Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Agricultural Reviews
Print ISSN: 0253-1496
Online ISSN: 0976-0741
NASS Rating
4.84

Chief Editor:
Pradeep K. Sharma
Sher-e-Kashmir Uni. of Agri. Sciences and Technology, J&K, INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abs...

Agricultural Reviews, volume 31 issue 4 (december 2010) : 279 - 285

GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS LIFELINE FOR LIVESTOCK - A REVIEW

Tilling Tayo, Neeta Longjam1, Vikuolie Mezhatsu, Rajib Deb
1ndian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Tayo Tilling, Longjam1 Neeta, Mezhatsu Vikuolie, Deb Rajib (2025). GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS LIFELINE FOR LIVESTOCK - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(4): 279 - 285. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Feeds requirement of increasing livestock population with the increasing demand of milk,
meat and eggs by the ever increasing population, within a limited cultivated land could be met
by introducing GM crops. The GM crops can potentially benefit the human as well as livestock
sectors as these increase crop yields per hectare of cultivated land. As a matter of fact these
may assist for improvement of various quality traits of animals, can be a safer fodder in terms of
energy/protein source and further improvement of animal productivity as well as their overall
performance. Thus the GM crops can ultimately pave a way to provide sufficient foods and
feeds to the growing world human and livestock population

REFERENCES

  1. Agnihotri, A. and Kaushik, N., (1998). Indian J. Plant Genetic Resources, 11(2): 251-255.
  2. Artim, L. et al., (2008). Proceedings of the 4th Pacific Rim Conference , Australian National University, Canberra,
  3. Australia, Nov 11-15: 246-253.
  4. Aumaitre, A. et al., (2002). Livestock Production Science, 74(3):223-238.
  5. Beever, D.E. and C.F. Kemp. (2000). Livestock Feeds and Feeding, 70(3):175-182.
  6. Beever, D.E. and R.H. Phipps. (2001). Journal of Animal Science, 79(E. Suppl.):E290-E295.
  7. Bell, J.M. (1984). J. Anim. Sci. 58: 996-1010.
  8. Chesson, A., Flachowsky, G. (2003). World’s Poultry Science Journal. 59: 201-208.
  9. Clark, J.H. and I.R. Ipharranguerre. (2001). Journal of Dairy Science, 84(E. Suppl.):E9-E18.
  10. Castillo, A.R. et al., ( 2004). J. Dairy Sci. 87:1778-1785.
  11. Cromwell, G. L. et al., (2002). J Anim Sci. 80:708-715.
  12. Delgado, C. et al., (1999). Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28, International
  13. Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC; Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy; International Livestock
  14. Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  15. Vol. 31, No. 4, 2010 285
  16. Faust,M.A., (2000). American Dairy Science Association and American Society of Animal Science Meeting. Baltimore,
  17. USA, July 2000.
  18. Flachowsky, G. and Aulrich, K., (2001). J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10:181–194.
  19. Folmer, J. et al., (2001). Dairy Report (2001-2002) University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  20. Gilbert, R. (2000). Agriwatch Livestock Newsletter, 27 September 2000.
  21. Iwarsson, K. and P.O. Nilsson, (1973). Acta Vet. Scand. 14: 620-629.
  22. Kuiper, H. A. et al., (2001). Plant J. 27: 503–528.
  23. MacKenzie, D. and M. McLean. (2002). Feed Mix 10(3):16-19.
  24. Munkvold, G. P. et al., (1997). Phytopathology 87:1071-1077
  25. Munkvold, G. P. et al., (1999).Plant Dis. 83:130-138.
  26. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1993). OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/
  27. 57/3/1946129.pdf (14 July 2004).
  28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Devel-opment (OECD). (1996). Biotechnology Regu-latory Contacts in
  29. OECD Member Countries, http://www.oecd.org/document/17 0, 2340, en_2649_34385_1890001_1_1_1_1,
  30. 00.html (1997).
  31. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Devel-opment (OECD). (1998) Biotechnology Regu-latory Contacts in
  32. OECD Member Countries, http://www.oecd.org/document/19/0,2340,en_2649_34385_,00.html.
  33. Padgette S.R. et al., (1996). J. Nutr. 126: 702-716.
  34. Pailan, G.H. and K.K. Singhal, (1997). Small Ruminants Research. 71; 31-37
  35. Papas, A. et al., (1979). J. Nutr. 109: 1129 -1139.
  36. Piva, G. et al., (2001). Poult. Sci. 80( 1):320.
  37. Piva, G. et al., (2001). Journal Animal Science 79( 1): 106. .
  38. Phipps, R.H. (2002). . International Conference on Food and Feed Safety. Doha, Qatar, September.
  39. Rosegrant, M.W. et al., (2001-2020) International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
  40. Singhal ,K. K., (1986). National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India, publication no. 220.
  41. Singhal, K.K. (2008 ). National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India,5-26
  42. Sidhu, R. S. et al., (2000). J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2305-2312.
  43. TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) (2003). ,TERI. Project report no. 993364, submitted to National Bureau of
  44. Plant Genetic Resources, ICAR, New Delhi, pp.58.
  45. Thomas, B.R. and K.J. Bradford. (2001). http://sbc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/abc/livestock_feeds_abc.htm.
  46. World Health Organisation, (1993). Environmental Health Criteria 70.World Health Organisation, Geneva,Switzerland.
  47. Zhang, B. H. and Feng, R., (2000).China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)