Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 38 issue 4 (december 2004) : 310 - 312

EFFECT OF UREA BLENDING AND MODES OF ITS APPUCATION ON PRODUCTIVI1Y OF WHEAT

K.K. Saxena, R.B. Singh, D.P. Singh, Arun Srivastava
1Department of Crop Physiology, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur ·208 002, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Saxena K.K., Singh R.B., Singh D.P., Srivastava Arun (2024). EFFECT OF UREA BLENDING AND MODES OF ITS APPUCATION ON PRODUCTIVI1Y OF WHEAT. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(4): 310 - 312. doi: .
A field experiment conducted during 1995–96, 1996–97 and 1997–98 in a sandy loam soil with two modes of urea application viz., urea alone and urea blended with neem cake (20% by weight) and three modes of application viz., broadcast, each row application and alternate row application revealed that the urea blended with neem cake proved significantly superior over application of urea alone and recorded higher grain, straw and total biological yield, Harvest index and productivity as well. Among the methods of application, the alternate row application of fertilizers proved signiflcantly superior over broadcast or each row application
    1. Deshmukh, S.C. and Tiwari, S.C. (1996). Indian J. Agron., 41: 586-590.
    2. Schnier, H.F. (1988). FertiJ Res., 16: 241-255.
    3. Sharma, AK and Tiwari S.P. (1996). Indian J. Agron., 41: 641-642

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)