Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 30 issue 4 (december 2009) : 283 - 292

GRAFT INDUCED GENETIC CHANGES AND ITS MECHANISM IN BELL PEPPER (CAPSICUM ANNUUM) – A REVIEW

K. Abirami1, P. A. Mathew, B. Sasikumar, J. Rema, V. Baskaran1
1Indian Institute of Spices Research Post Box No. 1701, Marikunnu P. O., Calicut-673012, Kerala, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Abirami1 K., Mathew A. P., Sasikumar B., Rema J., Baskaran1 V. (2024). GRAFT INDUCED GENETIC CHANGES AND ITS MECHANISM IN BELL PEPPER (CAPSICUM ANNUUM) – A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 30(4): 283 - 292. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Grafting has now transformed to a type of asexual hybridization in which heritable
changes may be induced by grafting. This graft hybridization concept was first put forth
by Darwin. In the beginning there was a refusal to accept this concept, believing it to be
a type of chimera. But the extensive work done in bell pepper (Capsicum) has proved
that this graft hybridization is quite different from chimera and involves a special grafting
method known as ‘mentor grafting’. The hereditary changes due to this graft hybridization
and also the work done on its mechanism in capsicum have added strength to this
concept. In future, this graft hybridization may open up new avenues in plant breeding
and improvement of many crops

REFERENCES

  1. Alder, M. J. (2001). Science, 294: 53-54.
  2. Amzallag, G. N. (2004). Theor. Biosci., 123:17-32.
  3. Anderson, N. G. (1970). Nature, 227: 1346-1347.
  4. Bailey, L. H. (1920). Plant Breeding, Macmilian Company, New York
  5. Bryant, J. A. (1976). In: Molecular aspects of gene expression in plants. (Bryant J. A. ed.). New York, Sanfrancisco.
  6. Burge, G. K., et al (2002). Plant cell Tiss. Org. cult., 70: 13-21.
  7. Cheng, D. (1956). Scientia Sin., 5: 497-507.
  8. Daniel, L. (1929). Proc. International Congress of Plant Sciences. George Banta Publishing Company, Menasha, WI.
  9. Danielli, J. F. (1953). Symp. Society of Experimental Biology 7: 440-448.
  10. Darwin, C. (1883). The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, D Appleton & Co, New York.
  11. Edelstein, M. (2004). Acta Hort., 659: 235-238.
  12. Frankel, R. (1956). Science, 124: 684-685.
  13. Frankel, R. (1962). Genetics, 47: 641-646.
  14. Frankel, R. (1971). Heredity, 26: 107-119.
  15. Gabriel, A. (1998). Trends Genet., 14: 220-221.
  16. Vol. 30, No. 4, 2009 291
  17. Glavinic, R. (1955). Proc.14th. Int. Hort. Cong. pp. 440-445.
  18. Glushchenko, I. E. (1973). Plant Breeding Abstracts, 43(6):335.
  19. Hartman, T. H. and Kester, D. E. (1972). In: Plant Propagation – Principles and Practices Prentice Hall of
  20. India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp. 368-369.
  21. Hirata, Y. and Yagishita, N. (1986). Euphytica, 35: 395-401.
  22. Hirata, Y., et al (2003). Acta Hort, 625: 125-127.
  23. Hirata, Y., et al (1986). VIth Meeting on Genetics and Breeding on Capsicum and Eggplant Eucarpia,
  24. Zaragoza. pp.19-23.
  25. Kasahara, J., et al (1973). Recent Adv. Breed., 13: 73-89.
  26. Kim, M., et al (2001). Science, 293: 287-289.
  27. Koch, J. (1973). Federation of European Biochemical Soc Lett, 32: 22-26.
  28. Kumar, A and Bennetson, J. L. (1999). Annu. Rev. Genet., 33: 479-532.
  29. Lee, J. and Oda, M. (2003). Hort. Rev., 28: 61-124.
  30. Liu, Y. S. (2000). In: Agricultural History. Zhou (Z. J. and Ni G. J. eds.). Jiangxi People’s Press, Nanchang.
  31. pp. 308-317.
  32. Liu, Y. S. (2007). Adv. in Genet., 56: 101-129.
  33. Lou, C. H., et al (1957). Scientia Sin., 6: 139-157.
  34. Marcotrigiano, M. (1997). Hortscience, 32: 773-784.
  35. Marukawa, S. (1979). Bull. Ibaraki- Ken Hort. Exp. Sta. Special Issue No3. 152 pp.
  36. Masuda, M. and Gomi, K. (1984). Japanese Soc. Hort. Sci., 52(4): 414-419.
  37. Michie, D. (1958). In: A century of Darwin, (Barnett, S.S. ed.). Heinrmann, London. pp. 56-84.
  38. Michurin, I. V. (1949). Selected Works, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow
  39. Morton, A. G. (1951).In: Soviet Genetics, Lawrence & Wishart, London.
  40. Nawa, S. and Yamada, M. A. (1967). Genetic effects of DNA in Ephestia. Natl. Inst. Genet. Japan Ann.
  41. Rep. 17: 48-49.
  42. Nawa, S. and Yamada, M. A. (1968). Genetics, 58: 573-584.
  43. Nawa, S. et al (1971). Genetics, 67: 221-234.
  44. Neilson – Jones, W. (1969). Plant Chimeras, 2nd Edition, Methuen, London.
  45. Ohta, Y. (1977). In: Capsicum 77. (Pochard, E. ed.). Eucarpia, Avignon-Montfavet. pp. 147-153.
  46. Ohta, Y. (1986). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 83: 715-719.
  47. Ohta, Y. (1991). Euphytica, 55: 91-99.
  48. Ohta, Y. and Chuong, P. V. (1975a). Euphytica, 24: 355-368.
  49. Ohta, Y. and Chuong, P. V. (1975b). Euphytica, 24: 605-611.
  50. Pandey, K. K. (1985).In: Plant Genetics, Freeling, M (ed.). Alan R Liss, Inc, Newyork. pp 235-249.
  51. Pandey, K. K. (1975). Incompatibility Newsletter, 6: 91-121.
  52. Pandey, K. K. (1976). Theor. Appl. Genet., 47: 299-302.
  53. Pandey, K. K. (1979). New phytol., 81: 685-704.
  54. Pearlman, P. S.and Boecke, J. D. (2004). Science, 303: 182-184.
  55. Peterson – Burch B. D., et al (2000). Trends Genet. 16: 151-152.
  56. Rao, P. N. and Johnson, R. T. (1972). Methods cell Physiol. 5: 75-126.
  57. Reanney, D. C. (1974). Int. Rev. Cytol. 37: 21-52.
  58. Steele, E. J. and Blanden, R. V. (2000). Science, 288: 2318-2319.
  59. 292 AGRICUTURAL REVIEWS
  60. Stroun, M., et al (1977). Int. Rev. Cytol., 51: 1-48.
  61. Stroun, M., Mathon, C. C. and Stroun, J. (1963). Arch. Sci., 16: 225-245
  62. Taller, J., et al (1998). Theor. Appl.Genet., 97: 705-713.
  63. Taller, J., et al (1999). Euphytica, 108: 73-78.
  64. Tilney – Bassett, R. A. E. (1986). Plant Chimeras, Edeard Arnold, London.
  65. Went, F. W. (1971). Taxon, 20: 197-226.
  66. West, D. A. (1971). Nature, 229: 637.
  67. Xoconostle – Cazerers, B., et al (1999). Science, 283: 94-98.
  68. Yagishita, N. (1961a). Bot. Mag., 74: 122-130.
  69. Yagishita, N. (1961b). Bot. Mag., 74: 480-489.
  70. Yagishita, N. (1964). Bot mag. 3: 1-48.
  71. Yagishita, N. and Hirata, Y. (1984). J. Breed., 34: 58-59.
  72. Yagishita, N. and Hirata, Y. (1986). Euphytica, 35: 17-23.
  73. Yagishita, N and Hirata, Y. (1987). Euphytica, 36: 809-814.
  74. Yagishita N., et al (1985). Euphytica, 34: 297-301.
  75. Yagishita N., et al (1990). Euphytica, 46: 249-252.
  76. Zhang, D. H., et al(2002). Acta Bot. Sin., 44: 832-837.
  77. Zu, D. M. and Zhao, Y. S. (1957). Scientia Sin., 6: 889-903.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)