Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 28 issue 4 (december 2007) : 301-304

NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW

M.M. Hongal, S.S.Nooli
1Agronomy Division, Agriculture Research Station, Dharwad Farm, Dharwad-580 007 India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Hongal M.M., S.S.Nooli (2025). NUTRIENT MOVEMENT IN FERTIGATION THROUGH DRIP- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(4): 301-304. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Fertilizer requirement can be reduced 15-25 per cent with fertigation through drip. The movement of nutrients depends on the discharge rate as high discharge rate lead to leaching of nutrients below the root zone. Application of high dose of fertilizers not only cause economic loss but also it leads to chemical changes in soil and reduces the yield. Among the N forms NH4 form is less mobile in soil. Movement of micronutrient is mainly associated with changes in soil pH so an effort was made to review nutrient movement in fertigation through drip.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bar, B.V. et al., (1989). Agron. J., 81: 443-447.
    2. Bharambe, P.R. et al., (1997). J. India. Soc. Soil Sci., 45: 705-709.
    3. Bresler, E. (1975). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 39: 604-612.
    4. Belton, P.R. and Goh, K.M. (1992). Fertil. Res., 33 : 239-247.
    5. Cook, P.W. (1991). Hort. Sci., 26: 250-252.
    6. Goldberg, D. and Bar, B.V. (1971). Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 96: 645-648.
    7. Haynes, R.J. (1988) Scientia Horticulturae, 35: 189-198.
    8. Haynes, R.J. and Swift, R.S. (1987). Plant and Soil., 102: 211-291.
    9. Haynes, R.J. (1990). Fertil. Res., 23 : 103-112.
    10. Laher, M. and Avinmelech, Y. (1980). Plant and Soil , 55 : 35-42.
    11. Martinez, J.J. et al., (1991). Irrig. Sci., 12 : 153-159.
    12. Niklkelsen, R.L. and Jarrell, W.M. (1987). Soil Sci. J., 51: 464-468.
    13. Neill, M.K.O. et al., (1979) Soil Sci. Soc. Amer, J., 43: 283-286.
    14. Neilsen, G.H. et al., (1995). Canadian. J. Soil Sci., 75: 307-320.
    15. Papadepoulos, J. (1985) Plant and Soil, 88: 231-236.
    16. Papadepoulos, J. (1986). Plant and Soil, 93 : 87-93.
    17. Papadepoulos, J. (1992) Fertil. Res., 34 : 9-13.
    18. Parchomchuk, P. et al., (1993) CanADIAN. J. Soil. Sci. 73: 157-164.
    19. Rauschkolb, R.S. et al., ( 1976). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 40 : 60-75.
    20. Stanley, C.D. et al., (1991). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 54 : 217-222.
    21. Shivakumar, H.R. (1997). Ph.D Thesis , UAS , Bangalore.
    22. Thomas, L.T. et al., (2000). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 64: 412-412.
    23. Thompson, T.I. and Doerge, T.A. (1996). Soil Sci. Amer. J., 60 168-173.
    24. Uriu, K. (1980). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 105:500-310.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)