Legume Research-An International Journal
Publish
your articles with us

Quick Facts



Payment Options

payment portals

Click here to pay directly

Genetic diversity analysis in green gram based on morphological traits

Reecha. T. Das* and Purna K. Barua

Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785 013, Assam, India.

reecha_das@yahoo.com

Page Range:
36-38
Article ID:
LR-3549
Online Published:
16-03-2016
Abstract

Twenty three advanced breeding lines of green gram, developed at different centres under the All-India Coordinated Research Project on MULLARP, were evaluated by growing them during summer to characterize the genotypes and to assess the magnitude of genetic diversity in the genotypes. Genetic dissimilarities as revealed by Euclidean distances ranged from 2.891 to 10.494. Maximum distance was observed between ML 1354 and MH 721. Based on Euclidean distances four clusters were formed. Cluster II was the largest, and was further divided into two sub-clusters, IIA and IIB, comprising of four and nine genotypes, respectively. Genotypes MH 709 and KM 2272 belonging to cluster I were closely placed as they shared most of the characters. But they could be distinguished with the help of characters like days to 50% flowering, position of pods in the plant and growth habit. Similarly, GM 04-02 and NM 1 in sub-cluster IIA were closely grouped, and they could be distinguished based on the characters leaf size and pod length. Similarly other closely grouped genotypes were also distinguishable on the basis of some characters. It was observed from the average Euclidean distances that ML 1354, SG 1, MH 721, SG 63-14 and MH 709 were divergent genotypes. These genotypes were potential parents in green gram breeding programme.

Keywords
Cluster, Genetic diversity, green gram.
References
  1. Anonymous. (2001). Seed production and certification. In Annual Report (2001-2002), National Seed Project (Crops), IARI, New Delhi. pp :64-151.
  2. Arunachalam V. (1981). Genetic distance in plant breeding. Indian J. Genet. 14: 226–236.
  3. Katiyar, P. K., Chandra, S.,. Singh, B.B, Dixit G.P, Ali, H. (2007). Characterization of mungbean varieties released in India. Acta Horticulture. 752: 271-273.
  4. Lavanya, G. R.; Srivastava, J and Ranade, S.A. (2008). Molecular assessment of genetic diversity in mungbean germplasm. J. Genet. 87: 65-74.
  5. Rohlf, F. J. (1992). NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2, Exeter Software, New York.
  6. Selvi, R., Muthiah, R., Meshwaran, A.K. and Shanmugasundaram, P. (2003). Genetic diversity analysis in genus Vigna based on morphological traits and isozyme markers. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 35: 103-112.
  7. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy WH. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
  8. Yimran, T., Somta, P. and Srinives, P. (2009).Genetic variance in cultivated mungbean germplasm and its implication in breeding for high yield. Field Crops Research. 112: 260-266.
Global footprints


© 2015 ARCC JOURNALS. All Rights Reserved. Powered By ARCC JOURNALS