et al. (1996). Bull. Ento. Res., 86: 499-514.
  5. Armes, N.J. et al. (1997). Pesticide Sci., 50: 240-248.
  6. Bakhetia, D.R.C. et al. (1996). Pest. Mgmt. Eco. Zool., 4(1-2): 1-13.
  7. Balakrishnan, N. et al. (2003). Ann. Plant Protection Sci., 11: 377-378.
  8. Balakrishnan, N. et al. (2004). In: International Symposium on “Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production - A Global Vision” 3. Crop Protection, 23-25 November, 2004, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp. 254-257.
  9. Bharpoda, T.M. et al. (2000). Indian J. Ento., 62: 327-331.
  10. Birthal, P.S. et al. (2000). Indian J. Agric. Econ., 55: 644-659.
  11. Butter, N.S. and Kular, J.S. (2002). Indian J. Ent., 64: 531-534.
  12. Chalam, M.S.V. et al. (2003). Ann. Plant Protection Sci., 11: 228-231.
  13. Chinnabbai, Ch. (1999). M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis submitted to ANGRAU, Hyderabad.
  14. Dhawan A.K. et al. (2004). Insecticide Resistance Management in Cotton. PAU, Ludhiana, pp. 33-34.
  15. Deva Prasad, V. et al. (1993). Indian J. Plant Protect., 21: 102-103.
  16. Georghiou, G.P. and Tajeda, A.L. (1991). The Occurrence of Resistance to Pesticides in Arthropods. FAO (U N), Rome Publication AGPP/MISC/91-1.
  17. Jhansi, K. and Subbaratnam, G.V. (2004). Relative toxicity of selected insecticides to cotton aphid, Aphis gossypi Glover in A.P. National symposium on changing world order - Cotton Research, development and policy in context held from 10-12-2004 at ANGRAU, Hyderabad.
  18. Kharche, S.N. et al. (1996). Pestology, 20(11): 8-11.
  19. Kranthi, K.R. et al. (2000). Pestology, 24(12): 58-67.
  20. Kranthi, K.R. et al. (2001a). Bull. Ento. Res., 91: 37-46. 168 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
  21. Kranthi, K.R. et al. (2001b). J. Econ. Ento., 94: 253-263.
  22. Kranthi, K.R. et al. (2004). Recent advancess in IRM strategies for sustainable cotton pest management in India. (Chauhan, M.S. and Saini, R.K. eds.). National symposium on changing world orders - Cotton Research, development and policy in context held from 10-12 August, 2004 at ANGRAU, Hyderabad.
  23. Kundu, S.K. et al. (1998). Indian J. Ent., 60: 297-300.
  24. Lande, S.S. and Sarode, S.V. (1994). Indian J. Plant Protect., 22: 41-42.
  25. Lande, S.S. and Sarode, S.V. (1995). Pesticide Res. J., 7: 92-94.
  26. Mangat, I.S. et al. (1998). Indian J. Ecol., 25(1): 50-54.
  27. Mayuravalli, V.V.L. et al. (1987). Sci. Cult., 53: 348-351.
  28. Mehta, D.M. et al. (1992). Indian J. Plant Protect., 20: 234-236.
  29. Metcalf, R.L. (1989). Pest. Sci., 26: 333-358.
  30. Mukherjee, A.B. and Srivastava, V.S. (1970). Indian J. Ento., 32: 251-255.
  31. Murugesan, K. and Dhingra, S. (1995). J. Ento. Res., 19: 313-319.
  32. Patel, C.C. et al. (1992). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 62: 421-423.
  33. Patil, B.V. et al. (1991). Entomon., 16: 291-300.
  34. Phadke, A.D. et al. (1988). Pesticides - Bombay, 22(4): 36-37.
  35. Phokela, A. and Mehrotra, K.N. (1993). Pesticide Res. J., 5: 106-108.
  36. Pradhan, S. et al. (1963). Indian J. Ento., 25: 177-180.
  37. Pradhan, S. et al. (1964). Indian Fmg., 14: 33-35.
  38. Radhika, P. and Subbaratnam, G.V. (2002). Insecticide resistance in the population of Spodoptera litura (F.) and its management (Unpublished).
  39. Rajaram, V. et al. (2000). Insect Environ., 6: 47-48.
  40. Rajeswar Reddy, G. et al. (1991). Indian J. Ento., 53: 393-395.
  41. Ramakrishnan, N. et al. (1984). Pesticides, 18: 23-27.
  42. Rao, N.V. et al. (1995). J. Biol. Control, 9: 105-108.
  43. Rosaiah, B. et al. (1997). Indian J. Plant Protect., 25: 93-95.
  44. Russell, D.A. et al. (2000). In: The BCPC Conference : Pests and diseases, Volume 1. Proc Intern Conference held at the Brighton Hilton Metropole Hotel, Brighton, UK, 13-16 November, 2000, pp. 205-212.
  45. Satyavani, P. et al. (1991). Indian J. Plant Protect., 19: 85-88.
  46. Saxena, J.D. et al. (1992a). Indian J. Ento., 54: 347-350.
  47. Sharma, O.P. et al. (2001). ASHTA cotton IPM module at Sonkhed. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 9: 193-200.
  48. Sharma, O.P. et al. (2004). In: International symposium on “Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production - A Global Vision” 3. Crop Protection, 23-25 November, 2004, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp. 258-262.
  49. Shrivastava, V.K. et al. (2004). In: Intern Symposium on “Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production - A Global Vision” 3. Crop Protection, 23-25 November, 2004, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp. 267-269.
  50. Sindhu, A.S. et al. (1992). Indian Fmg., 42(1): 9.
  51. Singh, H.N. (1992). In: Helicoverpa management : Current status and future strategies, Proc. First national workshop (Directorate of Pulse Research), (Sachan, J.N. ed.) Kanpur, August, 1990) pp. 150-158.
  52. Srivastava, B.K. and Joshi, H.C. (1965). Indian J. Ento., 27: 102-104.
  53. Sudhakar, K. and Reddy, A.S. (1997). Indian J. Plant Protect., 25: 1-3.
  54. Sundaramurthy, V.T. and Chitra, K. (1992). Indian J. Plant Protect., 20: 1-7.
  55. Surendra Reddy, C.N.V. and Reddy, G.P.V. (1984). Andhra Agric. J., 31: 85-91.
  56. Suri, S. et al. (1992). State of the art of IPM research and adoption in India. Integrated pest management in the Asia Pacific region, pp. 95-111.
  57. Tanwar, R.K. et al. (2004). Validation of IPM in irrigated cotton of North zone. International symposium on “Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production – A Global Vision” 3.Crop Protection, 23-25 November, 2004, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp. 263-266.
  58. Taylor, C.E. (1986). Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 27: 103-112.
  59. Vadodaria, M.P. et al. (2004). In: Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production - A Global Vision 3. Crop Protection, 23-25 November, 2004, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp. 270-273.
  60. Venkataiah, M. et al. (1990). Indian J. Plant Protect., 18: 285-286.
  61. Venugopal Rao, N. (1991). Insect Pests of Cotton-Integrated Pest Manangement. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
  62. Venugopal Rao, N. et al. (1994). Indian J. Plant Protect., 22: 96-104.
  63. Venugopal Rao, N. et al. (1990). Indian J. Plant Protect., 18: 97-100

Global Footprints