Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 31 issue 1 (march 2010) : 21 - 30

METABOLOMICS: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE FOOD AND DAIRY INDUSTRY- A REVIEW

S
Suja Senan
S
Sunita Grover
V
Virender Kumar Batish
1Department of Dairy Microbiology, SMC College of Dairy Science, Anand Agricultural University, Anand – 388 110, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Senan Suja, Grover Sunita, Batish Kumar Virender (2025). METABOLOMICS: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE FOOD AND DAIRY INDUSTRY- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(1): 21 - 30. doi: .

ABSTRACT

To understand the link between the genotype and the phenotype in humans and other organisms,
scientists have devised ‘OMIC’ tools, like genomics, trasncriptomics, proteomics and the new entrant
metabolomics. This paper introduces the principles of why metabolomics is a promising omic tool to
identify biomarkers especially in the area of nutrition. Metabolomics allows the simultaneous
characterization of biological matrices like milk and helps us have an understanding of the relation
between food composition, consumption and consequences. It has to be remarked finally that to
exploit the potential of metabolomics to the fullest we need better analytical tools and improved
softwares.

REFERENCES

  1. Agabriel, D. et al. (2007) J Dairy Sci. 90: 4884 – 4896.
  2. Almeida, C.et al (2006) J Agr Food Chem. 54: 700 – 706.
  3. Bino, RJ. et al,(2004) Trends Plant Sci.9:418-25.
  4. Bogani ,P. et al (2007). Atherosclerosis. 190: 181-186.
  5. Castrillo, J.I. et al. (2003) Phytochemistry 62: 929–937.
  6. Dettmer, K, et al (2007) Mass Spectrom Rev. 26 : 51–78.
  7. Drackley, J.K. et al (2006) J. Dairy Sci. 89: 1324–1336.
  8. Famili ,I..et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 13134–13139.
  9. Fardet, A. et al (2007) J Nutr. 137: 923 - 929.
  10. Francois-Pierre, JM, et al (2007) J. Proteome Res., 6 (4): 1471 -1481.
  11. German, J.B. et al (2005) Metabolomics 1: 3-9.
  12. 30 AGRICUTURAL REVIEWS
  13. Gibney MJ, et al (2005) Amer Jf Clinical Nuti. 82: 497-503.
  14. Glassbrook, N.C. and Beecher,J. (2000) Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 1142 – 1148.
  15. Goodacre, R.S. et al . (2004) Trends Biotechnol. 22: 245–252.
  16. Griennavar, B. et al (2006) Bioorganic and Medicinal Chem 15: 2606 -2612.
  17. Hu, F. et al. (2007). J Agri Food Chem. 55: 4307 - 4311.
  18. Keseler, I.M. et al (2005) Nucleic Acids Res. 33: D334–D337.
  19. Kopka, J. (2006) J. Biotechnology. 124: 312–322.
  20. Kopka, J.N. (2005) Bioinformatics. 21: 1635 - 1639.
  21. Kussmann, M. (2008) Curr Opinion Biotechnol. 19: 83 –99.
  22. Mack, G. and Schjoerring JK. (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 999-1009.
  23. Maharjan, R.P. and Ferenci T. (2003) Anal Biochem. 313: 145-54
  24. Martin, F.P. et al (2007). Mol Syst Biol . 3: 112 – 115.
  25. Masclaux-Daubresse ,C, et al. (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 1451-1462.
  26. Matt, P. et al (2002) Plant J. 30: 663-677.
  27. Moco, S. et al (2006) Plant Physiology. 141: 1205-1218.
  28. Nicholson, J.K. et al (2005) Nat Rev Microbiol. 3: 431-438.
  29. Nicholson, J.K. et al (1999) Xenobiotica. 29: 1181–1189.
  30. Nielsen, K.F. and Smedsgaard, J. (2003). J Chromatogr 1002: 111-136.
  31. Ninonuevo, M.R. (2006) J Agri Food Chemi. 54: 7471-7480.
  32. Nobeli, I.H. et al (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 334: 697–719.
  33. Novistskaya, L. (2002) Plant, Cell Environment 25: 821-835.
  34. Oliver, D.J. et al (2002) Metab. Eng. 4: 98–108.
  35. Oliver, F. (2002) Plant Mol Biol. 48 :155-71.
  36. Oliver, S.G. (1998) Trends Biotechnol. 16: 373- 378.
  37. Oliver, S.G. (2002) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 357(1417): 17–23.
  38. Pedrioli, P.G.A. (2004) Nat. Biotechnol, 22: 1459–1466
  39. Schauer, N. et al (2005) FEBS Lett. 579: 1332–1337.
  40. Serkova, N.J. (2007) Transplantation. 83: 517-521.
  41. Shulaev, V. (2006) Brief Bioinform 7:128-139.
  42. Solansky, K.S. et al (2003) Analy Biochemistry. 323: 197-204.
  43. Stephanopoulos, G. Alper H, Moxley J (2004) Nat Biotechnol 22:1261-1267
  44. Teusink, B.et al (1998) Meth. Microbiol. 26: 297–336.
  45. Theobald, U. (1993) Anal Biochem. 214:31–37.
  46. Thompson, H.J. et al (2006) J Nutri. 136: 2207-2212.
  47. Trygg, J.et al (2007) J Proteome Res, 6: 469-479.
  48. Vaidyanathan S, Goodacre R. (2003) In C.G. Harrigan, R. Goodacre (Eds.), Kluwer Academic, Boston.
  49. Van der Werf MJ, et al (2005) J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32: 234–252.
  50. Vemuri GN, Aristidou AA. (2005) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 69: 197–216.
  51. Villas-Bo et al (2005) Trends in Biotechnolog. 23:385–386.
  52. Werner E, et al (2008) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 871(2):143-63.
Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 31 issue 1 (march 2010) : 21 - 30

    METABOLOMICS: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE FOOD AND DAIRY INDUSTRY- A REVIEW

    S
    Suja Senan
    S
    Sunita Grover
    V
    Virender Kumar Batish
    1Department of Dairy Microbiology, SMC College of Dairy Science, Anand Agricultural University, Anand – 388 110, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Senan Suja, Grover Sunita, Batish Kumar Virender (2025). METABOLOMICS: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE FOOD AND DAIRY INDUSTRY- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(1): 21 - 30. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    To understand the link between the genotype and the phenotype in humans and other organisms,
    scientists have devised ‘OMIC’ tools, like genomics, trasncriptomics, proteomics and the new entrant
    metabolomics. This paper introduces the principles of why metabolomics is a promising omic tool to
    identify biomarkers especially in the area of nutrition. Metabolomics allows the simultaneous
    characterization of biological matrices like milk and helps us have an understanding of the relation
    between food composition, consumption and consequences. It has to be remarked finally that to
    exploit the potential of metabolomics to the fullest we need better analytical tools and improved
    softwares.

    REFERENCES

    1. Agabriel, D. et al. (2007) J Dairy Sci. 90: 4884 – 4896.
    2. Almeida, C.et al (2006) J Agr Food Chem. 54: 700 – 706.
    3. Bino, RJ. et al,(2004) Trends Plant Sci.9:418-25.
    4. Bogani ,P. et al (2007). Atherosclerosis. 190: 181-186.
    5. Castrillo, J.I. et al. (2003) Phytochemistry 62: 929–937.
    6. Dettmer, K, et al (2007) Mass Spectrom Rev. 26 : 51–78.
    7. Drackley, J.K. et al (2006) J. Dairy Sci. 89: 1324–1336.
    8. Famili ,I..et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 13134–13139.
    9. Fardet, A. et al (2007) J Nutr. 137: 923 - 929.
    10. Francois-Pierre, JM, et al (2007) J. Proteome Res., 6 (4): 1471 -1481.
    11. German, J.B. et al (2005) Metabolomics 1: 3-9.
    12. 30 AGRICUTURAL REVIEWS
    13. Gibney MJ, et al (2005) Amer Jf Clinical Nuti. 82: 497-503.
    14. Glassbrook, N.C. and Beecher,J. (2000) Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 1142 – 1148.
    15. Goodacre, R.S. et al . (2004) Trends Biotechnol. 22: 245–252.
    16. Griennavar, B. et al (2006) Bioorganic and Medicinal Chem 15: 2606 -2612.
    17. Hu, F. et al. (2007). J Agri Food Chem. 55: 4307 - 4311.
    18. Keseler, I.M. et al (2005) Nucleic Acids Res. 33: D334–D337.
    19. Kopka, J. (2006) J. Biotechnology. 124: 312–322.
    20. Kopka, J.N. (2005) Bioinformatics. 21: 1635 - 1639.
    21. Kussmann, M. (2008) Curr Opinion Biotechnol. 19: 83 –99.
    22. Mack, G. and Schjoerring JK. (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 999-1009.
    23. Maharjan, R.P. and Ferenci T. (2003) Anal Biochem. 313: 145-54
    24. Martin, F.P. et al (2007). Mol Syst Biol . 3: 112 – 115.
    25. Masclaux-Daubresse ,C, et al. (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 1451-1462.
    26. Matt, P. et al (2002) Plant J. 30: 663-677.
    27. Moco, S. et al (2006) Plant Physiology. 141: 1205-1218.
    28. Nicholson, J.K. et al (2005) Nat Rev Microbiol. 3: 431-438.
    29. Nicholson, J.K. et al (1999) Xenobiotica. 29: 1181–1189.
    30. Nielsen, K.F. and Smedsgaard, J. (2003). J Chromatogr 1002: 111-136.
    31. Ninonuevo, M.R. (2006) J Agri Food Chemi. 54: 7471-7480.
    32. Nobeli, I.H. et al (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 334: 697–719.
    33. Novistskaya, L. (2002) Plant, Cell Environment 25: 821-835.
    34. Oliver, D.J. et al (2002) Metab. Eng. 4: 98–108.
    35. Oliver, F. (2002) Plant Mol Biol. 48 :155-71.
    36. Oliver, S.G. (1998) Trends Biotechnol. 16: 373- 378.
    37. Oliver, S.G. (2002) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 357(1417): 17–23.
    38. Pedrioli, P.G.A. (2004) Nat. Biotechnol, 22: 1459–1466
    39. Schauer, N. et al (2005) FEBS Lett. 579: 1332–1337.
    40. Serkova, N.J. (2007) Transplantation. 83: 517-521.
    41. Shulaev, V. (2006) Brief Bioinform 7:128-139.
    42. Solansky, K.S. et al (2003) Analy Biochemistry. 323: 197-204.
    43. Stephanopoulos, G. Alper H, Moxley J (2004) Nat Biotechnol 22:1261-1267
    44. Teusink, B.et al (1998) Meth. Microbiol. 26: 297–336.
    45. Theobald, U. (1993) Anal Biochem. 214:31–37.
    46. Thompson, H.J. et al (2006) J Nutri. 136: 2207-2212.
    47. Trygg, J.et al (2007) J Proteome Res, 6: 469-479.
    48. Vaidyanathan S, Goodacre R. (2003) In C.G. Harrigan, R. Goodacre (Eds.), Kluwer Academic, Boston.
    49. Van der Werf MJ, et al (2005) J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32: 234–252.
    50. Vemuri GN, Aristidou AA. (2005) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 69: 197–216.
    51. Villas-Bo et al (2005) Trends in Biotechnolog. 23:385–386.
    52. Werner E, et al (2008) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 871(2):143-63.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Reviews

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)