Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 30 issue 3 (september 2007) : 229 - 230

EVALUATION OF FUNGAL ANTAGONISTS AGAINST MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA CAUSING ROOT ROT OF MUNGBEAN

Surender Singh, P. Kishore Varma, Hari Chand
1Department of Plant Pathology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Surender, Varma Kishore P., Chand Hari (2024). EVALUATION OF FUNGAL ANTAGONISTS AGAINST MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA CAUSING ROOT ROT OF MUNGBEAN. Legume Research. 30(3): 229 - 230. doi: .
Out of four bioagents (Aspergillus sp., Gliocladium virens, Trichoderma harzianum and T. viride) tested against the root rot pathogen, T. harzianum was proved highly effective in inhibiting mycelial growth ofMacrophomina phaseolina and root rot incidence under green house conditions. This was followed by G. virens and T. viride. Aspergillus sp was found least effective in controlling the pathogen.
    1. Chang, Y. C. et al. (1986). Pl. Dis., 70: 145-148.
    2. Elad, Y. et al. (1981). Pl. Dis., 65: 675-677.
    3. Hadar, Y. et al. (1979). Phytopathology, 69: 64-68.
    4. Indra, N. and Thiribuvanamala, G. (2002). Pl. Dis. Res., 17: 142-144.
    5. Mathew, K. A. and Gupta, S. K. (1998). J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 28: 202-205.
    6. Windham, M. T. et al. (1986). Phytopathology, 76: 518-521.
    7. Zeppa, G. et al. (1990). Annals di. Micro. Ento., 90: 171-176.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)