Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 29 issue 1 (march 2008) : 21 - 30

SEED PROTEIN ELECTROPHORESIS STUDIES IN CUCURBITS-A REVIEW

R. K. Yadav
1Division of Horticulture, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umroi Road, Umiam-793 103, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Yadav K. R. (2024). SEED PROTEIN ELECTROPHORESIS STUDIES IN CUCURBITS-A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 29(1): 21 - 30. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Seed protein electrophoresis is increasingly being utilized as an additional approach for species
identification and as a useful tool for tracing back the evolution of various groups of plants. This
paper summarizes the main features of the seed protein profile-stability, uniformity and additive
nature. In addition, the significance of this approach for resolving specific taxonomic and evolutionary problems in cucurbitaceous family has been pointed out.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Agrawal, P.K. (1985). Seed Tech. Newsl,. 15: 1-5.
    2. Ahl, P.A. et al. S. (1982). Phytopathology 72: 80-85.
    3. Arus, P. (1983).. In: Isozymes on Plant Genetics and
    4. Breeding: Part-A. Tanksley, S.D. and Orton, T.J. (eds.).
    5. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.. pp. 415-423.
    6. VVooll.. 2298,, NNoo.. 14,, 22000087 2299
    7. Bailey, D.C.(1983). In: Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Tanksley, S.D. and Orton, T.J. (eds). Elsevier Science
    8. Publishers, Amsterdam.. pp.425-440.
    9. Baudracco-Arnas, S. and Pitrat, M. (1996). Theor. Appl. Genet., 93:57-64.
    10. Berg-Van den, B.M. and Gabillard, D. (1994). Electrophoresis, 15: 1541-1551.
    11. Brewbaker, J.L. (1966). Hawaiian Bot. Soc. Newsl. 1: 1-3.
    12. Chaudhary, Harshawardhan and Ram, H.H. (2000). Veg. Sci,. 27: 35-38.
    13. Chen, C.H. and Bushuk, W. (1970). Can. J. Plant Sci., 50, 25-30
    14. Chen, F.C.et al. (1990). J. Agric. Res. China, 39: 182-189.
    15. Chen, J.et al. (1997). Euphytica, 97: 139-141
    16. Cooke, R.J. (1984). Electrophoresis, 5: 59-72.
    17. Dane, F. (1983). In: Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding part –B. (Tanksley, S.D. and Orton, T.J. eds.). Elsevier
    18. Science Publishers, Amsterdam. pp 369-390.
    19. Denna, D.W. and Alexander, M.B.(1975).Isozyme II: Physiological Function. (Markert, C.L. eds.).Academic Press Inc.NewYork.pp.851-864.
    20. Dhall, R.K. and Cheema, D.S. (2001). Agric Rev, 22 (3/4): 168-182.
    21. Dvorak, M and Cernohorska, J. (1967). Biologia Plantarum, 9:308-316.
    22. Engalychev, O. Kh. and Zhemchuzhnikova, I.P. (1988). Referativnyi Zhurnal 27: 42-53.
    23. Engalychev, O. Kh. et al. (1987). Selskokhozyaistaist Vennay Biolagiya, 9: 29-35.
    24. Esquinas-Alcazar, J.T. (1977). Dissertation Ph.D. University of California, Davis. 170 p.
    25. Ford, T.W. and Simon, E.W. (1972). J. Exp. Bot., 23: 423-431.
    26. Gepts, P. (1990). In : Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Brown, A.H.D., Clegg, M.T.; Kahler,
    27. A.L. and Weir, B.S. (eds.)., Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland.
    28. Gray, J.R. et al. (1973). Bot. Gaz., 134: 166-173.
    29. Hall, O. and Johnson, B.L. (1963). Hereditas , 48: 530-535
    30. Harlan, J.R. and de Wet, J.M.J. (1971). Taxon , 20: 509-517.
    31. Hawkins, L.K. and Fenny Dane. (2001). HortScience, 36(7): 1318-1322.
    32. Henn, G. et al. (1992). Euphytica, 62: 77-82.
    33. Hoey, B.K.et al.(1996).Theor. Appl. Genet., 92:92-100.
    34. Houts, K.P. and Hillebrand, G.R. (1976). Am. J. Bot., 63, 156-165
    35. Ignart, F. and Weeden, N.F. (1984). Euphytica, 33: 779-785.
    36. Isshiki, S.et. al. (1992). J. Japanese Soc. Hort. Sci., 61: 595-601.
    37. Jackson, P and Ricardo, C.P.P.(1992). Analytical Biochem, 200:36-41.
    38. Johari, R.P.et al. (1989). Curr. Sci., 46: 409-411.
    39. Kephart, S.R. (1990). Amer. J.Bot., 77:693-712.
    40. Ladizinsky, G. and Hymowitz, T. (1979). Theor. Appl. Gent., 54 : 145- 151.
    41. Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Nature, 227: 680-685.
    42. Larsen, A.L. and Benson, W.C. (1970). Crop Sci., 10:493-495.
    43. Larsen, AL. (1967). Crop Sci., 7, 311-313
    44. Lebeda, A. and Dolezal, K. (1995). Zeitschriftfur Pflanzenkrankheitenund Pflanzenschutz 102: 467-471.
    45. Lee, S.J. et al.(1996). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:719-725.
    46. Markert, C.L. (1968).. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 151: 14-40.
    47. Meglic, V and Staub, J.E. (1996). Theor. Appl. Genet., 92:865-872.
    48. Mies, D.W. and Hymowitz, T. (1973). Bot. Gaz., 134: 121-125
    49. Murphy,R.W.et al.(1990). In: Molecular systematics. Hills, D.M. and Moritz, C. (eds.). Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Mass.pp 45-126.
    50. Murray, B.E.et al. (1970). Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 12: 651-665
    51. Nakai, Y. (1977). Jap. J. Genet., 52: 171-181.
    52. Nielsen, G. (1985). In: Isozymes : Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research. V.2. Rattazzi, M.C.; Scandalios, J.G. and Whitt, G.S. (eds.). Alan R. Liss. Inc ,New York. pp. 1-32.
    53. Pasha, M.K. and Sen, S.P. (1991). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 19: 569-576
    54. Peirce, L.C. and Brewbaker, J.L. (1973). HortScience, 8: 17-22.
    55. Pitrat, M. (1982). Station d amelioration des Plantes Maraicheres, Avignon-Montfavet.pp31-32.
    56. Price et al. (2003).J.Biochem.,278:41389-41399.
    57. Puchalski, J.T. and Robinson, R.W.(1978). Cucurbit Genetics Coop. Rep., 1:39.
    58. Robinson, P.J. and Megarrity, R.G. (1975). Austr. J. Agric. Res. 26: 467-480.
    59. Sarkar, R. and Bose, S. (1984). Theor. Appl. Genet. 65: 415-419.
    60. 3300 AGRAICGURLITCUURTAULR SACLI ERNEVCIEE WDISGEST
    61. Shepherd, K.W.(1968). In: Third Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. Finlay, K.W.; Shepherd, D.W eds.. Butterworth & Co., Ltd., London. pp. 86-96.
    62. Simpson, M.J.A. and Withers, L.A.(1986). Characterization of Plant Genetic Resources Using Isozyme Electrophoresis:
    63. A guide to the literature, IBPGR, Rome
    64. Singh, A. (1996). Thesis, M.Sc. (Ag.), G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. 104 p.
    65. Singh, D.K. and Ram, Hari Har. (2001). Veg. Sci., 28: 22-23.
    66. Smith, J.S.C. and Smith, O.S. (1992). Adv. Agron., 47: 85-140.
    67. Staub, J.E.et al. (1992). Can. J. Bot., 70: 509-517.
    68. Staub, J.E.et al. (1996). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 31: 1234-1245.
    69. Staub, J.E.et al.. (1983). Rep. Cucurbit. Genet. Coop., 6: 32-34.
    70. Sujatha, V.S. and Seshadri, V.S. (1991). Indian J. Genet., 51 : 445-447.
    71. Sujatha, V.S.et al. (1991a). Indian J. Genet., 51 : 438-444.
    72. Sujatha, V.S.et al. (1991b). Indian J. Genet., 51(4) : 445-448.
    73. Tanksley, S.D. and Orton, T.J. (1983). In: Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding : Part-A. Elsevier Science Publishers,
    74. Amsterdam. pp. 1-4.
    75. Tewari, D. (1997). Thesis, M.Sc.Ag., G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. 97 p.
    76. Upadhyay, R. (1995). Thesis M.Sc., G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. 104 p.
    77. Vaughan, J.G. and Denford, K.E. (1968). J. Exp. Bot., 19: 724-732.
    78. Vaz, A.C.et al. (2004).Field Crop Res. 87:23-34
    79. Wall, J.R. (1969). South Western Naturalist, 14: 141-148.
    80. Walters, T.W.et al. (1991). Systematic Bot., 16: 30-40.
    81. Weeden, N.F. and Wendel, J.F. (1989). In: Isozyme in Plant Biology. Soltis, D. and Soltis, P. (eds.), Dioscorides Press,
    82. Portland, Ore.pp 46-72.
    83. Welles, G.W.H. and Buitelaar, K. (1988). Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 36: 239.
    84. Wendel, J.F. and Weeden, N.F. (1989). In: Isozyme in Plant Biology. (Soltis, D. and Soltis, P. eds.), Dioscorides Press, Portland, Ore.pp 5-45.
    85. Wilkinson, C.A.et al. (1985). Crop Sci., 25: 971-974.
    86. Wilkinson,J.F. and Beard, J.B.(1972). Crop Sci., 12: 833-834.
    87. Wills A.B. et al. (1977). Ann. Appl. Biol., 91: 263-270.
    88. Yadav, R.K.et al. (1998). Veg. Sci., 25: 8-10.
    89. Zheng, X.Y. and Wolf, D.W. (2000). HortScience, 35(4): 716-721.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)