Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 28 issue 4 (december 2007) : 301-304

NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW

M
M.M. Hongal
S
S.S.Nooli
1Agronomy Division, Agriculture Research Station, Dharwad Farm, Dharwad-580 007 India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Hongal M.M., S.S.Nooli (2025). NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(4): 301-304. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Fertilizer requirement can be reduced 15-25 per cent with fertigation through drip. The movement of nutrients depends on the discharge rate as high discharge rate lead to leaching of nutrients below the root zone. Application of high dose of fertilizers not only cause economic loss but also it leads to chemical changes in soil and reduces the yield. Among the N forms NH4 form is less mobile in soil. Movement of micronutrient is mainly associated with changes in soil pH so an effort was made to review nutrient movement in fertigation through drip.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bar, B.V. et al., (1989). Agron. J., 81: 443-447.
    2. Bharambe, P.R. et al., (1997). J. India. Soc. Soil Sci., 45: 705-709.
    3. Bresler, E. (1975). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 39: 604-612.
    4. Belton, P.R. and Goh, K.M. (1992). Fertil. Res., 33 : 239-247.
    5. Cook, P.W. (1991). Hort. Sci., 26: 250-252.
    6. Goldberg, D. and Bar, B.V. (1971). Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 96: 645-648.
    7. Haynes, R.J. (1988) Scientia Horticulturae, 35: 189-198.
    8. Haynes, R.J. and Swift, R.S. (1987). Plant and Soil., 102: 211-291.
    9. Haynes, R.J. (1990). Fertil. Res., 23 : 103-112.
    10. Laher, M. and Avinmelech, Y. (1980). Plant and Soil , 55 : 35-42.
    11. Martinez, J.J. et al., (1991). Irrig. Sci., 12 : 153-159.
    12. Niklkelsen, R.L. and Jarrell, W.M. (1987). Soil Sci. J., 51: 464-468.
    13. Neill, M.K.O. et al., (1979) Soil Sci. Soc. Amer, J., 43: 283-286.
    14. Neilsen, G.H. et al., (1995). Canadian. J. Soil Sci., 75: 307-320.
    15. Papadepoulos, J. (1985) Plant and Soil, 88: 231-236.
    16. Papadepoulos, J. (1986). Plant and Soil, 93 : 87-93.
    17. Papadepoulos, J. (1992) Fertil. Res., 34 : 9-13.
    18. Parchomchuk, P. et al., (1993) CanADIAN. J. Soil. Sci. 73: 157-164.
    19. Rauschkolb, R.S. et al., ( 1976). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 40 : 60-75.
    20. Stanley, C.D. et al., (1991). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 54 : 217-222.
    21. Shivakumar, H.R. (1997). Ph.D Thesis , UAS , Bangalore.
    22. Thomas, L.T. et al., (2000). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 64: 412-412.
    23. Thompson, T.I. and Doerge, T.A. (1996). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 60 168-173.
    24. Uriu, K. (1980). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 105:500-310.
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 28 issue 4 (december 2007) : 301-304

      NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW

      M
      M.M. Hongal
      S
      S.S.Nooli
      1Agronomy Division, Agriculture Research Station, Dharwad Farm, Dharwad-580 007 India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Hongal M.M., S.S.Nooli (2025). NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(4): 301-304. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Fertilizer requirement can be reduced 15-25 per cent with fertigation through drip. The movement of nutrients depends on the discharge rate as high discharge rate lead to leaching of nutrients below the root zone. Application of high dose of fertilizers not only cause economic loss but also it leads to chemical changes in soil and reduces the yield. Among the N forms NH4 form is less mobile in soil. Movement of micronutrient is mainly associated with changes in soil pH so an effort was made to review nutrient movement in fertigation through drip.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Bar, B.V. et al., (1989). Agron. J., 81: 443-447.
        2. Bharambe, P.R. et al., (1997). J. India. Soc. Soil Sci., 45: 705-709.
        3. Bresler, E. (1975). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 39: 604-612.
        4. Belton, P.R. and Goh, K.M. (1992). Fertil. Res., 33 : 239-247.
        5. Cook, P.W. (1991). Hort. Sci., 26: 250-252.
        6. Goldberg, D. and Bar, B.V. (1971). Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 96: 645-648.
        7. Haynes, R.J. (1988) Scientia Horticulturae, 35: 189-198.
        8. Haynes, R.J. and Swift, R.S. (1987). Plant and Soil., 102: 211-291.
        9. Haynes, R.J. (1990). Fertil. Res., 23 : 103-112.
        10. Laher, M. and Avinmelech, Y. (1980). Plant and Soil , 55 : 35-42.
        11. Martinez, J.J. et al., (1991). Irrig. Sci., 12 : 153-159.
        12. Niklkelsen, R.L. and Jarrell, W.M. (1987). Soil Sci. J., 51: 464-468.
        13. Neill, M.K.O. et al., (1979) Soil Sci. Soc. Amer, J., 43: 283-286.
        14. Neilsen, G.H. et al., (1995). Canadian. J. Soil Sci., 75: 307-320.
        15. Papadepoulos, J. (1985) Plant and Soil, 88: 231-236.
        16. Papadepoulos, J. (1986). Plant and Soil, 93 : 87-93.
        17. Papadepoulos, J. (1992) Fertil. Res., 34 : 9-13.
        18. Parchomchuk, P. et al., (1993) CanADIAN. J. Soil. Sci. 73: 157-164.
        19. Rauschkolb, R.S. et al., ( 1976). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 40 : 60-75.
        20. Stanley, C.D. et al., (1991). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 54 : 217-222.
        21. Shivakumar, H.R. (1997). Ph.D Thesis , UAS , Bangalore.
        22. Thomas, L.T. et al., (2000). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 64: 412-412.
        23. Thompson, T.I. and Doerge, T.A. (1996). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 60 168-173.
        24. Uriu, K. (1980). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 105:500-310.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)