Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 34 issue 3 (september 2000) : 147-151

Indian J. Agric. Res., 34 (3) : 147-151,2000 CHANGES IN ACTIVITY OF SOME PHENOL RELATED ENZVME IN FIELDPEA LEAVES INFECTED WITH POWDERY MILDEW UNDER RAINFED AND IRRIGATED CONDITION

A. Bhattacharya, Pratibha Shukla·
1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhattacharya A., Shukla· Pratibha (2024). Indian J. Agric. Res., 34 (3) : 147-151,2000 CHANGES IN ACTIVITY OF SOME PHENOL RELATED ENZVME IN FIELDPEA LEAVES INFECTED WITH POWDERY MILDEW UNDER RAINFED AND IRRIGATED CONDITION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 34(3): 147-151. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Resistant, diseased and healthy plants of susceptible fieldpea cultivars were taken in field experiment with three sowing dates under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Activities of monophenolase, o-diphenolase, catalase, phenol concentrations and powdery mildew severity were observed in leaves at different growth stages, Levels of phenols were similar in resistance and healthy plants of susceptible cultivar along with higher activities of o-diphenolase and catalase. Through correlations, path analysis and association (%), the activities of o-diphenolase and catalase are of greater importance for disease resistance compared to activity of monophenolase and phenol concentration. The higher accumulation of phenolic compounds in diseased plants were due to non-conversion to their respective quinones.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bell, A A (1981). Ann. Rev. PI. Physiol., 32: 21-81.
    2. Chopra, B.L et al. (1974) Phytopathol. Z., 79: 47=52.
    3. Dewey, D.R and Lu, KH. (1959) Agron ,f. 51 : 515-519.
    4. Hayes, HK et al. (1955) In : Method of Plant Breeding. Int Student Edn. McGraw Hill Book Company Inc.
    5. Tokyo. pp. 442-443. .
    6. Hecker, RJ. et al. (l975) Phytopathol, z., 82 : 175-181.
    7. . Kelman, A. (1979) In : Plant Disease, An Advance Treatise, Vol. IV, (J.G. Horshfall and E.B. Cowling, Ed.)
    8. Academic Press New York, p. 181-202
    9. Legrand, M. et al. (1976) Phytochemistry, 15: 1353-1359.
    10. Lowrey, a.M. et al. (1951) J. Bioi. Chem., 193 : 265-275.
    11. Maule, A.J. and Ride, J.P. (1976) Phytochemistry, 15 : 1661-1664.
    12. Mayer, AM. and Harel, E. (1979) Phytochemistry, 18: 193-215.
    13. Mooney, HA (1972) Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst., 3 : 315-346.
    14. Perera, RG. and Wheeler, B.E.J. (1975) Tran. BT. Myco/. Soc., 64: 313-319.
    15. Snedecor, G.W and Cochran, WG. (1962) In .. Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology", Iowa State College, USA
    16. Swain, T. and Hillis, WE. (1959). J. Sci. Food. Agric., 19: 63-68.
    17. Taneja, S.R andSacchar, RC. (1974) Phytochemistry, 13 : 2695-2702.
    18. Taranishi, Y. et al. (1974) Agric. BioI Chem., 38 : 1213-1216.
    19. Yamamoto, H. et al. (1978). Phytopathol. Z., 91 : 193-202.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)