Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 45 issue 1 (march 2011) : 1 - 10

EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF METHANOL ON EFFICIENCY, PRODUCTION AND YIELD OF PLANTS - A REVIEW

Abolfazl Tavassoli*, Galavi, Mohammad
1Agricultural Faculty, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Tavassoli* Abolfazl, Galavi, Mohammad (2024). EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF METHANOL ON EFFICIENCY, PRODUCTION AND YIELD OF PLANTS - A REVIEW. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 45(1): 1 - 10. doi: .
Many cultivated area are situated in arid zone, where crop photosynthesis and productivity is limited by drought. Thus any treatment, such as methanol, that improves plant water relation and reduces stress impacts, could be of benefit. This paper investigated the effects of methanol application on some physiological and growth properties of plants. Recent reports indicate that vegetative growth and yield of C3 crops were enhanced by foliar methanol application and that overall crop water use was reduced by methanol sprays. It has been suggested that methanol may act as a C source for the plant and a photorespiration inhibitor. However foliar application of methanol solutions on crops would improve their accelerate ripening, reduce impacts of drought and decline crop water requirements. Methanol also appeared to improve the efficiency of water use in C3 plants, especially under water stress situations. On the other hand, methanol leads to increase of plants resistance to drought stress because these compounds play primarily a role in preventing increasing photorespiration induced in stressed plants.
  1. Albrecht, S. L., Douglas C.L.., Klepper. E.L., Rasmussen P.E., Rickman R.W., Smiley R. W., Wilkins D.E. and Wysocki D.J. (1994) Effects of foliar methanol applications on crop yield. Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal, 10552: 74-89.
  2. Ali, S. K. L. and Mazumdar M.C. (1991) Studies on pectin content of some fruits and plant parts. Sci. Cult., 57: 256.
  3. Andres, A. R., Lazaro J.J., Chueca A., Hermoso R. and Lopez Gorge J. (1990). Effect of alcohols on the association of photosynthetic FBPase to thylakoid membranes. Physiol. Plant, 78: 409-413.
  4. Benson, A. A and Nonomura A.M. (1992) The path of carbon in photosynthesis: Methanol inhibition of glycolic acid accumulation. Photosynth. Res., 34 : 196. http://www.pnas.org/content/89/20/9794. abstract.
  5. Bruckman, V and Habermann B. (2008). Agrofuels between sustainability and development. Commission for Development Studies at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/kioes/biofuels.htm.
  6. Cossins, E. A. (1964) The utilization of carbon-1 compounds by plants. 1. The metabolism of methanol-14C and its role in amino acid biosynthesis. Can. J. Biochem. 421: 1793-1802.
  7. Crowe, F. D., Coats D. D. and Butler M.D. (1994) Performance of Kentuky bluegrass seed treated with methanol. p. 115-120. Central Orange Agric. Res. Ctr. Ann. Rep. (1993) Orgeon St. Univ. Special Rep. 930.
  8. Daneshian, J and Zare D. (2005) Diversity for resistance drought on soybean. J. Agric. Sci., 1: 23-50.
  9. Daneshian, J and Jonobi P. (2001) Effect of drought stress and different calcium on characters soybean. Agric. Sci., 1: 95-108.
  10. Desclaux, D., Huynh T.T. and Roumet P. (2000). Identification of soybean plant characteristics that indicate the timing of drought stress. Crop Sci., 40: 716-722.
  11. Devlin, R. M. (1994) Influence of methanol on plant germination and growth. Plant Growth Soc. Am. Quart. 22: 102-108.
  12. Demirbas. A. (2005) Biodiesel production from vegetable oils by supercritical methanol. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 64 : 858-865.
  13. Downie, A., Myazaki S. and Bohnert H.. (2004) Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation. Phytochemistry, 65: 2305-2316.
  14. EEA, (2006) Sustainable bioenergy cropping systems in the Mediterranean. Proceedings of the workshop 9–10 February (2006)', forthcoming.
  15. Fall, R and Benson A.A. (1996) Leaf methanol, the simplest natural product from plants. Trends Plant Sci., 1: 296-301.
  16. Feibert, E. B. G., James S.R.., Rykbost K.A., Mitchell A.R. and Shock C.C. (1995). Potato yield and quality not changed by foliar-applied methanol. Hort Science, 30 : 494-495.
  17. Galbally, E. and Kirstine W. (2002) The production of methanol by flowering plants and the global cycle of methanol. J. Atmos. Chem., 43 : 195-229.
  18. Gout, E., Aubert S., Bligny R., Rébeillé F., Nonomura A.R., Benson A.A. and Douce R., (2000) Metabolism of methanol in plant cells. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Plant Physiol.,123: 287-296.
  19. Hanson, A. D and Roje S. (2001) One-carbon metabolism in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 119-137.
  20. Hartz, T. K., Mayberry K.S., McGiffen., LeStrange M., Miyao G. and Baameur A. (1994) Foliar methanol application ineffective in tomato amd melon. HortScience 22: 1087.
  21. Heins, R. (1980) Inhibition of ethylene synthesis and senescence in carnation by ethanol. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 105: 141-144.
  22. Hemming, D. J. B., Criddle R.S. and Hansen L.D. (1995) Effects of methanol on plant respiration. J. Plant Physiol. 146: 193-198.
  23. Idso, S. B., Idso K.E., Garcia R.L., Kimball B.A. and Hoober J.K. (1995) Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment and foliar methanol application on net photosynthesis of sour orange tree (Citrus aurantium; Rutaceae) leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 26-30.
  24. Ivanova, E. G., Dornina N.V. and Trotsenko Y. A. (2001) Aerobic methylbacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiology, 70: 392-397.
  25. Ivanova, E.G., Dornina N.V., Shepelyakovskaya A.O., Laman A.G., Brovko F.A. and Trotsenko Y. A. (2000) Facultative obligate aerobic methylobacteria synthesize cytokenins. Microbiology, 69 : 646-651.
  26. Joshi, J. (1996) Foliar applied methanol and nitrogen for increased productivity on leguminous Plant. Plant Physiol, 45: 197-209.
  27. Kesselmeier, J and Staudt M. 1999. Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J. Atmosph. Chem., 33: 23-88.
  28. Kishitani, S., Takanami T., Suzuki M., Oikawa M. and Yokoi S. (2000) Compatibility of glycinbetaine in rice plants: Evaluation using transgenic rice plants with a gene for peroxisomal betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase from barley. Plant Cell Environ., 23: 107-114.
  29. Lawlor, D. W. (1987). Photosynthesis: Metabolism, Control and Physiology. Longman, Harlow, ISBN:0470206810, : 262 p.
  30. Li. Y., Gupta G., Josh J.M. and Siyumbano A.K. (1995) Effect of methanol on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll. J. Plant Nutr. 18: 1875-1880.
  31. Ma. F and Hanna M.A. (1999) Biodiesel production: A review Biores Technol, 70: 1-15.
  32. Madhaiyan, T., S. Poonguzhali., Sundaram S.P. and Tongmin S.A. (2006). A new insight into foliar applied methanol influencing phylloplane ethylotrophic dynamics and growth promotion of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot., 57: 168-176.
  33. Makhdum, M. I., Malik M.N.A., Din S.U., Ahmad F. and Chaudhry F.I. (2002) Physilogical response of cotton to methanol foliar application. J. Res. Sci., 13: 37-43.
  34. Mauney, J. 1993. Is wood alcohol in the future of crop production? Cotton Grower. 29 (1): 36.
  35. Mauney, J. R. and T. J. Gerik. 1994. Evaluating methanol usage in cotton. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.Heber D.J. and D.A. Richter (eds.), San Diego, CA, vol 1. Natl. Cotton Couuncil of Amer., Memphis, TN. Pp. 39-40.
  36. McGiffen, M. E., R. L. Green., Manthey J.A., Faber B.A., Downer A.J., Aguiar N.J. 1995. Field tests of methanol as crop yield enhancer. HortScience 30: 1225-1228.
  37. McGiffen, M.E and Manthely J.A. (1996) The role of methanol in promoting plant growth: A current evaluation. HortScience 31: 1092-1096.
  38. Morales-Payan, J. P. (1997) Influence of methanol, ethanol and nitrogen on the yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). HortScience 32(3): 437.
  39. Morales-Payan, J. P. and Santos B.M. (1997) Initial Bell pepper (Capsicum annum) growth as influenced by different leaf-application ethanol concentrations. 1997 Proc. Carib. Food. Crops Soc. San Juan, PR.
  40. Moran, J. F., Becana M., Iturbe-Ormaetxe I., Frechilla S., Klucas R.V. and Aparicio-Teho P. (1994) Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants. Planta, 194: 346-352.
  41. Nonomura, A. M and Benson A.A. (1992a) The path of carbon in photosynthesis: stimulation of crop yields with methanol. Photosynthesis Research 34 (abst. P-589). Presented at the IXth International Congress on Photosynthesis, Nagoya, Japan. Aug. 30-Sep. 4, (1992).
  42. Nonomura, A. M and Benson A.A. (1992b) The path of carbon in photosynthesis: methanol and light. Research in Photosynthesis 3:991-914.
  43. Nonomura, A.M and Benson A.A. (1992c) The path of carbon in photosynthesis: improved crop yields with methanol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89:9794-9798.125.
  44. Nonomura, A. M and Benson A.A.. (1997) Methods and compositions for enhancing carbon fixation in plants. United States Patent, number 55974.
  45. Nemecek-Marshall, M., MacDonald R.C., Franzen J.J., Wojciechowski C.L. and Fall R. (1995) Methanol emission from leaves: Enzymatic detection of gasphase methanol and relation of methanol. Fluxes to stomata conductance and leaf development. Plant Physiol., 108: 1359-1368.
  46. Ramberg, H. A., Bradley J.S.C., Olson J.S.C., Nishio J.N., Markwell J. and Osterman J.C. (2002). The role of methanol in promoting plant growth: An update. Rev. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol : 1:113-126.
  47. Ramirez, I., Dorta F., Espinoza V., Jimenez E., Mercado A. and Pena-Cortes H. (2006) Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol on the growth of arabidopsis, tobacco and tomato plants. J Plant Growth Regul., 25: 30-44.
  48. Robinson, S. P and Jones G.P. (1986) Acclimation of glycinbetaine in choloroplasts provides osmotic. Adjustment during salt stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 13 : 659-668.
  49. Rowe, R.N., Farr D.J. and Richards B.A.J. (1994) Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol and ethanol on growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). New Zealand J. Crop Hort. Sci. 22 (3): 335-337.
  50. Safarzade Vishgahi M. N., Normohamadi G.H., Majidi Haravan E., Rabiei B. 2005. Effect of methanol on peanut Growth and yield (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Agric. Sci., 103-188.
  51. Theodoridou, A., Dornemann D. and Kotzabasis K. (2002) Light-dependent induction of strongly increased microalgal growth by methanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1573 : 189-198.
  52. Yuncong, L. I., Gupta G., Joshi J. M. and Siyumbano A.K. (1995) Effect of methanol on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll. J. Plant Nutr., 18: 1875-1880.
  53. Zbiec, I and Karczmarczyk S. (1997) Effect of methanol on some plants. J. Romanian Agric. Res. No. 7-8: 45-49.
  54. Zbiec, I., Karczmarczyk S. and Podsiadlo C. (2003) Response of some cultivated plants to methanol as compared to supplemental irrigation. Elect. J. Polish Agric. Univ.: Agron. 6: 1-7.

Editorial Board

View all (0)