Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 51 issue 4 (august 2017) : 771-775

Influence of somatic cell count and body condition score on reproduction traits and milk composition of Czech Holstein cows

Ludek Stádník, Savas Atasever
1<p>Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources,&nbsp;Dep. &nbsp;Animal Husbandry, Kamick&aacute; 129, 165 21, Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.</p>
Cite article:- St&aacute;dn&iacute;k Ludek, Atasever Savas (2016). Influence of somatic cell count and body condition score on reproductiontraits and milk composition of Czech Holstein cows . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(4): 771-775. doi: 10.18805/ijar.11469.

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of somatic cell count (SCC) and body condition score (BCS) on reproduction and milk composition characteristics in Czech Holstein cows. A total of 275 records of chosen cows was evaluated by milk composition, SCC, BCS and fertility traits. Infrared spectroscopic method was used for SCC test and an automatic device was used for milk composition analysis. Before statistical test, SCC data were transformed to log10 for normality and homogeneity of variances.  BCS was performed using a 1-5 point scale and days from calving to first insemination (ICF), number of inseminations per conceptions (NIC) and days open (DO) were assessed as fertility parameters. To evaluate days in milk (DIM) on SCC and BCS, two groups were designed (group 1: cows in 1-69th day DIM and group 2: cows in 70-119th DIM).  For testing BCS on chosen traits; cows with 2.50 £ BCS and cows with BCS ³ 2.75 were tested in two groups. All statistical work was applied by SPSS 17.0 at the 0.05 significance level. It was found that SCC elevated with high parities and cows with lower BCS had lower milk protein percentage. Cows with lower BCS had lower reproduction traits than those with higher BCS. Correlation coefficient between two markers was estimated as r= -0.181. Calculated means for the parameters could be assessed in reasonable thresholds. The study revealed that SCC played a marked role on protein percentage of milk, and BCS affected important reproductive characteristics of Czech Holstein cows.

REFERENCES


  1. Afzal, M., Anwar, M. and Mirza, A. (2007). Some factors affecting milk yield and lactation length in Nili Ravi buffaloes. Pakistan Vet. J. 27: 113-117.

  2. Atasever, S. and Erdem, H. (2008) An investigation on the determination of mastitis risk levels and production traits in Holstein cows. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 34: 13–16.

  3. Atasever, S., Erdem H. and Kul, E. (2012). Using viscosity values for determining somatic cell count in cow milk. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 7: 441-445.

  4. Berry, D.P., Buckley, F. and Dillon, P. (2011). Relationship between liwe weight and body condition score in Irish Holstein-    Fresian dairy cows. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 50: 141-147.

  5. Doležalová, M., Stádník, L., Nejdlová, M., Nìmeèková, D., Beran, J. and Ducháèek, J. (2013). The relationship between energy balance after calving and reproductive functions in Holstein dairy cows treated by the OVSYNCH system. Acta Univ. Agric. et Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 61: 601-610. 

  6. Eckersall, P.D., Young, F.J., McComb, C., Hogarth, C.J., Safi, S., Weber, A., McDonald, T., Nolan, A.M. and Fitzpatrick, J.L. (2001). Acute phase proteins in serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Vet Rec. 148:35-41.

  7. Frigo, E., Samore, A.B., Vicario, D., Bagnato, A. and Pedron, O. (2013). Heritabilities and genetic correlations of body condition score and muscularity with productive traits and their trend functions in Italian Simmental cattle. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 12: 240-246.

  8. Jankovská, R. and Šustová, K. (2003). Analysis of cow milk by near-infrared spectroscopy. Czech J. Food Sci. 21: 123–    128.

  9. Juozaitiene, V. and Juazatitis, A. (2005). The influence of somatic cell count in milk on reproductive traits and production of Black-and-White cows. Vet. Arhiv. 75: 407-414. 

  10. Isensee, A., Leiber, F., Bieber, A., Spengler, A., Ivemeyer, S., Maurer, V. and Kolcke, P. (2014). Comparison of a classical with a highly formularized body condition scoring system for dairy cattle. Animal. 8: 1971-1977.

  11. Köster, G., Tenhagen B.A. and Heuwieser, W. (2006). Factors associated with high milk test day somatic cell counts in large dairy herds in Brandenburg. 1: Housing conditions. J. Vet. Med. A. 53: 134–139.

  12. Lee, J.Y. and Kim, I.H. (2006). Advancing parity is associated with high milk production at the cost of body condition and increased periparturient disorders in dairy herds. J. Vet Sci. 7:161-166.

  13. Meikle, A., Kulcsar, M., Chilliard, Y., Febel, H., Delavaud, C., Cavestany, D. and Chilibroste, P. (2004). Effects of parity and body condition at parturition on endocrine and reproductive parameters of the cow. Reproduction. 127: 727-    737.

  14. Olechnowicz, J. and Jackowski, J. M. (2014). Body condition related to lameness in dairy cows. Med. Weter., 70: 353-356.

  15. Piccinini, R., Miarelli, M., Feri B., Tripaldi C., Belotti M., Dapra V., Orlandini S. and Zecconi, A. (2006). Relationship between cellular and whey components in buffalo milk. J. Dairy Res. 73: 129–133.

  16. Roche, J.R., Friggens, N.C., Kay, J.K., Fisher, M.W., Stafford, K.J. and Berry, D.P. (2009). Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 5769-5801.

  17. Sakaguchi, M. (2009). Differences between body condition scores and body weight changes in postpartum dairy cows in relation to parity and reproductive indices. Can. Vet. J. 50: 649–656.

  18. Stádník, L., Louda, F. and Ježková, A. (2002). The effect of selected factors at insemination on reproduction of Holstein cows. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 47: 169-175.

  19. Szczubia, M., Dabrowski, R., Kankofer, M., Bochniarz, M. and Komar, M. (2012). Concentration of serum amyloid A and ceruloplasmin activity in milk from cows with subclinical mastitis caused by different pathogens. Polish J. Vet. Sci. 15: 291-296.

  20. Tiezzi, F., Maltecca, C., Cecchinato, A., Penasa, M. and Bittante, G. (2013). Thin and fat cows, and the nonlinear genetic relationship between body condition score and fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 96:6730-6741. 

  21. Vasilev, N., Dinev D., Mitev, Y., Koleva, M. and Miteva, C. (2007). Hygiene status of dairy cows reared in a spacious building and resulting quality of produced milk. Trakia J. Sci. 5: 47-51.

  22. Yoon, J.T., Lee, J.H., Kim, C.K., Chung, Y.C. and Kim, C.H. (2004). Effects of milk production, season, parity and lactation period on variations of milk urea nitrogen concentration and milk components of Holstein dairy cows. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 479-484.

  23. Zink V., Zavadilová, L., Lassen, J., Štipková, M., Vacek, M. and Štolc, L. (2014). Analyses of genetic relationships between linear type traits, fat-to-protein ratio, milk production traits, and somatic cell count in first-parity Czech Holstein cows. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 59: 539–547.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)