Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 28 issue 4 (december 2007) : 245-253

LOWLAND RICE IN COASTAL SALINE SOILS – A REVIEW

1M. Mohamed Amanullah, S. Natarajan, D. Vanathi, S. Ramasamy, K. Sathyamoorthi
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Amanullah Mohamed 1M., Natarajan S., Vanathi D., Ramasamy S., Sathyamoorthi K. (2025). LOWLAND RICE IN COASTAL SALINE SOILS – A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(4): 245-253. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In India, the coastal areas have lagged behind in production owing to the fragility of the ecosystem and presence of various constraints thereby suffering from lower productivity with slow positive trend in the growth rate in comparison to several inland areas. Salinity coupled with flooding promotes the cultivation of traditional rice varieties that are tolerant to both submergence and salinity The use of amendments viz., organic and inorganics enhances the yield as the amendments in addition to the supply of nutrients, improves the soil physical conditions and provides a buffering action against adverse soil conditions. The type of amendment may depend on the cost, availability and quantity. The materials available locally and crop wastes can be used effectively for reclamation. The present review was aimed to examine the impact of amendments and management practices on rice growth and grain yield to enhance rice yield under lowland ecosystems in the coastal saline environment by adoption of better management strategies

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Abrol, I.P. and Bhumbla, D.R. (1971). World Soil Resources Report, 41: 42-51, F.A.O., Rome, Italy.
    2. Agarwal, R.R. (1983). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 1 (2): 72-77.
    3. Aich, A.C. et al. (1996). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 14 (1 & 2): 53-57.
    4. Ali, A.M. et al. (1974). Madras Agric. J., 61 (8): 472 – 476.
    5. Arokiaraj, A. (1988). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    6. Aruna, L. et al. (1999). Madras Agric. J., 86 (7-9): 356 – 359.
    7. Bandyopadhyay et al., (1987). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 5 (1): 1 – 14.
    8. 225522 AGRIACGURLITCUURTAULR ASLC IERNECVEI EDWISGEST
    9. Bandyopadhyay, A. K., and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1984). Fertil News, 29 (8): 18-22.
    10. Biswas C.R., and Bhattacharya. (1987). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 5 (1): 61-66.
    11. Biswas, C.R. et al. (1990). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 8 (1): 37 – 41.
    12. Channabasavanna, A.S. et al. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46 (3): 458-461.
    13. Chhipa, B.R., and Lal, P. (2003). In: Salt Affected Soils and Crop Production. (Eds.) Lal, P., B.R. Chhipa and Aravind
    14. Kumar. Agrobios (India), Jodhpur. pp. 94 – 113.
    15. Chitdeshwari, T., and Krishnasamy, R. (2000). Madras Agric. J., 87 (7-9): 491-494.
    16. Choi, W.Y. et al. (2003). Int. Rice Res. Newsl., 28 (1): 54 – 55.
    17. CSSRI. (2002). CSSRI Annual Report 2001-02. p. 91.
    18. Dagar, J.C. (1996). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 14 (1 & 2): 185 – 194.
    19. Dar, S.R. et al. (2004). Allahabad Farmer, LVIII (1):19- 27.
    20. Dargan, K.S. et al. (1982). Crop Production in Salt Affected Soils. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi. p. 273.
    21. Das, P.C. (1993). Manures and Fertilizers. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India. pp. 175 – 180.
    22. Djanaguiram, M. et al. (2004). Indian J. Agric. Res., 38 (1): 73 – 76.
    23. Duraisamy, P. et al. (1986). Madras Agric. J., 73 (3): 129 – 134.
    24. Duraisamy, P. et al. (1988). Madras Agric. J., 75 (3 – 4): 119 – 124.
    25. Dutta, D. et al. (2003). Crop Res., (1): 53 – 57.
    26. Gill, K.S., and Singh, O.S. (1992). J. Potassium Res., 8 (3): 255 – 263.
    27. Govindaraju, P., and Balakrishnan, K. (2002). Madras Agric. J., 89 (1 – 3): 67 – 69.
    28. Gupta, R.K., and Abrol, I.P. (1990). Adv. Soil Sciences, 11: 223 – 288.
    29. Gupta, R.K., and Singh, R.R. (1988). Soil Sci., 146 (4): 277-283.
    30. Gupta, R.P., and Woodhead, T. (1989). In: Physical Environment of Rice Ecosystem, Monograph (1). Indian Soc. of
    31. Agro – physics, IARI, New Delhi.
    32. Gupta, S.K. (1992). Technical Bulletin No. 17, Central Soil Salinity and Research Institute, Karnal.
    33. Haq, I. et al. (2001) Int. J. Agric. Biol., 3 (3) : 289-291.
    34. Hassan, C. et al. (2001). Int. J. Agri. Biol., 3 (3): 286-288.
    35. Ibrahim, M. et al. (2000). In: Proc. Symp. IPNS. NFDC, Islamabad, Pakistan. 186-195.
    36. Jeyaraman, S. (1991). Madras Agric. J., 78 (9 – 12): 313 – 314.
    37. Kadu, P.B. et al. (1991). J. Soils and Crops, 1 (2): 172 – 174.
    38. Karthikeyan, R. (1999). M.Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    39. Keller, J., and Alfaro, F.J. (1966). Soil Sci., 102 (2):107-114.
    40. Keshwa, G.L., and Singh, G.D. (1992). Madras Agric. J., 79 (10): 557 – 562.
    41. Khan, H.R. et al. (1991). Intern. J. Tropic. Agric., 9 (3): 182-189.
    42. Kothandaraman, G.V. (1987). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 5 (1): 117-122.
    43. Kuligod, V.B. et al. (2000). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48 (3): 426-432.
    44. Kulkarni, K.R., and Kulkarni, M.V. (1982). Fert. News, 27 (10): 44 – 51.
    45. Kumar, R. et al. (1991). Indian J. Agron., 61 (2): 139 – 142.
    46. Kumar, R.M. et al. (2003). Indian J. Agron., 48 (3): 175 – 177.
    47. Lal, P. et al. (2003). Salt Affected Soils and Crop Production: A Modern Synthesis. Agrobios, Jodhpur, India.
    48. pp. 2 – 5.
    49. Maas, E.V. (1998). In: Agriculture Salinity assessment and management manual. ASCE publication.
    50. Mahimairaja, S., and Mayalagu, K. (1986). Andhra Agric. J., 2: 1982 – 1984.
    51. Maji, B., and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1990). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 8 (2): 109 – 111.
    52. Mani, A.K. et al. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46 (1): 89-93.
    53. Mani, S. et al. (1993). Madras Agric. J., 80 (2) : 45 – 47.
    54. Mathew, J. et al. (1993). Oryza, 30: 26 – 29.
    55. Minhas, P.S., and Khosla, B.K. (1986). Agric. Water Mgt., 12: 64 – 74.
    56. Mishra, B. 1995. Annual Report’s. Central Soil Salinity Research Centre, Karnal.
    57. Misra, V.K., and Gupta, G.P. (1974). JNKVV Res. J., 8: 37 – 39.
    58. Munns, R. (2003). In: Salt Affected Soils and Crop Production: A Modern Synthesis (Lal, Pehared). Agrobios
    59. Publishers, Jodhpur, India. pp. 296 – 315.
    60. Mythili, S. et al. (2001). Madras Agric. J., 88 (7-9): 514-517.
    61. Nagarajan, R. et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J., 87 (4-6): 186-190.
    62. VVooll.. 2288,, NNoo.. 44,, 22000077 225533
    63. Naik, B.B., and Yakadri, M. (2004). J. Res. ANGRAU, 32 (2): 85 – 89.
    64. Panda, N., and Sahoo, D. (1989). Fertil News, 34: 39 – 44.
    65. Pandey, U.K., and Saxena, H.K. (1987). Indian J. Agric. Chemistry, 20 (2): 149 – 155.
    66. Patel, M.S., and. Goswami, K.P. (1995). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 13 (1): 33-37.
    67. Ponnamperuma, F.N. (1972). Ad. Agron., 24: 29 – 92.
    68. Poss, A.J. et al. (2004). Cereal Research Communications, 32 (3): 339 – 346.
    69. Prasad, B. et al. (1983). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 31 (4): 601 – 603.
    70. Raj, M., and Nath, J. (1984).J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 32: 349-352.
    71. Raju, R.A., and Reddy, M.N. (2000). Indian J. Agron., 45 (4): 629-635.
    72. Ramakrishnan, S. (1985). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    73. Ramaswami, P.P., and Kothandaraman, G.V. (1985). In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Coir Research. Coir House
    74. Cochin, Kerala, India.
    75. Rao, C.P., and Shukla, D.N. (1999). Indian J. Agron., 44 (1): 94-98.
    76. Rao, I.V.S. et al. (1994). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 12 (1 & 2): 23-35.
    77. Sadana, U.S. (2002). In: Problem Soils and Their Amelioration for Crop Production. Feb 21-March 13, 2002. Center
    78. for Advanced Studies. Punjab Agricultural University.
    79. Sadhana, U.S., and Singh, J. U. (1983). PAU, Ludhiana. Thesis Abstracts, 9: 7 - 8.
    80. Selvakumari, G. et al. (1993). Madras Agric. J., 8 (11): 659 – 660.
    81. Shanmugam, P.M., and Veeraputhran, R. (2000). Madras Agric. J., 87 (1-3): 90-92.
    82. Shanmugam, P.M., and Veeraputhran, R. (2001). Madras Agric. J., 88 (7-9): 514-517.
    83. Sharma, A.R., and Mittra, B.N. (1992). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 62 (1): 70 – 72.
    84. Sharma, D.R., and Khosla, B.K. (1984). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 33: 344-348.
    85. Sharma, P.K. et al. (1994). Adv. Agric. Res. India, 2: 35 – 55.
    86. Sharma, R.D. (1997). Adv. Agric. Res. India, 8: 129 – 134.
    87. Sharma, R.D. et al. (1996). IRRI Notes., 21 :72-73.
    88. Sharma, V. P. (1995). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 13 (1): 1-9.
    89. Sheeba, S., and Kumarasamy, K. (2001). Madras Agric. J., 88 (7-9): 430 –434.
    90. Siddique, M.T. et al. (1988) In: Proc. 1st Natl. Cong. Soil Sci. October, 1985, Lahore, 380-385.
    91. Singaravel, R. et al. (1996). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 14 (1 & 2): 59 – 61.
    92. Singh, K.P., and Sarkar, M.C. (1992). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 40: 762 – 767.
    93. Singh, N.T. et al. (1981). Agro Kemia ES, Taljtan, 30. Supplement 158-177.
    94. Singh, P.K. et al. (1981). Plant and Soil, 62: 35 – 44.
    95. Singh, P.K. et al. (2000). Indian. J. Agron., 45 (2): 217-222.
    96. Subburaj, D., and Ramaswami, P.P. (1994). Madras Agric. J., 81 (9): 515 – 517.
    97. Swarup, A. (1992). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 40: 816 – 822.
    98. Thampi, C. J. et al. (1987). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 5 (5): 85-91.
    99. Tiller, K.G., and Wassermann, A. (1972). Isotopes and Radiation in Soil Plant Relationship. IAEA. Vienna.
    100. Tomar, S.S. et al. (1992). In : Effect of amendments on soil physical properties under upland conditions of paddy –
    101. wheat cropping. Sept. 28 – 29, 1993. National Seminar Organization, Indore. pp. 116 – 119.
    102. U.S. Salinity Laboratory. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Handbook 60, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
    103. Vanthi, D. and Mohamed Amanullah, M. (2007). Internat. J. Agric Sci., 3 (1): 39-42
    104. Verma, K.S. and Abrol, I.P. (1980). Indian. J. Agric. Sci., 50: 844-851.
    105. Verma, S.K., and Gupta, R.K. (1985). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 33: 465 – 468.
    106. Yadav, J.S.P. (1979). Fert. News, 24: 67-74.
    107. Yadav, J.S.P. (1996). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 14 (1 & 2): 17-29.
    108. Yadav, J.S.P. et al. (1983). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 1 (1): 1 – 6.
    109. Yoshida, S. (1981). Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. International Rice Research Institute. Los Banos, Philippines. p. 144 -146.
    110. Yoshida, S., and Padre, B.C (Jr.). (1976). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 21: 281 – 292.
    111. Zaman, S.K. et al. (1995). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 13 (2): 99-104.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)