Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 28 issue 1 (march 2007) : 1-9

CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH ON WEB BLIGHT DISEASE OF URD BEAN: A REVIEW

Shailbala, H. S.Tripathi
1Department of Plant Pathology G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263145, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shailbala, S.Tripathi H. (2024). CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH ON WEB BLIGHT DISEASE OF URD BEAN: A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(1): 1-9. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The urd bean (Vigna mungo (L.l Hepper) is an important pulse crop of India. It is rich in
phosphoric acid. The genus Rhizoctonia was described to accommodate the non sporulating root
pathogen R. erocorum. The pathogen was observed on diseased potato tubers and named it as
Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Genus Rhizoctonia has gained the reputation of being a widespread,
destructive and versatile plant pathogen. It was reported that 26 - 280C temperatures and 90 - 100 percent relative humidity (RHl favoured maximum disease development. R. solani Kuhn is a common soil borne pathogen that has many hosts forms sclerotia in/on soi! and survives for a long period in the absence of a host either as sclerotia or thick walled brown hyphae in plants debries. The web blight disease severity is recorded by using 1 - I) rating scale. Cultural practices, chemical control and biological control are effective methods for management the web blight of urd bean.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Abawi, G. S. (1985). Plant Dis. 69: 158·161.
    2. Adams, G. C. Jr. and Butler, E. E. (1983 b). Phytopathology. 73: 152·155.
    3. Alam, S. S. eta/(1985). PakistanJ. Bot. 17:165.
    4. Allinson, J. L. (1951). Plant Dis. Reptr. 35: 372-373.
    5. Anonymous. (2003). All India Coordinated Research Project on MULLaR?: 18
    6. Bains, S. S. and Dhaliwal, H. S. (1993). Indian Bot. Reptr. 11: 11-14.
    7. Baker, R. and Martinson, C. A. (1970). In: Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. (J.R. Parmeter, Jr Ed.), , University of California Press, Berkeley. 172-188p
    8. Basandrai, A. K. et a/. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 69: 507-508.
    9. Bauske, E. M. and Kirby, H. W. O. (1992). Plant Dis. 76: 236-239.
    10. Bhattacharya, A. and Poy, A. K. (1998). Indian Phytopathol. 51: 81-86.
    11. Boosalis, M. G. and Scharen, A. L. (1959). Phytopathology. 49: 192 ~198.
    12. Buder. E. E. and Bracker, C. E. (1970). In: Biology and Pathology ofRhizoctonia solani (J.R. Parmeter, Jr Ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley. 32·53p.
    13. Cardenas, M. R. (1989). Ph.D. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
    14. Carpenter, ,J. B. (1949). Phytopathology. 39: 980-985.
    15. ClAT. (1985). Centro International de Agriculture Tropical. 263 - 267.
    16. Cotterill, P. J. and Mclean, L. K. (1992). Plant Prot. Quart. 7: 51-54.
    17. De Candolle, A. P. (1815). Mem. Mus. D Hist. Nat., 2: 209 - 216.
    18. Donk, M. A. (1956). Fungi Reinwardita, 3: 363 - 379.
    19. Dubey S. C. And Dwivedi, R. P. (1992). Agric. So. Digest. 12: 90 - 92.
    20. 8 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    21. Dubey, S. C. (1997). Indian Phytopathol. 50: 119-120.
    22. Dubey, S. C. (1998). J. Myco. Pl. Pathol. 28: 15-18.
    23. Dubey, S. C. and Patel, B. (2001). Indian Phytopathol. 54: 206-209.
    24. Dugger, B.M. (1995). Ann. Missouri Botanical Garden. 2: 403-458.
    25. Dwivedi, R. P. (1977). Ph.D. Thesis. Kanpur University, Kanpur.
    26. Dwivedi, R P. and Dubey, S. C. (1986). Farm Sci J. 1: 33-37.
    27. Dwivedi, R. P. and Saxena, H. K. (1974). Indian J. Farm Sci. 2: 100.
    28. Uwivedi, R P and Saxena, H. K (1975). /ndianJ. Farm Sci. 3: 114-115.
    29. Dwivedi,V. B. and Dwivedi, R. P. (1999). 51" Annual Meeting and National Symposium on Seed Health Care And
    30. Phytosanitation For Sustainable Agriculture. U.S.R., Lucknow, feb.17-19, 1999.
    31. Echandi, E. (1965). Phytopathology. 55: 698-699.
    32. Elazequi, F A. and Mew, T. W. (1983). Trap. Grain Legume Bull. 27: 3.
    33. Flentje, N. T. (1956). Trans. Brit Mycol. Soc. 39: 343-356.
    34. Galindo, J. J. (1983). Plant Dis. 67: 1016-1021.
    35. Galindo, M. P. et a/. (1982). Plant Dis. 66: 390-394.
    36. Galvez et al. (1980). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Trapical. 101-110.
    37. Gangopadhyay, S. and Grover, RK (1984). Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 14: 57-58.
    38. Harville, B. G. etal. (1996). Crap Sci. 36: 563-566.
    39. Ja\a\\, B. L. (1')8')\. H\sa~. Ccmso\\dated Re?ottOn Khat\{ Pulse, 144-145\1,
    40. Joye, G. F. et al. (1990). Plant Dis. 14: 158-160.
    41. Kataria, H. R. and Grover, R. K. (1987). Pl,mt and Soil. 103: 57-66.
    42. Kataria, H. R. et al. (1989). Crop Protection. 8: 399 - 404.
    43. Kotila, J. E. (1947). J. Agric. Res. 74: 289 - 314
    44. Kuhn, J.G. (1858). Gustav Bosselman, Berlin, 312p
    45. Kumar, R. and Lakpale, N. (2000). Adv. Pl. Sci. 13: 327-328.
    46. Kumar, R. et aJ. (1999). Ann. Agric Res. 20: 468-471.
    47. Lal, S. (1984). Indian farming. 36: 3-4.
    48. Lam, S. T. and Gaffney, T. D. (1993). Wiley-Liss, Inc. North Carolina pp. 291-320.
    49. Leach, L. D. and Devey, A. E. (1938). J. Agric. Res. 56: 619-632.
    50. Liu, Z. (1991). Plant Dis. 15: 682-687.
    51. Marian, S. and Manibhushanrao, K. (1990). Trap. Agric. 67: 207-208.
    52. Mathew, A. and Gupta, S. K. (1996). Indian J. MycoI. Pl. Pathol. 26: 171-177.
    53. Mathew, A. and Gupta, S. K. (1996). Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 26: 171-177.
    54. Matz, J. (1917). Phytopathology. 7: 110 - 117
    55. Matz, J. (1921). Cire No-57. San Juan Puerto Rica, 8 pp.
    56. Mildenhall, J. P. and Williams, P. H. (1973). Phytopathology. 63: 276-283.
    57. Mishra, B. and Dubey, S. C. (1991). Indian PhytopathoJ. 44: 244-246.
    58. Mittal, R. K. (1999). J. Mycol. Pl. PathoI. 29: 128-130.
    59. Mukhopadhyay, A. N. et al. (1992). FAD Pl. Prot. Bull. 40: 21-30.
    60. Murray, D. I. L. (1984). Aust. J. Bot. 32: 101-108.
    61. Naiki, T. and Ui, T. (1981). Mem. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 12: 262 -269.
    62. 0' Neill, N. R. et al. (1977).61: 713-716.
    63. Ogoshi, A. (1975). Bull. Natl. Agric. Ser. C. 30: 1-63.
    64. Ogoshi, A. (1987). Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 25: 125-143.
    65. Oladiran, A. O. (1980). Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 13-15.
    66. Olaya, G. (1994). Plant Dis. 18: 805-810.
    67. Oyekan, P. O. (1979). Plant Dis. Reptr. 63: 574-577.
    68. Patel, B. L. and Bhargava, P. K. (1998). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68: 277-278.
    69. Pierre, R. E. (1979).Proc. Regional workshop on tropical grain legume. Faculty of Agric. University of West Indies, SI. Augustine, Trininad (unpublished).
    70. Ploper, L.D. (1981). Revista Industrial y Agricola de Tucuman. 58: 101-111.
    71. Poromarto, S. H. etal. (1998). Phytopathology. 88: 1056-1067.
    72. Rahman, M. H. et al. (1995). Bangladesh J. PI. Pathol. 1: 19-22.
    73. Rajnauth, G. (1987). Trap. Agric. 64: 356-358.
    74. Reddy, KS. et al. (1992). Indian J. Pl. Prot. 20: 37-42.
    75. Saksena, H. K. and Dwivedi, R. P. (1973). Indian J. Farms Sci. 1: 58 - 61.
    76. Vol. 28. No.1. 2007
    77. Saksena. H. K. and Vaartaja. O. (1961). Can. J. Bot. 39: 627 - 647.
    78. Schroth, M. N. and Cook. R. K. (1964). Phytopathology. 54: 670-673.
    79. Sharma. J. and Tripathi, H. S. (2002). Indian Phytopathol. 55: 90-91.
    80. Sharma, S. R. and Sohi, H. S. (1981). Indian J. Mycol. PI. Patho. 11: 216·220.
    81. Sims. A. C. Jr. (1956). Phytopathology. 46: 413417.
    82. Singh. A. and Malhotra, S. K. (1994). Bhartiya Krishi Anusahdhan Patrika. 9: 113-116.
    83. Singh, D. P. et I'll. (1989). Indian J. Pulse Res. 2: 10-14.
    84. Singh, R. e.t I'll. (1995). Plant Dis. Res. 10: 41-43.
    85. Stonehouse. J. (1994). Plant Pathol. 43: 519-527.
    86. Stretton, H. M. etal. (1964). Phytopathology. 54: 1093-1095.
    87. Sugha, S. K..etal. (1989).lndianJ. Pl. Pathol. 7: 167-172.
    88. Sundar, S. and Dadan, D. S. (1993). Plant Dis. Res. 8: 11-18.
    89. Tachibana, H. etal. (1971). Phytopathology. 61: 1444-1446.
    90. Talboto, P. H. B. (1965). Persoonia. 3: 371- 406.
    91. Tiwari, T. N. (1993). Ph. D. Thesis, C.SA Univ. Agric. Tech. Kanpur. 103p.
    92. Uchida. J. Y. et aI. (1986). Mycologia. 78: 587 - 592.
    93. Ullstrup, A. J. (1939). Phytopathology. 29: 373-374.
    94. Verma, H.s. and Thapliyal, P.N. (1976). Indian Phytopathol. 29: 389·391.
    95. . Weber, G. F. (1939). Phytopi'lthology. 29: 559 - 575
    96. Weller, J.M. (1988). Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 26: 379-407.
    97. Wu, Lung-chi. and Lin, Vi- Shan. (1966). Mem. Coli. Agric. Natl. Taiwan Univ. 9: 57-69.
    98. Yang, X. B. et al. (1990). Phytopathology. 80: 386-392.
    99. Yang, X. B. etal. (1988). Plant Dis. 72: 644.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)