Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 31 issue 4 (december 2008) : 306 - 307

SCREENING OF INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDS AGAINST STERILITY MOSAIC DISEASE IN PIGEONPEA

Lokesh Kumar Gangwar*, G.C. Bajpai
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263 145, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gangwar* Kumar Lokesh, Bajpai G.C. (2024). SCREENING OF INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDS AGAINST STERILITY MOSAIC DISEASE IN PIGEONPEA. Legume Research. 31(4): 306 - 307. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Study was conducted to identify resistant lines against sterility mosaic disease in F3 generation
of nine interspecific hybrids derived between wild species viz., Cajanus cajanifolius, Cajanus
acutifolius and Cajanus scarabaeoides and three lines viz,. UPAS120, Pant A134 and ICPL84023 of
cultivated sps. Cajanus cajan . Among the nine progenies of interspecific hybrids that were evaluated against sterility mosaic disease, the progenies of four crosses UPAS120 x C. cajanifolius, Pant A 134 x C. scarabaeoides, Pant A134 x C. cajanifolius and ICPL84023 x C. scarabaeoides showed mosaic disease incidence was less than 10%. Out of three wild species the two wild species namely Cajanus scarabaeoides and Cajanus cajanifolius showed resistance

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Barhato, B.G., et al. (2000). Legume Res., 23(1):136-138.
    2. Baskaram K. and Muthiah A.R. (2005). Indian J. Pulses Res. 18(2):124-126.
    3. Das N.D., et al. (2001). Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci., 9(1):117-170.
    4. Garg R., et al. (1996). Agric. Sci. Digest, 16(2):97-100.
    5. Kannaiyan J. et al. (1984). Trop. Pest Mgmt. 30:62-71.
    6. Pawar K.B. et al. (1993). Indian J.Pulses Res. 6(1):112-114.
    7. Shukla P. and Asthana A.N. (1991). Agric. Sci. Digest. 11(1):51-55.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)