Asian Journal Of Dairy and Food Research
your articles with us

Quick Facts

Payment Options

payment portals

Click here to pay directly

Factors affecting the preference of bovine by dairy farmersin the South-Bihar Alluvial Plain Zone

Sanjeev Kumar*, Ritu Chakravarty, A.K. Chakravarty1, Mukesh Bhakat2, Niketha L. and Bagish Kumar
Dairy Extension Division,ICAR – National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India.

Page Range:
Article ID:
Online Published:
Dairy farmers bear the flagship of the mammoth total of milk production, therefore, their preference for the bovine which includes cattle and buffalo, must be counted. The liking or preference is affected by a range of factors. Bovine preference can be referred to as the greater liking for one dairy animal over another or other dairy animal. This includes certain major factors as economic, climatic, animal or bovine trait, marketing, governmental support, traditional aspects, technical support, infrastructure and so on. For the study, South-Bihar Alluvial Plain Zone was selected purposefully from where two districts and under each district, two blocks and from each block two villages were selected randomly. From each village, twenty respondents were selected randomly, which constitute the total sample size of 160 respondents. The study, revealed that economic factor was found to be most (92.7 %) influencing factor and ranked 1st among various factors followed by climatic factor (92.3 %) ranked 2nd, marketing factor (91.8 %) ranked 3rd, trait factor (85.6%) ranked 4th, governmental factors (78.5 %) ranked 5th, traditional factors (76.9 %) ranked 6th, technical factors (74.4 %) ranked 7th , infrastructural factor (70.1 %) ranked 8th, socio-psychological factor (61.7 %) ranked 9th and NGOs factor (60.4 %) ranked 10th among above said factors.
A.I. (Artificial Insemination), Agro-Climatic Zone, Alluvial Plains Zone, Bovine, Preference, South-Bihar.
  1. Anonymous. (2006). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics, AHS Series-10, Published by Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries. New Delhi, India.
  2. Anonymous.(2012). Bihar Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics, Published by Government of Bihar, Department of Animal & Fisheries Resources, Bihar, Patna.
  3. Desta, S., and Coppock, D. Layne. (2011). Breed and trait preferences of Sheko cattle keepers in South-Western Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod., 43:851–856.
  4. Jabbar, M. A. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives on breeding strategy and choice of breeds for livestock development in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 39: 20-43.
  5. Nauta, W.J., Baars, T., Saatkamp, H., Weenink, D.,and Roep D. (2009). Farming strategies in organic dairy farming: Effects on breeding goal and choice of breed. An explorative study. Livestock Science 121:187–199.
  6. Ouma, E., Abdulai, A. and Drucker, A. (2005). Assessment of farmer preferences for cattle traits in cattle production systems of Kenya. The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System.,Copenhagen, Denmark.
  7. Tada, O., Muchenje, V., and Dzama, K. (2013). Preferential traits for breeding Nguni cattle in low-input in-situ conservation production systems. Springer Plus., 2:195.
  8. Przewozny, A., Peters, K.J. (2012). Preferences for breeding bulls in dairy farms -An empirical survey in Brandenburg, Züchtungskunde. Germany. 84:474-484.
  9. Tano, K., Kamuanga, M., Faminow, M., and Swallow, B. (2003). Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer’s preferences for cattle traits in West Africa. Ecological Economics. 45: 393-407.
Global footprints

© 2015 AARC JOURNALS. All Rights Reserved. Powered By AARC JOURNALS